Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 6/2017

21-07-2017

Mobile Devices and Apps as Scaffolds to Science Learning in the Primary Classroom

Author: Garry Falloon

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 6/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Considerable work over many years has explored the contribution technology can make to science learning, at all levels of education. In the school sector, historically this has focused on the use of fixed, desktop-based or semi-mobile laptop systems for purposes such as experiment data collection or analysis, or as a means of engaging or motivating interest in science. However, the advent of mobile devices such as iPads supported by a huge array of low or no cost apps, means that new opportunities are becoming available for teachers to explore how these resources may be useful for supporting ‘hands on’ science learning. This article reports outcomes from a study of primary (elementary) school students’ use of a series of apps integrated with practical science activities, in a topic exploring Energy concepts. It used an innovative display capture tool to examine how the students used the apps and features of their iPads to scaffold their practical work at different stages during the experiments. Results identify device functions and app-based scaffolds that assisted these students to structure their experiments, understand procedures, think about the influence of variables and communicate and share outcomes. However, they also discovered limitations in the apps’ ability to support conceptual knowledge development, identifying the critical role of teachers and the importance of task structure and design to ensuring conceptual knowledge objectives are met.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
According to Apple, presently there are over 80,000 educational apps in the AppStore
 
2
The New Zealand Government is renovating schools to develop ILEs as part of its programme to evolve physical learning spaces to promote collaborative teaching and learning and ‘twenty-first Century’ competency development. See http://​www.​education.​govt.​nz/​school/​property/​state-schools/​design-standards/​flexible-learning-spaces/​
 
