Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Development and Validation of Usability Heuristics for Evaluation of Interfaces in ATMs Read chapter Read first chapter

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Measuring UX Capability and Maturity in Organizations

Authors : Luka Rukonić, Vincent Kervyn de Meerendré, Suzanne Kieffer

Published in: Design, User Experience, and Usability. Practice and Case Studies

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Measuring organizational UX Capability/Maturity (UXCM) has been difficult or inaccurate. Moreover, the lack of empirically developed maturity models, models validated in practice, studies demonstrating their benefit and poor documentation or support for their use, has made this measurement even more problematic. To date, there is no straightforward and efficient method to assess UXCM although such assessment is a prerequisite for the improvement of UX processes. UX artifacts, methods and resources contribute toward the execution of UX processes: the production of UX artifacts demonstrate the execution of a process, whereas the use of UX methods demonstrates the implementation of specific UX processes with specific UX resources. In this paper, we present a measurement structure aiming at assessing organizational capabilities to implement UX processes. This structure consists of a capability scale, a maturity scale, a rating scale and a set of process attributes as measurable characteristics of UX processes. The contribution of this paper is threefold: a description of the measurement structure for the UXCM assessment, a questionnaire for the capability assessment by means of online survey or remote interviews and the documentation of a case study demonstrating the efficiency of the proposed model in an industrial project.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter The Purpose Quadrant: A Collaborative Workshop Method to Brand UX Teams and Raise Their Reputation in Organizations
next chapter A Value-Centered Approach for Unique and Novel Software Applications
Literature
1.
Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J.: Cost-Justifying Usability: An Update for an Internet Age, vol. 2. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2005)
2.
3.
De Bruin, T., Freeze, R., Kaulkarni, U., Rosemann, M.: Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) (2005)
4.
Earthy, J.: Usability maturity model: human centredness scale. INUSE Proj. Deliverable D5 5, 1–34 (1998)
5.
Earthy, J.: Usability maturity model: processes. Lloyd’s Reg. Shipp. 2, 84 (1999)
6.
Garcia, A., Silva da Silva, T., Selbach Silveira, M.: Artifacts for agile user-centered design: a systematic mapping. In: Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 5859–5868 (2017)
7.
Goldenson, D.R., Gibson, D.L.: Demonstrating the impact and benefit of CMMI: an update and preliminary results. Special report, Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, USA (2003)
8.
ISO: Information Technology — Software Process Assessment - Part 2: Performing an Assessment. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2003)
9.
ISO: Information Technology — Software Process Assessment - Part 1: Concepts and Introductory Guide. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2004)
10.
ISO: Information Technology — Software Process Assessment - Part 5: An Assessment Model and Indicator Guidance. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2012)
11.
12.
13.
Kieffer, S., Rukonic, L., Vincent, K.D.M., Vanderdonckt, J.: Specification of a UX process reference model towards the strategic planning of UX activities. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications (VISIGRAPP 2019) - Volume 2, HUCAPP. vol. 2, pp. 74–85 (2019)
14.
Lacerda, T.C., von Wangenheim, C.G.: Systematic literature review of usability capability/maturity models. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 55(C), 95–105 (2018)CrossRef
15.
Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: CHI 2009, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 23–32 (2009)
16.
Mayhew, D.J.: Business: strategic development of the usability engineering function. Interactions 6(5), 27–34 (1999)CrossRef
17.
Nielsen, J.: Corporate UX Maturity: Stages 1–4. Nielsen Norman Group, Silicon Valley (2006)
18.
Nielsen, J.: Corporate UX Maturity: Stages 5–8. Nielsen Norman Group, Silicon Valley (2006)
19.
Ovad, T., Larsen, L.B.: The prevalence of UX design in agile development processes in industry. In: Proceedings 2015 Agile Conference, pp. 40–49 (2015)
20.
Paulk, M.C.: Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Softw. 10(4), 18–27 (1993)CrossRef
21.
Sauro, J., Johnson, K., Meenan, C.: From snake-oil to science: measuring UX maturity. In: CHI 2017 Extended Abstracts, pp. 1084–1091 (2017)
22.
Schaffer, E.: Institutionalization of Usability: A Step-by-Step Guide. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City (2004)
23.
Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Development, Version 1.3. Carnegie Mellon University (2010)
24.
Staggers, N., et al.: Promoting usability in health organizations: initial steps and progress towards a healthcare usability maturity model. In: 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, p. 56 (2011)
25.
Venturi, G., Troost, J., Jokela, T.: People, organizations, and processes: an inquiry into the adoption of user-centered design in industry. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 21(2), 219–238 (2006)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measuring UX Capability and Maturity in Organizations
Authors
Luka Rukonić
Vincent Kervyn de Meerendré
Suzanne Kieffer
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Book
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Practice and Case Studies

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-23534-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-23535-2

Copyright Year: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23535-2_26