Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Wireless Networks
Published in: Wireless Networks 8/2020

05-07-2020

Optimal solution for malicious node detection and prevention using hybrid chaotic particle dragonfly swarm algorithm in VANETs

Authors: S. Prabakeran, T. Sethukarasi

Published in: Wireless Networks | Issue 8/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) have the ability to make changes in travelling and driving mode of people and so on, in which vehicle can broadcast and forward the message related to emergency or present road condition. The safety and efficiency of modern transportation system is highly improved using VANETs. However, the vehicular communication performance is weakened with the sudden emergence of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. Among other attacks, DDoS attack is the fastest attack degrading the VANETs performance due to its node mobility nature. Also, the attackers (cyber terrorists, politicians, etc.) have now considered the DDoS attack as a network service degradation weapon. In current trend, there is a quick need for mitigation and prevention of DDoS attacks in the exploration field. To resolve the conflict of privacy preservation, we propose a fast and secure HCPDS based framework for DDoS attack detection and prevention in VANETs. The Road Side Units (RSUs) have used HCPDS algorithm to evaluate the fitness values of all vehicles. This evaluation process is done for effective detection of spoofing and misbehaving nodes by comparing the obtained fitness value with the statistical information (packet factors, RSU zone, and vehicle dynamics) gathered from the vehicles. The credentials of all worst nodes are cancelled to avoid further communication with other vehicles. In HCPDS algorithm, the PSO updation strategy is added to Dragon fly algorithm to improve the search space. In addition, Chaos theory is applied to tune the parameters of proposed HCPDS algorithm. From the experimental results, it proved that the HCPDS based proposed approach can efficiently meet the requirements of security and privacy in VANETs.
previous article Implementation and parametric analysis of single and dual band planar filtering antennas for WLAN applications
next article Catora: congestion avoidance through transmission ordering and resource awareness in delay tolerant networks

