1989 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
Methodological Basis
Author : Igor Birman
Published in: Personal Consumption in the USSR and the USA
Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK
Included in: Professional Book Archive
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
The concept of standard of living itself must be defined first — a lot depends on one’s point of view, on a country’s cultural traditions — no objective truth exists here.1 Clearly this standard is largely determined by the quantity and quality of food, clothing, various services, and by the size and comfort of housing. But it is somewhat less clear with respect to entertainment and sport — recreation in general. Rejuvenating relaxation is an important element of the standard of living, but without a concrete statement of what it is, one might conclude that the unemployed live better than everyone else.2 Therefore, the assumption is made that entertainment, sport, and recreation can be measured by expenditures on them, i.e., other things being equal, the more we spend for these pursuits, the better we live. Including health and education in the standard of living is no less questionable,3 but it is intuitively clear that, again, other things being equal, by spending more on universities, schools, and hospitals, people live better. Be that as it may, all these are components of consumption, and it is the total expenditures for consumption that characterises the standard of living.