Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Customer Needs and Solutions 1-2/2021

25-03-2021 | Research Article

More or Less? Consumer Goal Orientation and Product Choice

Authors: Haipeng (Allan) Chen, Woojin Choi, Yan (Lucy) Liu, Haoying Sun, Fu Liu

Published in: Customer Needs and Solutions | Issue 1-2/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study the impact of consumers’ goal orientation on their preference between high-quality and low-priced products. Consistent with our theorizing, we find that US (Korean) consumers, who are more promotion (prevention) oriented, prefer high-quality (vs. low-priced) products because they assign more weight to quality in their choice. In addition, we identify a boundary condition of the effect by showing that it is mitigated for products for which safety is a salient feature. We also rule out price/quality perceptions, regret, and price-quality association as rival explanations of our results. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and managerial implications of the current research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
We aimed for 80 participants in each country, but many more were recruited in South Korea due to a clerical error. The resultant imbalance in the study design may reduce the statistical power of detecting the proposed effect, thus providing a conservative test of our predictions.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aaker JL, Lee AY (2001) I seek pleasures and we avoid pains: The role of self regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. J Consum Res 28:33–49CrossRef Aaker JL, Lee AY (2001) I seek pleasures and we avoid pains: The role of self regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. J Consum Res 28:33–49CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ahtola OT (1984) Price as a give component in an exchange theoretic multicomponent model, vol 11. Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor Ahtola OT (1984) Price as a give component in an exchange theoretic multicomponent model, vol 11. Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor
3.
go back to reference Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE (2009) Affect and retail shopping behavior: understanding the role of mood regulation and regulatory focus. J Retail 85(3):308–320CrossRef Arnold MJ, Reynolds KE (2009) Affect and retail shopping behavior: understanding the role of mood regulation and regulatory focus. J Retail 85(3):308–320CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Avnet T, Tory Higgins E (2006) How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. J Mark Res 43:1–10CrossRef Avnet T, Tory Higgins E (2006) How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. J Mark Res 43:1–10CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: the confounding effect of price-response heterogeneity. Mark Sci 19(2):185–200CrossRef Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: the confounding effect of price-response heterogeneity. Mark Sci 19(2):185–200CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bettman J, Luce MF, Payne J (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J Consum Res 25(December):187–217CrossRef Bettman J, Luce MF, Payne J (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J Consum Res 25(December):187–217CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bornemann T, Homburg C (2011) Psychological distance and the dual role of price. J Consum Res 38:490–504CrossRef Bornemann T, Homburg C (2011) Psychological distance and the dual role of price. J Consum Res 38:490–504CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bronnenberg BJ, Dhar SK, Dube J-P (2007) Consumer packaged goods in the united states: national brands, local branding. J Mark Res 44(1):4–13CrossRef Bronnenberg BJ, Dhar SK, Dube J-P (2007) Consumer packaged goods in the united states: national brands, local branding. J Mark Res 44(1):4–13CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chartrand T, Huber J, Shiv B, Tanner R (2008) Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. J Consum Res 35:189–201CrossRef Chartrand T, Huber J, Shiv B, Tanner R (2008) Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. J Consum Res 35:189–201CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chernev A (2004) Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. J Consum Res 31(December):557–65CrossRef Chernev A (2004) Goal orientation and consumer preference for the status quo. J Consum Res 31(December):557–65CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Choi W, Sun H, (lucy) liu Y, (allan) chen H (2020) Guess who buys cheap? the effect of consumers’, goal orientation on product preference. J Consum Psychol 30(3):506–514CrossRef Choi W, Sun H, (lucy) liu Y, (allan) chen H (2020) Guess who buys cheap? the effect of consumers, goal orientation on product preference. J Consum Psychol 30(3):506–514CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fong N, Simester D, Anderson E (2011) Private label vs. national brand price sensitivity: evaluating non-experimental identification strategies. MIT Working Paper Fong N, Simester D, Anderson E (2011) Private label vs. national brand price sensitivity: evaluating non-experimental identification strategies. MIT Working Paper
13.
go back to reference Forster J, Tory Higgins E, Bianco AT (2003) Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: built in trade off or separate strategic concerns? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 90:148–64 Forster J, Tory Higgins E, Bianco AT (2003) Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: built in trade off or separate strategic concerns? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 90:148–64
