1 Introduction
False brinelling, a form of fretting wear, mainly occurs when a lubricated rolling bearing is stationary during transport either by sea or rail [
1,
2]. The identification of false brinelling is by the elliptical wear marks on the raceways in the axial direction at each roller position [
3]. The false brinelling marks are caused by micromovements due to very low-amplitude oscillation/ vibration between the rolling elements and the raceways. If the false brinelling wear is left unaddressed, service failure of the bearing will arise due to excessive running vibration, production of oxide particles and subsequent fatigue damage to the bearing surface during service [
4‐
6]. The definition of false brinelling and fretting corrosion in the literature is inconsistent [
7,
8] and it can be a challenge to distinguish between these two terms because they can occur simultaneously, depending on the operating conditions [
9]. For example, false brinelling can escalate to fretting corrosion when the number of cyclic vibrations increases, resulting in a lubricant being squeezed out of the contact zones [
4,
6,
10,
11]. The above situation also leads to some challenges for a lubricant to replenish the contact areas, which was observed in roller bearings for wind turbine applications [
11]. In the current paper, false brinelling is seen in an oil/grease lubricated rolling bearing subjected to small oscillations, whereas fretting corrosion is described in the unlubricated condition [
5,
7,
9,
12].
Lubrication is one of the major methods to reduce false brinelling wear and prevent fretting damage [
6]. Main contributions of the lubricant to reduce fretting wear are lowering coefficient of friction (COF) and inhibiting oxygen access to the fretting contact areas [
13,
14]. For an oil lubricant, viscosity is considered one of most important parameters for preventing fretting wear [
6]. The effect of oil viscosity on fretting wear reduction has been shown to be dependent on the amplitude of oscillatory motions [
15‐
17]. An oil with lower viscosity is effective for decreasing fretting wear when the amplitude is less than 9 µm [
15]. When the amplitude is more than 60 µm, oil viscosity has less impact on fretting wear reduction [
15,
16,
18]. The degree of amplitude (
A/
D), defined by a ratio between amplitude under oscillatory motion (
A) and Hertzian contact diameter (
D), has been used to study the effect of oil viscosity in fretting behaviour [
11,
16,
17]. The above studies found the fretting wear can be reduced using (1) an oil with greater viscosity when
A/
D > 1.5 or (2) a less viscous oil when
A/
D ≤ 1. Maruyama et al. [
17] showed that fretting wear can also be reduced by increasing the oscillating velocity under the same degree of amplitude (i.e.,
A/
D = 1.9).
Grease, on the other hand, its mechanisms of fretting wear reduction are more complicated and different from oil due to the complexity of chemical formula [
6,
14,
17]. Studies have focused the ability of wear reduction of oscillating ball and thrust bearings in relation to the base oil viscosity [
3,
17], grease consistency [
19] as well as types of thickeners [
3,
14]. Pittroff [
19] reported that soft grease is less effective for fretting wear reduction due to its weak shear strength and adhesiveness. Contradicting results published by Yan et al. [
3] and Kita and Yamamoto [
20] showed soft grease is more effective due to the higher fluidity of the base oil. Recent work done by Maruyama et al. [
17] highlighted the grease with high bleed oil does not contribute to fretting wear reduction when
A/
D > 1; because the worked thickener entered the contact and formed a layer to reduce the fretting wear. In Saatchi’s work [
14], three types of greases were tested under rolling fretting (referred to as false brinelling) with the Fafnir test and sliding fretting with linear-oscillation (SRV) test. His results showed oil bleeding behaviour of different grease types influences false brinelling, which is not the case in sliding contact fretting. This work highlighted the bleed or oil release mechanisms of grease under rolling and sliding are essentially different, resulting from the direction of the forces, motion on the thickener particles and oil-thickener interaction.
The most studies on grease performance for fretting wear was performed by unidirectional tests via the Fafnir fretting test, SRV and impact fretting test [
3,
14,
17,
19]. However, from the authors’ previous work [
5], rolling bearings were found to experience rotational oscillating displacements and subjected to three dimensional vibrations during rail/sea transportation. Hence, a false brinelling test rig was designed accordingly, allowing authors to investigate vibration amplitudes and different types of loadings on false brinelling damage in railway cylinder roller bearings [
12]. The results showed that the radial load and the amplitude of rotational displacement are the main causes of false brinelling wear during rail/sea transportation [
12]. Hence, to build on this previous discovery, and using the custom false brinelling test rig, the current work aims to study the effect of four different types of greases for mitigation of false brinelling of rolling bearings during rail/sea transport.
It is a widely believed that to prevent false brinelling, a grease with high bleed properties should be selected to provide the fretting contacts with oil, to prevent starvation. However, recent studies have shown, that for grease, oil bleed (and oil viscosity) only partially contribute to the false brinelling reduction [
14,
17]. Grease thickener, polyurea to be specific, is also effective for mitigation of false brinelling by forming a layer in the fretting contact areas [
17]. Except for the above studies, there is little work on the effect of different greases on false brinelling reduction. In addition, for oil lubricated systems, antiwear (AW) and extreme pressure (EP) additives have been shown to protect the fretting contact if the oil bleed is insufficient. However, it is unclear if the same protective principal applies to grease lubricated systems.
To date, most research has studied AW additives in oil for the mitigation of false brinelling [
8,
20‐
23], with very little research available on AW additive performance in grease for false brinelling mitigation. Zinc dialkyl dithiophosphates (ZDDP) is the most popular AW agent [
24,
25] and has shown promising results in reducing fretting wear in oil lubricated conditions [
8,
21,
22]. Given that all research into AW additives in grease focuses on tribofilm formation mechanisms during operating service conditions [
24,
26‐
28], this paper sets out to explore the possibility of ZDDP tribofilm formation under false brinelling conditions (i.e., non-service conditions).
This study provides the following contributions to the body of false brinelling knowledge:
-
Experimentally determined effect of four types of greases (different base oils, thickeners and additives) on false brinelling reduction via a custom false brinelling test rig. This test rig simulated the false brinelling in cylinder roller bearings that occur during rail/sea transportation
-
Evaluation of tribological properties of four greases by reciprocating wear tests, so the possible mechanisms for false brinelling reduction under different greases can be understood.
-
Evaluate the possibility of using ZDDP as a functional AW additive to mitigate false brinelling wear under grease lubricated conditions.
The current work focuses on the investigation of four commercial greases (contains different thickener, oil and additives) in mitigating false brinelling occurrence during rail/sea transportation. The false brinelling resistance of tested greases was evaluated by the maximum wear depth measured on the raceways. To understand how different types of greases mitigate the false brinelling, reciprocating wear tests with pin-on-cylinder configuration were performed. COF values of each grease type was measured in terms of frequencies, normal pressures, and temperatures. Worn surfaces and the tested greases were examined via optical microscopy, SEM/EDS (scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive spectroscopy) and XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy) to establish the extent to which lubricant formulation can reduce false brinelling damage.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.