Top

Published in:

2012 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Ökologische Wirkungspfadanalyse: Bt-Mais in der Umwelt

Authors : Broder Breckling, Simone Böckmann, Hauke Reuter

Published in: GeneRisk

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Zusammenfassung

Gentechnische Veränderung wirkt auf molekularer Ebene. Primäres Ziel des Eingriffs ist ein Effekt auf einer höheren Ebene, der des Organismus. Er soll Eigenschaften aufweisen, die im Rahmen der konventionellen Züchtung nicht oder nicht so einfach erreichbar sind. Da beim Anbau von GVO die nähere und weitere Umgebung betroffen ist, entsteht ein Wirkungszusammenhang, der von der molekularen Ebene bis zur makroskopischen, landschaftlichen bzw. regionalen Ebene reichen kann. Die Beziehungen zu analysieren, die dabei eine Rolle spielen, ist Gegenstand der Wirkungspfadanalyse im Rahmen der Risikoabschätzung.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Systemische Risiken von GVO und ihre wissenschaftliche Analyse: Strukturelle Aspekte der Risiko-Charakterisierung von GVO

next chapter Entwicklung eines Modells zur Abschätzung der regionalen Pollenverbreitung von gentechnisch verändertem Mais (MaMo)

Abel CA, Adamczyk JJ Jr (2004) Relative concentration of Cry1Ab in maize leaves and cotton bolls with diverse chlorophyll content and corresponding larval development of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and southwestern corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on maize whorl leaf profiles. J Econ Entomol 97:1737–1744PubMedCrossRef

Alcalde E (2003) Introduction to the co-existence of GM and non-GM maize. In: Boelt B (ed) Proceedings 1st European conference on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. GMCC-03 13th–14th November, 2003 Helsingør, Denmark. Published by the Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark, pp 71–73. http://xwww.agrsci.dk/gmcc-03/gmcc_proceedings.pdf

Anderson PL, Hellmich RL, Sears MK, Sumerford DV, Lewis LC (2004) Effects of Cry1Ab-expressing corn anthers on monarch butterfly larvae. Environ Entomol 33:1109–1115CrossRef

Andow DA, Zwahlen C (2006) Assessing environmental risks of transgenic plants. Ecol Lett 9:196–214PubMedCrossRef

Arpas K, Toth F, Kiss J (2004) Analysis of web content of Theridion impressum L. Koch (Araneae: Theridiidae) in BT (DK440BTY, MON810, Cry1Ab) and isogenic (DK440) maize. In: Romeis J, Bigler F (eds) Proceedings of the Meeting “Ecological Impact of Genetically Modified Organisms” at Prague (Czech Republic), 26–29 November 2003. Working Group “GMOs in Integrated Production”. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 27:23–29

Bates SL, Zhao JZ, Roush RT, Shelton AM (2005) Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future. Nat Biotechnol 23:57–62PubMedCrossRef

Benbrook CM (2004) Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in the United States: the first nine years. BioTech InfoNet Tech Pap 7:1–53

Bourguet D, Chaufaux J, Micoud A, Delos M, Naibo B, Bombarde F, Marque G, Eychenne N, Pagliarr C (2002) Ostrina nubilalis parasitism and the field abundance of non-target insects in transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn (Zea mays). Environ Biosaf Res 1:49–60CrossRef

Brauner R, Moch K, Christ H (2004) Aufbereitung des Wissenstandes zu Auskreuzungsdistanzen. Öko-Institut e.V., Freiburg, pp 1–73

Breckling B, Middelhoff U, Borgmann P, Menzel G, Brauner R, Born A, Laue H, Schmidt G, Schröder W, Wurbs A, Glemnitz M (2004) Generische Erfassungs- und Extrapolationsmethoden der Rapsausbreitung (Brassica napus L.). – Bremen (Abschlussbericht zum GenEERA-Verbund-Projekt im BMBF-Förderschwerpunkt Biologische Sicherheitsforschung), Förderkennzeichen 0312637A,B,C,D, 684 S.

