Top

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Published in:

03-03-2021 | LCA FOR AGRICULTURE

Multifunctional modelling in the life cycle assessment of honey considering pollination

Authors: Ioannis Arzoumanidis, Luigia Petti, Domenico Raucci, Andrea Raggi

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 4/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

An apicultural system is characterised by multifunctionality, with one of the functions being the pollination service performed by honeybees, which is of fundamental importance for the nutrition of mankind. The discussion on including ecosystem services in the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology has opened; this article proposes an alternative way of considering ecosystem services in the specific case of a multifunctional system. Indeed, in an LCA implementation, this study applies an economic allocation between the main product (honey) and the pollination service performed by domesticated honeybees for the ecosystems. Here, the consideration of the pollination service in two honey (orange-blossom and cherry-blossom) LCA case studies is examined.

Methods

The multifunctionality was managed by performing an economic allocation between the main product (honey) and the pollination service. The economic value of the main product was calculated by using specific costing approaches for honey, whilst the one of the pollination service by using its market value, where applicable, or on the basis of the dependence of the two species of fruit trees (related to the two types of honey analysed) upon pollination. The calculated values were then used in the main scenario of the study.

Results and discussion

The results of the case studies showed that the potential environmental impact of honey decreases for all impact categories when the economic allocation is performed. Electricity consumption for the storage of supers in the hives placement phase and the use of packaging materials were found to be the most impacting processes for both honey types, as well as the transport by aircraft for the distribution of the product overseas. Water consumption was the first most affected impact category, followed by human carcinogenic toxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity. A sensitivity analysis confirmed the results.

Conclusions

Given the identified hotspots, an attempt should be made to reduce the impact of glass (for the jar) and steel (for the lid) by reducing their mass per unit as well as the electricity consumption for the refrigeration of supers. Furthermore, different options for distributing the product abroad should be examined.

previous article The 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management 2021—Stuttgart, Germany, September 05–08, 2021

next article Global scale life cycle environmental impacts of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Pollination is considered as a service by the authors. Nonetheless, some terminological subtleties have been expressed, e.g. according to Boyd and Banzhaf (2007), pollination is not a service itself, but an ecosystem function and that the final ecosystem service provided by such a function is the delivery of sexually viable pollen to the crop.

Alattar JM, Kouhy R, Innes J (2009) Management accounting information in micro enterprises in Gaza. J Account & Organ Change 5(1):81–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910910932223CrossRef

Alcamo J, Ash NJ, Butler CD et al (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

Arzoumanidis I, Petti L, Raggi A, Zamagni A (2013) Life cycle assessment (LCA) for the agri-food sector. In: Salomone R, Clasadonte MT, Proto M, Raggi A (eds) Product-Oriented Environmental Management System (POEMS)—Improving Sustainability and Competitiveness in the Agri-Food Chain with Innovative Environmental Management Tools. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 105–122

Arzoumanidis I, Raggi A, Petti L (2019) Life cycle assessment of honey: considering the pollination service. Adm Sci 9(1):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010027CrossRef

Biondi L, Gulluscio C, Rossi A, D'Alessio L (2017) Accounting costs without a cost accounting system: the case of a small Italian winery of excellence. Piccola Impresa/Small Business 3. https://doi.org/10.14596/pisb.283.

Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):616–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002CrossRef

Brun F, Mosso A, Blanc S (2015) Analisi economica dell'apicoltura su piccola scala con particolare riferimento ad un'area marginale. Presentation at the XIII AISSA Conference – “Nutrire il pianeta con l'agricoltura: il punto di vista dei ricercatori” – Turin 26–27 November 2015, SIDEA – AISSA [in Italian].

Chapin FS III, Matson PA, Vitousek PM (2011) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRef

Crenna E, Sala S, Polce C, Collina E (2017) Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a framework for impact assessment, J Clean Prod 140(Part 2):525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.058.

Crenna E, Jolliet O, Collina E, Sala S, Fantke P (2020) Characterizing honey bee exposure and effects from pesticides for chemical prioritization and life cycle assessment, Environ Int 138(105642). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105642.

D’Eusanio M, Serreli M, Zamagni A, Petti L (2018) Assessment of social dimension of a jar of honey: a methodological outline. J Clean Prod 199:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.157CrossRef

Ecoinvent Center (2020) The Ecoinvent database. Available online: https://www.ecoinvent.org/database/database.html. Accessed 02 June 2020.

European Commission (2010) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) handbook—Specific guide for life cycle inventory data sets. First edition (2010) EUR 24709 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg

FAO (2018) Biodiversity—Pollinators. http://www.fao.org/pollination/en/. Accessed 10 March 2019.

FAO (2020a). Tool for valuation of pollination services at a national level. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pollination/docs/POLLINATION_VALUE_ARRAY.xls. Accessed 01 June 2020.

FAO (2020b) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations—FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Accessed 01 June 2020.

Finocchio F (2011) Aspetti di misurazione ed analisi dei costi di un’azienda apistica. Il caso dell’azienda “Apicoltura Luca Finocchio”. BSc thesis, Univ. “G. d'Annunzio”, Pescara, Italy [in Italian].

