Finds documents with both search terms in any word order, permitting "n" words as a maximum distance between them. Best choose between 15 and 30 (e.g. NEAR(recruit, professionals, 20)).
Finds documents with the search term in word versions or composites. The asterisk * marks whether you wish them BEFORE, BEHIND, or BEFORE and BEHIND the search term (e.g. lightweight*, *lightweight, *lightweight*).
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence.
powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search.
powered by
(Link opens in a new window)
Abstract
The article investigates the effects of different growing media and bio-stimulants on the health and productivity of Gerbera flowers. It discusses the advantages of using organic materials like compost and vermicompost in combination with bio-stimulants to improve plant growth, nutrient uptake, and flower yield. The study also highlights the importance of soil pH and microbial activity in enhancing nutrient availability and plant health. The findings suggest that a mixture of peat moss, sand, and vermicompost inoculated with nitrogen-fixing bacteria is optimal for achieving high-quality Gerbera flowers. The research underscores the need for further investigation into the use of organic materials as growing media for ornamental plants.
AI Generated
This summary of the content was generated with the help of AI.
Abstract
Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) cv. Jaguar Yellow is an ornamental plant of the Asteraceae family. Ordinarily, farmers use expensive materials such as peat moss as a media substrate in gerbera production, in addition to application high nitrogen fertilizers. Therefore, the current study was designed to assess the yield and quality changes of gerbera flowers owing to utilizing environment-friendly inputs under unheated plastic greenhouse conditions for two seasons of 2017/18 and 2018/19. The experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates, each replicate involved 5 pots per treatment. For preparing the soil substrate mixtures, four substances were used which involved peat moss (P), sand (S), vermicompost (V), and compost (C). P + S, P + S + V and P + S + C were assembled whether with or without Azotobacter+Azospirillum as bio stimulant (Bio) addition to obtain six combinations. Results showed that P + S + V + Bio was the effective practice for enhancing gerbera plant height, leaf width, root weight plant plant-1 and leaves weight plant-1. Also, P + S + V + Bio produced the maximum values of leaf chlorophyll, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents. The differences in flowering initiation between P + S and each of P + S + V, P + S + V + Bio, P + S + C and P + S + C + Bio were not significant. P + S + V + Bio (for flowering duration and flower yield), in addition to P + S + V (for flowering duration) recorded the highest values in both seasons.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1 Introduction
The Asteraceae family is one of the largest families of flowering plants in the plant kingdom with over 1500 genera and close to 23,000 species (Bremer et al. 1994). As a prominent member of the Asteraceae family, gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) is commonly known as Transvaal Daisy or African Daisy, with nearly 70 species (Norberto 2010). Gerbera is a very popular flower plant having double, semi-double, and single-structure flowers. Because of color variation, size of flowers, and long-lasting and wide adaptability for culture, gerbera is highly demanded for cultivation worldwide under protected conditions (Singh et al. 2017).
Soilless culture, a technique of growing plants without soil as a rooting medium, in which the inorganic nutrients needed for the plant are supplied via the irrigation water, to be absorbed by the roots, has rapidly increased around the world. The use of appropriate substrates, for growing medium, is essential to produce healthy horticultural plants. A good growing medium would provide comfortable anchorage or support to the plant, function as a reservoir for nutrients and water (El-Metwally et al. 2022; El-Bially et al. 2023). As well, the useful medium enables oxygen diffusion to the roots, and permit foamy exchange between the roots and atmosphere outside the foundation substrate (Abad et al. 2002). Therefore, supplying soil with different nutrients is a crucial action to improve soil properties (Salem et al. 2022; Saudy and El-Metwally 2023; Shaaban et al. 2023), hence, nutrient uptake (El-Metwally and Saudy 2021) as well as growth and yield of the crops (Saudy et al. 2023).
Advertisement
Although crop production requires nutrients, the overly large doses of fertilizers with chemically unbalanced NPK ratios have resulted in soil-related problems, such as acidification (Chen 2006; Saudy and Mubarak 2015). Mineral nutrition is one of the most important factors for plant growth and yield (Saudy et al. 2021a, 2022a; Abd El-Mageed et al. 2022; Abou El-Enin et al. 2023). Mineral fertilizers, particularly inorganic nitrogen, are important elements for plant nutrition (Noureldin et al. 2013; Saudy 2014, 2015); however, they are also potential source of environmental pollution (Hartman et al. 1988). Thus, developing and adopting environmentally friendly alternatives are needed to supplement and/or replace chemical fertilizers (Saudy et al. 2018, 2020a).
