Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 1/2022

01-02-2022 | INFORMATION ANALYSIS

On the Incorrect Use of Citation Indices for Assessment by Comparison of Divisions of Science

Author: R. S. Gilyarevskii

Published in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Abstract

The well-known inaccuracy of assessments of the contribution of scientists, organizations, and countries, as well as the half-life of publications and the number of articles and their citations by sections of science when using indexing and citation platforms (using the example of Web of Science) is discussed. This inaccuracy is explained by the fact, that on these platforms, journals are classified by thematic category, while the objects of calculations require classification by articles. The distribution of articles on specific topics among journals is uneven and obeys the Bradford dispersion law, which is not taken into account. It turns out that it is impossible to correct the results of such calculations. The way out is seen in the use of abstract journals for them, in which articles are indexed by headings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mikhailov, A.I., Chernyi, A.I., and Gilyarevskii, R.S., Osnovy nauchnoi informatsii (Foundations of Scientific Information), Moscow: Nauka, 1965. Mikhailov, A.I., Chernyi, A.I., and Gilyarevskii, R.S., Osnovy nauchnoi informatsii (Foundations of Scientific Information), Moscow: Nauka, 1965.
2.
go back to reference Akoev, M.A., Markusova, V.A., Moskaleva, O.V., and Pislyakov, V.V., Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory razvitiya nauki i tekhnologii (Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of Development of Science and Technology), Akoev, M.A., Ed., Yekaterinburg: Ural. Univ., 2021, 2nd ed. Akoev, M.A., Markusova, V.A., Moskaleva, O.V., and Pislyakov, V.V., Rukovodstvo po naukometrii: indikatory razvitiya nauki i tekhnologii (Guide to Scientometrics: Indicators of Development of Science and Technology), Akoev, M.A., Ed., Yekaterinburg: Ural. Univ., 2021, 2nd ed.
3.
go back to reference Bradford, S.C., Documentation, London: Lockwood, 1953, 2nd ed. Bradford, S.C., Documentation, London: Lockwood, 1953, 2nd ed.
5.
go back to reference Handbook of Special Librarianship and Information Work, Ashworth, W., Ed., London: Aslib, 1962. Handbook of Special Librarianship and Information Work, Ashworth, W., Ed., London: Aslib, 1962.
6.
go back to reference Arapov, M.V. and Libkind, A.N., The concept of the closed information flow, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 1977, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 77–94. Arapov, M.V. and Libkind, A.N., The concept of the closed information flow, Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist., 1977, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 77–94.
Metadata
Title
On the Incorrect Use of Citation Indices for Assessment by Comparison of Divisions of Science
Author
R. S. Gilyarevskii
Publication date
01-02-2022
Publisher
Pleiades Publishing
Published in
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Electronic ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510552201006X

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 1/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner