Top

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Published in:

26-06-2021 | Original research

Not Only the Intention to Complete: The Role of Action-Oriented Intentions in MOOC Completion

Author: Tatiana Semenova

Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Issue 3/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Some researchers have questioned the use of dropout metrics to assess the quality of MOOCs. The main reason for this doubt is that participants register for online courses with different intentions. Therefore, it is proposed to use a learner-centred approach and to study the learner intention-fulfilment. Researchers studied the effect of result-oriented intention on MOOC completion. However, studies in traditional educational settings have shown that a more significant predictor of behavior is not result-oriented intention, but action-oriented intention. In our paper, we expand the study of the intention-to-behavior relation in MOOCs and identify the role of strong positive action-oriented intentions in MOOCs. As strong positive action-oriented intentions, we identified two types of intention: intention to watch all the video lectures and intention to complete all the tasks. The research database consists of trace data and survey data collected among participants of 5 MOOCs launched in the spring semester of 2017. Survey data recorded one result-oriented intention (to earn a certificate) and the two strong positive action-oriented intentions. The results showed, first, a significant relationship between strong positive action-oriented intentions and behavior in MOOCs. Secondly, we found that the intention to watch lectures and to complete tasks are conceptually different intentions: the intention to watch lectures does not play a significant role in course completion compared to the intention to complete all the tasks. Thirdly, we found that the strong positive action-oriented intention to complete all the tasks is a more powerful predictor of course completion than the result-oriented intention. These results can be used to adjust interventions that are embedded in the courses to increase their effectiveness.

previous article The Promises and Pitfalls of Self-regulated Learning Interventions in MOOCs

next article How Does Digital Competence Training Affect Teachers' Professional Development and Activities?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRef

Bache, S. M., & Wickham, H. (2014). magrittr: A Forward-Pipe Operator for R. R package version 1.5. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation. Retrieved from https://CRAN. R-project. org/package= magrittr. Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/magrittr/index.html

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). The degree of intention formation as a moderator of the attitude-behavior relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786991CrossRef

Brooker, A., Corrin, L., De Barba, P., Lodge, J., & Kennedy, G. (2018). A tale of two MOOCs: How student motivation and participation predict learning outcomes in different MOOCs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3237CrossRef

DeBoer, J., Ho, A. D., Stump, G. S., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “course” reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14523038CrossRef

Egloffstein, M., & Schwerer, F. (2019). Participation and achievement in enterprise MOOCs for professional development: Initial findings from the openSAP University. Learning technologies for transforming large-scale teaching, learning, and assessment (pp. 91–103). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Escueta, M., Quan, V., Nickow, A. J., & Oreopoulos, P. (2017). Education technology: An evidence-based review (No. w23744). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3031695

Fox, J., Weisberg, S., Adler, D., Bates, D., Baud-Bovy, G., Ellison, S., ... & Heiberger, R. (2012). Package ‘car’. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from: https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/car/

Gohel, D. Flextable: Functions for Tabular Reporting, 2018. URL https://CRAN. R-project. org/package= flextable. R package version 0.4, 4, 3. Retrieved from: https://davidgohel.github.io/flextable/

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European review of social psychology, 4(1), 141–185.CrossRef

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493CrossRef

Handoko, E., Gronseth, S. L., McNeil, S. G., Bonk, C. J., & Robin, B. R. (2019). Goal setting and MOOC completion: A study on the role of self-regulated learning in student performance in massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4270CrossRef

Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention–behavior gap. Distance Education, 38(3), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006CrossRef

Hew, K. F., Hu, X., Qiao, C., & Tang, Y. (2020). What predicts student satisfaction with MOOCs: A gradient boosting trees supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis approach. Computers & Education, 145, 103724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103724CrossRef

Ho, A., Chuang, I., Reich, J., Coleman, C., Whitehill, J., Northcutt, C., & Petersen, R. (2015). HarvardX and MITx: Two years of open online courses fall 2012 summer 2014. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2586847

Huin, L., Bergheaud, Y., Caron, P. A., Codina, A., & Disson, E. (2016). Measuring completion and dropout in MOOCs: A learner-centered model. In Khalil, M., Ebner, M., Kopp, M., Lorenz, A., & Kalz, M. (Eds.). Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, (pp. 55–68).

