Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1-4/2019

01-06-2019 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Machine layout design problem under product family evolution in reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a two-phase-based AMOSA approach

Authors: Hichem Haddou Benderbal, Lyes Benyoucef

Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Issue 1-4/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) are designed to manufacture a specific product, incorporating the scalability to other products in the same family. This ability is based primarily on the reconfiguration capabilities offered by reconfigurable machines tools (RMTs). This paper addresses one of the most important aspects related to the reactivity of RMSs. More specifically, it considers the relations, which link the conceived system with two important environments: its logical environment, i.e., the product family (products that share similarities) in which the RMS can evolve, and its physical environment, i.e., the physical workshop that implements this RMS. We study the machine layout problem by considering the product family evolution where two sub-problems are addressed. The first sub-problem concerns the evolution of the product, in the same family, towards new products to meet the evolutions and the requirements of the customers. The second sub-problem deals with the machine layout problem based on the results of the first sub-problem. For this, our two-phase-based approach combines the well-known metaheuristic, archived multi-objective simulated annealing (AMOSA), with an exhaustive search–based heuristic to determine the best machine layout for all the selected machines of the product family. The developed approach is based on the initially generated process plans of products (in the product family) for the RMS design under performance metrics. Moreover, the proposed layout must, at its best, respect both the constraints imposed by the generated process plans and those depicting the available location in the shop floor where machines can be placed. An illustrative numerical example is proposed to demonstrate the applicability of our approach.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Altuntas S, Selim H (2012) Facility layout using weighted association rule-based data mining algorithms: evaluation with simulation. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):3–13CrossRef Altuntas S, Selim H (2012) Facility layout using weighted association rule-based data mining algorithms: evaluation with simulation. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):3–13CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Andersen AL, Brunoe TD, Nielsen K (2015) Reconfigurable manufacturing on multiple levels: literature review and research directions. In: IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 266–273 Andersen AL, Brunoe TD, Nielsen K (2015) Reconfigurable manufacturing on multiple levels: literature review and research directions. In: IFIP international conference on advances in production management systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 266–273
3.
go back to reference Andersen AL, Brunoe TD, Nielsen K, Rösiö C (2017) Towards a generic design method for reconfigurable manufacturing systems: analysis and synthesis of current design methods and evaluation of supportive tools. J Manuf Syst 42:179–195CrossRef Andersen AL, Brunoe TD, Nielsen K, Rösiö C (2017) Towards a generic design method for reconfigurable manufacturing systems: analysis and synthesis of current design methods and evaluation of supportive tools. J Manuf Syst 42:179–195CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ashraf M, Hasan F (2016) Product family formation for RMS - a review. In: In proceedings of the NCMEI3. Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh Ashraf M, Hasan F (2016) Product family formation for RMS - a review. In: In proceedings of the NCMEI3. Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh
5.
go back to reference Azevedo MM, Crispim JA, de Sousa JP (2017) A dynamic multi-objective approach for the reconfigurable multi-facility layout problem. J Manuf Syst 42:140–152CrossRef Azevedo MM, Crispim JA, de Sousa JP (2017) A dynamic multi-objective approach for the reconfigurable multi-facility layout problem. J Manuf Syst 42:140–152CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bandyopadhyay S, Saha S, Maulik U, Deb K (2008) A simulated annealing-based multiobjective optimization algorithm: AMOSA. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(3):269–283CrossRef Bandyopadhyay S, Saha S, Maulik U, Deb K (2008) A simulated annealing-based multiobjective optimization algorithm: AMOSA. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 12(3):269–283CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Battaïa O, Dolgui A, Guschinsky N (2017) Decision support for design of reconfigurable rotary machining systems for family part production. Int J Prod Res 55:1368–1385CrossRef Battaïa O, Dolgui A, Guschinsky N (2017) Decision support for design of reconfigurable rotary machining systems for family part production. Int J Prod Res 55:1368–1385CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Benjaafar S, Heragu SS, Irani SA (2002) Next generation factory layouts: research challenges and recent progress. Interfaces 32(6):58–76CrossRef Benjaafar S, Heragu SS, Irani SA (2002) Next generation factory layouts: research challenges and recent progress. Interfaces 32(6):58–76CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bensmaine A, Mohammed D, Lyes B (2013) A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm based approach for optimal machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing environment. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):519–524 Bensmaine A, Mohammed D, Lyes B (2013) A non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm based approach for optimal machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing environment. Comput Ind Eng 66(3):519–524
10.