Peat moss is vastly exploited as a prime component of growing media in potted ornamental plants production. However, recently, owing to its ecological unsustainability (Carlile and Coules 2013), in addition to its high price (Gruda 2010) ornamental farms has been trying to reduce the application of peat as a media substrate. Consequently, several new plant substrates and mixtures have been inserted and evaluated worldwide (Gruda 2019). Compost prepared from various organic wastes has the beneficial effects not only in terms of its positive carbon footprint but also for its good impact to suppress some soil diseases and low cost (Raviv 2011; Saudy et al. 2021b).
Since vermi-compost has high potential to maintain soil fertility by improving aggregates and holding water, it is considered a promising organic fertilizer (Abul-Soud et al. 2014). Vermi-compost is a privileged material in available forms of various nutrients, i.e. nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus (Hashem and Abd-Elrahman 2016). Therefore, vermi-compost is recommended in fertilization programs in different soil and crop cultivations (Frederickson et al. 2007; Amalraj et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2015; Abd-Elrahman et al. 2022).
There is no doubt that mineral nutrients application occurred distinctive prosperity in crop production. However, the ecosystems have been injured owing to continuous use of inorganic fertilizers. In this respect reducing the dependence on inorganic nutrients can be archived by exploiting the plant bio-stimulants via bio-fertilization (Rouphael and Colla 2020), maintain the efficient uptake by plants (Zulfiqar et al. 2020; Saudy et al. 2022b). Accordingly, the use of bio-stimulants is so significant in agricultural sustainability since they can boost crop production while reduce the possible environmental pollution (Ertani et al. 2015; Saudy et al. 2020b).
Advertisement
Little knowledges are available about the optimal growing substrate mixture for healthy status of gerbera plants. The current work hypothesized that substitution peat moss partially with compost or vermi-compost will possess better growth of gerbera inoculated by bio-stimulants. To combine the benefits of various organic materials while reducing costs, mixing peat moss, compost and vermi-compost with sand in the preparation of growth media substrate of gerbera plants was applied and evaluated in the current study. Furthermore, different structured substrate mixtures were supported by bio-stimulants bacteria (Azotobacter and Azospirillum) to assess their nutritional value.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Experimental Site and Treatments
Pot experiments were conducted at the Arid land Agriculture Research Institute (ALARI), Shobra Elkheima area, Qalyobia governorate, Egypt (30o07′01.6″N 31o14′37.6″E) under open plastic house in December-September period (25th December to 21st September for two seasons of 2017/18 and 2018/19).
The experiment included six packages of growth medium and bio stimulators as follows:
T1 = Peat moss + sand (1:1 v/v), P + S
T2 = Peat moss + sand (1:1 v/v) with (Azotobacter+Azospirillum), P + S + Bio
T3 = Peat moss + sand + vermicompost (1:1:1v/v/v), P + S + V
T4 = Peat moss + sand + vermicompost (1:1:1 v/v/v) with (Azotobacter+Azospirillum), P + S + V + Bio
T5 = Peat moss + sand + compost (1:1:1 v/v/v), P + S + C
T6 = Peat moss + sand + compost (1:1:1 v/v/v) with (Azotobacter+Azospirillum), P + S + C + Bio
The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates, each replicate involved 5 pots per treatment.
Peat moss used was obtained from Sab Syker Agrar Beratungs Company from Syke, Germany. Table 1 shows the chemical analysis of the peat moss and sand. Compost was obtained from Al-Nile Organic Fertilizer company, Egypt. While, vermi-compost is a product of decomposing compost by certain types of earthworms, usually red, white, and other earthworms in order to make a heterogeneous decomposed compound from vegetable or food waste, animal bedding material. Worms stools is the final result of the process of breaking down organic matter using the earthworm (10.6% N), obtained from Central Laboratory for Agriculture Climate Research Center (CLAC), Dokki, Giza governorate, Egypt.
Table 1
Chemical analysis of peat the used moss and sand
Growing Medium
Cations (meq L−1)
Anions (meq L−1)
Ca++
Mg++
Na+
K+
Cl−
CO3− −
HCO3−
Peat moss
9.6
10.4
337.5
224.8
108.2
Not detected
13.0
Sand
13.8
18.2
30.1
64.3
36.4
Not detected
8.0
The physical and chemical properties of the used vermicompost and compost are illustrated in Table 2. Furthermore, after preparing each mixture, physical properties of the pots growing medium were estimated (Table 3).
