Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Multilevel Coordination in EU Energy Policy: A New Type of “Harder” Soft Governance?

share
SHARE

Abstract

This chapter deals with a new trend in European governance which combines soft governance mechanisms with harder elements in order to enhance the EU’s capacity to steer in areas with limited European competences. It first develops theoretically a new type of governance, the ‘horizontal joint decision-making+’ in comparison with other types of multilevel governance. Energy policy was chosen as one of the areas where the new type of governance can be detected. The policy field is characterized by only limited competences at the EU level and no competences when it comes to decisions concerning the energy mix of the member states. Within the legislative package “Clean Energy for All Europeans” the EU designed an energy governance regulation which focuses on a better coordination of national energy policies. Despite the recourse to the soft method of open coordination, the regulation contains elements of a more binding and “harder” nature, potentially leading to the point of intervening in the national energy mix of Member States. This chapter analyses the steering potential of the EU Commission through “harder” soft governance in the multilevel system in an area of limited European competences.
Footnotes
1
The research presented in this contribution is sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Reference: 03SFK4P0, Consortium ENavi, Kopernikus).
 
Literature
go back to reference Anderson, K. (2015). Social Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education. CrossRef Anderson, K. (2015). Social Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education. CrossRef
go back to reference Benz, A. (2007). Accountable Multilevel Governance by the Open Method of Coordination? European Law Journal, 13(4), 505–522. CrossRef Benz, A. (2007). Accountable Multilevel Governance by the Open Method of Coordination? European Law Journal, 13(4), 505–522. CrossRef
go back to reference Benz, A. (2008). Die Entwicklung von Governance im Mehrebenensystem der EU. In I. Tömmel (Ed.), Die Europäische Union. Governance und Policy-Making. PVS-Sonderheft (pp. 40, 36–57). Benz, A. (2008). Die Entwicklung von Governance im Mehrebenensystem der EU. In I. Tömmel (Ed.), Die Europäische Union. Governance und Policy-Making. PVS-Sonderheft (pp. 40, 36–57).
go back to reference Benz, A., Lütz, S., Schimank, U., & Simonis, G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und Empirische Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Benz, A., Lütz, S., Schimank, U., & Simonis, G. (Eds.). (2007). Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und Empirische Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
go back to reference Council of the European Union. (2018). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources—Analysis of the Final Compromise Text with a View to Agreement (Document 10308/18). Brussels: Council of the European Union. Council of the European Union. (2018). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources—Analysis of the Final Compromise Text with a View to Agreement (Document 10308/18). Brussels: Council of the European Union.
go back to reference de la Porte, C. (2002). Is the Open Method of Coordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas? European Law Journal, 8(1), 38–58. CrossRef de la Porte, C. (2002). Is the Open Method of Coordination Appropriate for Organising Activities at European Level in Sensitive Policy Areas? European Law Journal, 8(1), 38–58. CrossRef
go back to reference de la Porte, C., & Stiller, S. (2018). Lessons from OMC Governance for Climate and Energy Policy Governance in the EU Energy Union: Ideas, Institutions, Incentives. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Hamburg 23–25 August 2018, Section ‘Energy Policy and Politics: Conceptual Challenges, Core Problems and Emerging Issues’, Panel P015: ‘An Energy Union by Policy Surveillance?’ Chairs: Schönefeld, J., & Knodt, M., Hamburg. de la Porte, C., & Stiller, S. (2018). Lessons from OMC Governance for Climate and Energy Policy Governance in the EU Energy Union: Ideas, Institutions, Incentives. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Hamburg 23–25 August 2018, Section ‘Energy Policy and Politics: Conceptual Challenges, Core Problems and Emerging Issues’, Panel P015: ‘An Energy Union by Policy Surveillance?’ Chairs: Schönefeld, J., & Knodt, M., Hamburg.
go back to reference Deganis, I. (2006). The Politics Behind Consensus: Tracing the Role of the Commission Within the European Employment Strategy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2(1), 21–40. Deganis, I. (2006). The Politics Behind Consensus: Tracing the Role of the Commission Within the European Employment Strategy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2(1), 21–40.
go back to reference European Commission. (2006, March 8). A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy, COM(2006) 105 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2006, March 8). A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy, COM(2006) 105 final. Brussels.
go back to reference European Commission. (2007, January 10). An Energy Policy for Europe: Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament, COM(2007) 1 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2007, January 10). An Energy Policy for Europe: Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament, COM(2007) 1 final. Brussels.
go back to reference European Commission. (2008, November 13). Second Strategic Energy Review: An EU Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2008) 781 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2008, November 13). Second Strategic Energy Review: An EU Energy Security and Solidarity Action Plan. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2008) 781 final. Brussels.
go back to reference European Commission. (2010, November 10). Energy 2020: A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy. Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 639 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2010, November 10). Energy 2020: A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy. Communication From the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) 639 final. Brussels.
go back to reference European Commission. (2011, December 15). Energy Roadmap 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 885 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2011, December 15). Energy Roadmap 2050. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2011) 885 final. Brussels.