go back to reference Bi ZM, Lang SY, Shen W, Wang L (2008) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: the state of the art. Int J Prod Res 46:967–992CrossRefMATH Bi ZM, Lang SY, Shen W, Wang L (2008) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: the state of the art. Int J Prod Res 46:967–992CrossRefMATH
11.
go back to reference Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: literature review and research trend. J Manuf Syst 49:93–106CrossRef Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: literature review and research trend. J Manuf Syst 49:93–106CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chaube A, Lyés B, Manoj KT (2012) An adapted NSGA-2 algorithm based dynamic process plan generation for a reconfigurable manufacturing system. J Intell Manuf 23(4):1141–1155 Chaube A, Lyés B, Manoj KT (2012) An adapted NSGA-2 algorithm based dynamic process plan generation for a reconfigurable manufacturing system. J Intell Manuf 23(4):1141–1155
13.
go back to reference Devise O, Pierreval H (2000) Indicators for measuring performances of morphology and material handling systems in flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Econ 64(1):209–218CrossRef Devise O, Pierreval H (2000) Indicators for measuring performances of morphology and material handling systems in flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Econ 64(1):209–218CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2010) Optimisation for multi-part flow-line configuration of re-configurable manufacturing systems using GA. Int J Prod Res 48(14):4071–4100CrossRefMATH Dou J, Dai X, Meng Z (2010) Optimisation for multi-part flow-line configuration of re-configurable manufacturing systems using GA. Int J Prod Res 48(14):4071–4100CrossRefMATH
15.
go back to reference Drira A, Pierreval H, Hajri-Gabouj S (2007) Facility layout problems: a survey. Annu Rev Control 31(2):255–267CrossRef Drira A, Pierreval H, Hajri-Gabouj S (2007) Facility layout problems: a survey. Annu Rev Control 31(2):255–267CrossRef
16.
go back to reference ElMaraghy HA (2007) Reconfigurable process plans for responsive manufacturing systems. In: Digital enterprise technology. Springer, New York, pp 35–44CrossRef ElMaraghy HA (2007) Reconfigurable process plans for responsive manufacturing systems. In: Digital enterprise technology. Springer, New York, pp 35–44CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gadalla M, Xue D (2018) An approach to identify the optimal configurations and reconfiguration processes for design of reconfigurable machine tools. Int J Prod Res 56(11):3880–3900CrossRef Gadalla M, Xue D (2018) An approach to identify the optimal configurations and reconfiguration processes for design of reconfigurable machine tools. Int J Prod Res 56(11):3880–3900CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Galan R, Racero J, Eguia I, Garcia JM (2007) A systematic approach for product families formation in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23(5):489–502CrossRef Galan R, Racero J, Eguia I, Garcia JM (2007) A systematic approach for product families formation in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23(5):489–502CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goyal KK, Jain PK (2016) Design of reconfigurable flow lines using MOPSO and maximum deviation theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5–8):1587–1600 Goyal KK, Jain PK (2016) Design of reconfigurable flow lines using MOPSO and maximum deviation theory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84(5–8):1587–1600
20.
