Top

Metals and Materials International

Published in:

19-05-2023

Mesoscale Deformation Incompatibility Analysis of DP1180 Steel

Authors: Bingying Zhou, Yisheng Zhang, Xuexi Cui, Fei Han, Bobin Guan, Xiangdong Wu, Min Wan

Published in: Metals and Materials International | Issue 10/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) is of great technological interest in automotive lightweight applications. The dual-phase (DP) steel with a higher volume fraction of martensite has been rarely studied. In this work, the micromechanical deformation incompatibility of DP1180 steel was analyzed by a microstructure-based representative volume element (RVE) model. Via the electron-backscattered diffraction (EBSD) and the open-source software DREAM.3D, the statistically real microstructure-based RVE model was established. The flow curve of ferrite was obtained by the dislocation-based method. And the flow curve of martensite was obtained by the isostrain method (ISM) and the non-isostrain method (NISM). The simulation results showed good coincidence with the experiments. Furthermore, the ISM and the NISM were well clarified and improved. The microscale stress and strain in ferrite and martensite are approximately normal distributions due to the deformation incompatibility. The simulations verified that martensite carries much higher stress than ferrite. The mean value of strain in martensite is smaller than that in ferrite. And the strain variances of ferrite and martensite are similar. A larger variation range of stress triaxiality in ferrite indicates that the ferrite has gone through a more complex stress state. While the martensite has been approaching from the tension–compression state to the uniaxial-tension state. Consequently, the strain localization and damage initiation are predicted to be preferentially through ferrite compared to martensite, which is in good agreement with the results of the in situ tensile test. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the deformation incompatibility of the DP steel, especially in which the volume fraction of martensite is larger than that of ferrite. And it has theoretical significance for accurately predicting the micromechanical deformation behavior of multi-phase materials.

Graphical Abstract

previous article Optimal Process Conditions for Powder Bed Fusion and Analysis of Properties of Maraging Steel

next article Oxidation Behavior of CoCrFeMnNi High-Entropy Alloy Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

S.K. Paul, Mater. Des. 44, 397–406 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.023CrossRef

T. Sirinakorn, S. Wongwises, V. Uthaisangsuk, Mater. Des. 64, 729–742 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.009CrossRef

A. Bag, K.K. Ray, E.S. Dwarakadasa, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 30, 1193–1202 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-999-0269-4CrossRef

C. Tasan, M. Diehl, D. Yan, M. Bechtold, F. Roters, L. Schemmann, C. Zheng, N. Peranio, D. Ponge, M. Koyama, K. Tsuzaki, D. Raabe, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 45, 391–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021103CrossRef

K. Ismail, A. Perlade, P.J. Jacques, T. Pardoen, L. Brassart, Int. J. Plast. 118, 130–146 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.02.005CrossRef

W. Woo, V.T. Em, E.Y. Kim, S.H. Han, Y.S. Han, S.H. Choi, Acta Mater. 60, 6972–6981 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.054CrossRef

Y. Mazaheri, A. Kermanpur, A. Najafizadeh, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 619, 1–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.058CrossRef

Y.-Z. Wang, S.-L. Zang, L. Sun, J.-W. Ma, Mater. Des. 129, 34–43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.100CrossRef

V. Tvergaard, Int. J. Fract. 17, 389–407 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036191CrossRef

10.

F.M. Al-Abbasi, J.A. Nemes, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 45, 1449–1465 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2003.10.007CrossRef

11.

F.M. Al-Abbasi, J.A. Nemes, Mater. Sci. Forum 426–432, 1559–1564 (2003). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.1559

12.

J.H. Kim, M.-G. Lee, R.H. Wagoner, Comput. Mater. Sci. 47, 785–795 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.11.004CrossRef

13.

A. Ramazani, K. Mukherjee, A. Schwedt, P. Goravanchi, U. Prahl, W. Bleck, Int. J. Plast. 43, 128–152 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.003CrossRef

14.

S. Sodjit, V. Uthaisangsuk, Mater. Des. 41, 370–379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.010CrossRef

15.

W. Julsri, S. Suranuntchai, V. Uthaisangsuk, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 135, 499–516 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.11.043CrossRef

16.

A.K. Rana, J. Sethi, D.P. Tiwari, A. Sarkar, J. Santra, S. Kundu, P.P. Dey, Mater. Today Proc. 18, 2662–2671 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.07.127

17.

H. Hosseini-Toudeshky, B. Anbarlooie, J. Kadkhodapour, Mater. Des. 68, 167–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.013CrossRef

18.

N. Ormsuptave, V. Uthaisangsuk, Mater. Des. 118, 314–329 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.040CrossRef

19.

J. Ha, J. Lee, J.H. Kim, M.-G. Lee, F. Barlat, Int. J. Plast. 93, 89–111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.02.005CrossRef

20.

E. Espinosa, A. Sardar, C.H.M. Simha, A. Bardelcik, Mech. Mater 160, 103961 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103961CrossRef

21.

F. Scherff, J. Gola, S. Scholl, K. Srivastava, T. Staudt, D. Britz, F. Mücklich, S. Diebels, Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 33, 1989–2006 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00161-021-00980-xCrossRef

22.

H. Zhang, M. Diehl, F. Roters, D. Raabe, Int. J. Plast. 80, 111–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.01.002CrossRef

23.

W. Liu, J. Lian, N. Aravas, S. Münstermann, Int. J. Plast. 126, 102614 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.10.002CrossRef

24.

Z.Y. Cai, B. Meng, M. Wan, X.D. Wu, M.W. Fu, Int. J. Plast. 129, 102707 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102707CrossRef

25.

D. Peirce, R.J. Asaro, A. Needleman, Acta Metall. 30, 1087–1119 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(82)90005-0CrossRef

26.

