Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Events
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
12th International Engine Congress 2025 | 25. + 26. February 2025

Meeting Place for the Powertrain and Sustainable Fuels Community

The congress will examine the future role of the internal combustion engine and its non-fossil fuels from a global perspective with leading experts. Be part of it! More information and booking options are available on our website.
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Read chapter Read first chapter

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. Ökosystem-Leadership

Author : Daniel Fasnacht

Published in: Offene und digitale Ökosysteme

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Welche dynamischen Fähigkeiten werden in einem Ökosystem benötigt? Erfolgreiche Unternehmen haben ihre Grenzen geöffnet und machen sich externes Wissen, Ressourcen und Fähigkeiten zunutze. Makroökonomische Entwicklungen und Vorschriften, sich ständig ändernde Kundenanforderungen und der technologische Wandel führen zu einer hohen Dynamik und Komplexität. Der Schlüssel für die Transformation und die effektive Anpassung von Geschäftsmodellen ist eine offene und permissive Organisationskultur und neue Managementpraktiken. Diese basieren auf synergetischen- und systemischen Führungsansätzen. Drei Ökosystem-Fähigkeiten sind dabei höchst relevant – Offenheit, Agilität und Ambidexterität. Offenheit verinnerlicht den Open-Innovation-Ansatz und fördert im Kontext der Organisationsstruktur Neugier, Motivation und Flexibilität, um Neues zu schaffen. Agilität ist in einem Ökosystem für die Zusammenarbeit und Kommunikation entscheidend und ist charakterisiert durch Anpassungsfähigkeit, Geschwindigkeit und Kundenzentriertheit. Ambidexterie ist die Fähigkeit diametral entgegengesetzte Dinge in einen ganzheitlichen Kontext zu bringen und gleichzeitig anzugehen. Alle drei Schlüsselprinzipien sind eng miteinander verflochten und haben großen Einfluss auf Wissen, Lernen und die Innovationskraft einer Organisation, welche in einem Ökosystem einen fragmentierten Wertbeitrag leistet.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Der Weg zum Ökosystem
next chapter Die Zukunft der Arbeit im Ökosystem
Literature
Adler, P.S., Goldoftas, B. & Levine, D.I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeover in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–67.CrossRef
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.CrossRef
Agarwal, R. & Selen, W. (2009). Dynamic Capability Building in Service Value Networks for Achieving Service Innovation. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 431–76.CrossRef
Alam, M. A., Rooney, D. & Taylor, M. (2022). Measuring inter-firm openness in innovation ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 138, 436–456.CrossRef
Andriopoulos, C. & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717.CrossRef
Brown, S.L. & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997). The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRef
Buchanan, D., Fitzgerald, L., Ketley, D., Gollop, R., Jones, J. L., Lamont, S. S. & Whitby, E. (2005). No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(3), 189–205.CrossRef
Burns, T. (1966). On the Plurality of Social Systems. In: J. R. Lawrence (Hrsg.) (1966) Operational Research and the Social Sciences. Tavistock.
Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock.
Cappelli, P. (2019). Your Approach to Hiring Is All Wrong. Harvard Business Review, May–June.
Chen, Y. (2017). Dynamic ambidexterity: How innovators manage exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 60(3), 385–394.CrossRef
Clark, D. (2021). The Long Game: How to Be a Long-Term Thinker in a Short-Term World. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston.
Clough, D.R. & Wu, A. (2022) Artificial Intelligence: Data-Driven Learning, and the Decentralized Structure of Platform Ecosystems. Academy of Management Review, 47(1), 184–192.CrossRef
Deal, T. E. & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading: Massachusetts.
Denison, D. R., Haaland, S. & Goelzer, P. (2003). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness: is there a similar pattern around the world? In: Advances in Global Leadership, 3, 205–227. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Eisenhardt, K.M. & Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.
Fasnacht, D. & Proba. D. (2024). The mediating role of inter-organizational agility on innovation in increased uncertainty. Strategy & Leadership, unveröffentlicht.
Gilbert, C. G. (2006). Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science, 17(1):150–167.CrossRef
Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. A. (1994). Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of management. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 91–112.
Gomez, P. & Probst, G. (1999). Die Praxis des ganzheitlichen Problemlösens. Haupt: Bern.
Gomez, P., Lambertz, M. & Meynhardt, T. (2019). Verantwortungsvoll führen in einer komplexen Welt. Haupt: Bern.
Graham, J.R. et al. (2017). Corporate Culture: Evidence for the Field. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper Nr. 23255, Cambridge: Massachusetts.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2012). The Institution as Servant. Center for Servant Leadership.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic Intent. Harvard Business Review, May–June, 63–76.
Heracleous, L., Papachroni, A. Andriopoulos, C., Gotsi, M. (2017). Structural ambidexterity and competency traps: insights from Xerox PARC. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 327–338.CrossRef
Inoue, Y. (2021). Indirect innovation management by platform ecosystem governance and positioning: Toward collective ambidexterity in the ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120652.
Jacobides, M.G., Cennamo, C. & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards the theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal 39(8), 2255–2276.CrossRef
Jansen, J.J.P., Van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W. (2005). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and ambidexterity: the impact of environmental and organizational antecedents. Schmalenbach Business Review, 57(4), 351–363.
Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N. & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.CrossRef
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269–299.
Luhmann, N. (1968). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart.
March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRef
Mintzberg, H. (1975): The Manager’s Job: Folklore and Fact. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 49–61.
Moore, M. H. (2013). Recognizing public value. Cambridge: Massachusetts.
Nambisan, S. & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40–57.
O’Reilly, C. & Tushman, M.L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
O’Reilly, C. & Tushman, M.L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.CrossRef
Ossenbrink, J., Hoppmann, J. & Hoffmann, V. H. (2019). Hybrid ambidexterity: How the environment shapes incumbents’ use of structural and contextual approaches. Organization Science, 30(6), 1319–1348.CrossRef
Pidun, U., Reeves, M. & Schüssler, M. (2020). How Do You “Design” a Business Ecosystem? BCG Henderson Institute.
PwC (2021). Global Culture Survey 2021: The link between culture and competitive advantage. Katzenbach Center, PwC.
Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence. Harper & Row: New York.
Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A. & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.CrossRef
Sheng, M. L. & Chien, I. (2016). Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2302–2308.CrossRef
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597–624.CrossRef
Teece, D., Peteraf, M. & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35.CrossRef
Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.CrossRef
Teece, D.J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.CrossRef
Teece D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef
Tushman, M.L. & O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.CrossRef
Tushman, M.L. & O’Reilly, C. (2002). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre. Gabler Verlag.
Weber, M. (1956). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Mohr Siebeck.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361–386.CrossRef
West, J. & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831.CrossRef
Whyte, W. H. (1956). The Organization Man. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Metadata
Title
Ökosystem-Leadership
Author
Daniel Fasnacht
Copyright Year
2023
Book
Offene und digitale Ökosysteme

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-42493-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-42494-7

Copyright Year: 2023

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42494-7_8

Premium Partner

    Image Credits