Top

Published in:

09-04-2021 | Ceramics

On the production of novel zirconia-reinforced bioactive glass porous structures for bone repair

Authors: Paula F. Gouveia, Joana Mesquita-Guimarães, Maria E. Galarraga-Vinueza, Júlio C. M. Souza, Anderson C. Moreira, Filipe S. Silva, Márcio C. Fredel, Bruno Henriques

Published in: Journal of Materials Science | Issue 20/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The objective of this study was to develop a replica method for producing zirconia-reinforced bioactive glass (ZRBG) porous structures for bone repair. Four different types of porous structures were produced: zirconia (G1), 58S BG-coated zirconia (G2), zirconia-reinforced BG (G3) and 58S BG-coated zirconia-reinforced BG (G4). A complete characterization of the specimens was performed via SEM-EDS, Archimedes method, 3D X-ray micro-tomography, micro-indentation, compressive strength tests and SBF immersion tests. G3 and G4 specimens presented a BG matrix (~ 33% glassy phase) with dispersed zirconia particles. The porosity of the specimens ranged from 86% up to 93%. BG58S-zirconia groups G3 and G4) exhibited lower YM (38.76 ± 11.20 GPa and 43.49 ± 2.16 GPa) than that of G1 monolithic zirconia specimens (94.39 ± 12.62 GPa), which were more compatible to that of the bone. No significant difference in compressive strength between BG58S-zirconia (G3: 0.41 ± 0.20 MPa; G4: 0.45 ± 0.11 MPa) and zirconia (G1: 0.32 ± 0.11 MPa) was detected observed (p > 0.05). In vitro SBF tests showed a potential bioactivity for ZRBG porous structures.

previous article A review of main characterization methods for identifying two-dimensional organic–inorganic halide perovskites

next article Interrelation among superstructural ordering, oxygen nonstoichiometry and lattice strain of double perovskite Sr2FeMoO6−δ materials

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Perez RA, Mestres G (2016) Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C 61:922–939CrossRef

Shadjou NHM (2015) Bone tissue engineering using silica-based mesoporous nanobiomaterials: recent progress. Mater Sci Eng C 55:401–409CrossRef

do Vale Pereira R (2011) Arcabouço compósito biodegradável produzido via sinterização seletiva a laser com matriz de Policaprolactona e partículas dispersas de Biovidro 58S. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccaccini AR (2006) Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:3413–3431CrossRef

Hing K (2005) Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: influence of porosity and chemistry. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 2(3):184–199CrossRef

Loh Q, Choong C (2013) Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engi-neering applications: role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Eng B Rev 19(6):485–502CrossRef

Tiainen H, Lyngstadaas S, Ellingsen J, Haugen H (2010) Ultra-porous titanium oxide scaffold with high compressive strength. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21(10):2783–2792CrossRef

Hutmacher D (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24):2529–2543CrossRef

Mohamad YD, Bretcanu O, Boccaccini A (2008) Polymer-bioceramic composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci 43:4433–4442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2552-yCrossRef

10.

Saiz E, Zimmermann EA, Lee JS et al (2013) Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater 29:103–115CrossRef

11.

Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–5491CrossRef

12.

Jones JR, Hench LL (2003) Regeneration of trabecular bone using porous ceramics. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 7:301–307CrossRef

13.

Sebdani MM, Fathi MH (2011) Fabrication and characterization of hydroxyapatite-forsterite-bioactive glass composite nanopowder for biomedical applications. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 8:553–559CrossRef

14.

Bellucci D, Cannillo V, Sola A (2012) A new highly bioactive composite for bone tissue repair. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 9:455–467CrossRef

15.

Oréfice RL, Pereira MDM, Mansur HS (2006) Biomateriais: fundamentos e aplicações. Cultura Médica, Rio de Janeiro

16.

Hench LL (2015) Opening paper 2015-some comments on bioglass: four eras of discovery and development. Biomed Glas 1:1–11

17.

Jones JR (2015) Review of bioactive glass: from hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater 23:S53–S82CrossRef

18.

Ma J, Chen CZ, Wang DG et al (2010) Influence of the sintering temperature on the structural feature and bioactivity of sol-gel derived SiO2-CaO-P2O5 bioglass. Ceram Int 36:1911–1916CrossRef

19.

Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK (1972) Bonding mechanism at interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. Biomed Mater 5(6):117–141CrossRef

20.

Rahaman MN, Liu X, Bal BS et al (2012) Bioactive glass in bone tissue engineering. Ceram Trans 237:73–82CrossRef

21.

Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR (2011) A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials 32:2757–2774CrossRef

22.

Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL (2001) Characterization of melt-derived 45S5 and sol-gel-derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 58:734–740CrossRef

23.

Zhong J, Greenspan DC (2000) Processing and properties of sol–gel bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 53(6):696–701CrossRef

24.

Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL (2002) In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol–gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res 61:301–311CrossRef

25.

Fu Q, Saiz E, Rahaman MN, Tomsia AP (2011) Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives. Mater Sci Eng C 31(7):1245–1256CrossRef

26.

Boccardi E, Philippart A, Melli V et al (2016) Bioactivity and mechanical stability of 45S5 bioactive glass scaffolds based on natural marine sponges. Ann Biomed Eng 44:1881–1893CrossRef

27.

Hum J, Boccaccini AR (2018) Collagen as coating material for 45S5 bioactive glass-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci 19(6):1807CrossRef

28.

Lacefield WR, Hench LL (1985) The bonding of bioglass® to a cobalt-chromium surgical implant alloy. Biomaterials 7(2):104–108CrossRef

29.

Gomez-Vega JM, Saiz E, Tomsia AP et al (2000) Novel bioactive functionally graded coatings on Ti6Al4V. Adv Mater 12:894–898CrossRef

30.

Schubert H (1986) Anisotropic thermal expansion coefficients of Y2O3-stabilized tetragonal zirconia. J Am Ceram Soc 69:270–271CrossRef

31.

Zhang Y, Legeros R, Kim J (2014). B2-Bioactive graded zirconia-based structures. US 8, 703,294

32.

Chevalier J (2006) What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials 27:535–543CrossRef

33.

Denry I, Kelly JR (2008) State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 24:299–307CrossRef

34.

Özkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E (2011) Zirconia dental implants: a literature review. J Oral Implantol 37:367–376CrossRef

35.

Gouveia PF, Schabbach LM, Souza JCM et al (2017) New perspectives for recycling dental zirconia waste resulting from CAD/CAM manufacturing process. J Clean Prod 152:454–463CrossRef

36.

Kelly JR, Denry I (2008) Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 24:289–298CrossRef

37.

Mesquita-Guimarães J, Leite MA, Souza JCM et al (2017) Processing and strengthening of 58S bioactive glass-infiltrated titania scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A 105:590–600CrossRef

38.

Galarraga-Vinueza ME, Passoni B, Benfatti CAM et al (2017) Inhibition of multi-species oral biofilm by bromide doped bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A 105:1994–2003CrossRef

39.

Pereira RDV, Salmoria GV, de Moura MOC et al (2014) Scaffolds of PDLLA/bioglass 58S produced via selective laser sintering. Mater Res 17:33–38CrossRef

40.

Bettelheim F, Brown W, Campbell M et al (2009) Introduction to general organic and biochemistry, 10th edn. Cengage Learning, Boston

41.

Yin Y, Ma B, Hu C et al (2019) Preparation and properties of porous SiC–Al2O3 ceramics using coal ash. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 16:23–31CrossRef

42.

Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682CrossRef

43.

Serra J (1986) Introduction to mathematical morphology. Comput Vision, Graph Image Process 35(3):283–305CrossRef

44.

Gonzalez R, Woods R (2002) Digital image processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

45.

Chassery JM, Montanvert A (1991) Géométrie discrete en analyse d’images, Editions H

46.

Diógenes AN, Dos Santos LOE, Fernandes CP et al (2009) Porous media microstrucutre reconstruction using pixel-based and object-based simulated annealing–comparison with other reconstruction methods. Rev Eng Térmica 8:35

47.

Stochero NP, de Moraes EG, Moreira AC et al (2020) Ceramic shell foams produced by direct foaming and gelcasting of proteins: permeability and microstructural characterization by X-ray microtomography. J Eur Ceram Soc 40(12):4224–4231CrossRef

48.

