Skip to main content
Top

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Optimal Selection of Artificial Boundary Conditions for Model Update and Damage Detection – Part 1: Theory

Authors : Joshua H. Gordis, L. T. Konstantinos Papagiannakis

Published in: Topics in Modal Analysis, Volume 7

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sensitivity-based model error localization and damage detection is hindered by the relative differences in modal sensitivity magnitude among updating parameters. The method of artificial boundary conditions is shown to directly address this limitation, resulting in the increase of the number of updating parameters at which errors can be accurately localized. Using a single set of FRF data collected from a modal test, the artificial boundary conditions (ABC) method identifies experimentally the natural frequencies of a structure under test for a variety of different boundary conditions, without having to physically apply the boundary conditions, hence the term “artificial.” The parameter-specific optimal ABC sets applied to the finite element model will produce increased sensitivities in the updating parameter, yielding accurate error localization and damage detection solutions. A method is developed for identifying the parameter-specific optimal ABC sets for updating or damage detection, and is based on the QR decomposition with column pivoting. Updating solution residuals, such as magnitude error and false error location, are shown to be minimized when the updating parameter set is limited to those corresponding to the QR pivot columns. The existence of an optimal ABC set for a given updating parameter is shown to be dependent on the number of modes used, and hence the method developed provides a systematic determination of the minimum number of modes required for localization in a given updating parameter. These various concepts are demonstrated on a simple model with simulated test data.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Lallement G, Piranda J (1990) Localisation methods for parameter updating of finite element models in elastodynamics. In: 8th international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL, pp 579–585 Lallement G, Piranda J (1990) Localisation methods for parameter updating of finite element models in elastodynamics. In: 8th international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL, pp 579–585
2.
go back to reference D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2004) Dynamic model updating using virtual antiresonances. Shock Vib 11:351–363 D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2004) Dynamic model updating using virtual antiresonances. Shock Vib 11:351–363
3.
go back to reference Mottershead JE (1998) On the zeros of structural frequency response functions and their sensitivities. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(5):591–597 Mottershead JE (1998) On the zeros of structural frequency response functions and their sensitivities. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(5):591–597
4.
go back to reference D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2000) The use of antiresonances for robust model updating. J Sound Vib 236(2):227–243 D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2000) The use of antiresonances for robust model updating. J Sound Vib 236(2):227–243
5.
go back to reference Jones K, Turcotte J (2002) Finite element model updating using antiresonant frequencies. J Sound Vib 252(4):717–727 Jones K, Turcotte J (2002) Finite element model updating using antiresonant frequencies. J Sound Vib 252(4):717–727
6.
go back to reference D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2003) Results obtained by minimizing natural frequency and antiresonance errors of a beam model. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(1):29–37 D’Ambrogio W, Fregolent A (2003) Results obtained by minimizing natural frequency and antiresonance errors of a beam model. Mech Syst Signal Process 17(1):29–37
7.
go back to reference Hanson D, Waters TP, Thompson DJ, Randall RB, Ford RAJ (2007) The role of anti-resonance frequencies from operational modal analysis in finite element model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:74–97 Hanson D, Waters TP, Thompson DJ, Randall RB, Ford RAJ (2007) The role of anti-resonance frequencies from operational modal analysis in finite element model updating. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:74–97
8.
go back to reference Li S, Shelley S, Brown D (1995) Perturbed boundary condition testing. In: Proceedings of the 13th international modal analysis conference, vol 1, Nashville, TN, pp 902–907 Li S, Shelley S, Brown D (1995) Perturbed boundary condition testing. In: Proceedings of the 13th international modal analysis conference, vol 1, Nashville, TN, pp 902–907
9.
go back to reference Wada BK, Kui CP, Glaser RJ (1986) Extension of ground-based testing for large space structures. J Spacecr 23(2):184–188 Wada BK, Kui CP, Glaser RJ (1986) Extension of ground-based testing for large space structures. J Spacecr 23(2):184–188
10.
go back to reference Wada BK, Kuo CP, Glaser RJ (1986) Multiple boundary condition tests (MBCT) for verification of large space structures. AIAA Paper 86-0905 Wada BK, Kuo CP, Glaser RJ (1986) Multiple boundary condition tests (MBCT) for verification of large space structures. AIAA Paper 86-0905
11.
go back to reference Kuo CP, Wada BK (1987) System identification of a truss type space structure using the multiple boundary condition test (MBCT) method. AIAA Paper 87-0746 Kuo CP, Wada BK (1987) System identification of a truss type space structure using the multiple boundary condition test (MBCT) method. AIAA Paper 87-0746
12.
go back to reference Kuo CP, Wada BK (1988) Multiple boundary condition test (MBCT): identification with mode shapes. AIAA Paper 88-2353 Kuo CP, Wada BK (1988) Multiple boundary condition test (MBCT): identification with mode shapes. AIAA Paper 88-2353
13.
go back to reference Gordis JH (1999) Artificial boundary conditions for model updating and damage detection. J Mech Syst Signal Process 13(3):437–448 Gordis JH (1999) Artificial boundary conditions for model updating and damage detection. J Mech Syst Signal Process 13(3):437–448