Gallai N, Vaissière BE (2009) Guidelines for the economic valuation of pollination services at a national scale. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2001) The Eco-indicator 99 – a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment – Methodology report –, 3rd edn. Pré Consultants, Amersfoort

Goedkoop (2016) Biodiversity Part 1: our impact on biodiversity. https://simapro.com/2016/biodiversity-i-biodiversity-in-impact-assessment/. Accessed 20 May 2020.

Granato A, Zecchin B, Baratto C, Duquesne V, Negrisolo E, Chauzat MP, Ribière Chambert M, Cattoli G, Mutinelli F (2016) Introduction of Aethina tumida Murray 1867 (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) in the regions of Calabria and Sicily (Southern Italy). Apidologie 48:194–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-016-0465-3CrossRef

Greenleaf SS, Kremen C (2006) Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:13890–13895. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600929103CrossRef

Hanley N, Breeze TD, Ellis C, Goulson D (2015) Measuring the economic value of pollination services: principles, evidence and knowledge gaps. Ecosyst Serv 14:124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.013CrossRef

Huijbregts MAJ, Steinmann ZJN, Elshout PMF, Stam G, Verones F, Vieira MDM, Hollander A, Zijp M, van Zelm R (2016) ReCiPe 2016 - A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level - report I: characterization - RIVM Report 2016–0104. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven

ISO (2006a) ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework, 2nd ed. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva.

ISO (2006b) ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva.

Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Ass 8(6):324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505CrossRef

Kendall A, Yuan J, Brodt SB (2013) Carbon footprint and air emissions inventories for US honey production: case studies. Int J Life Cycle Ass 18:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0487-7CrossRef

Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Dewenter IS, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. P Roy Soc B—Biol Sci 274:303–13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721.

Mitchell F, Reid GC (2000) Editorial problems, challenges and opportunities: the small business as a setting for management accounting research. Manag Account Res 11(4):385–390. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0152CrossRef

Mujica M, Blanco G, Santalla E (2016) Carbon footprint of honey produced in Argentina. J Clean Prod 116:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.086CrossRef

Ndemewah SR, Menges K, Hiebl MRW (2019) Management accounting research on farms: what is known and what needs knowing? J Account & Organ Change 15(1):58–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2018-0044CrossRef

Othoniel B, Rugani B, Heijungs R, Beyer M, Machwitz M, Post P (2019) An improved life cycle impact assessment principle for assessing the impact of land use on ecosystem services, Sci Total Environ 693(133374). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.180.

Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, Collins S, Dobson A, Duke C, Gold B, Jacobson R, Kingsland S, Kranz R, Mappin M, Martinez ML, Micheli F, Morse J, Pace M, Pascual M, Palumbi S, Reichman OJ, Simons A, Townsend A, Turner M (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet Sci 304(5675):1251–1252. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095780CrossRef

Pré (2020) Sustainability software for fact-based decisions. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/sustainability-consulting/sustainable-practices/custom-sustainability-software. Accessed 28 May 2020.

Raggi A (2017) Obiettivi e campo di applicazione. In: Cellura M (ed) La Life cycle assessment applicata all’edificio: metodologia e casi di studio sul sistema fabbricato-impianto. Editoriale Delfino, Milan, pp 39–52 [in Italian]

Rugani B, Maia de Souza D, Weidema BP, Bare J, Bakshi B, Grann B, Johnston JM, Pavan ALR, Liu X, Laurent A, Verones F (2019) Towards integrating the ecosystem services cascade framework within the life cycle assessment (LCA) cause-effect methodology. Sci Total Environ 690:1284–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.023CrossRef

OSN (2017) Il valore della Terra. In Agricoltura e nuova ruralità—Economia e sostenibilità—Qualità e Consumo Consapevole. Report 2/2016. Italian National Honey Observatory (OSN), Bologna [in Italian].

Schulze E-D, Beck E, Buchmann N, Clemens S, Müller-Hohenstein K, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2019) Plant Ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRef

Science for Environment Policy (2015) Ecosystem services and the environment. In-depth Report 11 produced for the European Commission, DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/ecosystem_services_biodiversity_IR11_en.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2020.

Southwick EE, Southwick L Jr (1992) Estimating the economic value of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as agricultural pollinators in the United States. J Econ Entomol 85:621–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/85.3.621CrossRef

Statista (2020) Euro (EUR) to U.S. dollar (USD) annual average exchange rate from 1999 to 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/412794/euro-to-u-s-dollar-annual-average-exchange-rate/. Accessed 29 May 2020.

UN - United Nations (2016) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication. Accessed 26 May 2020.

Zhang YI, Baral A, Bakshi BR (2010) Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. Environ Sci Technol 44(7):2624–2631. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900548aCrossRef

Title: Multifunctional modelling in the life cycle assessment of honey considering pollination
Authors: Ioannis Arzoumanidis
Luigia Petti
Domenico Raucci
Andrea Raggi
Publication date: 03-03-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01863-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results and discussion

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Life cycle assessment of peach transportation considering trade-off between food loss and environmental impact

Global scale life cycle environmental impacts of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotube synthesis processes

Environmental performance scenarios in the production of hollow glass containers for food packaging: an LCA approach

Correction to: Selecting the best product alternative in a sea of uncertainty

Life cycle assessment of decarbonization options—towards scientifically robust carbon neutrality

Reducing the carbon and water footprints of Brazilian green coconut