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Wafa, B. J., Mauro, C., & Chhagan, L. (2020). Security and design requirements for software-defined VANETs. Computer Networks, 169, 107099.
2.
Deb, N., Chakraborty, M., & Chaki, N. (2014). CORIDS: A cluster-oriented reward-based intrusion detection system for wireless mesh networks. Security and Communication Networks, 7(3), 532–543.
3.
Kumar, N., & Chilamkurti, N. (2014). Collaborative trust aware intelligent intrusion detection in VANETs. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40(6), 1981–1996.
4.
Misra, S., Venkata Krishna, P., & Abraham, K. I. (2011). A stochastic learning automata based solution for intrusion detection in vehicular ad hoc networks. Security and Communication Networks, 4(6), 666–677.
5.
Jiang, S., Zhu, X., & Wang, L. (2016). An efficient anonymous batch authentication scheme based on HMAC for VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(8), 2193–2204.
6.
Li, Q., Malip, A., Martin, K. M., Ng, S.-L., & Zhang, J. (2012). A reputation-based announcement scheme for VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(9), 4095–4108.
7.
Kerrache, C. A., Lagraa, N., Calafate, C. T., & Lakas, A. (2017). TFDD: A trust-based framework for reliable data delivery and DoS defense in VANETs. Vehicular Communications, 9, 254–267.
8.
Vinu, S. (2019). Optimal task assignment in mobile cloud computing by queue based ant-bee algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications, 104(1), 173–197.
9.
Li, Z., & Chigan, C. T. (2014). On joint privacy and reputation assurance for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 13(10), 2334–2344.
10.
Mahmoud, M. E., & Shen, X. (2011). An integrated stimulation and punishment mechanism for thwarting packet dropping attack in multihop wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(8), 3947–3962.
11.
Prabakeran Saravanan, Sethukarasi, T., & Indumathi, V. (2018). Authentic novel trust propagation model with deceptive recommendation penalty scheme for distributed denial of service attacks. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 15(6), 2383–2389.
12.
Prabakeran Saravanan, Sethukarasi, T., & Indumathi, V. (2018). An efficient software defined network based cooperative scheme for mitigation of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 15(6), 2221–2226.
13.
Saravanan, P., Sethukarasi, T., & Indumathi, V. (2018). Two level trust propagation model with global weighted index for detecting and mitigating denial of service. TAGA Journal of Graphic Technology, 14, 1748–0345.
14.
Saravanan, P., Swarnapriya, K., & Agnes Priscilla Remina. (2019). Multi-defense framework for mitigating man in the cloud attack (MitC). i-Manager's Journal on Computer Science, 7(2), 8.
15.
Vinu Sundararaj. (2016). An efficient threshold prediction scheme for wavelet based ECG signal noise reduction using variable step size firefly algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 9(3), 117–126.
16.
Vinu, S., Selvi, M., & Kumar, R. S. (2018). An optimal cluster formation based energy efficient dynamic scheduling hybrid MAC protocol for heavy traffic load in wireless sensor networks. Computers and Security, 77, 277–288.
17.
Hussain, R., Hussain, F., & Zeadally, S. (2019). Integration of VANET and 5G security: A review of design and implementation issues. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 843–864.
18.
Petit, J., Schaub, F., Feiri, M., & Kargl, F. (2014). Pseudonym schemes in vehicular networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(1), 228–255.
19.
Buttyán, L., Tamás H., André W., & William W. (2009). Slow: A practical pseudonym changing scheme for location privacy in vanets. In 2009 IEEE vehicular networking conference (VNC) (pp. 1–8). IEEE.
20.
Emara, K. (2017). Safety-aware location privacy in VANET: Evaluation and comparison. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(12), 10718–10731.
21.
Freudiger, J., Mohammad H. M., Jean-Yves L. B., & Jean-Pierre H. (2010). On the age of pseudonyms in mobile ad hoc networks. In 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM (pp. 1–9). IEEE.
22.
Lu, R., Lin, X., Luan, T. H., Liang, X., & Shen, X. (2011). Pseudonym changing at social spots: An effective strategy for location privacy in vanets. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(1), 86–96.
23.
Arif, M., Guojun Wang, M., Bhuiyan, Z. A., Wang, T., & Chen, J. (2019). A survey on security attacks in VANETs: Communication, applications and challenges. Vehicular Communications, 19, 100179.
24.
Pan, Y., & Li, J. (2013). Cooperative pseudonym change scheme based on the number of neighbors in VANETs. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 36(6), 1599–1609.MathSciNet
25.
Sun, Y., Zhang, B., Zhao, B., Xiangyu, S., & Jinshu, S. (2015). Mix-zones optimal deployment for protecting location privacy in VANET. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 8(6), 1108–1121.
26.
Ullah, I., Abdul W., Munam A. S., & Abdul W. (2017). VBPC: Velocity based pseudonym changing strategy to protect location privacy of vehicles in VANET. In 2017 International conference on communication technologies (ComTech) (pp. 132–137). IEEE.
27.
Wasef, A., & Shen, X. S. (2010). REP: Location privacy for VANETs using random encryption periods. Mobile Networks and Applications, 15(1), 172–185.
28.
Ying, B., Makrakis, D., & Hou, Z. (2015). Motivation for protecting selfish vehicles’ location privacy in vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 64(12), 5631–5641.
29.
Bayat, M., Barmshoory, M., Rahimi, M., & Aref, M. R. (2015). A secure authentication scheme for VANETs with batch verification. Wireless Networks, 21(5), 1733–1743.
30.