go back to reference European Commission. (2014, January 22). A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2014) 15 final. Brussels. European Commission. (2014, January 22). A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2014) 15 final. Brussels.
go back to reference European Commission. (2016a). Memo: New Energy Union Governance to Deliver Common Goals. Brussels: European Commission. European Commission. (2016a). Memo: New Energy Union Governance to Deliver Common Goals. Brussels: European Commission.
go back to reference European Commission. (2016b). Proposal for a Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union, COM(2016) 759 final. Brussels: European Commission. European Commission. (2016b). Proposal for a Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union, COM(2016) 759 final. Brussels: European Commission.
go back to reference European Commission. (2016c). Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union, SWD(2016) 394 final. Brussels: European Commission. European Commission. (2016c). Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union, SWD(2016) 394 final. Brussels: European Commission.
go back to reference European Council. (2000, March 23/24). Presidency Conclusion, Lisbon. European Council. (2000, March 23/24). Presidency Conclusion, Lisbon.
go back to reference European Council. (2014, October 24). ‘Presidency Conclusions’, EUCO 169/14, Co EUR 13, CONCL 5, Brussels. European Council. (2014, October 24). ‘Presidency Conclusions’, EUCO 169/14, Co EUR 13, CONCL 5, Brussels.
go back to reference Fischer, S. (2014). The EU’s New Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030. SWP Comments, 55, Berlin. Fischer, S. (2014). The EU’s New Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030. SWP Comments, 55, Berlin.
go back to reference Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). Wie viel Europa braucht die Energiewende? ZEnergiewirtsch, 38, 163–182. CrossRef Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014). Wie viel Europa braucht die Energiewende? ZEnergiewirtsch, 38, 163–182. CrossRef
go back to reference Hartlapp, M. (2009). Learning About Policy Learning: Reflections on the European Employment Strategy. European Integration Online Papers, 13(1), Art. 7. Hartlapp, M. (2009). Learning About Policy Learning: Reflections on the European Employment Strategy. European Integration Online Papers, 13(1), Art. 7.
go back to reference Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2016). An Emerging EU Energy Diplomacy? Discursive Shifts, Enduring Practices. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(6), 1386–1405. CrossRef Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2016). An Emerging EU Energy Diplomacy? Discursive Shifts, Enduring Practices. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(6), 1386–1405. CrossRef
go back to reference Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Jollands, N., & Staudt, L. (2012). Global Governance for Sustainable Energy: The Contribution of a Global Public Goods Approach. Ecological Economics, 83, 11–18. CrossRef Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Jollands, N., & Staudt, L. (2012). Global Governance for Sustainable Energy: The Contribution of a Global Public Goods Approach. Ecological Economics, 83, 11–18. CrossRef
go back to reference Kemmerzell, J., & Knodt, M. (2017, September 6–9). European Energy Transitions Compared: Building Blocks of a Framework for Analysis. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Oslo. Kemmerzell, J., & Knodt, M. (2017, September 6–9). European Energy Transitions Compared: Building Blocks of a Framework for Analysis. Paper Presented at the ECPR General Conference, Oslo.
go back to reference Knodt, M. (2018). Energy Policy. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European Policies: Interpretive Approaches to the EU (pp. 224–240). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. CrossRef Knodt, M. (2018). Energy Policy. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European Policies: Interpretive Approaches to the EU (pp. 224–240). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. CrossRef
go back to reference Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2017). “Soft” Governance in European Energy Policy: The “Winter Package” for the Energy Union of the European Commission (Joint Working Paper Series of Mainz Papers on International and European Politics [MPIEP] No. 14) and Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence “EU in Global Dialogue” (CEDI Working Paper Series No. 6). Mainz: Chair of International Relations, Johannes Gutenberg University. Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2017). “Soft” Governance in European Energy Policy: The “Winter Package” for the Energy Union of the European Commission (Joint Working Paper Series of Mainz Papers on International and European Politics [MPIEP] No. 14) and Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence “EU in Global Dialogue” (CEDI Working Paper Series No. 6). Mainz: Chair of International Relations, Johannes Gutenberg University.
go back to reference Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2018). The European Commission as a Policy Shaper—Harder Soft Governance in the Energy Union. In M. W. Bauer, J. Ege, & S. Becker (Eds.), The European Commission in Turbulent Times (pp. 181–204). Baden-Baden: Nomos. CrossRef Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2018). The European Commission as a Policy Shaper—Harder Soft Governance in the Energy Union. In M. W. Bauer, J. Ege, & S. Becker (Eds.), The European Commission in Turbulent Times (pp. 181–204). Baden-Baden: Nomos. CrossRef
go back to reference Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2019, forthcoming). Creating Convergence of National Energy Policies by Increased Cooperation: The EU Energy Governance and Its Impact on the German Energy Transition. In E. Gawel, S. Strunz, P. Lehmann, & A. Purkus (Eds.), From a German to a European Energy Transition? Opportunities and Conflicts. Wiesbaden: Springer. Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2019, forthcoming). Creating Convergence of National Energy Policies by Increased Cooperation: The EU Energy Governance and Its Impact on the German Energy Transition. In E. Gawel, S. Strunz, P. Lehmann, & A. Purkus (Eds.), From a German to a European Energy Transition? Opportunities and Conflicts. Wiesbaden: Springer.