Bruinsma M, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA (2003) Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biol Fertil Soils 37:329–337

Brunet Y, Foueillassar X, Audran A, Garrigou D, Dayau S, Tardieu L (2003) Evidence for long-range transport of viable maize pollen. In: Boelt B (ed) Proceedings 1st European conference on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. GMCC-03 13th–14th November, 2003 Helsingør, Denmark. Published by the Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark, pp 74–76

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (2000) Text and annexes. Montreal, pp 1–19. http://www.biodiv.org/doc/legal/cartagena-protocol-en.pdf

CEC Commission for Environmental Co-operation (2004) Maize and biodiversity. The effects of transgenic maize in Mexico. Key findings and recommendations. Quebec, pp 1–50. http://www.cec.org/files/PDF//Maize-and-Biodiversity_en.pdf

Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EMG (2002) Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol 20:567–574PubMedCrossRef

DEFRA (2001) Review of knowledge of the potential impacts of GMOs on organic agriculture. CSG 15. Final Project Report. London, pp 1–69. http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/publications/pubcat/pesticides.htm

Devos Y, Reheul D, De Schrijver A (2005) The co-existence between transgenic and non-transgenic maize in the European Union: a focus on pollen flow and cross-fertilization. Environ Biosaf Res 4:71–87CrossRef

Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release onto the environment of genetically modified organisms (12 März 2001). Official Journal of the European Communities. L 106, 17.4.2001. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/1_106/1_10620010417en00010039.pdf

Dolezel M, Heissenberger A, Gaugitsch H (2005) Ökologische Effekte von gentechnisch verändertem Mais mit Insektizidresistenz und/oder Herbizidresistenz. Umweltbundesamt Wien Rote Reihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit und Frauen. Sektion IV. Band 6/05. Wien, pp 1–64

Donegan KK, Palm CJ, Fieland VJ, Porteous LA, Ganio LM, Schaller DL, Bucao LQ, Seidler RJ (1995) Changes in levels, species and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganisms associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin. Appl Soil Ecol 2:111–124CrossRef

Donegan KK, Schaller DL, Stone JD, Ganio LM, Reed G, Hamm PB, Seidler R (1996) Microbioal populations, fungal species diversity and plant pathogen levels in field plots of potato plants expressing Bacillus thuringiensis var. tenebrionis endotoxin. Transgenic Res 5:25–35CrossRef

Dutton A, Klein H, Romeis J, Bigler F (2002) Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Crysoperla carnea. Ecol Entomol 27:441–447CrossRef

Dutton A, Obrist L, Alessandro D, Diener L, Müller M, Romeis J, Bigler F (2004) Tracing Bt-toxin in transgenic maize to assess the risks on non-target arthropods. In: Romeis J, Bigler F (eds) Proceedings of the Meeting “Ecological Impact of Genetically Modified Organisms” at Prague (Czech Republic), 26–29 November 2003. Working Group “GMOs in Integrated Production”. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 27:57–63

Eastham K, Sweet J (2002) Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Environ Issue Rep 28:1–75

Eckert J, Gathmann A, Schuphan I (2004) Auswirkungen des Anbaus von Bt-Mais auf Nichtzielorganismen: Thripse und ihre Gegenspieler. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Entomol 14:439–442

EFSA (2005) Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. EFSA J 99:1–94

Einspannier R, Lutz B, Rief S, Berezina O, Zverlov V, Schwartz W, Mayer J (2004) Tracing residual recombinant feed molecules during digestion and rumen bacterial diversity in cattle fed transgene maize. Eur Food Res Technol 218:269–273CrossRef

Emberlin J, Adams-Groom B, Tidmarsh J (1999) The dispersal of maize (Zea mays) pollen. A report based on evidence available from publications and internet sites. A report commissioned by the UK Soil Association: National Pollen Research Unit, University College Worcester, Worcester, UK

Escher N, Käch B, Nentwig W (2000) Decomposition of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis maize by microorganisms and woodlice Porcellio scaber (Crustacea: Isopoda). Basic Appl Ecol 1:161–169CrossRef

Felke M, Langenbruch G-A (2005) Auswirkungen des Pollens von transgenem Bt-Mais auf ausgewählte Schmettelingslarven. Bfn-Skipten 157:1–143

