Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Multivariate Concave and Convex Stochastic Dominance

Authors : Michel Denuit, Louis Eeckhoudt, Ilia Tsetlin, Robert L. Winkler

Published in: Risk Measures and Attitudes

Publisher: Springer London

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Stochastic dominance permits a partial ordering of alternatives (probability distributions on consequences) based only on partial information about a decision maker’s utility function. Univariate stochastic dominance has been widely studied and applied, with general agreement on classes of utility functions for dominance of different degrees. Extensions to the multivariate case have received less attention and have used different classes of utility functions, some of which require strong assumptions about utility. The multivariate concave stochastic dominance we investigate is a natural extension of the stochastic order typically used in the univariate case and is consistent with a basic preference assumption. The corresponding utility functions are multivariate risk averse, and reversing the preference assumption allows us to investigate stochastic dominance for utility functions that are multivariate risk seeking. We provide insight into these two contrasting forms of stochastic dominance, develop some criteria to compare probability distributions (hence alternatives) via multivariate stochastic dominance, and illustrate how this dominance could be used in practice to identify inferior alternatives. Connections between our approach and dominance using different stochastic orders are discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Denuit, M., & Eeckhoudt, L. (2010). Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk (in)dependent utilities. Decision Analysis, 7(3), 302–312. CrossRef Denuit, M., & Eeckhoudt, L. (2010). Bivariate stochastic dominance and substitute risk (in)dependent utilities. Decision Analysis, 7(3), 302–312. CrossRef
go back to reference Denuit, M., & Mesfioui, M. (2010). Generalized increasing convex and directionally convex orders. Journal of Applied Probability, 47(1), 264–276. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Denuit, M., & Mesfioui, M. (2010). Generalized increasing convex and directionally convex orders. Journal of Applied Probability, 47(1), 264–276. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Denuit, M., Lefèvre, C., & Mesfioui, M. (1999). A class of bivariate stochastic orderings, with applications in actuarial sciences. Insurance. Mathematics & Economics, 24(1), 31–50. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Denuit, M., Lefèvre, C., & Mesfioui, M. (1999). A class of bivariate stochastic orderings, with applications in actuarial sciences. Insurance. Mathematics & Economics, 24(1), 31–50. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Denuit, M., Eeckhoudt, L., & Rey, B. (2010). Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science. Annals of Operations Research, 176(1), 259–269. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Denuit, M., Eeckhoudt, L., & Rey, B. (2010). Some consequences of correlation aversion in decision science. Annals of Operations Research, 176(1), 259–269. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 280–289. CrossRef Eeckhoudt, L., & Schlesinger, H. (2006). Putting risk in its proper place. The American Economic Review, 96(1), 280–289. CrossRef
go back to reference Eeckhoudt, L., Rey, B., & Schlesinger, H. (2007). A good sign for multivariate risk taking. Management Science, 53(1), 117–124. CrossRef Eeckhoudt, L., Rey, B., & Schlesinger, H. (2007). A good sign for multivariate risk taking. Management Science, 53(1), 117–124. CrossRef
go back to reference Eeckhoudt, L., Schlesinger, H., & Tsetlin, I. (2009). Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(3), 994–1003. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Eeckhoudt, L., Schlesinger, H., & Tsetlin, I. (2009). Apportioning of risks via stochastic dominance. Journal of Economic Theory, 144(3), 994–1003. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, L. G., & Tanny, S. M. (1980). Increasing general correlation: a definition and some economic consequences. Canadian Journal of Economics, 13(1), 16–34. CrossRef Epstein, L. G., & Tanny, S. M. (1980). Increasing general correlation: a definition and some economic consequences. Canadian Journal of Economics, 13(1), 16–34. CrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C. (1974). Convex stochastic dominance with continuous distribution functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(2), 143–158. MathSciNetCrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1974). Convex stochastic dominance with continuous distribution functions. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(2), 143–158. MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C. (1978). Convex stochastic dominance. In G. A. Whitmore & M. C. Findlay (Eds.), Stochastic dominance: an approach to decision-making under risk (pp. 337–351). Lexington: Heath. Fishburn, P. C. (1978). Convex stochastic dominance. In G. A. Whitmore & M. C. Findlay (Eds.), Stochastic dominance: an approach to decision-making under risk (pp. 337–351). Lexington: Heath.