go back to reference Knodt, M., & Stoiber, M. (2010). Comparative Politics in the Context of Multilevel Analysis. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 4(1), 79–102. CrossRef Knodt, M., & Stoiber, M. (2010). Comparative Politics in the Context of Multilevel Analysis. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 4(1), 79–102. CrossRef
go back to reference Linsenmann, I., & Meyer, C. (2002). Dritter Weg, Übergang oder Teststrecke? Theoretische Konzeption und Praxis der offenen Politikkoordinierung. Integration, 4(25), 285–296. Linsenmann, I., & Meyer, C. (2002). Dritter Weg, Übergang oder Teststrecke? Theoretische Konzeption und Praxis der offenen Politikkoordinierung. Integration, 4(25), 285–296.
go back to reference Mattock, K. (2017). Co-ordinating Co-ordination: The European Commission and the Culture Open Method of Co-ordination. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 318–334. Mattock, K. (2017). Co-ordinating Co-ordination: The European Commission and the Culture Open Method of Co-ordination. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 318–334.
go back to reference Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018a). The Governance of the European Energy Union. Efficiency, Effectiveness and Acceptance of the Winter Package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. CrossRef Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018a). The Governance of the European Energy Union. Efficiency, Effectiveness and Acceptance of the Winter Package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. CrossRef
go back to reference Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018b). Flaws in the EU 2030 Energy Policies: Stakeholder Perception of the Clean Energy Pack-Age (Joint Working Paper Series of Mainz Papers on International and European Politics [MPIEP] No. 20) and Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence “EU in Global Dialogue” (CEDI Working Paper Series No. 12). Mainz: Chair of International Relations, Johannes Gutenberg University. Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018b). Flaws in the EU 2030 Energy Policies: Stakeholder Perception of the Clean Energy Pack-Age (Joint Working Paper Series of Mainz Papers on International and European Politics [MPIEP] No. 20) and Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence “EU in Global Dialogue” (CEDI Working Paper Series No. 12). Mainz: Chair of International Relations, Johannes Gutenberg University.
go back to reference Ringel, M., Schlomann, B., Krail, M., & Rohde, C. (2016). Towards a Green Economy in Germany? The Role of Energy Efficiency Policies. Applied Energy, 179(1), 1293–1303. CrossRef Ringel, M., Schlomann, B., Krail, M., & Rohde, C. (2016). Towards a Green Economy in Germany? The Role of Energy Efficiency Policies. Applied Energy, 179(1), 1293–1303. CrossRef
go back to reference Sajn, N. (2017). Revised Energy Efficiency Directive: European Parliamentary Research Service, 1–8. Accessed 3 March 2017. Sajn, N. (2017). Revised Energy Efficiency Directive: European Parliamentary Research Service, 1–8. Accessed 3 March 2017.
go back to reference Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 845–864. CrossRef Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 845–864. CrossRef
go back to reference Scharpf, F. W., Reissert, B., & Schnabel, F. (1976). Politikverflechtung: Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik. Kronberg: Scriptor. Scharpf, F. W., Reissert, B., & Schnabel, F. (1976). Politikverflechtung: Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik. Kronberg: Scriptor.
go back to reference Schmid, G., & Kull, S. (2005). Die Europäische Beschäftigungsstrategie: Perspektiven der Offenen Methode der Koordinierung. In H. Kaelble & G. Schmid (Eds.), Das europäische Sozialmodell: Auf dem Weg zum transnationalen Sozialstaat (pp. 317–343). Berlin: Edition Sigma. Schmid, G., & Kull, S. (2005). Die Europäische Beschäftigungsstrategie: Perspektiven der Offenen Methode der Koordinierung. In H. Kaelble & G. Schmid (Eds.), Das europäische Sozialmodell: Auf dem Weg zum transnationalen Sozialstaat (pp. 317–343). Berlin: Edition Sigma.
go back to reference Schmitter, P. (2002). Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is There Any Reason to Expect It Will Achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-level Context”? In J. K. Grote & B. Gbikpi (Ed.), Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications (pp. 51–69). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. CrossRef Schmitter, P. (2002). Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is There Any Reason to Expect It Will Achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-level Context”? In J. K. Grote & B. Gbikpi (Ed.), Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications (pp. 51–69). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. CrossRef
go back to reference Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty Years of Multi-level Governance: ‘Where Does It Come from? What Is It? Where Is It Going?’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837. CrossRef Stephenson, P. (2013). Twenty Years of Multi-level Governance: ‘Where Does It Come from? What Is It? Where Is It Going?’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 817–837. CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multilevel Coordination in EU Energy Policy: A New Type of “Harder” Soft Governance?
Author
Michèle Knodt
Copyright Year
2019
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05511-0_10