Kizilcec, R. F., & Cohen, G. L. (2017). Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(17), 4348–4353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611898114CrossRef

Kizilcec, R. F., & Halawa, S. (2015). Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 57–66). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724680

Kizilcec, R. F., & Schneider, E. (2015). Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699735CrossRef

Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001CrossRef

Lamb, A., Smilack, J., Ho, A., & Reich, J. (2015). Addressing common analytic challenges to randomized experiments in MOOCs: Attrition and zero-inflation. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 21–30). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2724660.2724669

Lüdecke, D. (2017). Package ‘esc’. Retrieved from: https://github.com/strengejacke/esc

Lüdecke, D. (2018). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version, 2(1). Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=sjPlot

Maya-Jariego, I., Holgado, D., González-Tinoco, E., Castaño-Muñoz, J., & Punie, Y. (2020). Typology of motivation and learning intentions of users in MOOCs: The MOOCKNOWLEDGE study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09682-3CrossRef

Rabin, E., Kalman, Y. M., & Kalz, M. (2019). An empirical investigation of the antecedents of learner-centered outcome measures in MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0144-3CrossRef

Reich, J. (2014). MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. EDUCAUSE Review Online, 8. Retrieved from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent

Renz, J., Schwerer, F., & Meinel, C. (2016). openSAP: Evaluating xMOOC usage and challenges for scalable and open enterprise education. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 9, 34–39.CrossRef

Rieber, L. P. (2017). Participation patterns in a massive open online course (MOOC) about statistics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12504CrossRef

Robinson, C., Yeomans, M., Reich, J., Hulleman, C., & Gehlbach, H. (2016). Forecasting student achievement in MOOCs with natural language processing. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 383–387). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883932

Rohloff, T., & Meinel, C. (2018). Towards personalized learning objectives in MOOCs. European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 202–215). Cham: Springer.CrossRef

Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003CrossRef

Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Implementation intentions and repeated behaviour: Augmenting the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3%3c349::AID-EJSP931%3e3.0.CO;2-YCrossRef

Sheeran, P., Orbell, S., & Trafimow, D. (1999). Does the temporal stability of behavioral intentions moderate intention-behavior and past behavior-future behavior relations? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(6), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025006007CrossRef

Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Van Knippenberg, A. D., & Moonen, A. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01160.xCrossRef

Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400CrossRef

Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2018). Grit and intention: Why do learners complete MOOCs? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i3.3393CrossRef

Warnes, G. R., Bolker, B., Lumley, T.,Johnson, R. C. (2018). Package ‘gmodels’. Retrieved from: http://mirrors.ucr.ac.cr/CRAN/web/packages/gmodels/gmodels.pdf

Wickham, H. (2016). rvest: Easily harvest (scrape) web pages. R package version 0.3, 2. Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rvest

Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., ... & Kuhn, M. (2019). Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 2019. Retrieved from: https://joss.theoj.org/papers/https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686

Zhu, H. (2018). KableExtra: Construct complex table with ’kable’ and pipe syntax. Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/kableExtra/index.html

Title: Not Only the Intention to Complete: The Role of Action-Oriented Intentions in MOOC Completion
Author: Tatiana Semenova
Publication date: 26-06-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Electronic ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09534-1

A Pragmatic Approach for Evaluating and Accrediting Digital Competence of Digital Profiles: A Case Study of Entrepreneurs and Remote Workers

Original research

Correction to: Do Teachers Find Dashboards Trustworthy, Actionable and Useful? A Vignette Study Using a Logs and Audio Dashboard

Correction

Towards an Institutional Blended Learning Adoption Model for Higher Education Institutions

Original research

The Promises and Pitfalls of Self-regulated Learning Interventions in MOOCs

Original research

Methodological Elements for the Implementation of Data Acquisition Systems as Support for Experimental Activity in the Physics Teaching

Original research

Blended Learning Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Information Systems Models

Original research

Springer Professional

Not Only the Intention to Complete: The Role of Action-Oriented Intentions in MOOC Completion

Abstract

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

A Pragmatic Approach for Evaluating and Accrediting Digital Competence of Digital Profiles: A Case Study of Entrepreneurs and Remote Workers

Correction to: Do Teachers Find Dashboards Trustworthy, Actionable and Useful? A Vignette Study Using a Logs and Audio Dashboard

Towards an Institutional Blended Learning Adoption Model for Higher Education Institutions

The Promises and Pitfalls of Self-regulated Learning Interventions in MOOCs

Methodological Elements for the Implementation of Data Acquisition Systems as Support for Experimental Activity in the Physics Teaching

Blended Learning Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Information Systems Models

Premium Partners

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

A Pragmatic Approach for Evaluating and Accrediting Digital Competence of Digital Profiles: A Case Study of Entrepreneurs and Remote Workers

Correction to: Do Teachers Find Dashboards Trustworthy, Actionable and Useful? A Vignette Study Using a Logs and Audio Dashboard

Towards an Institutional Blended Learning Adoption Model for Higher Education Institutions

The Promises and Pitfalls of Self-regulated Learning Interventions in MOOCs

Methodological Elements for the Implementation of Data Acquisition Systems as Support for Experimental Activity in the Physics Teaching

Blended Learning Acceptance: A Systematic Review of Information Systems Models