Firbank LG (2003) The Farm Scale Evaluations of spring–sown genetically modified crops. Introduction. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 358:1777–1778CrossRef

Freier B, Schorling M, Traugott M, Juen A, Volkmar C (2004) Results of a 4-year plant survey and pitfall trapping in Bt maize and conventional maize fields regarding the occurrence of selected arthropoda taxa. In: Romeis J, Bigler F (eds) Proceedings of the Meeting “Ecological Impact of Genetically Modified Organisms” at Prague (Czech Republic), 26–29 November 2003. Working Group “GMOs in Integrated Production”. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 27:79–84

Gathmann A, Wirooks L, Hothorn LA, Bartsch D, Schuphan I (2006) Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds. Mol Ecol 15:2677–2685PubMedCrossRef

GM Science Review Panel (2003) An open review of the science relevant to GM corps and food based on interests and concerns of the public. http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file15655.pdf

Gould F (1998) Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annu Rev Entomol 43:701–726PubMedCrossRef

Halsey ME, Remund KM, Davis CA, Qualls MQ, Eppard PJ, Berberich SA (2005) Isolation of maize from pollen-mediated gene flow by time and distance. Crop Sci Soc Am 45:2172–2185CrossRef

Hanley AV, Huang ZY, Pett WL (2003) Effects of dietary transgenic Bt corn pollen on larvae of Apis mellifera and Galleria mellonella. J Agr Res 42:77–81

Hansen LC, Obrycki J, Obrycki JJ (2000) Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: lethal effects on the monarch butterfly. Oecologica 125:241–248CrossRef

Harwood JD, Wallin WG, Obrycki JJ (2005) Uptake of Bt endotoxins by nontarget herbivores and higher order arthropod predators: molecular evidence from a trangenic corn agroecosystem. Mol Ecol 14:2815–2823PubMedCrossRef

Hellmich RL, Blair DS, Sears MK, Stanley-Horn DE, Daniels MJ, Mattila HR, Spencer T, Bidne KG, Lewis LC (2001) Monarch larvae sensitivity to Bacillus thuringiensis- purified proteins and pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (PNAS) 98:11925–11930CrossRef

Henry C, Morgan D, Weekes R, Daniels R, Boffey C (2003) Farm scale evaluations of GM crops: monitoring gene flow from GM crops to non-GM equivalent crops in the vicinity. Part I: Forage Maize. Final Report Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Dorchester, Dorset DT28ZD

Hilbeck A (2001) Implications of transgenic, insecticidal plants for insect and plant biodiversity. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Systemat 4:43–61CrossRef

Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F (1998) Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Entomol Soc Am 27:480–487

Hofmann F, Janicke L, Janicke U, Wachter R, Kuhn U (2008) Modellrechnungen zur Ausbreitung von Maispollen unter Worst-Case Annahmen mit Vergleich von Freilandmessdaten. Gutachten für das Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Ökollogie Büro, Bremen, pp 1–47 http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/Hofmann_et_al_2009_Maispollen_WorstCase_Modell.pdf

Hofmann F, Schlechtriemen U, Wosniok W, Foth M (2005) GVO-Pollenmonitoring – Technische und biologische Pollenakkumulatoren und PCR-Screening für ein Monitoring von gentechnisch veränderten Organismen. BfN-Skripte 139:1–275

Ingram J (2000) Report on the separation distances required to ensure cross pollination is below specified limits in non-seed crops of sugar beet, maize and oilseed rape. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Projekt No RGO123. National Institute of Agricultural Botany Huntingdon Road Cambridge UK, pp 1–37

Ives AR, Andow DA (2002) Evolution of resistance to Bt crops: directional selection in structured environments. Ecol Lett 5:792–801CrossRef

Jarosz N, Loubet B, Durand B, Foueillassar X, Huber L (2005) Variations in maize pollen emission and deposition in relation to microclimate. Eviron Sci Technol 39:4377–4384CrossRef

Jesse LCH, Obrycki JJ (2000) Field deposition of Bt transgenic corn pollen: lethal effects on the monarch butterfly. Oecologica 125:241–248CrossRef