go back to reference Goyal KK, Jain PK, Jain M (2013) A comprehensive approach to operation sequence similarity based part family formation in the reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 51(6):1762–1776CrossRef Goyal KK, Jain PK, Jain M (2013) A comprehensive approach to operation sequence similarity based part family formation in the reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Prod Res 51(6):1762–1776CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Guan X, Dai X, Qiu B, Li J (2012) A revised electromagnetism-like mechanism for layout design of reconfigurable manufacturing system. Comput Ind Eng 63(1):98–108CrossRef Guan X, Dai X, Qiu B, Li J (2012) A revised electromagnetism-like mechanism for layout design of reconfigurable manufacturing system. Comput Ind Eng 63(1):98–108CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017a) Flexibility based multi-objective approach for machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under unavailability constraints. Int J Prod Res 55(20):6033–6051CrossRef Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017a) Flexibility based multi-objective approach for machines selection in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design under unavailability constraints. Int J Prod Res 55(20):6033–6051CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017b) Layout evolution effort for product family in reconfigurable manufacturing system design. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):10166–10171 ISSN 2405-8963CrossRef Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2017b) Layout evolution effort for product family in reconfigurable manufacturing system design. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):10166–10171 ISSN 2405-8963CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018a) Exhaustive search based heuristic for solving machine layout problem in reconfigurable manufacturing system design. IFAC-Papers 51(11):78–83 ISSN 2405-8963CrossRef Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018a) Exhaustive search based heuristic for solving machine layout problem in reconfigurable manufacturing system design. IFAC-Papers 51(11):78–83 ISSN 2405-8963CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018b) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:729–749CrossRef Haddou Benderbal H, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018b) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:729–749CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Heragu S, Zijm WHM, Meng G, Heragu SS, van Ommeren JCW, van Houtum GJ (2001) Design and analysis of reconfigurable layout systems. (Memorandum faculteit TW; no. 1604). Stochastic Operations Research (SOR), Enschede Heragu S, Zijm WHM, Meng G, Heragu SS, van Ommeren JCW, van Houtum GJ (2001) Design and analysis of reconfigurable layout systems. (Memorandum faculteit TW; no. 1604). Stochastic Operations Research (SOR), Enschede
27.
go back to reference Huang L, Gao Y, Qian F, Tang S, Wang D (2011) Configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing systems by means of characteristic state space. Chin J Mech Eng 24(1):23CrossRef Huang L, Gao Y, Qian F, Tang S, Wang D (2011) Configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing systems by means of characteristic state space. Chin J Mech Eng 24(1):23CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kashkoush M, ElMaraghy H (2014) Product family formation for reconfigurable assembly systems. Procedia CIRP 17:302–307CrossRef Kashkoush M, ElMaraghy H (2014) Product family formation for reconfigurable assembly systems. Procedia CIRP 17:302–307CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Koren Y (2010) The global manufacturing revolution: product-process-business integration and reconfigurable systems, vol 80. Wiley, HobokenCrossRef Koren Y (2010) The global manufacturing revolution: product-process-business integration and reconfigurable systems, vol 80. Wiley, HobokenCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Koren Y, Shpitalni M (2010) Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 29(4):130–141CrossRef Koren Y, Shpitalni M (2010) Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J Manuf Syst 29(4):130–141CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Koren Y, Wang W, Gu X (2017) Value creation through design for scalability of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1227–1242CrossRef Koren Y, Wang W, Gu X (2017) Value creation through design for scalability of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1227–1242CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018a) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng 13(2):121–136CrossRef Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018a) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng 13(2):121–136CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018b) Choosing the system configuration for high-volume manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):476–490CrossRef Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2018b) Choosing the system configuration for high-volume manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):476–490CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Maganha I, Silva C, Ferreira LMD (2018) Understanding reconfigurability of manufacturing systems: an empirical analysis. J Manuf Syst 48:120–130CrossRef Maganha I, Silva C, Ferreira LMD (2018) Understanding reconfigurability of manufacturing systems: an empirical analysis. J Manuf Syst 48:120–130CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Maniraj M, Pakkirisamy V, Parthiban P (2014) Optimisation of process plans in re-configurable manufacturing systems using ant colony technique. Int J Enterprise Netw Manag 6(2):125–138CrossRef Maniraj M, Pakkirisamy V, Parthiban P (2014) Optimisation of process plans in re-configurable manufacturing systems using ant colony technique. Int J Enterprise Netw Manag 6(2):125–138CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Musharavati F, Hamouda AMS (2012a) Enhanced simulated-annealing-based algorithms and their applications to process planning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Adv Eng Softw 45(1):80–90CrossRef Musharavati F, Hamouda AMS (2012a) Enhanced simulated-annealing-based algorithms and their applications to process planning in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Adv Eng Softw 45(1):80–90CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Musharavati F, Hamouda AMS (2012b) Simulated annealing with auxiliary knowledge for process planning optimization in reconfigurable manufacturing. Robot ComputIntegr Manuf 28(2):113–131 Musharavati F, Hamouda AMS (2012b) Simulated annealing with auxiliary knowledge for process planning optimization in reconfigurable manufacturing. Robot ComputIntegr Manuf 28(2):113–131
38.
