2012 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
On the Representation of Normative Sentences in FOL
Authors : Andrew J. I. Jones, Steven O. Kimbrough
Published in: Logic Programs, Norms and Action
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Rules, regulations and policy statements quite frequently contain nested sequences of normative modalities as in, for example:
The database manager is obliged to permit the deputy-manager to authorise access for senior departmental staff.
Parking on highways ought to be forbidden. [24]
Accordingly, a knowledge-representation language for such sentences must be able to accommodate nesting of this kind. However, if—as some have proposed—normative modalities such as
obligatory, permitted,
and
authorised
are to be interpreted as first-order predicates of named actions, then nesting appears to present a problem, since the scope formula of
obligatory
in “obligatory that it is permitted that
a
” (where
a
names an action) is not a name but a sentence.
The ‘disquotation’ theory presented in Kimbrough (“A Note on Interpretations for Federated Languages and the Use of Disquotation”, and elsewhere) may provide a candidate solution to this FOL problem. In this paper we rehearse parts of that theory and evaluate its efficacy for dealing with the indicated normative nesting problem.