Jones M, Brooks J (1950) Effectiveness of distance and border rows in preventing outcrossing in corn. Okla Agric Exp Stn Tech Bull T-38:3–18

Jones M, Brooks J (1952) Effect of tree barriers on outcrossing in corn. Okla Agric Exp Stn Tech Bull T-45:3–11

Kawata M, Ishikawa T, Murakami K (2008) Dispersal and persistence of genetically modified oilseed rape around Japanese harbours. In: Schröder W, Schmidt G (eds) Implications of GM-crop cultivation – series. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:120–126

Kuparinen A, Schurr F, Tackenberg O, O’Hara R (2007) Air mediated pollen flow from genetically modified to conventional crops. Ecol Appl 17:431–440PubMedCrossRef

Lang A, Vojtech E (2006) The effects of pollen consumption of transgenic Bt maize on the common swallowtail, Papilio machaon L. (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Basic Appl Ecol 7:296–306CrossRef

Losey JE, Rayor LS, Carter Me (1999) Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature 299:214CrossRef

Lövei GL, Arpaia S (2005) The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies. Entomol Exp Appl 114:1–15CrossRef

Ludy C, Lang A (2006) Bt maize pollen exposure and impact on the garden spider, Araneus diadematus. Entomol Exp Appl 118:145–156CrossRef

Lumbierres B, Albajes R, Pons X (2004) Transgenic Bt maize and Rhopalosiphum padi (Hom., Aphididae) performance. Ecol Entomol 29:309–317CrossRef

Luna V, Figueroa M, Baltazar B, Gomez L, Townsend R, Schoper J (2001) Maize pollen longevity and isolation distance requirements for effective pollen control. Crop Sci 41:1551–1557CrossRef

Ma BL, Subedi KD, Reid LM (2004) Extent of cross-fertilization in maize by pollen from neighboring transgenic hybrids. Crop Sci Soc Am 44:1273–1282CrossRef

Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710CrossRef

Malone LA, Pham-Delegue M-H (2001) Effects of transgene products on honey bees (Apis mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus sp.). Apidologie 32:287–304CrossRef

Marquard E, Durka W (2005) Auswirkungen des Anbaus gentechnisch veränderter Pflanzen auf Umwelt und Gesundheit: Potentielle Schäden und Monitoring. UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle, pp 1–194

Marvier M, Van Acker RC (2005) Can crops transgenes be kept on a leash? Front Ecol Environ 3:99–106CrossRef

Meier MS, Hilbeck A (2001) Influence of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on prey preference of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Basic Appl Ecol 2:35–44CrossRef

Meier-Bethke S, Schiemann J (2003) Effect of varying distances and intervening maize fields on outcrossing rates of transgenic maize. In: Boelt B (ed) Proceedings 1st European conference on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. GMCC-03 13th–14th November, 2003 Helsingør, Denmark. Published by the Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark, pp 77–78

Meissle M, Lang A (2005) Comparing methods to evaluate the effects of Bt maize and insecticide on spider assemblages. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:359–370CrossRef

Menzel G (2006) Verbreitungsdynamik und Auskreuzungspotential von Brassica napus L. (Raps) im Großraum Bremen. GCA-Verlag, Waabs

Messean A, Angevin F, Gomez-Barbero M, Menrad K, Rodriguez-Cerezo E (2006) New case studies on the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in European agriculture. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Eco-innov Unit, Grignon, France. University of Applied Sciences of Weihenstephan, Science Centre Straubing, Germany. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission Technical Report Series, EUR 22102 EN

Messeguer J (2003) Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tiss Org 73:201–212CrossRef

Mulder C, Wouterse M, Raubuch M, Roelofs W, Rutgers M (2006) Can transgenic maize affect soil microbial communities? PLoS Comput Biol 2(9):e128. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020128PubMedCrossRef

Müller W (2001) Handbuch zu Monitoring und Resistentmanagement für Bt-Mais. UBA-Monographie Band 144

Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM, Carey JR (2000) Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends Ecol Evol 15:316–320PubMedCrossRef

Obrist LB, Dutton A, Albajes R, Bigler R (2006a) Exposure of arthropod predators to Cry1Ab toxin in Bt maize fields. Ecol Entomol 31:143–154CrossRef

