Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Misinterpretations of Residual Claim in Finance and Corporate Law

Author : Kuo-Ping Chang

Published in: The Ownership of the Firm, Corporate Finance, and Derivatives

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The corporate finance literature claims that within a firm, debt is senior to equity (or debt has first claim over equity), e.g., “debt has prior claim on the firm’s assets and earnings, so the cost of debt is always less than the cost of equity” (Myers 2001, pp. 84–85). In this chapter, I will show that in the firm, though de jure (according to the corporate law) there might be first or residual claims, there is de facto no first claim between fixed-income assets and non-fixed-income assets. But the first claim among fixed-income assets can affect the market values of these assets.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
E.g., Fama and Jensen (1983, p. 328) argue that “the residual risk—the risk of the difference between stochastic inflows of resources and promised payments to agents—is borne by those who contract for the rights to net cash flows. We call these agents the residual claimants or residual risk bearers”.
 
2
See also the Robin Hood story in Chap. 1.
 
3
Here it is assumed that the time-1 price of the mountain is at least $250, i.e., the debt is riskless. If the time-1 price of the mountain is less than $250, say, $180, then the equityholder will be given $180 to exchange for the stock which has zero value.
 
Literature
go back to reference Alchian A, Woodward S (1987) Reflections on the theory of the firm. J Inst Theor Econ 143:110–136 Alchian A, Woodward S (1987) Reflections on the theory of the firm. J Inst Theor Econ 143:110–136
go back to reference Fama E, Michael J (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. J Law Econ 26:327–349CrossRef Fama E, Michael J (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. J Law Econ 26:327–349CrossRef
go back to reference Grossman S, Hart O (1983) Unemployment with observable aggregate shocks. J Polit Econ 91:907–928CrossRef Grossman S, Hart O (1983) Unemployment with observable aggregate shocks. J Polit Econ 91:907–928CrossRef
go back to reference Klein B, Crawford G, Alchian A (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J Law Econ 21:297–326CrossRef Klein B, Crawford G, Alchian A (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J Law Econ 21:297–326CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Misinterpretations of Residual Claim in Finance and Corporate Law
Author
Kuo-Ping Chang
Copyright Year
2015
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-353-8_6