Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Mechanism

Authors : Kailash Chandra Khulbe, Takeshi Matsuura

Published in: Nanotechnology in Membrane Processes

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Gas separation via membrane has been recognized as the main technology that is used for hydrogen recovery, air separation, natural gas sweetening, helium recovery, natural gas dehydration, and so on. The successful application of a membrane-based separation process depends significantly on the appropriate chemical, physical, mechanical, and permeation properties of the membranes. Mathematical modeling of the membrane-based gas separation process can be useful to predict the performance under different conditions. Gas separation through membranes can take place by solution-diffusion mechanisms, depending mainly on the chemical and physical structures of the membrane.
Gas transport through a mixed-matrix membrane (MMM) is a complicated problem. Different modeling attempts have been developed for the prediction of the performance of MMMs by various theoretical expressions depending on the MMM’s morphology and chemistry, including ideal and nonideal MMMs. Attempts have been made to predict the effective permeability of a gaseous penetrant through the MMMs as a function of continuous phase (polymer matrix) and dispersed phase (porous or nonporous particles) permeabilities, as well as volume fraction of the dispersed phase. Also various models and mechanisms for the solvent and solute transport through reverse osmosis membrane have been proposed by a number of investigators.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Membrane Modification
next chapter Membrane Applications
Literature
1.
2.
Vinh-Thang H, Kaliaguine S (2013) Predictive models for mixed-matrix membrane performance: a review. ACS Chem Rev 313:4980–5028CrossRef
3.
Shimekit B, Shariff A, Mukhtar H, Bustam A, Elkhalifah AEI, Ullah S, Riaz N (2014) Interfacial defects on mixed matrix membranes and mitigation techniques for gas separation: a review. Appl Mechan Mater 625:653–656CrossRef
4.
Doong SJ (2012) Separation in functional materials for sustainable energy applications. In: Functional materials for sustainable energy applications, Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, pp 179–216
5.
Nagy E (2019) Chapter 18. Basic equations of mass transport through a membrane layer, 2nd edn. In: Membrane gas separation, Elsevier, pp 457–481
6.
7.
Hashemifard SA, Ismail A, Matsuura T (2010) Prediction of gas permeability in mixed matrix membranes using theoretical models. J Membr Sci 347(1–2):53–61CrossRef
8.
9.
Jeon YW, Lee DS (2015) Gas membranes for CO2/CH4 (biogas) separation: a review. Environ Eng Sci 32(2):71–85
10.
Bruggeman DAG (1935) Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer konstanten von heterogenen substanzen. i. dielektrizitatskonstanten und leitfahigkeiten der mischkorper aus isotropen substanzen. Ann Phys 24:636–679CrossRef
11.
van Beek LKH (1967) Dielectric behaviour of heterogeneous mixtures. Prog Dielectr 7:69–114
12.
Bánhegyi G (1986) Comparison of electrical mixture rules for composites. Colloid Polymer Sci 264:1030–1050CrossRef
13.
Bottcher CJF (1945) The dielectric constant of crystalline powders. Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas 64:47–51CrossRef
14.
Higuchi WI, Higuchi T (1960) Theoretical analysis of diffusional movement through heterogeneous barriers. J Am Pharm Assoc Sci Ed 49:598CrossRef
15.
Lewis L, Nielsen LE (1970) Dynamic mechanical properties of particulate-filled composites. J Appl Polym Sci 14:449–1471CrossRef
16.
Nielsen LE (1973) Thermal conductivity of particulate-filled polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 17:3819–3820CrossRef
17.
Cussler E (1990) Membranes containing selective flakes. J Membr Sci 52:275–288CrossRef
18.
Petropoulos JHJ (1985) A comparative study of approaches applied to the permeability of binary composite polymeric materials. Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 23:1309–1324CrossRef
19.
Toy LG, Freeman BD, Spontak RJ (1997) Gas permeability and phase morphology of poly (1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne)/poly (1-phenyl-1-propyne)) blends. Macromolecules 30(16):4766–4769
20.
Pal R (2007) New models for thermal conductivity of particulate composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 26:643–651CrossRef