Obrist LB, Klein H, Dutton A, Bigler F (2006b) Assessing the effects of Bt maize on the predatory mite Neoseiulus cucumeris. Exp Appl Acarol 38:125–139PubMedCrossRef

Obrist LB, Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2006c) Biological activity of Cry1Ab toxin expressed by Bt maize following ingestion by herbivorous arthropods and exposure of the predator Chrysoperla carnea. BioControl 51:31–48CrossRef

OECD (2002) Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of maize (Zea Mays): key food and feed nutritiens, anti-nutritients and secondary plant metabolites. OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds 6:1–42. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO%282002%2925&docLanguage=En

Ortiz-Garcia S, Ezcurra E, Schoel B, Acevedo F, Soberon J, Snow AA (2005) Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003–2004). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (PNAS) 102:12338–12343CrossRef

Pfanzagl B (1999) Begleituntersuchungen bei gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen. Sicherheitsforschung, Ökologische Begleitforschung und Monitoring. Umweltbundesamt Monographie M-114, Wien

Pilson D, Prendeville HR (2004) Ecological effects of transgenic crops and the escape of transgenes into wild populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:149–179CrossRef

Quist D, Chapela ICH (2001) Transgenic DNA introgressed into traditional maize landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico. Nature 414:541–543PubMedCrossRef

Raps A, Kehr J, Gugerli P, Moar WJ, Bigler F, Hilbeck A (2001) Immunological analysis of phloem sap of Bacillus thuringiensis corn and of the nontarget herbivore Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) for the presence of Cry1Ab. Mol Ecol 10:525–533PubMedCrossRef

Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed (22 September 2003). Official Journal of the European Union. L 268, 18.10.2003. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/1_268/1_26820031018en00010023.pdf

Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products from genetically modified organisms (22 September 2003) and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. L 268, 18.10.2003. http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/1_268/1_26820031018en00240028.pdf

Reuter H, Böckmann S, Breckling B (2008) Analysing cross-pollination studies in maize. In: Breckling B, Reuter H, Verhoeven R (eds) Implications of GM crop cultivation at large spatial scales. Theorie in der Ökologie 14, Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 47–52

Romeis J, Meissle M, Bigler F (2006) Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nat Biotech 24:63–71CrossRef

Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (2002) Vertical movement in soil of insecticidal Cry1Ab protein from Bacillus thuringiensis. Soil Biol Biochem 34:111–120CrossRef

Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001a) Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria and fungi in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1225–1230CrossRef

Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001b) Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn. Am J Bot 88:1704–1706PubMedCrossRef

Schimpf E (2006a) Exemplarische Analyse zu maschineller Verschleppung von gentechnisch verändertem Pflanzenmaterial beim überbetrieblichen Maschineneinsatz. Diplomarbeit, Universität Kassel

Schimpf M (2006b) Koexistenz im landwirtschaftlichen Alltag. Bericht zur Verbreitung von gentechnisch verändertem Material durch Landmaschinen. Arbeitsgemeinschaft bäuerliche Landwirtschaft e.V. (AbL) Hamm, pp 1–30. http://www.gentechnikfreieregionen. de/fileadmin/content/studien/koexistenz/06_Schimpf_Koexistenz.pdf

Sears MK, Hellmich RL, Stanley-Horn DE, Oberhauser KS, Pleasants JM, Mattila HR, Siegfried BD, Dively GP (2001) Impact of Bt corn pollen on monarch butterfly populations: a risk assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (PNAS) 98:11937–11942CrossRef

Shirai Y, Takahashi M (2005) Effects of transgenix Bt corn pollen on a non-target lycaenid butterfly, Pseudozizeeria maha. Appl Entomol Zool 40:151–159CrossRef

Squire GR, Brooks DR, Bohan DA, Champion GT, Daniels RE, Haughton AJ, Hawes C, Heard MS, Hill MO, May MJ, Osborne JL, Perry JN, Roy DB, Woiwod IP, Firbank LG (2003) On the rationale and interpretation of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 358:1779–1799. doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1403CrossRef

