Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Measuring the Relative Importance of Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) Using Best–Worst Method (BWM)

Authors : Ashutosh Singh, Mohammad Asjad, Piyush Gupta, Zahid Akhtar Khan, Arshad Noor Siddiquee

Published in: Advances in Electromechanical Technologies

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Manufacturing companies have since been continuously facing volatile market conditions, primarily due to rapidly changing customers demand and quick introduction of new products. Therefore, to stay competitive in globally ever-changing manufacturing environment, manufacturing sectors need to adopt and implement those manufacturing systems which are capable to keep pace with the changes occurring and this is why a new concept, namely “reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS)”, has come into being. The manufacturing organizations have to meet the requirements of RMS by developing a suitable system which keeps their entity globally viable. The main objective of this paper is to identify and analyse the factors which directly or indirectly influence reconfigurable manufacturing system. In this present work, local and global weights have been calculated to measure the global ranking of all the possible RMS factors (e.g. modularity, scalability, integrability, flexibility, convertibility and diagnosability) based on which the best and worst alternatives are selected right at the design stage of RMS. All these factors have been mapped together through multi-criteria decision-making approach known as best–worst method (BWM). Finally, sensitivity analysis has been done to validate the proposed results. The proposed multi-decision approach is quite versatile from the point of view that it provides an opportunity to integrate all possible factors and sub-factors which could impact manufacturing processes.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Azadeh A, Allahverdiloo M, Shirkouhi SN (2011) A computer simulation model for analyzing performance of inventory policy in multi-product mode in two-echelon supply chain. Int J Logistics Syst Manage 8(1):66–85CrossRef Azadeh A, Allahverdiloo M, Shirkouhi SN (2011) A computer simulation model for analyzing performance of inventory policy in multi-product mode in two-echelon supply chain. Int J Logistics Syst Manage 8(1):66–85CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ahmad S, Schroeder RG, Mallick DN (2010) The relationship among modularity, functional coordination, and mass customization: implications for competitiveness. Eur J Innov Manage 13(1):46–61CrossRef Ahmad S, Schroeder RG, Mallick DN (2010) The relationship among modularity, functional coordination, and mass customization: implications for competitiveness. Eur J Innov Manage 13(1):46–61CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ali A, Erwin P, Michael P, Frank W (2018) Scheduling in manufacturing systems: new trends and perspectives. Int J Prod Res 56(19):6333–6335CrossRef Ali A, Erwin P, Michael P, Frank W (2018) Scheduling in manufacturing systems: new trends and perspectives. Int J Prod Res 56(19):6333–6335CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Asl FM, Ulsoy AG (2003) Stochastic optimal capacity management in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):371–374CrossRef Asl FM, Ulsoy AG (2003) Stochastic optimal capacity management in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):371–374CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ashraf M, Hasan F (2018) Configuration selection for a reconfigurable manufacturing flow line involving part production with operation constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5–8):2137–2156CrossRef Ashraf M, Hasan F (2018) Configuration selection for a reconfigurable manufacturing flow line involving part production with operation constraints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(5–8):2137–2156CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1–4):729–749CrossRef Benderbal HH, Dahane M, Benyoucef L (2018) Modularity assessment in reconfigurable manufacturing system (RMS) design: an archived multi-objective simulated annealing-based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1–4):729–749CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: literature review and research trend. J Manuf Syst 49:93–106CrossRef Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C (2018) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: literature review and research trend. J Manuf Syst 49:93–106CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cheng CH, Chen Y (2012) Autonomous intelligent manufacturing systems and its applications. J Adv Eng 31(1):409–412 Cheng CH, Chen Y (2012) Autonomous intelligent manufacturing systems and its applications. J Adv Eng 31(1):409–412
9.
go back to reference Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Helo P, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ, Sahay BS (2017) Explaining the impact of reconfigurable manufacturing systems on environmental performance: the role of top management and organizational culture. J Clean Prod 141:56–66CrossRef Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Helo P, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ, Sahay BS (2017) Explaining the impact of reconfigurable manufacturing systems on environmental performance: the role of top management and organizational culture. J Clean Prod 141:56–66CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Deif AM, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Assessing capacity scalability policies in RMS using system dynamics. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19(3):128–150MATHCrossRef Deif AM, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Assessing capacity scalability policies in RMS using system dynamics. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19(3):128–150MATHCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dolgui A, Guschinsky N, Levin G (2009) Graph approach for optimal design of transfer machine with rotary table. Int J Prod Res 47(2):321–341CrossRef Dolgui A, Guschinsky N, Levin G (2009) Graph approach for optimal design of transfer machine with rotary table. Int J Prod Res 47(2):321–341CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gyulai D, Monostori L (2017) Capacity management of modular assembly systems. J Manuf Syst 43(Part 1):88–99CrossRef Gyulai D, Monostori L (2017) Capacity management of modular assembly systems. J Manuf Syst 43(Part 1):88–99CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gupta S, Gupta P (2018) Setting-up material handling network in manufacturing systems using graph theory. J Adv Manage Res 15(1):58–67CrossRef Gupta S, Gupta P (2018) Setting-up material handling network in manufacturing systems using graph theory. J Adv Manage Res 15(1):58–67CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gupta P (2018) Modularity enablers: a tool for Industry 4.0. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 1–7 Gupta P (2018) Modularity enablers: a tool for Industry 4.0. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 1–7
15.