go back to reference Nallakumarasamy G, Srinivasan PSS, Raja KV, Malayalamurthi R (2011) Optimization of operation sequencing in CAPP using superhybrid genetic algorithms-simulated annealing technique. ISRN Mech Eng 2011:1–7CrossRef Nallakumarasamy G, Srinivasan PSS, Raja KV, Malayalamurthi R (2011) Optimization of operation sequencing in CAPP using superhybrid genetic algorithms-simulated annealing technique. ISRN Mech Eng 2011:1–7CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Pattanaik LN, Kumar V (2011) Product family formation for reconfigurable manufacturing using a bi-criterion evolutionary algorithm. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 18(9):493–505 Pattanaik LN, Kumar V (2011) Product family formation for reconfigurable manufacturing using a bi-criterion evolutionary algorithm. Int J Ind Eng Theory Appl Pract 18(9):493–505
40.
go back to reference Rehman AU, Babu AS (2013) Reconfigurations of manufacturing systems—an empirical study on concepts, research, and applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:107–124CrossRef Rehman AU, Babu AS (2013) Reconfigurations of manufacturing systems—an empirical study on concepts, research, and applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:107–124CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Renzi C, Leali F, Cavazzuti M, Andrisano A (2014) A review on artificial intelligence applications to the optimal design of dedicated and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:403–418CrossRef Renzi C, Leali F, Cavazzuti M, Andrisano A (2014) A review on artificial intelligence applications to the optimal design of dedicated and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72:403–418CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Saxena LK, Jain PK (2012) A model and optimisation approach for reconfigurable manufacturing system configuration design. Int J Prod Res 50(12):3359–3381CrossRef Saxena LK, Jain PK (2012) A model and optimisation approach for reconfigurable manufacturing system configuration design. Int J Prod Res 50(12):3359–3381CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Shabaka A, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Generation of machine configurations based on product features. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 20:355–369CrossRef Shabaka A, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Generation of machine configurations based on product features. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 20:355–369CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Sharma P, Singhal S (2016) Design and evaluation of layout alternatives to enhance the performance of industry. OPSEARCH 53(4):741–760CrossRefMATH Sharma P, Singhal S (2016) Design and evaluation of layout alternatives to enhance the performance of industry. OPSEARCH 53(4):741–760CrossRefMATH
45.
go back to reference Singh SP, Sharma RR (2006) A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(5–6):425–433CrossRef Singh SP, Sharma RR (2006) A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(5–6):425–433CrossRef
46.
47.
go back to reference Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2018a) Multi-objective sustainable process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: exact and adapted evolutionary approaches. Int J Prod Res:1–17 Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2018a) Multi-objective sustainable process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: exact and adapted evolutionary approaches. Int J Prod Res:1–17
48.
go back to reference Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2018b) Sustainable multi-unit process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a comparative study of three hybrid-meta-heuristics. In 23rd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), vol 1. IEEE, pp 661–668 Touzout FA, Benyoucef L (2018b) Sustainable multi-unit process plan generation in a reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a comparative study of three hybrid-meta-heuristics. In 23rd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), vol 1. IEEE, pp 661–668
49.
go back to reference Wang GX, Huang SH, Shang XW, Yan Y, Du JJ (2016) Formation of part family for re-configurable manufacturing systems considering bypassing moves and idle machines. J Manuf Syst 41:120–129CrossRef Wang GX, Huang SH, Shang XW, Yan Y, Du JJ (2016) Formation of part family for re-configurable manufacturing systems considering bypassing moves and idle machines. J Manuf Syst 41:120–129CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Wang W, Yoram K (2013) Design principles of scalable reconfigurable manufacturing systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46(9):1411–1416 Wang W, Yoram K (2013) Design principles of scalable reconfigurable manufacturing systems. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46(9):1411–1416
51.
go back to reference Yang T, Brett AP, Mingan T (2005) Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single-loop directional flow patterns. Eur J Oper Res 164(2):440–455 Yang T, Brett AP, Mingan T (2005) Layout design for flexible manufacturing systems considering single-loop directional flow patterns. Eur J Oper Res 164(2):440–455
Metadata
Title
Machine layout design problem under product family evolution in reconfigurable manufacturing environment: a two-phase-based AMOSA approach
Authors
Hichem Haddou Benderbal
Lyes Benyoucef
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Issue 1-4/2019
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03865-1

Other articles of this Issue 1-4/2019

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1-4/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partners