Table 2
Physical and chemical properties of the used vermicompost and compost
Property
Vermicompost
Compost
pH
8.14
7.92
EC (ds m−1)
2.55
10.1
Organic matter (%)
21.2
40.4
Carbon (%)
10.6
20.2
Nitrogen (%)
10.6
2.11
Weight/kg
0.816
0.527
Phosphorus (%)
0.600
0.304
Potassium (%)
1.10
2.20
Calcium (%)
0.67
1.42
Magnesium (%)
1.16
0.73
Iron (mg L−1)
1.80
1.14
Manganese (mg L−1)
315.11
54.37
Zinc (mg L−1)
578.11
305.96
Cupper (mg L−1)
82.24
49.11
Table 3
Physical properties of the pots growing medium applied
Property
P + S
P + S + V
P + S + C
Particle density (g cm−3)
2.52
2.36
2.38
Bulk density (g cm−3)
1.49
1.21
1.25
WHC (% v/v)
3.27
42.51
40.00
Air at WHC (% v/v) 100g−1
1.02
1.16
1.12
Total porosity (% v/v)
40.48
49.43
47.26
Organic matter %
22.40
13.65
13.55
pH
7.19
7.27
7.38
Organic carbon %
11.15
6.80
12.41
Weight/kg
1.086
0.909
0.858
P peat moss, S sand, V vermicompost, C compost, WHC water-holding capacity
250 ml of Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum spp. mixture was added one time, 15 days after planting, (Soil Application). Biofertilizer contained 103 cfu/ml of Azotobacter chroococcum and 103 cfu/ml of Azospirillum spp.
2.2 Preparation of Greenhouse and Growing Place
The experiment was carried out in an unheated greenhouse with a plastic cover (25 m2 length × 9 m width × 3.5 m height) covered with IR, UV, Anti-Fog reinforced plastic cover. Cultivation was carried out in the polyethylene pots 30 cm diameter and 15 height, filled with the experimental mediums. The pots were placed in a black & white 200-micron thickness polyethylene sheets. In the preparation of the cultivation areas, the greenhouse floor was first cleaned of weeds, stones, and clods, processed, and leveled with a rake, giving a fine structure. Later, a slope of 1% was given to the greenhouse floor in order to ensure the flow of water with different fertilization, and a smooth surface was obtained by rolling the ground. Fertilizer losses should be prevented in the experiment. For this reason, the necessity of collecting the drained water with different fertilizers has emerged and catchment tanks are placed end of the plastic sheets. A technique was adopted in that these catchment tanks used for the collection of the drained water with different fertilizers can be placed under the ground level by approximately 2 cm.
One month old, healthy, and uniform in shape, gerbera transplants (approximately 20 cm length) were purchased from a private nursery, Giza, Egypt. Each single transplant was cultivated in December in a plastic pot filled with experimental medium. The irrigation was regularly done 2–3 times a week after calculating the decrease in water-holding capacity using the weight method.
2.3 Measurements
2.3.1 Growth and Yield Attributes
At harvest (on 21st September), ten plants per treatment were taken randomly to measure plant height, leaf width, first flower bud appearance (flower initiation), and duration of flowering. Leaves and roots fresh weights, leaves and roots dry weights, and flower yield were estimated.
2.3.2 Chemical Analysis
Using micro-Kjeldahl apparatus, nitrogen % was determined in leaves according to Jackson (1973). Phosphorus (%) was assessed calorimetrically by the methods described by Trough and Meyer (1939). By flame photometric method (Brown and Lilliland 1946), potassium % was measured. Furthermore, four plants were randomly chosen for each treatment to measure leaf greenness (SPAD). The SPAD value of the leaf was determined by a chlorophyll meter (SPAD–502Plus) according to Süß et al. (2015).
2.3.3 Microbial Count
Samples from the growing medium were taken two months after each addition by withdrawing about 400 g of soil at a depth of 15 cm around the root of the plant. Total counts of bacterial (Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirullum sp. mixture) were determined in these samples two times (April and July) using the plate count technique on nutrient agar according to the method of (Louw and Webley 1959). Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days and cell concentration was calculated by counting the growing colonies.
2.4 Data Analysis
Results of the whole experiment were subjected to statistical analyses using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) method. Mean comparisons were carried out by Casella (2008) multiple range test at p ≤ 0.05. Data were statistically analyzed using the analysis of variance adopting a SAS package.
3 Results
Different combination treatments of soil substrates showed significant effects on gerbera growth parameters (plant height, leaf width, root weight plant−1 and leaves weight plant−1) in both seasons of 2017/18 and 2018/19 (Table 4). P + S + V + Bio was an effective practice for enhancing all growth traits. Furthermore, P + S + V + Bio statistically leveled with P + S, P + S + Bio, and P + S + C (for leaf width in the first season) as well as P + S + V (for root fresh weight plant−1 in both seasons) and P + S (for plant height in the second season).