go back to reference Gupta YP, Goyal S (1989) Flexibility of manufacturing systems: concepts and measurements. Eur J Oper Res 43(2):119–135MathSciNetCrossRef Gupta YP, Goyal S (1989) Flexibility of manufacturing systems: concepts and measurements. Eur J Oper Res 43(2):119–135MathSciNetCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Holtta K, Suh ES, De Weck OL (2005) Trade-off between modularity and performance for engineered systems and products. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on engineering design, Melbourne, Australia, 15–18 Aug 2005 Holtta K, Suh ES, De Weck OL (2005) Trade-off between modularity and performance for engineered systems and products. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on engineering design, Melbourne, Australia, 15–18 Aug 2005
17.
go back to reference Koren Y, Jovane F, Heisel U, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. A Keynote Pap CIRP Ann 48(2):527–540CrossRef Koren Y, Jovane F, Heisel U, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. A Keynote Pap CIRP Ann 48(2):527–540CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kristianto Y, Gunasekaran A, Jiao J (2014) Logical reconfiguration of reconfigurable manufacturing systems with stream of variations modelling: a stochastic two-stage programming and shortest path model. Int J Prod Res 52(5):1401–1418CrossRef Kristianto Y, Gunasekaran A, Jiao J (2014) Logical reconfiguration of reconfigurable manufacturing systems with stream of variations modelling: a stochastic two-stage programming and shortest path model. Int J Prod Res 52(5):1401–1418CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2017a) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-018-0483-0 Koren Y, Gu X, Guo W (2017a) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: principles, design, and future trends. Front Mech Eng, 1–16. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11465-018-0483-0
20.
go back to reference Koren Y, Wang W, Gu X (2017) Value creation through design for scalability of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1227–1242CrossRef Koren Y, Wang W, Gu X (2017) Value creation through design for scalability of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res 55(5):1227–1242CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lameche K, Najid NM, Castagna P, Kouiss K (2017) Modularity in the design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. IFAC-Papers On Line 50(1):3511–3516CrossRef Lameche K, Najid NM, Castagna P, Kouiss K (2017) Modularity in the design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. IFAC-Papers On Line 50(1):3511–3516CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG (eds) (1997) State-of the-art in technologies related to reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Report #2, vol II, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable machining systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA (1997) Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG (eds) (1997) State-of the-art in technologies related to reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Report #2, vol II, Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable machining systems (ERC/RMS), The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA (1997)
23.
go back to reference Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG, Koren Y (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and their enabling technologies. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 1(1):113–130CrossRef Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG, Koren Y (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems and their enabling technologies. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 1(1):113–130CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK (2015) Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:375–390CrossRef Mangla SK, Kumar P, Barua MK (2015) Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: a case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:375–390CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Malhotra V (2014) Modelling the barriers affecting design and implementation of reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Logistics Syst Manage 17(2):200–217CrossRef Malhotra V (2014) Modelling the barriers affecting design and implementation of reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Logistics Syst Manage 17(2):200–217CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Malhotra V (2014) Analysis of factors affecting the reconfigurable manufacturing system using an interpretive structural modelling technique. Int J Ind Syst Eng 16(3):396–413 Malhotra V (2014) Analysis of factors affecting the reconfigurable manufacturing system using an interpretive structural modelling technique. Int J Ind Syst Eng 16(3):396–413
27.
go back to reference Malhotra V, Raj T, Arora A (2012) Evaluation of barriers affecting reconfigurable manufacturing systems with graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Manuf Processes 27(1):88–94CrossRef Malhotra V, Raj T, Arora A (2012) Evaluation of barriers affecting reconfigurable manufacturing systems with graph theory and matrix approach. Mater Manuf Processes 27(1):88–94CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Malhotra V, Raj T (2012) Quantifying the factors affecting the reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Serv Oper Manage 13(2):226–246 Malhotra V, Raj T (2012) Quantifying the factors affecting the reconfigurable manufacturing system. Int J Serv Oper Manage 13(2):226–246
29.
go back to reference Mesa J, Maury H, Arrieta R, Bula A, Riba C (2015) Characterization of modular architecture principles towards reconfiguration: a first approach in its selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1–4):221–232CrossRef Mesa J, Maury H, Arrieta R, Bula A, Riba C (2015) Characterization of modular architecture principles towards reconfiguration: a first approach in its selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1–4):221–232CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Maganha I, Silva C, Ferreira LMD (2018) Understanding reconfigurability of manufacturing systems: an empirical analysis. J Manuf Syst 48:120–130CrossRef Maganha I, Silva C, Ferreira LMD (2018) Understanding reconfigurability of manufacturing systems: an empirical analysis. J Manuf Syst 48:120–130CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Maier-Speredelozzi V, Koren Y, Hu SJ (2003) Convertibility measures for manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):367–370CrossRef Maier-Speredelozzi V, Koren Y, Hu SJ (2003) Convertibility measures for manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):367–370CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Prakash C, Barua MK (2015) Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J Manuf Syst 37:599–615CrossRef Prakash C, Barua MK (2015) Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J Manuf Syst 37:599–615CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57 Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57
34.
