Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction: Reflections on Working Together—Through and Beyond Design Thinking Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress

Authors : Joy Kim, Maneesh Agrawala, Michael S. Bernstein

Published in: Design Thinking Research

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Online creative communities allow creators to share their work with a large audience, maximizing opportunities to showcase their work and connect with fans and peers. However, sharing in-progress work can be technically and socially challenging in environments designed for sharing completed pieces. We propose an online creative community where sharing process, rather than showcasing outcomes, is the main method of sharing creative work. Based on this, we present Mosaic—an online community where illustrators share work-in-progress snapshots showing how an artwork was completed from start to finish. In an online deployment and observational study, artists used Mosaic as a vehicle for reflecting on how they can improve their own creative process, developed a social norm of detailed feedback, and became less apprehensive of sharing early versions of artwork. Through Mosaic, we argue that communities oriented around sharing creative process can create a collaborative environment that is beneficial for creative growth.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Mechanical Novel: Crowdsourcing Complex Work Through Reflection and Revision
next chapter Investigating Tangible Collaboration for Design Towards Augmented Physical Telepresence
Literature
99designs.
Block, J. H., Airasian, P. W., Bloom, B. S., & Carroll, J. B. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. London: Routledge.
Campbell, J., Aragon, C., Davis, K., Evans, S., Evans, A., & Randall, D. (2016). Thousands of positive reviews: Distributed mentoring in online fan communities. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’16 (pp. 691–704). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2818048.2819934.
Chan, J., Fu, K., Schunn, C., Cagan, J., Wood, K., & Kotovsky, K. (2011). On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(8), 081004.CrossRef
Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.CrossRef
Dontcheva, M., Morris, R. R., Brandt, J. R., & Gerber, E. M. (2014). Combining crowdsourcing and learning to improve engagement and performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’14 (pp. 3379–3388). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557217.
Dow, S. P., Glassco, A., Kass, J., Schwarz, M., Schwartz, D. L., & Klemmer, S. R. (2010). Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 17(4), 1–24 (Article 18).
Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. A. (2000). Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 59–83. doi:10.1145/344949.345004.CrossRef
Ericsson, K., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363.CrossRef
Feldman, E. B. (1971). Varieties of visual experience: Art as image and idea. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.
Guo, P. J. (2015). Codeopticon: Real-time, one-to-many human tutoring for computer programming. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology, UIST ’15 (pp. 599–608). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2807442.2807469.CrossRef
Herring, S. R., Chang, C. C., Krantzler, J., & Bailey, B. P. (2009). Getting inspired!: Understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’09 (pp. 87–96). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518717.
Hill, B. M., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2013). The cost of collaboration for code and art: Evidence from a remixing community. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’13 (pp. 1035–1046). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441893.
Hodges, S., Williams, L., Berry, E., Izadi, S., Srinivasan, J., Butler, A., Smyth, G., Kapur, N., & Wood, K. (2006). Sensecam: A retrospective memory aid. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp’06 (pp. 177–193). Berlin: Springer.
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11.CrossRef
Kim, J., Cheng, J., & Bernstein, M. S. (2014). Ensemble: Exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’14 (pp. 745–755). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531638.
Kraut, R. E., Resnick, P., Kiesler, S., Burke, M., Chen, Y., Kittur, N., Konstan, J., Ren, Y., & Riedl, J. (2012). Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kulkarni, C., Dow, S. P., & Klemmer, S. R. (2014). Early and repeated exposure to examples improves creative work. In Design thinking research (pp. 49–62). New York: Springer.CrossRef
Kuznetsov, S., & Paulos, E. (2010). Rise of the expert amateur: Diy projects, communities, and cultures. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI ’10 (pp. 295–304). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1868914.1868950.CrossRef
Lee, Y. J., Zitnick, C. L., & Cohen, M. F. (2011). Shadowdraw: Real-time user guidance for freehand drawing. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Papers, SIGGRAPH ’11 (pp. 27:1–27:10). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1964921.1964922.
Luther, K., Caine, K., Ziegler, K., & Bruckman, A. (2010). Why it works (when it works): Success factors in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP ’10 (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1880071.1880073.
Luther, K., Fiesler, C., & Bruckman, A. (2013). Redistributing leadership in online creative collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW ’13 (pp. 1007–1022). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441891.
Luther, K., Tolentino, J. L., Wu, W., Pavel, A., Bailey, B. P., Agrawala, M., Hartmann, B., & Dow, S. P. (2015). Structuring, aggregating, and evaluating crowdsourced design critique. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’15 (pp. 473–485). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675283.
Marlow, J., & Dabbish, L. (2014). From rookie to all-star: Professional development in a graphic design social networking site. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’14 (pp. 922–933). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531651.
Marwick, A. E., et al. (2011). I tweet honestly, i tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.CrossRef
Matejka, J., Li, W., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2009). Communitycommands: Command recommendations for software applications. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’09 (pp. 193–202). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1622176.1622214.CrossRef
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2009). Motivational, structural and tenure factors that impact online community photo sharing. In Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.
Petrelli, D., van den Hoven, E., & Whittaker, S. (2009). Making history: Intentional capture of future memories. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’09 (pp. 1723–1732). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518966.
Retelny, D., Robaszkiewicz, S., To, A., Lasecki, W.S., Patel, J., Rahmati, N., Doshi, T., Valentine, M., & Bernstein, M. S. (2014). Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST ’14 (pp. 75–85). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2642918.2647409.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). New York: Basic Books.
Settles, B., & Dow, S. (2013). Let’s get together: The formation and success of online creative collaborations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’13 (pp. 2009–2018). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2466266.
Siangliulue, P., Arnold, K. C., Gajos, K. Z., & Dow, S. P. (2015a). Toward collaborative ideation at scale: Leveraging ideas from others to generate more creative and diverse ideas. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’15 (pp. 937–945). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675239.
Siangliulue, P., Chan, J., Gajos, K. Z., & Dow, S. P. (2015b). Providing timely examples improves the quantity and quality of generated ideas. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, C&C ’15 (pp. 83–92). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2757226.2757230.
Teo, H. J., & Johri, A. (2014). Fast, functional, and fitting: Expert response dynamics and response quality in an online newcomer help forum. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’14 (pp. 332–341). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531731.
Thiry, E., Lindley, S., Banks, R., & Regan, T. (2013). Authoring personal histories: Exploring the timeline as a framework for meaning making. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’13 (pp. 1619–1628). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2466215.
Torrey, C., McDonald, D. W., Schilit, B. N., & Bly, S. (2007). How-to pages: Informal systems of expertise sharing. In Proceedings of the 2007 Tenth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 391–410). Berlin: Springer.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should i share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.
Xu, A., Huang, S. W., & Bailey, B. (2014) Voyant: Generating structured feedback on visual designs using a crowd of non-experts. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’14 (pp. 1433–1444). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531604.
Xu, A., Rao, H., Dow, S. P., & Bailey, B. P. (2015). A classroom study of using crowd feedback in the iterative design process. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW ’15 (pp. 1637–1648). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675140.
Yu, L., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Cooks or cobblers?: Crowd creativity through combination. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’11 (pp. 1393–1402). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979147.
Metadata
Title
Mosaic: Designing Online Creative Communities for Sharing Works-in-Progress
Authors
Joy Kim
Maneesh Agrawala
Michael S. Bernstein
Copyright Year
2018
Book
Design Thinking Research

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60966-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60967-6

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_6

Premium Partner

    Image Credits