Table 4
Plant height, leaf width, root weight and leaves weight of gerbera as affected by different soil substrate matures
Variable
Plant height
(cm)
Leaf width
(cm)
Root weight plant−1(g)
Leaves weight plant−1 (g)
Fresh
Dry
Fresh
Dry
Season of 2017/18
P + S
16.30b
9.90a
30.05bc
13.05dc
15.15bc
3.85c
P + S + Bio
16.30b
7.60ab
26.25bc
16.85c
12.45c
3.25c
P + S + V
14.50b
6.90b
40.75ab
26.15b
39.35a
9.15b
P + S + V + Bio
25.75a
9.60a
60.65a
32.20a
45.95a
11.95a
P + S + C
11.20c
8.50ab
16.90c
4.30e
20.80b
3.20c
P + S + C + Bio
11.70c
6.05b
18.80c
8.60de
10.90c
2.20c
Season of 2018/19
P + S
24.80ab
9.90b
29.55bc
13.05dc
15.35bc
3.85c
P + S + Bio
17.75c
9.60bc
26.15bc
16.85c
12.65c
3.25c
P + S + V
21.50bc
8.05bcd
40.75ab
26.15b
39.5a
9.15b
P + S + V + Bio
29.50a
14.75a
60.70a
32.15a
45.95a
12.05a
P + S + C
17.00c
5.60cd
16.90c
4.30e
20.7b
3.20c
P + S + C + Bio
15.80c
4.75d
18.85c
8.65de
10.9c
2.20c
P peat moss, S sand, V vermicompost, C compost, Bio bio stimulants (Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum spp.). Means not sharing the letters for each variable in each column vary significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range
Chlorophyll content, nutrient content, and bio-stimulant count in gerbera significantly responded to the various soil substrate mixtures in the 2017/18 and 2018/19 seasons (Table 5). Along the two-growing season, P + S + V + Bio produced the maximum values of chlorophyll, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, with increases amounted to 92.4, 163.3, 137.5, and 98.0%, respectively, compared to the control treatment (P + S). However, the differences were not significant between P + S + V + Bio and P + S + V for nitrogen and phosphorus as well as P + S + V + Bio and P + S + C + Bio for the bio-stimulant count in 2018/19 season.
Table 5
Chlorophyll and nutrient contents of gerbera and biostimulants count as affected by different soil substrate matures
Variable
Chlorophyll
Nutrients content
Bio stimulant
count
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Potassium
Season of 2017/18
P + S
33.56d
0.96c
0.126c
3.06c
0.000d
P + S + Bio
34.25d
1.05c
0.165c
3.25c
12.250b
P + S + V
58.65b
2.45a
0.258ab
5.26b
2.120c
P + S + V + Bio
64.65a
2.65a
0.310a
6.00a
23.550a
P + S + C
45.65c
1.45b
0.206b
3.52c
2.650c
P + S + C + Bio
48.65bc
1.56b
0.226b
3.62c
20.340a
Season of 2018/19
P + S
34.25d
1.00c
0.135c
3.05c
0.000d
P + S + Bio
39.54cd
1.05c
0.175c
3.15c
13.825b
P + S + V
60.91b
2.51a
0.262ab
5.36b
2.554c
P + S + V + Bio
65.83a
2.51a
0.310a
6.10a
21.723a
P + S + C
44.75c
1.51b
0.217b
3.60c
3.520c
P + S + C + Bio
42.58c
1.65b
0.234b
3.46c
22.200a
P peat moss, S sand, V vermicompost, C compost, Bio bio stimulants (Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum spp.). Means not sharing the letters for each variable in each column vary significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range
Flowering initiation (Fig. 1), flowering duration (Fig. 2), and flower yield (Fig. 3) of gerbera were significantly influenced by different soil substrates. The flowering of gerbera began early in pots treated by P + S + V or P + S + V + Bio in both seasons, compared to the other treatments. While, the flowering delayed in pots treated with P + S + C and P + S + C + Bio. The differences in flowering initiation between P + S and each of P + S + V, P + S + V + Bio, P + S + C and P + S + C + Bio were not significant. Contrariwise, P + S + V + Bio (for flowering duration and flower yield), in addition to P + S + V (for flowering duration) recorded the highest values in both seasons. As averages of the two seasons, the increase percentages in flowering yield due to P + S + V + Bio were 3.12, 3.71, 1.32, 3.76 and 5.47 folds higher than each of P + S, P + S + Bio, P + S + V, P + S + C and P + S + C + Bio, respectively.