14.
go back to reference Hardie BGS, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Mark Sci 12(4):378–94CrossRef Hardie BGS, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Mark Sci 12(4):378–94CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hayes AF (2018) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process Modeling. Guilford Press Hayes AF (2018) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process Modeling. Guilford Press
16.
go back to reference Heath Chip, Larrick Richard, George W u (1999) Goals as reference points. Cogn Psychol 38:79–109CrossRef Heath Chip, Larrick Richard, George W u (1999) Goals as reference points. Cogn Psychol 38:79–109CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Heath T, Chatterjee S (1995) Asymmetric decoy effects on lower quality versus higher quality brands: meta analytic and experimental evidence. J Consum Res 22:268–84CrossRef Heath T, Chatterjee S (1995) Asymmetric decoy effects on lower quality versus higher quality brands: meta analytic and experimental evidence. J Consum Res 22:268–84CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Higgins E (1998) Advances in experimental psychology, vol 30. Academic Press, San Diego Higgins E (1998) Advances in experimental psychology, vol 30. Academic Press, San Diego
19.
go back to reference Higgins E (2002) How self regulation creates distinct values: the case of promotion and prevention decision making. J Consum Psychol 12(3):177–91CrossRef Higgins E (2002) How self regulation creates distinct values: the case of promotion and prevention decision making. J Consum Psychol 12(3):177–91CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Higgins E, Idson L, Freitas AL, Spiegel S, Molden DC (2003) Transfer of value from fit. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:1140–53CrossRef Higgins E, Idson L, Freitas AL, Spiegel S, Molden DC (2003) Transfer of value from fit. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:1140–53CrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Higgins T, Friedman R, Harlow R, Idson LC, Ayduk O, Taylor A (2001) Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. Eur J Soc Psychol 31 (1):3–23CrossRef Higgins T, Friedman R, Harlow R, Idson LC, Ayduk O, Taylor A (2001) Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: promotion pride versus prevention pride. Eur J Soc Psychol 31 (1):3–23CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hoch S, Banerji S (1993) When do private labels succeed? Sloan Manag Rev 34:57–67 Hoch S, Banerji S (1993) When do private labels succeed? Sloan Manag Rev 34:57–67
24.
go back to reference Hwang M, Thomadsen R (2016) How point-of-sale marketing mix impacts national-brand purchase shares. Manag Sci 62(2):571–590CrossRef Hwang M, Thomadsen R (2016) How point-of-sale marketing mix impacts national-brand purchase shares. Manag Sci 62(2):571–590CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Idson L, Liberman N, Tory Higgins E (2000) Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: a regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. J Exp Soc Psychol 36:252–74CrossRef Idson L, Liberman N, Tory Higgins E (2000) Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: a regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. J Exp Soc Psychol 36:252–74CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lalwani A, Shavitt S (2013) You get what you pay for? self-construal influences price-quality judgments. J Consum Res 40:255–267CrossRef Lalwani A, Shavitt S (2013) You get what you pay for? self-construal influences price-quality judgments. J Consum Res 40:255–267CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Leder S, Florack A, Keller J (2013) Thoughts about possible failure: regulatory focus and the anticipation of regret. Soc Cogn 31(3):349–373CrossRef Leder S, Florack A, Keller J (2013) Thoughts about possible failure: regulatory focus and the anticipation of regret. Soc Cogn 31(3):349–373CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lee A, Aaker J, Gardner W (2000) The pleasures and pains of distinct self construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. J Pers Soc Psychol 78(June):1122–34CrossRef Lee A, Aaker J, Gardner W (2000) The pleasures and pains of distinct self construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. J Pers Soc Psychol 78(June):1122–34CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lee A, Keller P, Sternthal B (2010) Value from regulatory construal fit: the persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. J Consum Res 36:735–47CrossRef Lee A, Keller P, Sternthal B (2010) Value from regulatory construal fit: the persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. J Consum Res 36:735–47CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lee L, Ariely D (2006) Shopping goals, goal concreteness and conditional promotions. J Consum Res 33(1):60–70CrossRef Lee L, Ariely D (2006) Shopping goals, goal concreteness and conditional promotions. J Consum Res 33(1):60–70CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Luce MF (1998) Choosing to avoid: coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. J Consum Res 24(March):409–33CrossRef Luce MF (1998) Choosing to avoid: coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. J Consum Res 24(March):409–33CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Maimaran M, Simonson I (2011) Multiple routes to self versus other expression in consumer choice. J Mark Res 48(4):755–66CrossRef Maimaran M, Simonson I (2011) Multiple routes to self versus other expression in consumer choice. J Mark Res 48(4):755–66CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Mogilner C, Aaker JL, Pennington GL (2008) Time will tell: the distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. J Consum Res 34(February):670–81CrossRef Mogilner C, Aaker JL, Pennington GL (2008) Time will tell: the distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. J Consum Res 34(February):670–81CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Nowlis SM, Simonson I (1997) Attribute task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. J Mark Res 34(2):205–18 Nowlis SM, Simonson I (1997) Attribute task compatibility as a determinant of consumer preference reversals. J Mark Res 34(2):205–18
