Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Events
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
12th International Engine Congress 2025 | 25. + 26. February 2025

Meeting Place for the Powertrain and Sustainable Fuels Community

The congress will examine the future role of the internal combustion engine and its non-fossil fuels from a global perspective with leading experts. Be part of it! More information and booking options are available on our website.
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Read chapter Read first chapter

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Online Learning and MOOCs: A Framework Proposal

Authors : Jamie Murphy, Nadzeya Kalbaska, Laurel Horton-Tognazzini, Lorenzo Cantoni

Published in: Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Decades of distance learning evolution and innovation, particularly due to the Internet and recently, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), have led to industry and academic confusion about online learning nomenclature. This study takes a preliminary step in reducing the confusion, proposing a conceptual framework for categorising online learning. Drawing on content structure and interactivity, the paper proposes four categories of online learning: resources, tutorials, courses and MOOCs. These four categories serve as a base for illustrating five online learning variables—open versus closed access, cost, interactivity, recognition and assessment—which subsequently help clarify the framework of the four somewhat overlapping categories. The resultant framework gives industry and academia common ground for discussing online learning and for future research such as MOOC types and additional variables to consider, i.e., synchronicity, learning outcomes, openness, and self-direction.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Senior Travellers as Users of Online Travel Services: A Qualitative Enquiry
next chapter The Evolution of eTourism Research: A Case of ENTER Conference
Literature
Admiraal, W., & Lockhorst, D. (2009). E-learning in small and medium-sized enterprises across Europe. International Small Business Journal, 27(6), 743–767.CrossRef
Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1–14.
Baker III, F. W., & Surry, D. (2013). Open education designs: A taxonomy for differentiating and classifying open learning environments. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Chesapeake, VA.
Bates, A., & Sangrà, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bell, B., & Federman, J. (2013). eLearning in postsecondary education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 165–185.CrossRef
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.CrossRef
Cantoni, L., Botturi, L., Succi, C., & New MinE Lab. (2007). E-learning: Capire, progettare, comunicare. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Cantoni, L., & Kalbaska, N. (2010). eLearning offers by destination management organizations. In U. Gretzel, R. Law, & M. Fuchs (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 247–259). Wien: Springer.
Cantoni, L., Kalbaska, N., & Inversini, A. (2009). E-learning in tourism and hospitality: A map. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 8(2), 148–156.CrossRef
CEC. (2001). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament. The eLearning action plan: Designing tomorrow’s education. Brussels: COM.
Chauhan, A. (2014). Massive open online courses (MOOCS): Emerging trends in assessment and accreditation. Digital Education Review, 25, 7–18.
Cooper, S., & Sahami, M. (2013). Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(2), 28–30.CrossRef
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, 1–20.
DeBoer, J., Ho, A., Stump, G., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “Course”: Reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher. doi:10.​3102/​0013189X14523038​.
Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38–40.CrossRef
Handel, B., Groenland, C., & Gerzina, T. (2010). Dentistry students’ perceptions of learning management systems. European Journal of Dental Education, 14(1), 50–54.CrossRef
Harden, N. (2013). The end of the university as we know it. The American Interest, 8, 54–62.
Holmberg, B. (1995). The evolution of the character and practice of distance education. Open Learning, 10(2), 47–53.CrossRef
Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–159.
Kalbaska, N. (2012). Travel agents and destination management organizations: eLearning as a strategy to train tourism trade partners. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 13(1), 1–12.
Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2011). New dimensions to self-directed learning in an open networked learning environment. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 7(2), 2–20.
Kuttainen, C., & Lexhagen, M. (2012). Overcoming barriers to SME e-commerce adoption using blended learning: A Swedish action research case study. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 13(1), 13–26.CrossRef
Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers and Education, 53(3), 686–694.CrossRef
Murphy, J. (2012). LMS teaching versus community learning: A call for the latter. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25(5), 826–841.
Murphy, J., Kalbaska, N., Williams, A., Ryan, P., Cantoni, L., & Horton-Tognazzini, L. (2014). Massive open online courses: Strategies and research areas. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 26(1), 39–43.CrossRef
Nadkarni, S., & Venema, M. (2012). Tourism capacity building in developing geographies: A case for open educational resources. Journal of Information Technology and Tourism, 13(1), 27–37.CrossRef
Negash, S., & Wilcox, M. V. (2008). E-learning classifications: Differences and similarities. In S. Negash, M. Whitman, A. Woszczynski, K. Hoganson, & H. Mattord (Eds.), Handbook of distance learning for real-time and asynchronous information technology education (pp. 1–23). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRef
Peters, O. (2003). Distance education in transition. New trends and challenges. Oldenburg: Bibliotheks und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–426.CrossRef
Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs. Open Praxis, 5(1), 67–73.CrossRef
Sigala, M. (2002). The evolution of internet pedagogy: Benefits for tourism and hospitality education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 1(2), 29–45.
Tankelevičienė, L., & Damaševičius, R. (2009). Towards a conceptual model of learning context in e-learning. Paper presented at the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning, ICALT 2009, Riga, Latvia. Accessed August 20, 2014.
Wilkowski, J., Russell, D. M., & Deutsch, A. (2014). Self-evaluation in advanced power searching and mapping with Google MOOCs. Paper presented at the L@S‘14, Atlanta.
Metadata
Title
Online Learning and MOOCs: A Framework Proposal
Authors
Jamie Murphy
Nadzeya Kalbaska
Laurel Horton-Tognazzini
Lorenzo Cantoni
Copyright Year
2015
Book
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14342-2

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-14343-9

Copyright Year: 2015

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_61

Premium Partner

    Image Credits