Fig. 1
Flowering initiation of gerbera as affected by different soil substrate mixtures in 2017/18 (S1) and 2018/19 (S2) seasons. P peat moss, S sand, V vermicompost, C compost, Bio bio stimulants (Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum spp.). Means not sharing the letters for each variable in each bar vary significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range
Flowering duration of gerbera as affected by different soil mixtures in 2017/18 (S1) and 2018/19 (S2) seasons. P peat moss, S sand, V vermicompost, C compost, Bio bio stimulants (Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum spp.). Means not sharing the letters for each variable in each bar vary significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range
Flowering yield (number of flowers per plant) of gerbera as affected by different soil substrate mixtures in 2017/18 (S1) and 2018/19 (S2) seasons. P peat moss, S sand, V vermicompost, C compost, Bio bio stimulants (Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum spp.). Means not sharing the letters for each variable in each bar vary significantly at p ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range
Organic and natural sources of fertilizers represent continues providers for various plant nutrients and organic acids while adjusting the physicochemical and biological characteristics of the soil (Elgala et al. 2022). Accordingly, improvements in gerbera plant growth and nutritional status were gained (Moreira et al. 2014). In this respect, compost as an organic material of fertilization had the potential to manipulate the sandy soil traits, since it improves organic matter content, nutrient availability, porosity, and H2O holding capacity, while reducing the bulk density of soil (Mostafa et al. 2019). Another organic fertilization source is vermicompost which has a distinctive role in augmenting the fertility, moisture retaining, and aggregation of the soils (Abul-Soud et al. 2014). Also, several minerals such as nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, calcium and magnesium are present in vermicompost in a form available to plants (Hashem and Abd-Elrahman 2016).
Gerbera plants effectively grow in soil having low pH (Savvas et al. 2003). Accordingly, soil substrate constituents dramatically determine the cultivated soil acidity, hence the availability of nutrients (Khalaj et al. 2019). As shown in Table 3, the obtained substrate mixtures had pH values lower than the individual used substrate compound, i.e. compost and vermicompost (Table 2). High pH around the root system may disturb the physiological balance in plants via nutritional infirmity due to limitation of nutrients availability such as phosphorus, manganese and iron (Barker and Pilbeam 2007). Addition of compost lowered soil pH, enhancing the nutrient uptake by gerbera plants (Ahmad et al. 2012). Really, growing media included compost can prop the ornamental plant growth and development by saving nutrients (Massa et al. 2018), while releasing bioactive organic compounds that improve the nutrient use efficiency (Massa et al. 2019). The presence of organic compounds such as humic acid improved the plant physiological status ad nutrient homeostasis, hence yield and quality (Makhlouf et al. 2022; Ramadan et al. 2023).
Not only soil properties improved with organic soil substrates, but also gerbera growth and flower yield and nutrients content. Since the organic fertilizers positively affected physical characteristic and beneficial microbes’ activity the soil (Cayuela et al. 2009; Lima et al. 2009), the promotion of crop growth performance is expected. Leachates reduction is obtained with organic fertilizers addition (Girotto et al. 2013), since such types of fertilizers had high potential to hold water (Li et al. 2018). Thus, greater yield was recorded due slow–release organic fertilizer comparatively the mineral fertilizers (Wassie 2012; Yeshiwas et al. 2018). Long–term supply of organic fertilizers can modify soil properties expressed in acidy and microbial activity, hence increasing the nutrients availability (Rutkowska et al. 2014). Moreover, different soil mixture substrates have diversified mineralization rates and carbon content, therefore there was variation between compost and vermicompost in releasing nitrogen, potassium and calcium in soil (Hernández et al. 2016). Thus, growing gerbera in different mixed substrates showed differences in growth and flower yield. Owing to the abundance of available mineral in vermicompost (Abd-Elrahman et al. 2022), soil quality and plant growth improved (Birkhofer et al. 2008; Yang et al. 2015). Using mixture of soil substrates showed improvements in plant growth and number of flowers per plants (Zheng et al. 2004; Shrikant and Jawaharlal 2014).
Being the organic fertilizers provide the soil rhizosphere with organic carbon, the growth and activity of soil microbes increase whereby they can prepare their own food. Inoculation of Azotobacter in gerbera exhibited beneficial effect by improving growth traits due to the increase of N‑fixation efficiency (Lele et al. 2009). Fertilization program involved the use of biofertilizers, i.e. Azotobacter achieved increases in flowering duration, flowers yield and vase life (Singh et al. 2008). The mechanisms by which biofertilizers exert a positive effect on plant growth can be through the synthesis of phytohormones, N2-fixation, and some enzymes (such as ACC deaminase) that modulate the level of plant hormones. Free living N‑fixing bacteria, such as Azotobacter and Azospirillum, have the ability not only to fix nitrogen but also to release certain phytohormons, i.e. Gibberellins, Indole acetic acid, and cytokinins, which stimulate plant growth and increase the availability of nutrients for plant roots by increasing their dissolution, in addition to increasing photosynthesis (Abdel-Latif et al. 2001).
Conclusion
It could be concluded that the healthy status, and flower productivity and quality of gerbera dramatically influenced by the component of the growing media. Findings of the current research exhibited that the media substrate should involve a mixture of peat moss, sand and vermicompost inoculating with nitrogen fixer bacteria to gain high yield and quality flower of gerbera. In fact, for improving the growth of ornamental plants such as gerbera, mixtures of organic materials used as media substrates require further investigation at multiple mixing ratios.