He, D., Zeadally, S., Baowen, X., & Huang, X. (2015). An efficient identity-based conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 10(12), 2681–2691.
31.
Huang, D., Misra, S., Verma, M., & Xue, G. (2011). PACP: An efficient pseudonymous authentication-based conditional privacy protocol for VANETs. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(3), 736–746.
32.
Kumaresan, G., & Adiline Macriga, T. (2017). Group key authentication scheme for VANET intrusion detection (GKAVIN). Wireless Networks, 23(3), 935–945.
33.
Lee, C.-C., & Lai, Y.-M. (2013). Toward a secure batch verification with group testing for VANET. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1441–1449.
34.
Li, W., & Song, H. (2015). ART: An attack-resistant trust management scheme for securing vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(4), 960–969.
35.
Zhao, H., Xin Y., & Xiaolin L. (2010). cTrust: trust aggregation in cyclic mobile ad hoc networks. In European conference on parallel processing (pp. 454–465). Springer, Berlin.
36.
Jesudoss, A., Kasmir Raja, S. V., & Sulaiman, A. (2015). Stimulating truth-telling and cooperation among nodes in VANETs through payment and punishment scheme. Ad Hoc Networks, 24, 250–263.
37.
Wahab, O. A., Otrok, H., & Mourad, A. (2014). A cooperative watchdog model based on Dempster-Shafer for detecting misbehaving vehicles. Computer Communications, 41, 43–54.
38.
Minhas, U. F., Zhang, J., Tran, T., & Cohen, R. (2010). A multifaceted approach to modeling agent trust for effective communication in the application of mobile ad hoc vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 41(3), 407–420.
39.
Butun, I. (2017). Privacy and trust relations in internet of things from the user point of view. In 2017 IEEE 7th annual computing and communication workshop and conference (CCWC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
40.
Chen, Y.-M., & Wei, Y.-C. (2013). A beacon-based trust management system for enhancing user centric location privacy in VANETs. Journal of Communications and Networks, 15(2), 153–163.
41.
Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Xiang, G. (2016). RPRep: A robust and privacy-preserving reputation management scheme for pseudonym-enabled VANETs. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 12(3), 6138251.
42.
Sun, Y., Rongxing, L., Lin, X., Shen, X., & Jinshu, S. (2010). An efficient pseudonymous authentication scheme with strong privacy preservation for vehicular communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(7), 3589–3603.
43.
Zhao, H., Xin Y., & Xiaolin L. (2010). cTrust: Trust aggregation in cyclic mobile ad hoc networks. In European conference on parallel processing (pp. 454–465). Springer, Berlin.
44.
Malhi, A. K., & Batra, S. (2016). Genetic-based framework for prevention of masquerade and DDoS attacks in vehicular ad-hoc networks. Security and Communication Networks, 9(15), 2612–2626.
45.
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on Micro machine and human science, 1995. MHS’95 (pp. 39–43).
46.
Yang, X.-S. (2010). A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature inspired cooperative strategies for optimization (NICSO 2010) (pp. 65–74). Berlin: Springer.
47.
Ludwig, A., & Schmidt, K. D. (2010). Gauss–Markov loss prediction in a linear model. Casualty Actuarial Society E-Forum, Fall, 2010, 1–48.
48.
Mirjalili, S. (2016). Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 27(4), 1053–1073.MathSciNet
49.
Alatas, B., Akin, E., & Bedri Ozer, A. (2009). Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 40(4), 1715–1734.MathSciNetMATH
50.
Gandomi, A. H., Yang, X.-S., Talatahari, S., & Alavi, A. H. (2013). Firefly algorithm with chaos. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 18(1), 89–98.MathSciNetMATH
51.
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014). Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 69, 46–61.
52.
G´omez M´armol, F., & Mart´ınez P´erez, G. (2012). Trip, A trust and reputation infrastructure-based proposal for vehicular ad hoc networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(3), 934–941.
53.
Sedjelmaci, H., & Senouci, S. M. (2015). An accurate and efficient collaborative intrusion detection framework to secure vehicular networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 43, 33–47.
54.
Sundararaj, V. (2019). Optimised denoising scheme via opposition-based self-adaptive learning PSO algorithm for wavelet-based ECG signal noise reduction. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 31(4), 325.
Metadata
Title
Optimal solution for malicious node detection and prevention using hybrid chaotic particle dragonfly swarm algorithm in VANETs
Authors
S. Prabakeran
T. Sethukarasi
Publication date
05-07-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Wireless Networks / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02413-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

Wireless Networks 8/2020 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Computation offloading for multimedia workflows with deadline constraints in cloudlet-based mobile cloud

OriginalPaper

Implementation and parametric analysis of single and dual band planar filtering antennas for WLAN applications

OriginalPaper

A novel approach of dynamic base station switching strategy based on Markov decision process for interference alignment in VANETs

OriginalPaper

QoS aware cross layer paradigm for urban development applications in IoT

OriginalPaper

Channel model for simultaneous backhaul and access for mmWave 5G outdoor street canyon channel

OriginalPaper

Joint of full-duplex relay, non-linear energy harvesting and multiple access in performance improvement of cell-edge user in heterogeneous networks