Skip to main content


Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

01-01-2012 | Original Article | Issue 1/2012

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 1/2012

Managing dependencies in forest offset projects: toward a more complete evaluation of reversal risk

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change > Issue 1/2012
David M. Cooley, Christopher S. Galik, Thomas P. Holmes, Carolyn Kousky, Roger M. Cooke


Although forest carbon offsets can play an important role in the implementation of comprehensive climate policy, they also face an inherent risk of reversal. If such risks are positively correlated across projects, it can affect the integrity of larger project portfolios and potentially the entire offsets program. Here, we discuss three types of risks that could affect forest offsets—fat tails, micro-correlation, and tail dependence—and provide examples of how they could present themselves in a forest offset context. Given these potential dependencies, we suggest several new risk management approaches that take into account dependencies in reversal risk across projects and which could help guard the climate integrity of an offsets program. We also argue that data collection be included as an integral part of any offsets program so that disturbance-related dependencies may be identified and managed as early and to the greatest extent possible.

Please log in to get access to this content

About this article

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 1/2012 Go to the issue