Literature
go back to reference Ahmed S, Parsons D (2013) Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Comput Educ 63:62–72CrossRef Ahmed S, Parsons D (2013) Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Comput Educ 63:62–72CrossRef
go back to reference Aronin S, Floyd K (2013) Using an iPad in inclusive preschool classrooms to introduce STEM concepts. Teach Except Child 45(4):34–39CrossRef Aronin S, Floyd K (2013) Using an iPad in inclusive preschool classrooms to introduce STEM concepts. Teach Except Child 45(4):34–39CrossRef
go back to reference Devolder A, van Braak J, Tondeur J (2012) Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. J Comput Assist Learn 28(6):557–573CrossRef Devolder A, van Braak J, Tondeur J (2012) Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. J Comput Assist Learn 28(6):557–573CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis J (1984) A rationale for using computers in science education. Am Biol Teach 46(4):200–206CrossRef Ellis J (1984) A rationale for using computers in science education. Am Biol Teach 46(4):200–206CrossRef
go back to reference Falloon G (2013) Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning. Comput Educ 68:505–521 Falloon G (2013) Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning. Comput Educ 68:505–521
go back to reference Falloon GW (2015) What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Comput Educ 84:62–77 Falloon GW (2015) What’s the difference? Learning collaboratively using iPads in conventional classrooms. Comput Educ 84:62–77
go back to reference Gilbert J, Bull A (2013) Building a future-oriented science education system in New Zealand: how are we doing? New Zealand Council for Educational Research Press, Wellington Gilbert J, Bull A (2013) Building a future-oriented science education system in New Zealand: how are we doing? New Zealand Council for Educational Research Press, Wellington
go back to reference Hannafin M, Land S, Oliver K (1999) Open learning environments: foundations, methods, and models. In: Reigeluth C (ed) Instructional design theories and models, vol 2. NJ: Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 115–140 Hannafin M, Land S, Oliver K (1999) Open learning environments: foundations, methods, and models. In: Reigeluth C (ed) Instructional design theories and models, vol 2. NJ: Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 115–140
go back to reference Hartley J (1988) Learning from computer-based learning in science. Stud Sci Educ 15(1):55–76CrossRef Hartley J (1988) Learning from computer-based learning in science. Stud Sci Educ 15(1):55–76CrossRef
go back to reference Hwang G, Tsai C, Chu H, Kinshuk, Chen C (2012) A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a Science Park. Australas J Educ Technol 28(5):931–947CrossRef Hwang G, Tsai C, Chu H, Kinshuk, Chen C (2012) A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a Science Park. Australas J Educ Technol 28(5):931–947CrossRef
go back to reference Jonassen D, Reeves T (1996) Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In: Jonassen D (ed) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Macmillan, New York, pp 693–719 Jonassen D, Reeves T (1996) Learning with technology: using computers as cognitive tools. In: Jonassen D (ed) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Macmillan, New York, pp 693–719
go back to reference Kara I (2008) The effect on retention of computer assisted instruction in science education. J Instr Psychol 35(4):357–364 Kara I (2008) The effect on retention of computer assisted instruction in science education. J Instr Psychol 35(4):357–364
go back to reference Khan S (2011) New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. J Sci Educ Technol 20(3):215–232CrossRef Khan S (2011) New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. J Sci Educ Technol 20(3):215–232CrossRef
go back to reference Kim M, Hannafin M (2011a) Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enriched science classrooms: a qualitative case study. Instr Sci 39(3):255–282CrossRef Kim M, Hannafin M (2011a) Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enriched science classrooms: a qualitative case study. Instr Sci 39(3):255–282CrossRef
go back to reference Kim M, Hannafin M (2011b) Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced environments (TELEs): bridging research and theory with practice. Comput Educ 56:403–417CrossRef Kim M, Hannafin M (2011b) Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced environments (TELEs): bridging research and theory with practice. Comput Educ 56:403–417CrossRef
go back to reference Kim M, Hannafin M, Bryan L (2007) Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Sci Educ 91(6):1010–1030CrossRef Kim M, Hannafin M, Bryan L (2007) Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: an emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Sci Educ 91(6):1010–1030CrossRef
go back to reference Kirschner P, Erkens G (2006) Cognitive tools and Mindtools for collaborative learning. J Educ Comput Res 35(2):199–209CrossRef Kirschner P, Erkens G (2006) Cognitive tools and Mindtools for collaborative learning. J Educ Comput Res 35(2):199–209CrossRef
go back to reference Landis J, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis J, Koch G (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
go back to reference Looi C, Sun D, Xie W (2015) Exploring students’ progression in an inquiry science curriculum enabled by mobile learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 8(1):43–54CrossRef Looi C, Sun D, Xie W (2015) Exploring students’ progression in an inquiry science curriculum enabled by mobile learning. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 8(1):43–54CrossRef
go back to reference Meluso A, Zheng M, Spires H, Lester J (2012) Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Comput Educ 59:497–504CrossRef Meluso A, Zheng M, Spires H, Lester J (2012) Enhancing 5th graders’ science content knowledge and self-efficacy through game-based learning. Comput Educ 59:497–504CrossRef
go back to reference Miller B, Krockover G, Doughty T (2013) Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with a moderate to severe intellectual disability: a pilot study. J Res Sci Teach 50(8):887–911CrossRef Miller B, Krockover G, Doughty T (2013) Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with a moderate to severe intellectual disability: a pilot study. J Res Sci Teach 50(8):887–911CrossRef
go back to reference Ministry of Education (2007) The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media Ltd., Wellington Ministry of Education (2007) The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media Ltd., Wellington
go back to reference OECD, (2014). What students know and can do: student performance in mathematics, reading and science (volume 1). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264208780-3-en. Accessed May 11 2016 OECD, (2014). What students know and can do: student performance in mathematics, reading and science (volume 1). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.​1787/​9789264208780-3-en. Accessed May 11 2016
go back to reference Osman K, Vebrianto R (2013) Fostering science process skills and improving achievement through the use of multiple media. J Balt Sci Educ 12(2):191–204 Osman K, Vebrianto R (2013) Fostering science process skills and improving achievement through the use of multiple media. J Balt Sci Educ 12(2):191–204
go back to reference Sharma P, Hannafin M (2007) Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interact Learn Environ 15(1):27–46CrossRef Sharma P, Hannafin M (2007) Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments. Interact Learn Environ 15(1):27–46CrossRef
go back to reference Song Y (2014) ‘Bring your own device (BYOD)’ for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Comput Educ 74:50–60CrossRef Song Y (2014) ‘Bring your own device (BYOD)’ for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Comput Educ 74:50–60CrossRef
go back to reference Stone C (1993) What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In: Forman E, Minick N, Stone C (eds) Contexts for learning: sociocultural dynamics in children ‘s development. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 169–183 Stone C (1993) What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In: Forman E, Minick N, Stone C (eds) Contexts for learning: sociocultural dynamics in children ‘s development. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 169–183
go back to reference Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Vygotsky L (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Wallace D, Witus A (2013) Integrating iPad Technology in Earth Science K-12 outreach courses: field and classroom applications. J Geosci Educ 61(4):385–395 Wallace D, Witus A (2013) Integrating iPad Technology in Earth Science K-12 outreach courses: field and classroom applications. J Geosci Educ 61(4):385–395
go back to reference Watson, R., Crawford, M., & Farley, S. (2003). Strategic approaches to science and technology development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-3026. Accessed 21 June 2016 Watson, R., Crawford, M., & Farley, S. (2003). Strategic approaches to science and technology development. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. doi:10.​1596/​1813-9450-3026. Accessed 21 June 2016
go back to reference Weller H (1996) Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science. Journal of Research on Computing in Science 28(4):461–486 Weller H (1996) Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science. Journal of Research on Computing in Science 28(4):461–486
go back to reference Wilson R, Goodman J, Bradbury L, Gross L (2013) Exploring the use of iPads to investigate forces and motion in an elementary science methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 13(2):105–126 Wilson R, Goodman J, Bradbury L, Gross L (2013) Exploring the use of iPads to investigate forces and motion in an elementary science methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 13(2):105–126
go back to reference Windschitl M (2000) Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software. Educ Technol Res Dev 48(2):81–95CrossRef Windschitl M (2000) Supporting the development of science inquiry skills with special classes of software. Educ Technol Res Dev 48(2):81–95CrossRef
go back to reference Winn J (1994) Promises and challenges of Scaffolded instruction. Learn Disabil Q 17:89–104CrossRef Winn J (1994) Promises and challenges of Scaffolded instruction. Learn Disabil Q 17:89–104CrossRef
go back to reference Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 17(2):89–100CrossRef Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 17(2):89–100CrossRef
go back to reference Zydney J, Warner Z (2016) Mobile apps for science learning: review of research. Comput Educ 94:1–17CrossRef Zydney J, Warner Z (2016) Mobile apps for science learning: review of research. Comput Educ 94:1–17CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mobile Devices and Apps as Scaffolds to Science Learning in the Primary Classroom
Author
Garry Falloon
Publication date
21-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9702-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Journal of Science Education and Technology 6/2017 Go to the issue

Premium Partners