35.
go back to reference Rao A, Monroe KB (1988) The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. J Consum Res 15(September):253–64CrossRef Rao A, Monroe KB (1988) The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. J Consum Res 15(September):253–64CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Richardson P, Dick A, Jain A (1994) Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. J Mark 58(4):28–36CrossRef Richardson P, Dick A, Jain A (1994) Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. J Mark 58(4):28–36CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sethuraman R, Cole C (1999) Factors influencing the price premiums that consumers pay for national brands over store brands. J Prod Brand Manag 8(4):340–51CrossRef Sethuraman R, Cole C (1999) Factors influencing the price premiums that consumers pay for national brands over store brands. J Prod Brand Manag 8(4):340–51CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sethuraman R, Cole C (2007) Understanding impulsive eaters’ choice behaviors: The motivational influences of regulatory focus. J Mark Res 44(2):297–308CrossRef Sethuraman R, Cole C (2007) Understanding impulsive eaters’ choice behaviors: The motivational influences of regulatory focus. J Mark Res 44(2):297–308CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Shiv B, Carmon Z, Ariely D (2005) Placebo effects of marketing actions: consumers get what they pay for. J Mark Res 42:383–93CrossRef Shiv B, Carmon Z, Ariely D (2005) Placebo effects of marketing actions: consumers get what they pay for. J Mark Res 42:383–93CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Simonson I, Kramer T, Young M (2003) Effect propensity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 95(2):158–74 Simonson I, Kramer T, Young M (2003) Effect propensity. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 95(2):158–74
41.
go back to reference Simonson I, Nowlis S, Lemon K (1993) The effect of local consideration sets on global choice between lower price and higher quality. Mark Sci 12(4):357–377CrossRef Simonson I, Nowlis S, Lemon K (1993) The effect of local consideration sets on global choice between lower price and higher quality. Mark Sci 12(4):357–377CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29:281–95CrossRef Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29:281–95CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Steenkamp J-B, Van Heerde H, Geyskens I (2010) What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? J Mark Res 47(6):1011–24CrossRef Steenkamp J-B, Van Heerde H, Geyskens I (2010) What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? J Mark Res 47(6):1011–24CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Van H, Harald EG, Pauwels K (2008) Winners and losers in a major pricewar. J Mark Res 45(October):499–518 Van H, Harald EG, Pauwels K (2008) Winners and losers in a major pricewar. J Mark Res 45(October):499–518
45.
go back to reference Wakefield K, Inman J (2003) Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income. J Retail 79(4):199–212CrossRef Wakefield K, Inman J (2003) Situational price sensitivity: the role of consumption occasion, social context and income. J Retail 79(4):199–212CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Wan EW, Hong J, Sternthal B (2009) The effect of regulatory orientation and decision strategy on brand judgments. J Consum Res 35(6):1026–1038CrossRef Wan EW, Hong J, Sternthal B (2009) The effect of regulatory orientation and decision strategy on brand judgments. J Consum Res 35(6):1026–1038CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Wang J, Torelli CJ, Lalwani AK (2020) The interactive effect of power distance belief and consumers’ status on preference for national (vs. private-label) brands. J Bus Res 107:1–12CrossRef Wang J, Torelli CJ, Lalwani AK (2020) The interactive effect of power distance belief and consumers status on preference for national (vs. private-label) brands. J Bus Res 107:1–12CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Yan D, Sengupta J (2011) Effects of construal level on the price quality relationship. J Consum Res 38:376–89CrossRef Yan D, Sengupta J (2011) Effects of construal level on the price quality relationship. J Consum Res 38:376–89CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Zeithaml V (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52:2–22CrossRef Zeithaml V (1988) Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark 52:2–22CrossRef
Metadata
Title
More or Less? Consumer Goal Orientation and Product Choice
Authors
Haipeng (Allan) Chen
Woojin Choi
Yan (Lucy) Liu
Haoying Sun
Fu Liu
Publication date
25-03-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Customer Needs and Solutions / Issue 1-2/2021
Print ISSN: 2196-291X
Electronic ISSN: 2196-2928
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-021-00114-z

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2021

Customer Needs and Solutions 1-2/2021 Go to the issue