Conflict of interest
I.A.A. Ali, S.E. Hassan, A.A. Abdelhafez, M. Hewidy, M.A. Nasser, H.S. Saudy, K.M. Hassan and A.F. Abou-Hadid declare that they have no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abad M, Noguera P, Puchades R, Maquieira A, Noguera V (2002) Physico-chemical and chemical properties of some coconut coir dusts for use as a peat substitute for containerized ornamental plants. Bioresour Technol 82:241–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00189-4CrossRefPubMed
Abd El-Mageed TA, Mekdad AAA, Rady MOA, Abdelbaky AS, Saudy HS, Shaaban A (2022) Physio-biochemical and agronomic changes of two sugar beet cultivars grown in saline soil as influenced by potassium fertilizer. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:3636–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00916-7CrossRef
Abd-Elrahman SH, Saudy HS, Abd El-Fattah DA, Hashem FA (2022) Effect of irrigation water and organic fertilizer on reducing nitrate accumulation and boosting lettuce productivity. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:2144–2155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00799-8CrossRef
Abdel-Latif MR, El-Bana AA, Galal AA (2001) Effect of biofertilizers microbein and phosphorine on bacterial pod blight of guar and black cumin damping off root rot and with diseases. In: Proc. of the fifth Arabian Horticulture Conference, Ismailia, Egypt, March 2021, pp 24–28
Abou El-Enin MM, Sheha AM, El-Serafy RS, Ali OAM, Saudy HS, Shaaban A (2023) Foliage-sprayed nano-chitosan-loaded nitrogen boosts yield potentials, competitive ability, and profitability of intercropped maize-soybean. Int J Plant Prod 17:517–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00253-4CrossRef
Abul-Soud MA, Emam MSA, Abdrabbo MAA, Hashem FA, Abd-Elrahman SH (2014) Sustainable urban horticulture of sweet pepper via vermicomposting in summer season. J Adv Agric 3:110–122. https://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v3i1.5407CrossRef
Ahmad I, Ahmad T, Gulfam A, Saleem M (2012) Growth and flowering of gerbera as influenced by various horticultural substrates. Pak J Bot 44:291–299
Amalraj ELD, Kumar GP, Ahmed SKMH, Abdul R, Kishore N (2013) Microbiological analysis of panchagavya, vermicompost, and FYM and their effect on plant growth promotion of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) in India. Org Agric 3:23–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165–013–0042–2CrossRef
Barker AV, Pilbeam DJ (2007) Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Birkhofer K, Bezemer TM, Bloem J, Bonkowski M, Christensen S, Dubois D, Ekelund F, Fließach A, Gunst L, Hedlund K, Mäder P, Mikola J, Robin C, Setälä H, Tatin-Froux F, Van Der Putten WH, Scheu S (2008) Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2297–2308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.007CrossRef
Bremer E, Janzen HH, Johnston AM (1994) Sensitivity of total, light fraction and mineralizable organic matter to management practices in a Lethbridge soil. Can J Soil Sci 74:131–138CrossRef
Brown JG, Lilliland O (1946) Rapid determination of potassium and sodium in plan materials and soil extracts by flame photometry. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 48:341–346
Casella G (2008) Statistical design, 1st edn. Springer, GainesvilleCrossRef
Cayuela ML, Sinicco T, Mondini C (2009) Mineralization dynamics and biochemical properties during initial decomposition of plant and animal residues in soil. Appl Soil Ecol 41:118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.10.001CrossRef
Chen JH (2006) The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. In: International workshop on sustained management of the soil-rhizosphere system for efficient crop production and fertilizer use, Bangkok, pp 1–11
El-Bially MA, El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS, Aisa KH, Abd El-Samad GA (2023) Mycorrhiza-inoculated biochar as an eco-friendly tool improves the broomrape control efficacy in two faba bean cultivars. Rhizosphere 26:100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2023.100706CrossRef
El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS (2021) Interactive application of zinc and herbicides affects broad–leaved weeds, nutrient uptake, and yield in rice. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:238–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00356-1CrossRef
El-Metwally IM, Saudy HS, Elewa TA (2022) Natural plant by-products and mulching materials to suppress weeds and improve sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and quality. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:5217–5230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00997-4CrossRef
Elgala AM, Abd-Elrahman SH, Saudy HS, Nossier MI (2022) Exploiting Eichhornia crassipes shoots extract as a natural source of nutrients for producing healthy tomato plants. Gesunde Pflanzen 74:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00622-5CrossRef
Ertani A, Sambo P, Nicoletto C, Santagata S, Schiavon M, Nardi S (2015) The use of organic biostimulants in hot pepper plants to help low input sustainable agriculture. Chem Biol Technol Agric 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-015-0039-zCrossRef