go back to reference Hadar, J., & Russell, W. R. (1969). Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 25–34. Hadar, J., & Russell, W. R. (1969). Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. The American Economic Review, 59(1), 25–34.
go back to reference Hanoch, G., & Levy, H. (1969). The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Review of Economic Studies, 36(3), 335–346. MATHCrossRef Hanoch, G., & Levy, H. (1969). The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Review of Economic Studies, 36(3), 335–346. MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Hazen, G. B. (1986). Partial information, dominance, and potential optimality in multiattribute utility theory. Operations Research, 34(2), 296–310. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Hazen, G. B. (1986). Partial information, dominance, and potential optimality in multiattribute utility theory. Operations Research, 34(2), 296–310. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focused thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley. Keeney, R., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Levhari, D., Paroush, J., & Peleg, B. (1975). Efficiency analysis of multivariate distributions. Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 87–91. MATHCrossRef Levhari, D., Paroush, J., & Peleg, B. (1975). Efficiency analysis of multivariate distributions. Review of Economic Studies, 42(1), 87–91. MATHCrossRef
go back to reference Levy, H., & Paroush, J. (1974). Toward multi-variate efficiency criteria. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(2), 129–142. MathSciNetCrossRef Levy, H., & Paroush, J. (1974). Toward multi-variate efficiency criteria. Journal of Economic Theory, 7(2), 129–142. MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Menezes, C., Geiss, C., & Tressler, J. (1980). Increasing downside risk. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 921–932. Menezes, C., Geiss, C., & Tressler, J. (1980). Increasing downside risk. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 921–932.
go back to reference Mosler, K. C. (1984). Stochastic dominance decision rules when the attributes are utility independent. Management Science, 30(11), 1311–1322. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Mosler, K. C. (1984). Stochastic dominance decision rules when the attributes are utility independent. Management Science, 30(11), 1311–1322. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Müller, A. (2001). Stochastic ordering of multivariate normal distributions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53(3), 567–575. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Müller, A. (2001). Stochastic ordering of multivariate normal distributions. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53(3), 567–575. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Müller, A., & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. Chichester: Wiley. MATH Müller, A., & Stoyan, D. (2002). Comparison methods for stochastic models and risks. Chichester: Wiley. MATH
go back to reference Richard, S. F. (1975). Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions. Management Science, 22(1), 12–21. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Richard, S. F. (1975). Multivariate risk aversion, utility independence and separable utility functions. Management Science, 22(1), 12–21. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225–243. MathSciNetCrossRef Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing risk: I. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 225–243. MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2005). Risky choices and correlated background risk. Management Science, 51(9), 1336–1345. CrossRef Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2005). Risky choices and correlated background risk. Management Science, 51(9), 1336–1345. CrossRef
go back to reference Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2007). Decision making with multiattribute performance targets: the impact of changes in performance and target distributions. Operations Research, 55(2), 226–233. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2007). Decision making with multiattribute performance targets: the impact of changes in performance and target distributions. Operations Research, 55(2), 226–233. MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
go back to reference Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2009). Multiattribute utility satisfying a preference for combining good with bad. Management Science, 55(12), 1942–1952. MATHCrossRef Tsetlin, I., & Winkler, R. L. (2009). Multiattribute utility satisfying a preference for combining good with bad. Management Science, 55(12), 1942–1952. MATHCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multivariate Concave and Convex Stochastic Dominance
Authors
Michel Denuit
Louis Eeckhoudt
Ilia Tsetlin
Robert L. Winkler
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer London
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4926-2_2