Statistisches Bundesamt (2006) Ackerland nach Hauptfruchtgruppen und Fruchtarten. http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Content/Statistiken/LandForstwirtschaft/Bodennutzung/Tabellen/Content75/AckerlandHauptfruchtgruppenFruchtarten,templateId=renderPrint.psml

Sweet J (2003) Pollen dispersal and cross pollination. In: Boelt B (ed) Proceedings 1st European conference on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. GMCC-03 13th–14th November, 2003 Helsingør, Denmark. Published by the Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark, pp 21–32

Tabashnik BE, Gassmann AJ, Crowder DW, Carrière Y (2008) Field evolved insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops. ISB News Report Agricultural and Environmental Biotechnology, pp 1–5. http://www.isb.vt.edu/news/2008/aug08.pdf

Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998) Persistance of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 20:471–476CrossRef

Treu R, Emberlin J (2000) Pollen dispersal in the crops Maize (Zea mays), Oil seed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera), Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum). A report for the Soil Association from the National Pollen Research Unit. University College Worcester, pp 1–54

Turrini A, Sbrana C, Nuti MP, Pietrangeli BM, Giovannetti M (2004) Development of a model system to assess the impact of genetically modified corn and auberinge plants on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 266:69–75CrossRef

Van den Berg J (2010) Bt-resistant target pests. Quick occurrence in South Africa. Presented at: Advancing the understanding of biosafety. Latest scientific findigs, polica responses and public participation. Nagoya 7.-9.10. 2010. http://www.ensser.org/uploads/media/3.3-vandenBerg-EN.pdf

Van Rensburg JBJ (2007) First report of field resistance by the stem borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) to Bt-transgenic maize. S Afr J Plant Soil 24:147–151

Vercesi ML, Krogh PH, Holmstrup M (2006) Can Bacillus thuriengiensis (Bt) corn residues and Bt-corn plants affect life-history traits in the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa? Appl Soil Ecol 32:180–187CrossRef

Volkmar C, Traugoo M, Juen A, Schorling M, Freier B (2004) Spider communities in Bt maize and conventional maize. In: Romeis J, Bigler F (eds) Proceedings of the meeting “Ecological Impact of Genetically Modified Organisms” at Prague (Czech Republic), 26–29 November 2003. Working Group “GMOs in Integrated Production”. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 27:165–170

Weber W, Bringezu T, Broer I, Holz F, Eder J (2005) Koexistenz von gentechnisch verändertem und konventionellem Mais. Mais 1:1–6

Weekes R, Henry C, Morgan D, Boffey C, Daniels R (2003) Crop-to-crop gene flow in maize: a challenge to co-existence in England? In: Boelt B (ed) Proceedings 1st European conference on the co-existence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic crops. GMCC-03 13th–14th November, 2003 Helsingør, Denmark. Published by the Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark, pp 79–81

Wolfenbarger LL, Gonzalez-Espinola M (2004) Assessment of effects on natural ecosystems. Background document chapter 4 for: Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) Maize & biodiversity. The effects of transgenic maize in Mexico. CEC Secretariat Report, pp 1–36

Wraight CL, Zangerl AR, Carroll MJ, Berenbaum MR (2000) Absence of toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis pollen to black swallowtails under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (PNAS) 97:7700–7703CrossRef

Zangerl AR, McKenna D, Wraight CL, Carroll M, Ficarello P, Warner R, Berenbaum MR (2001) Effects of exposure to event 176 Bacillus thuringiensis corn pollen on monarch and black swallowtail caterpillars under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (PNAS) 98:11908–11912CrossRef

Züghart W, Breckling B (2003) Konzeptionelle Entwicklung eines Monitoring von Umweltwirkungen transgener Kulturpflanzen Teil 1 und 2. Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. UBA Texte 50/03

Zwahlen C, Hilbeck A, Howald R, Nentwig W (2003) Effects of transgenic Bt corn litter on the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris. Mol Ecol 12:1077–1086PubMedCrossRef

Title: Ökologische Wirkungspfadanalyse: Bt-Mais in der Umwelt
Authors: Broder Breckling
Simone Böckmann
Hauke Reuter
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Book: GeneRisk
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23432-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-642-23433-0

Copyright Year: 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23433-0_3