Girotto E, Ceretta CA, Lourenzi CR, Lorensini F, Tiecher TL, Vieira RCB, Trentin G, Basso CJ, Miotto A, Brunetto G (2013) Nutrient transfers by leaching in a no-tillage system through soil treated with repeated pig slurry applications. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 95:115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705–013–9552–2CrossRef
Gruda N (2010) Sustainable peat alternative growing media. Acta Hortic 927:973–979. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.927.120 (XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010), International symposium on greenhouse 2010 and soilless cultivation)CrossRef
Hartman HT, Kofranek AM, Rubatzky VE, Flocker WJ (1988) Plant science. Growth, development, and utilization of cultivated plants, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall
Hashem FA, Abd-Elrahman S (2016) Soil chemical characteristics and growth of broccoli and cauliflower plants as affected by liquid organic fertilizers and irrigation water levels. Glob J Adv Res 3:881–895
Hernández T, Chocano C, Moreno JL, García C (2016) Use of compost as an alternative to conventional inorganic fertilizers in intensive lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) crops–effects on soil and plant. Soil Tillage Res 160:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.02.005CrossRef
Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Delhi, p 498
Khalaj MA, Kumar PS, Roosta HR (2019) Evaluation of nutrient uptake and flowering of gerbera in response of various growing media. World J Environ Biosci 8:12–18
Lele AB, Pawar NB, Kolse SV (2009) Studies on Azotobacter from rhizosphere of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii H.). J Maharashtra Agric Univ 34:298–300
Lima DLD, Santos SM, Scherer HW, Schneider RJ, Duarte AC, Santos EBH, Esteves VI (2009) Effects of organic and inorganic amendments on soil organic matter properties. Geoderma 150:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.01.009ADSCrossRef
Louw HA, Webley DM (1959) The bacteriology of the root region of the oat plant grown under controlled pot culture conditions. J Appl Bacteriol 22:216–226CrossRef
Makhlouf BSI, Khalil SRA, Saudy HS (2022) Efficacy of humic acids and chitosan for enhancing yield and sugar quality of sugar beet under moderate and severe drought. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:1676–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00762-7CrossRef
Massa D, Lenzi A, Montoneri E, Ginepro M, Prisa D, Burchi G (2018) Plant response to biowaste soluble hydrolysates in hibiscus grown under limiting nutrient availability. J Plant Nutr 41:396–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2017.1404611CrossRef
Massa D, Bonetti A, Cacini S, Faraloni C, Prisa D, Tuccio L, Petruccelli R (2019) Soilless tomato grown under nutritional stress increases green biomass but not yield or quality in presence of biochar as growing medium. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 60:871–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00169-xCrossRef
Moreira MA, dos-Santos CAP, Lucas AAT, Bianchini FG, de-Souza IM, Viégas PRA (2014) Lettuce production according to different sources of organic matter and soil cover. Agric Sci 5:99–105. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.52013CrossRef
Mostafa HHA, Hefzy M, Zahran MMAA, Refai EFS (2019) Response of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) plants to application of compost levels under various irrigation regimes. Mid East J Agric Res 8:662–674
Norberto B (2010) The urban gardener. Official electronic publication of the Plant Biotechnology Project, Research and Development Center, Rizal Technological University, Boni Avenue, Mandaluyong City, Philippines, vol 3, pp 2094–1765
Noureldin NA, Saudy HS, Ashmawy F, Saed HM (2013) Grain yield response index of bread wheat cultivars as influenced by nitrogen levels. Ann Agric Sci Ain Shams Univ 58:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.012CrossRef
Ramadan KMA, El-Beltagi HS, Abd El-Mageed TAA, Saudy HS, Al-Otaibi HH, Mahmoud MAA (2023) The changes in various physio-biochemical parameters and yield traits of faba bean due to humic acid plus 6‑benzylaminopurine application under deficit irrigation. Agronomy 13:1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051227CrossRef
Rutkowska B, Szulc W, Sosulski T, Stępień W (2014) Soil micronutrient availability to crops affected by long-term inorganic and organic fertilizer applications. Plant Soil Environ 60:198–203. https://doi.org/10.17221/914/2013-PSECrossRef
Salem EMM, Kenawey MKM, Saudy HS, Mubarak M (2022) Influence of silicon forms on nutrient accumulation and grain yield of wheat under water deficit conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen 74:539–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00629-yCrossRef
Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM (2023) Effect of irrigation, nitrogen sources and metribuzin on performance of maize and its weeds. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 54:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2022.2109659CrossRef
Saudy HS, Mubarak M (2015) Mitigating the detrimental impacts of nitrogen deficit and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl herbicide on wheat using silicon. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46:913–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1011753CrossRef