21.
Gonzo EE, Parentis ML, Gottifredi JC (2006) Estimating models for predicting effective permeability of mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 277(1-2):46–54CrossRef
22.
Chiew YC, Glandt ED (1983) The effect of structure on the conductivity of a dispersion. J Colloid Interface Sci 94:90–104CrossRef
23.
Nasir R, Mukhtar H, Man Z (2016) Prediction of gas transport across amine mixed matrix membranes with ideal morphologies based on the Maxwell model. RSC Adv 6:30130–30138CrossRef
24.
Funk CV, Lloyd DR (2008) Zeolite-filled microporous mixed matrix (ZeoTIPS) membranes: prediction of gas separation performance. J Membr Sci 313:224–231CrossRef
25.
Felske JD (2004) Effective thermal conductivity of composite spheres in a continuous medium with contact resistance. Int Heat Mass Transfer 47:3453–3461CrossRef
26.
Mahajan R, Koros HJ (2002) Mixed matrix membrane materials with glassy polymers Part 1. Polym Eng Sci 42(7):1420–1431CrossRef
27.
Moore TT, Mahajan R, Vu DQ, Koros WJ (2004) Hybrid membrane materials comprising organic polymers with rigid dispersed phases. AIChE J 50:311–321CrossRef
28.
Hashemifard SA, Ismail AF, Matsuura T (2010) A new theoretical gas permeability model using resistance modeling for mixed matrix membrane systems. J Membr Sci 350:259–268CrossRef
29.
Monsalve-Bravo GM, Bhatia SK (2017) Extending effective medium theory to finite size systems: theory and simulation for permeation in mixed-matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 531:148–159CrossRef
30.
Chehrazi E, Sharif A, Omidkhah M, Karimi M (2017) Modeling the effects of interfacial characteristics on gas permeation behavior of nanotube–mixed matrix membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(42):37321–37331CrossRef
31.
Hamilton R, Crosser O (1962) Thermal conductivity of heterogeneous two-component systems. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 1:187–191CrossRef
32.
Kang DY, Jones CW, Nair S (2011) Modeling molecular transport in composite membranes with tubular fillers. J Membr Sci 381:50–63CrossRef
33.
Chehrazi E, Raef M, Noroozi M, Panahi-Sarmad M (2019) A theoretical model for the gas permeation prediction of nanotube-mixed matrix membranes: unveiling the effect of interfacial layer. J Membr Sci 570–571:168–175CrossRef
34.
Saqib S, Rafiq S, Muhammad N, Khan AL, Mukhtar A, Mellon NB, Man Z, Ullah S, Al-Sehemi AG, Jamil F (2020) Influence of interfacial layer parameters on gas transport properties through modeling approach in MWCNTs based mixed matrix composite membranes. Cheml Eng Sci 218:115543CrossRef
35.
Hoek EMV, Guiver M, Nikonenko V, Tarabara VV, Zydney AL (2013) Membrane terminology. In: Hoek EMV, Tarabara VV (eds) Encyclopedia of membrane science and technology, vol 3. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 2219–2222CrossRef
36.
Jamal K, Khan MA, Kamil M (2004) Mathematical modeling of reverse osmosis systems. Desalin 160:29–42CrossRef
37.
Mondal S, De S (2020) Chapter 8. Reverse osmosis modeling, simulation, and optimization in current trends and future developments on (bio-) membranes (reverse and forward osmosis: principles, applications). Advances, Elsevier, pp 186–206
38.
Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. Phys Rev 37:405–425CrossRef
39.
Ghernaout D (2017) Communication reverse osmosis process membranes modeling–a historical overview. J Civil Constr Environ Eng 2(4):112–122
40.
Sherwood TK, Brian PLT, Fisher RE (1967) Desalination by reverse osmosis, I&EC Fund 6:2–12 and 37
41.
Kezia K, Lee J, Hill AJ, Kentish SE (2013) Convective transport of boron through a brackish water reverse osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci 445:160–169CrossRef
42.
Niewersch C, Rieth C, Hailemariam L, Gilabert G, Justyna O (2020) Reverse osmosis membrane element integrity evaluation using imperfection model. Desalin 476:114175CrossRef
43.
44.
Monsalve-Bravo GM, Bhatia SK (2018) Comparison of hollow fibers and flat mixed-matrix membranes: theory and simulation. Chem Eng Sci 187:174-178
Metadata
Title
Mechanism
Authors
Kailash Chandra Khulbe
Takeshi Matsuura
Copyright Year
2021
Book
Nanotechnology in Membrane Processes

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64182-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-64183-2

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64183-2_5

Premium Partners

    Image Credits