Jain V, Johnson R, Ganesh I et al (2003) Effect of rubber encapsulation on the comparative mechanical behaviour of ceramic honeycomb and foam. Mater Sci Eng A 347:109–122CrossRef

49.

Mesquita-Guimarães J, Leite MA, Souza JCM et al (2017) Processing and strengthening of 58S bioactive glass-infiltrated titania scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 105:590–600CrossRef

50.

Kokubo T, Takadama H (2006) How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials 27:2907–2915CrossRef

51.

Chatzistavrou X, Kantiranis N, Kontonasaki E et al (2011) Thermal analysis and in vitro bioactivity of bioactive glass-alumina composites. Mater Charact 62:118–129CrossRef

52.

Boccaccini AR, Chen Q, Lefebvre L et al (2007) Sintering, crystallisation and biodegradation behaviour of bioglass s-derived glass–ceramics. Faraday Discuss 136:27–44CrossRef

53.

Cannillo V, Pierli F, Sampath S, Siligardi C (2009) Thermal and physical characterisation of apatite/wollastonite bioactive glass-ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:611–619CrossRef

54.

Blaeß C, Müller R, Poologasundarampillai G, Brauer DS (2019) Sintering and concomitant crystallization of bioactive glasses. Int J Appl Glas Sci 10:449–462CrossRef

55.

Habibe AF, Maeda LD, Souza RC et al (2009) Effect of bioglass additions on the sintering of Y-TZP bioceramics. Mater Sci Eng C 29(6):1959–1964CrossRef

56.

Zhu Y, Zhu R, Ma J et al (2015) In vitro cell proliferation evaluation of porous nano-zirconia scaffolds with different porosity for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 10:055009CrossRef

57.

Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR (2006) 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27:2414–2425CrossRef

58.

Chen QZ, Efthymiou A, Salih V, Boccaccini AR (2008) Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds: study of cell proliferation and scaffold degradation in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res-Part A 84(4):1049–1060CrossRef

59.

Xia W, Chang J (2010) Bioactive glass scaffold with similar structure and mechanical properties of cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res-Part B Appl Biomater 95(2):449–455CrossRef

60.

Srivastava AK, Pyare R, Sing SP (2012) Elastic properties of substituted 45S5 bioactive glasses and glass-ceramic. Int J Sci Eng Res 3(2):1–13

61.

Chen QZ, Xu JL, Yu LG et al (2012) Spark plasma sintering of sol-gel derived 45S5 Bioglass®-ceramics: mechanical properties and biocompatibility evaluation. Mater Sci Eng C 32(3):494–502CrossRef

62.

Thompson ID, Hcnch LL (1998) Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, glass-ceramics and composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 212(2):127–136CrossRef

63.

Bohner M, Lemaitre J (2009) Can bioactivity be tested in vitro with SBF solution? Biomaterials 30:2175–2179CrossRef

64.

Maçon ALB, Kim TB, Valliant EM et al (2015) A unified in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of bioactive glasses and their variants. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26:1–10CrossRef

Title: On the production of novel zirconia-reinforced bioactive glass porous structures for bone repair
Authors: Paula F. Gouveia
Joana Mesquita-Guimarães
Maria E. Galarraga-Vinueza
Júlio C. M. Souza
Anderson C. Moreira
Filipe S. Silva
Márcio C. Fredel
Bruno Henriques
Publication date: 09-04-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Materials Science / Issue 20/2021
Print ISSN: 0022-2461
Electronic ISSN: 1573-4803
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06005-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 20/2021

Correction to: Metformin-based copper(II) complexes: synthesis, structural characterization and mimicking activity of catechol oxidase and phenoxazinone synthase

Improvement of texture and magnetic properties of strip-cast grain-oriented electrical steel by trace Bi addition

A carbazole-grafted covalent organic framework as turn-on fluorescence chemosensor for recognition and detection of Pb2+ ions with high selectivity and sensitivity

Interrelation among superstructural ordering, oxygen nonstoichiometry and lattice strain of double perovskite Sr2FeMoO6−δ materials

A review of thermoplastic polymer foams for functional applications

Progress of porous Al-containing intermetallics fabricated by combustion synthesis reactions: a review

Premium Partners