Saudy HS, Abd El-Momen WR, El-khouly NS (2018) Diversified nitrogen rates influence nitrogen agronomic efficiency and seed yield response index of sesame (Sesamum indicum, L.) cultivars. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 49:2387–2395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1510949CrossRef
Saudy HS, Hamed MF, Abd El-Momen WR, Hussein H (2020a) Nitrogen use rationalization and boosting wheat productivity by applying packages of humic, amino acids and microorganisms. Comm Soil Sci Plant Anal 51:1036–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1744631CrossRef
Saudy HS, Noureldin NA, Mubarak M, Fares W, Elsayed M (2020b) Cultivar selection as a tool for managing soil phosphorus and faba bean yield sustainability. Arch Agron Soil Sci 66:414–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1619078CrossRef
Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM, Shahin MG (2021a) Co-application effect of herbicides and micronutrients on weeds and nutrient uptake in flooded irrigated rice: does it have a synergistic or an antagonistic effect? Crop Prot 149:105755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105755CrossRef
Saudy HS, Hamed MF, El-Metwally IM, Ramadan KA, Aisa KH (2021b) Assessing the effect of biochar or compost application as a spot placement on broomrape control in two cultivars of faba bean. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:1856–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00485-1CrossRef
Saudy HS, Abd El-Samad GA, El-Temsah ME, El-Gabry YA (2022a) Effect of iron, zinc and manganese nano-form mixture on the micronutrient recovery efficiency and seed yield response index of sesame genotypes. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:732–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00681-zCrossRef
Saudy HS, El-Metwally IM, Sobieh ST, Abd-Alwahed SHA (2022b) Mycorrhiza, charcoal, and rocket salad powder as eco-friendly methods for controlling broomrape weed in inter-planted faba bean with flax. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:5195–5206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00995-6CrossRef
Saudy HS, Salem EMM, Abd El-Momen WR (2023) Effect of potassium silicate and irrigation on grain nutrient uptake and water use efficiency of wheat under calcareous soils. Gesunde Pflanzen 75:647–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-022-00729-9CrossRef
Savvas D, Karagianni V, Kotsiras A, Demopoulos V, Karkamisi I, Pakou P (2003) Interactions between ammonium and pH of the nutrient solution supplied to gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) grown in pumice. Plant Soil 254:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025595201676CrossRef
Shaaban A, Abd El-Mageed TA, Abd El-Momen WR, Saudy HS, Al-Elwany OAAI (2023) The integrated application of phosphorous and zinc affects the physiological status, yield and quality of canola grown in phosphorus-suffered deficiency saline soil. Gesunde Pflanzen. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-023-00843-2CrossRef
Shrikant M, Jawaharlal M (2014) Effect of fertigation level and biostimulants on quality parameters of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex Hooker F.) var. Debora under poly house conditions. Trends Biosci 7:1134–1137
Singh P, Bhardwaj A, Kumar R, Singh D (2017) Evaluation of gerbera varieties for yield and quality under protected environment conditions in Bihar. Int J Curr Microbiol Appmi Sci 6:112–116. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.013CrossRef
Singh YP, Dwivedi R, Dwivedi SV (2008) Effect of bio-fertilizer and graded dose of nitrogen on growth and flower yield of calendula (Calendula officinalis L.). Plant Arch 8:957–958
Süß A, Danner M, Obster C, Locherer M, Hank T, Richter K (2015) Measuring leaf chlorophyll content with the Konica Minolta SPAD–502plus–Theory, measurement, problems, interpretation. EnMAP field guides technical report. GFZ Data Services https://doi.org/10.2312/enmap.2015.010CrossRef
Trough E, Mayer AH (1939) Improvement in the deiness calorimetric method for phosphorus and areseni. Ind Eng Chem Ann 1:136–139
Wassie H (2012) Appraisal of Erythrina bruci as a source for soil nutrition on nitisols of South Ethiopia. Int J Agric Biol 14:371–376
Yang L, Zhao F, Chang Q, Li T, Li F (2015) Effects of vermicomposts on tomato yield and quality and soil fertility in greenhouse under different soil water regimes. Agric Water Manag 160:98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.002CrossRef
Yeshiwas Y, Zewdie BYB, Chekol A, Walle A (2018) Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and farmyard manure on growth and yield of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Int J Agric Res 13:74–79. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2018.74.79CrossRef
Zheng Y, Graham T, Richard S, Dixon M (2004) Potted gerbera production in a sub irrigation system using low-concentration nutrient solutions. HortScience 39:1283–1286. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.39.6.1283CrossRef
Zulfiqar F, Younis A, Finnegan PM, Ferrante A (2020) Comparison of soaking corms with moringa leaf extract alone or in combination with synthetic plant growth regulators on the growth, physiology and vase life of sword lily. Plants 9:1590. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