14.
go back to reference Lallement G, Cogan S (1999) Parametric identification based on pseudo-tests. In: Silva JMM, Maia NMM (eds) Modal analysis and testing. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 265–280 Lallement G, Cogan S (1999) Parametric identification based on pseudo-tests. In: Silva JMM, Maia NMM (eds) Modal analysis and testing. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 265–280
15.
go back to reference Gordis JH (1996) Omitted coordinate systems and artificial constraints in spatially incomplete identification. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 11(1–2):83–95 Gordis JH (1996) Omitted coordinate systems and artificial constraints in spatially incomplete identification. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 11(1–2):83–95
16.
go back to reference Gordis JH (1992) Spatial, frequency domain updating of linear, structural dynamic models. In: Proceedings of the 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ACS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, La Jolla, CA, pp 3050–3058 Gordis JH (1992) Spatial, frequency domain updating of linear, structural dynamic models. In: Proceedings of the 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ACS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, La Jolla, CA, pp 3050–3058
17.
go back to reference Gordis JH (1994) An analysis of the improved reduced system model reduction procedure. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 9(4):269–285 Gordis JH (1994) An analysis of the improved reduced system model reduction procedure. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 9(4):269–285
18.
go back to reference Gordis JH (1995) An exact formulation for structural dynamic model error localization. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 10(1):19–33 Gordis JH (1995) An exact formulation for structural dynamic model error localization. Int J Anal Exp Modal Anal 10(1):19–33
19.
go back to reference Berman EJ, Allen MS, Kammer DC, Mayes RL (2010) Probabilistic investigation of sensitivities of advanced test-analysis model correlation methods. J Sound Vib 329:2516–2531 Berman EJ, Allen MS, Kammer DC, Mayes RL (2010) Probabilistic investigation of sensitivities of advanced test-analysis model correlation methods. J Sound Vib 329:2516–2531
20.
go back to reference Tu Z, Lu Y (2008) FE model updating using artificial boundary conditions with genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 86:714–727 Tu Z, Lu Y (2008) FE model updating using artificial boundary conditions with genetic algorithms. Comput Struct 86:714–727
21.
go back to reference Lu Y, Tu Z (2008) Artificial boundary condition approach for structural identification: a laboratory perspective. In: 26th international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL Lu Y, Tu Z (2008) Artificial boundary condition approach for structural identification: a laboratory perspective. In: 26th international modal analysis conference, Orlando, FL
22.
go back to reference Berman A (1984) System identification of structural dynamic models – theoretical and practical bounds. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 25th structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, pp 123–128 Berman A (1984) System identification of structural dynamic models – theoretical and practical bounds. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 25th structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, pp 123–128
23.
go back to reference Wilkinson JH (1965) The algebraic eigenvalue problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford Wilkinson JH (1965) The algebraic eigenvalue problem. Oxford University Press, Oxford
24.
go back to reference Rade DA, Lallement G (1998) A strategy for the enrichment of experimental data as applied to an inverse eigensensitivity-based FE model updating method. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(2):293–307 Rade DA, Lallement G (1998) A strategy for the enrichment of experimental data as applied to an inverse eigensensitivity-based FE model updating method. Mech Syst Signal Process 12(2):293–307
25.
go back to reference Fernandez C (2004) Artificial boundary conditions in sensitivity based finite element model updating and structural damage detection. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA Fernandez C (2004) Artificial boundary conditions in sensitivity based finite element model updating and structural damage detection. Master’s thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA
26.
go back to reference Boyd S (2007–2008) Lecture 8 Least-norm solutions of underdetermined equations. EE263 Autumn Stanford University Boyd S (2007–2008) Lecture 8 Least-norm solutions of underdetermined equations. EE263 Autumn Stanford University
27.
go back to reference Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1996) Matrix computations, 3rd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1996) Matrix computations, 3rd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
28.
go back to reference MATLAB®;R2010A. The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA MATLAB®;R2010A. The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA
29.
go back to reference Lai MJ (2009) On sparse solutions of underdetermined linear systems. J Concr Appl Math Lai MJ (2009) On sparse solutions of underdetermined linear systems. J Concr Appl Math
30.
go back to reference Donoho DL (2006) For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal L1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Commun Pure Appl Math LIX:0797–0829 Donoho DL (2006) For most large underdetermined systems of linear equations the minimal L1-norm solution is also the sparsest solution. Commun Pure Appl Math LIX:0797–0829
Metadata
Title
Optimal Selection of Artificial Boundary Conditions for Model Update and Damage Detection – Part 1: Theory
Authors
Joshua H. Gordis
L. T. Konstantinos Papagiannakis
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6585-0_3

Premium Partners