Y. Huang, A user-material subroutine incorporating single crystal plasticity in the ABAQUS finite element program, Harvard University Report Mech-178 (1991)

27.

J. Jinoch, S. Ankem, H. Margolin, Mater. Sci. Eng. 34, 203–211 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(78)90052-6CrossRef

28.

S. Neti, M.N. Vijayshankar, S. Ankem, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 145, 47–54 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(91)90294-WCrossRef

29.

H. Ghassemi-Armaki, R. Maaß, S.P. Bhat, S. Sriram, J.R. Greer, K.S. Kumar, Acta Mater. 62, 197–211 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.001CrossRef

30.

C.C. Tasan, M. Diehl, D. Yan, C. Zambaldi, P. Shanthraj, F. Roters, D. Raabe, Acta Mater. 81, 386–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.071CrossRef

31.

R.-M. Rodriguez, I. Gutiérrez, Mater. Sci. Forum 426–432, 4525–4530 (2003). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.4525CrossRef

32.

A. Ramazani, M. Abbasi, S. Kazemiabnavi, S. Schmauder, R. Larson, U. Prahl, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 660, 181–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.090CrossRef

33.

S.K. Basantia, V. Singh, A. Bhattacharya, N. Khutia, D. Das, Mater. Today Proc. 5, 18275–18280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.165CrossRef

34.

R.-B. Gou, W.-J. Dan, W.-G. Zhang, M. Yu, Procedia Manuf. 15, 1573–1580 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.310CrossRef

35.

S.K. Basantia, A. Bhattacharya, N. Khutia, D. Das, Met. Mater. Int. 27, 1025–1043 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00519-5CrossRef

36.

V. Uthaisangsuk, U. Prahl, W. Bleck, Eng. Fract. Mech. 78, 469–486 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.017CrossRef

37.

A. Ramazani, K. Mukherjee, U. Prahl, W. Bleck, Comput. Mater. Sci. 52, 46–54 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.05.041CrossRef

38.

M.-Y. Seok, Y.-J. Kim, I.-C. Choi, Y. Zhao, J.-I. Jang, Int. J. Plast. 59, 108–118 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.03.013CrossRef

39.

Y. Tomota, K. Kuroki, T. Mori, I. Tamura, Mater. Sci. Eng. 24, 85–94 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(76)90097-5CrossRef

40.

Y. Tomota, M. Umemoto, N. Komatsubara, A. Hiramatsu, N. Nakajima, A. Moriya, T. Watanabe, S. Nanba, G. Anan, K. Kunishige, Y. Higo, M. Miyahara, ISIJ Int. 32, 343–349 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.32.343CrossRef

41.

Rudiono and Y. Tomota, Acta Materialia, 45, 1923–1929 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00313-8.

42.

J.D. Eshelby, Proc. Roy. Soc. A Math. Phys. Sci. 241, 376–396 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1957.0133

43.

T. Mori, K. Tanaka, Acta Metall. 21, 571–574 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3CrossRef

44.

Q. Li, H. Zhang, F. Chen, D. Xu, D. Sui, Z. Cui, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 176, 105569 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105569.

45.

W. Gong, Y. Tomota, S. Harjo, Y.H. Su, K. Aizawa, Acta Mater. 85, 243–249 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.029CrossRef

46.

X.H. Hu, X. Sun, L.G. Hector, Y. Ren, Acta Mater. 132, 230–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.028CrossRef

47.

S.-H. Choi, E.-Y. Kim, W. Woo, S.H. Han, J.H. Kwak, Int. J. Plast. 45, 85–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.11.013CrossRef

48.

G. Gottstein, Physical Foundations of Materials Science (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004)

49.

M.A. Groeber, M.A. Jackson, Integr. Mater. Manuf. Inno. 3, 56–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9772-3-5CrossRef

50.

N. Saeidi, F. Ashrafizadeh, B. Niroumand, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 599, 145–149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.053CrossRef

51.

R.M. Rahimi, D.F. Bahr, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 756, 328–335 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.063CrossRef

52.

S. Qin, R. McLendon, V. Oancea, A.M. Beese, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 721, 168–178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2018.02.078CrossRef

53.

P.R. Rios, J.R.C. Guimarães, K.K. Chawla, Scripta Metall. 15, 899–904 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(81)90274-XCrossRef

54.

K. Araki, Y. Takada, K. Nakaoka, Trans. Iron Steel Ins. Japan 17, 710–717 (1977). https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational1966.17.710CrossRef

Title: Mesoscale Deformation Incompatibility Analysis of DP1180 Steel
Authors: Bingying Zhou
Yisheng Zhang
Xuexi Cui
Fei Han
Bobin Guan
Xiangdong Wu
Min Wan
Publication date: 19-05-2023
Publisher: The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials
Published in: Metals and Materials International / Issue 10/2023
Print ISSN: 1598-9623
Electronic ISSN: 2005-4149
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-023-01431-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 10/2023

Laser-Directed Energy Deposition of Dissimilar Maraging Steels with a Defect-Free Interface: Design for Improved Surface Hardness and Fracture Toughness

Microstructure and Texture Evolution During the Heat Treatment of 0.6Zn–0.6Ca–Mg Alloy Sheet Manufactured via Twin Roll Casting

Optimal Process Conditions for Powder Bed Fusion and Analysis of Properties of Maraging Steel

Effect of Continuous Stress-annealing on the Structure and Magnetic Properties of Fe72.9Si15.8B6.9Nb3.2Cu1Co0.2 Amorphous Alloy

Study on the Tensile and Shear Behaviors of Selective Laser Melting Manufactured Ti6Al4V

Performance Analysis of Wide Magnesium Alloy Foil Rolled by Multi-Pass Electric Plastic Rolling

Premium Partners