go back to reference Rezaei J, Nispeling T, Sarkis J, Tavasszy LA (2016) Supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J Clean Prod 135:577–588CrossRef Rezaei J, Nispeling T, Sarkis J, Tavasszy LA (2016) Supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. J Clean Prod 135:577–588CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Rezaei J, Wang J, Tavasszy L (2015) Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Syst Appl 42(23):9152–9164CrossRef Rezaei J, Wang J, Tavasszy L (2015) Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Syst Appl 42(23):9152–9164CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rezaei J, van Roekel WS, Tavasszy L (2018) Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transp Policy 68:158–169CrossRef Rezaei J, van Roekel WS, Tavasszy L (2018) Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transp Policy 68:158–169CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rezaei J (2016) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:126–130CrossRef Rezaei J (2016) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega 64:126–130CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Renna P (2017) Decision-making method of reconfigurable manufacturing systems’ reconfiguration by a Gale-Shapley model. J Manuf Syst 45:149–158CrossRef Renna P (2017) Decision-making method of reconfigurable manufacturing systems’ reconfiguration by a Gale-Shapley model. J Manuf Syst 45:149–158CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Singh A, Gupta S, Asjad M, Gupta P (2017) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: journey and the road ahead. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 8(Suppl. 2):1849–1857CrossRef Singh A, Gupta S, Asjad M, Gupta P (2017) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: journey and the road ahead. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manage 8(Suppl. 2):1849–1857CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Singh A, Gupta P, Asjad M (2019b) Reconfigurable manufacturing system (Rms): accelerate towards Industries 4.0 (18 Mar 2019). In: Proceedings of international conference on sustainable computing in science, technology and management (SUSCOM-2019), 26–28 Feb 2019. Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3354485 Singh A, Gupta P, Asjad M (2019b) Reconfigurable manufacturing system (Rms): accelerate towards Industries 4.0 (18 Mar 2019). In: Proceedings of international conference on sustainable computing in science, technology and management (SUSCOM-2019), 26–28 Feb 2019. Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India. Available at SSRN: https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3354485
42.
go back to reference Singh A, Asjad M, Gupta P (2019) Reconfigurable machine tool: a perspective. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 8(4):365–376CrossRef Singh A, Asjad M, Gupta P (2019) Reconfigurable machine tool: a perspective. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 8(4):365–376CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Setchi RM, Lagos N (2004) Reconfigurability and reconfigurable manufacturing systems: state-of-the-art review. In: IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, pp 529–535 Setchi RM, Lagos N (2004) Reconfigurability and reconfigurable manufacturing systems: state-of-the-art review. In: IEEE international conference on industrial informatics, pp 529–535
44.
go back to reference Son SY, Olsen TL, Yip-Hoi D (2001) An approach to scalability and line balancing for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Integr Manuf Syst 12(7):500–511CrossRef Son SY, Olsen TL, Yip-Hoi D (2001) An approach to scalability and line balancing for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Integr Manuf Syst 12(7):500–511CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tiwari MK, Gumasta K, Gupta SK, Benyoucef L (2011) Developing a reconfigurability index using multi-attribute utility theory. Int J Prod Res 49(6):1669–1683CrossRef Tiwari MK, Gumasta K, Gupta SK, Benyoucef L (2011) Developing a reconfigurability index using multi-attribute utility theory. Int J Prod Res 49(6):1669–1683CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Tu Q, Vonderembse MA, Ragu Nathan TS, RaguNathan B (2004) Measuring modularity based manufacturing practices and their impact on mass customization capability: a customer driven perspective. Decis Sci 35(2):147–168CrossRef Tu Q, Vonderembse MA, Ragu Nathan TS, RaguNathan B (2004) Measuring modularity based manufacturing practices and their impact on mass customization capability: a customer driven perspective. Decis Sci 35(2):147–168CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Zhong H, Zheng W (2012) Reconfigurable machine tools design methodology. Master thesis. Department of Production Engineering and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, p 56 Zhong H, Zheng W (2012) Reconfigurable machine tools design methodology. Master thesis. Department of Production Engineering and Management, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, p 56
49.
go back to reference Yin Y, Stecke KE, Swink M, Kaku I (2017) Lessons from seru production on manufacturing competitively in a high cost environment. J Oper Manage 49:67–76CrossRef Yin Y, Stecke KE, Swink M, Kaku I (2017) Lessons from seru production on manufacturing competitively in a high cost environment. J Oper Manage 49:67–76CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring the Relative Importance of Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) Using Best–Worst Method (BWM)
Authors
Ashutosh Singh
Mohammad Asjad
Piyush Gupta
Zahid Akhtar Khan
Arshad Noor Siddiquee
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5463-6_24

Premium Partners