Top

Journal of Management Control

Published in:

06-02-2021 | Original Paper

Optimism and profit-based incentives in cost stickiness: an experimental study

Authors: Komang Ayu Krisnadewi, Noorlailie Soewarno

Published in: Journal of Management Control | Issue 1/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether managerial optimism and profit-based incentives affect cost behavior asymmetry, especially cost stickiness. Differ from previous literature on cost stickiness, the researchers use an experimental 2 × 2 between-within subjects factorial design. This design allows us to use data related to cost management specifically, not just in general term as in studies using archival data from public financial statements. Our study results reaffirm cost stickiness literature. This study focuses on experiments among accounting students who are not knowledgeable about cost behavior asymmetry. Even though our 71 student participants know only the symmetric cost behavior theory, when presented with a scenario related to sales prospects and information on profit-based incentives, the results of this study show otherwise. When participants are more optimistic and profit-based incentives have been achieved, the level of cost stickiness is also higher.

previous article Tribute to our reviewers: Best Reviewer Awards—An Editorial

next article Financial constraints and asymmetric cost behavior

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

https://www.newsweek.com/how-be-good-leader-115757 3 April 2005 How be good leader. Accessed 14/3/2020.

https://www.investopedia.com/managing-wealth/guide-ceo-compensation/ Accessed 14 March 2020.

Participants must have taken management accounting courses (taken in the fourth semester), in which cost behavior and decision-making are both taught.

This test is reasonably robust to violations of this assumption, provided the size of groups is reasonably similar, e.g. largest/smallest = 1.5 (Pallant 2013, p. 183).

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Orgnizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef

Al-Shaikh, F. N. (2003). The practical reality theory and business ethics in non-Western context: Evidence from Jordan. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710310487855.CrossRef

Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00095.CrossRef

Anderson, S. W., & Lanen, W. N. (2007). Understanding cost management. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Argilés-Bosch, J. M., García-blandón, J., Ravenda, D., Valencia-silva, M. M., & Somoza, A. D. (2017). The influence of the trade-off between profitability and future increases in sales on cost stickiness. Estudios de Economia, 44(1), 81–104.CrossRef

Armanto, B., Tiono, K. M., & Suthiono, H. (2014). The stickiness of selling, general, and administrative costs in the Indonesian companies. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 7(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.7.1.39-53.CrossRef

Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, R. S., Maemura, E. M., & Young, S. M. (2012). Management accounting: Information for decision making and strategy execution (6th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Baber, W. R., Janakiraman, S. N., & Kang, S.-H. (1996). Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(96)00421-1.CrossRef

Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. T. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003.CrossRef

Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., & Mashruwala, R. (2014a). The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50726.CrossRef

Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Plehn-Dujowich, J. M. (2014b). Demand uncertainty and cost behavior. Accounting Review, 89(3), 839–865. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50661.CrossRef

Bracha, A., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Affective decision making: A theory of optimism bias. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2011.11.004.CrossRef

Brüggen, A., & Oliver, J. Z. (2014). SG & A cost stickiness and equity-based executive compensation: Does empire building matter ? Journal of Management Control, 25, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-014-0195-5.CrossRef

Bugeja, M., Lu, M., & Shan, Y. (2015). Cost stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and determinants. Australian Accounting Review, 25(3), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12066.CrossRef

Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 2(30), 879–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_11.CrossRef

Chae, S., & Ryu, H. (2016). The effect of control—ownership disparity on cost stickiness. Journal of Distribution Science, 14(8), 51–57.CrossRef

Chen, J. V., Kama, I., & Lehavy, R. (2015). Management expectations and asymmetric cost behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2684164.CrossRef

Cheung, J., Kim, H., Kim, S., & Huang, R. (2018). Is the asymmetric cost behavior affected by competition factors? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(1–2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2016.1266271.CrossRef

Cohen, S., Karatzimas, S., & Naoum, V. (2017). The sticky cost phenomenon at the local government level: empirical evidence from Greece. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-03-2015-0019.CrossRef

Dermer, S. B., Robey, P. A., & Dunham, S. M. (2012). A comparison of reality therapy and choice theory with solution—focused therapy. International Journal of Choice Theory and Reality Therapy, XXXI(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02834.x.CrossRef

Echterhoff, G., & Schmalbach, B. (2018). How shared reality is created in interpersonal communication. Current Opinion in Psychology, 23, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.005.CrossRef

Eltivia, N., Widiastuti, R., & Wahyuni, H. (2017). Do stickiness costs exist in Indonesia? Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research, 6(1), 16–21.

Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.CrossRef

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRef

Flor, C. R., Frimor, H., & Munk, C. (2014). Options in compensation: Promises and pitfalls. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(3), 703–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12049.CrossRef

Gallagher, M. W., & Lopez, S. J. (2009). Positive expectancies and mental health: Identifying the unique contributions of hope and optimism. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903157166.CrossRef

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2013). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (9th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Guenther, T. W., Riehl, A., & Rößler, R. (2014). Cost stickiness: State of the art of research and implications. Journal of Management Control, 24(4), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-013-0176-0.CrossRef

Hansen, D. R., & Mowen, M. M. (2007). Managerial accounting (8th ed.). USA: Thomson South Western.

Hecht, D. (2013). The neural basis of optimism and pessimism. Experimental Neurobiology, 22(3), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2013.22.3.173.CrossRef

Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2012). Cost accounting: A managerial emphasis (14th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.CrossRef

Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x.CrossRef

Kitching, K., Mashruwala, R., & Pevzner, M. (2016). Culture and cost stickiness: A cross-country study. International Journal of Accounting, 51(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2016.07.010.CrossRef

Koo, J., Song, S., & Paik, T. (2015). Earning management and cost stickiness. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 84(Business), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.84.09.CrossRef

Krisnadewi, K. A., & Soewarno, N. (2020). Competitiveness and cost behaviour: Evidence from the retail industry. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2018-0120.CrossRef

Li, W. L., & Zheng, K. (2017). Product market competition and cost stickiness. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49(2), 283–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-016-0591-z.CrossRef

Liang, C. K., & Dunn, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial characteristics, optimism, pessimism, and realism—correlation or collision? Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 22(1), 1–21.

Lohmann, C. (2015). Managerial incentives for capacity investment decisions. Journal of Management Control, 26(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-015-0202-5.CrossRef

Maher, M. W., Stickney, C. P., & Weil, R. L. (2008). Managerial accounting: An introduction to concepts, methods, and uses (10th ed.). USA: Thomson South- Western.

Malik, M. (2012). A review and synthesis of “cost stickiness” literature. SSRN Electronic Journal, SSRN, 22767, 1–41.

McClure, B. (2019). A Guide to CEO Compensation. Investopedia, (August 2). https://www.investopedia.com/managing-wealth/guide-ceo-compensation/.

Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2010). Hope: The power of wish and possibility. Theory & Psychology, 20(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309354393.CrossRef

Moers, F. (2007). Doing archival research in management accounting. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research, 1, 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01016-9.CrossRef

Mohammadi, A., & Taherkhani, P. (2017). Organizational capital, intellectual capital and cost stickiness (evidence from Iran). Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-06-2016-0066.CrossRef

Murphy, K. J. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 11–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90026-6.CrossRef

Nagasawa, S. (2018). Asymmetric cost behavior in local public enterprises: Exploring the public interest and striving for efficiency. Journal of Management Control, 29(3–4), 225–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-0269-x.CrossRef

Namitha, C., & Shijin, S. (2016). Managerial discretion and agency cost in Indian market. Advances in Accounting, 35(C), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2016.06.002.

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual. McGraw Hill (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Companies. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.2027c.x.

Prabowo, R., Hooghiemstra, R., Veen-dirks, P. Van, & Van Veen-Dirks, P. (2018). State ownership, socio-political factors, and labor cost stickiness. European Accounting Review, 27(4), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1329659.CrossRef

Weijden, R. F. M. van der. (2013). Cost stickiness and CEO compensation: A study of chief executive officer incentive structure and sticky cost behavior. Amsterdam Business School.

Rhodes, A. (2016). The relation between earnings-based measures in firm debt contracts and CEO pay sensitivity to earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.11.002.CrossRef

Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002.CrossRef

Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.CrossRef

Sepasi, S., & Hassani, H. (2015). Study of the effect of the firm size on cost stickiness: Evidence from Teheran Stock Exchange. IJABER, 13(6), 4143–4159.

Shust, E., & Weiss, D. (2014). Discussion of asymmetric cost behavior—sticky costs: Expenses versus cash flows. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-10406.CrossRef

Subramaniam, C., & Watson, M. W. (2016). Additional evidence on the sticky behavior of costs. Advances in Management Accounting, 26, 275–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-787120150000026006.CrossRef

Trevelyan, R. (2008). Optimism, overconfidence and entrepreneurial activity. Management Decision, 46(7), 986–1001. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810890177.CrossRef

Uy, A. O. O. (2014). The dynamics of firm competitiveness: Evidence from cost behavior of Filipino firms. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 18(4), 84–95.

Uy, A. O. O. (2016). Analyzing cost behavior of Philippine. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 20(1), 103–114.

Venieris, G., Naoum, V. C., & Vlismas, O. (2015). Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, general and administrative expenses. Management Accounting Research, 26(2014), 54–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2014.10.003.CrossRef

Via, N. D., & Perego, P. (2014). Sticky cost behavior: Evidence from small and medium sized companies. Accounting and Finance, 54(3), 753–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12020.CrossRef

Xi, F., Liu, X., Wang, Q., & Liang, M. (2013). Empirical research of the cost stickiness behavior under opportunism incentives. Information Technology Journal, 12(19), 5281–5285. https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2013.5281.5285.CrossRef

Xu, J., & Sim, J. W. (2017). Are costs really sticky and biased? Evidence from manufacturing listed companies in China. Applied Economics, 49(55), 5601–5613. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1316823.CrossRef

Xue, S., & Hong, Y. (2016). Earnings management, corporate governance and expense stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.02.001.CrossRef

Yasukata, K., & Kajiwara, T. (2011). Are “sticky costs” the result of deliberate decision of managers? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1444746.CrossRef

Title: Optimism and profit-based incentives in cost stickiness: an experimental study
Authors: Komang Ayu Krisnadewi
Noorlailie Soewarno
Publication date: 06-02-2021
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Journal of Management Control / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2191-4761
Electronic ISSN: 2191-477X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00309-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Validation of the D&M IS success model in the context of accounting information system of the banking sector in the least developed countries

Corporate social responsibility and sustainability performance measurement systems: implications for organizational performance

Financial constraints and asymmetric cost behavior

Tribute to our reviewers: Best Reviewer Awards—An Editorial