Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Other Single-Unit Auctions

Authors : Asunción Mochón, Yago Sáez

Published in: Understanding Auctions

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we studied the four standard single-unit auctions. However, the seller has multiple options when designing an auction. In this chapter, we examine other single-unit models, such as hybrid auctions (Anglo-Dutch and Dutch–English auctions), auctions with different pricing rules (third-price or average price), auctions with different closing rules, and all-pay auctions. The chapter ends with the definition of optimal and efficient auctions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
This auction model corresponds to a first-price auction in which everyone pays.
 
2
An example might be the race of many governments to invest in nuclear weapons. Although it would be more rational to reach an agreement that no one has nuclear weapons, some governments invest in them if other countries have done so.
 
3
Krishna and Morgan [42] compared the expected revenue for an all-pay auction and a war of attrition, assuming that the bidders have interdependent values.
 
4
This auction model corresponds to a second-price auction in which everyone pays.
 
5
Under the assumptions mentioned in Chap. 2: risk neutral bidders, bidders with independent-private-values, symmetric bidders and no budget constraints.
 
6
Ausubel and Cramton [6] show that if there is an efficient resale market, an efficient auction can also maximize the seller’s expected revenue.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference S. Anwar, R. McMillan, and M. Zheng. Bidding behavior in competing auctions: Evidence from ebay. European Economic Review, 50(2):307–322, 2006.CrossRef S. Anwar, R. McMillan, and M. Zheng. Bidding behavior in competing auctions: Evidence from ebay. European Economic Review, 50(2):307–322, 2006.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference D. Ariely and I. Simonson. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13:1113–1123, 2003.CrossRef D. Ariely and I. Simonson. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13:1113–1123, 2003.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference O. Ashenfelter. How auctions work for wine and art. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3:23–26, 1989.CrossRef O. Ashenfelter. How auctions work for wine and art. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3:23–26, 1989.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel. An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. American Economic Review, 94:1452–1475, 2004.CrossRef L.M. Ausubel. An efficient ascending-bid auction for multiple objects. American Economic Review, 94:1452–1475, 2004.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel and O. Baranov. Core-selecting auctions with incomplete information. Working Paper, University of Maryland, 2010. L.M. Ausubel and O. Baranov. Core-selecting auctions with incomplete information. Working Paper, University of Maryland, 2010.
6.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel and P. Cramton. The optimality of being efficient. Working Paper, University of Maryland, 1998. L.M. Ausubel and P. Cramton. The optimality of being efficient. Working Paper, University of Maryland, 1998.
7.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel, P. Cramton, P. McAfee, and J. McMillan. Synergies in wireless telephony: Evidence from the broadband pcs auctions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6(3):497–527, 1997.CrossRef L.M. Ausubel, P. Cramton, P. McAfee, and J. McMillan. Synergies in wireless telephony: Evidence from the broadband pcs auctions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 6(3):497–527, 1997.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel, P. Cramton, and P. Milgrom. The clock-proxy auction: A practical combinatorial auction design. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 115–138. The MIT Press, 2006. L.M. Ausubel, P. Cramton, and P. Milgrom. The clock-proxy auction: A practical combinatorial auction design. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 115–138. The MIT Press, 2006.
9.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. Ascending proxy auctions. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 79–98. The MIT Press, 2006. L.M. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. Ascending proxy auctions. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 79–98. The MIT Press, 2006.
10.
go back to reference L.M. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. The lovely but lonely vickrey auction. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 17–40. The MIT Press, 2006. L.M. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. The lovely but lonely vickrey auction. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 17–40. The MIT Press, 2006.
11.
go back to reference M.R. Baye, D. Kovenock, and C.G. De Vries. Rigging the lobbying process: an application of the all-pay auction. The American Economic Review, 83(1):289–294, 1993. M.R. Baye, D. Kovenock, and C.G. De Vries. Rigging the lobbying process: an application of the all-pay auction. The American Economic Review, 83(1):289–294, 1993.
12.
go back to reference D.T. Bishop, C. Cannings, and J. Maynard Smith. The war of attrition with random rewards. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 74(3):377–388, 1978.CrossRef D.T. Bishop, C. Cannings, and J. Maynard Smith. The war of attrition with random rewards. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 74(3):377–388, 1978.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference J. Bulow and P. Klemperer. Auctions versus negotiations. The American Economic Review, 86:180–194, 1996. J. Bulow and P. Klemperer. Auctions versus negotiations. The American Economic Review, 86:180–194, 1996.
14.
go back to reference J. Bulow and P. Klemperer. Prices and the winner’s curse. RAND Journal of Economics, 33(1):1–21, 2002.CrossRef J. Bulow and P. Klemperer. Prices and the winner’s curse. RAND Journal of Economics, 33(1):1–21, 2002.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference E. Cantillon and M. Pesendorfer. Auctioning bus routes: The london experience. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 573–592. The MIT Press, 2005. E. Cantillon and M. Pesendorfer. Auctioning bus routes: The london experience. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 573–592. The MIT Press, 2005.
16.
go back to reference R. Cassady. Auctions and Auctioneering. University of California Press, 1967. R. Cassady. Auctions and Auctioneering. University of California Press, 1967.
17.
go back to reference E.H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11(1):7–33, 1971.CrossRef E.H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11(1):7–33, 1971.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference P. Cramton. The fcc spectrum auctions: An early assessment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17(3):229–252, 1997. P. Cramton. The fcc spectrum auctions: An early assessment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17(3):229–252, 1997.
19.
go back to reference P. Cramton and P. Sujarittanonta. Pricing rule in a clock auction. Decision Analysis, 7(1): 40–57, 2010.CrossRef P. Cramton and P. Sujarittanonta. Pricing rule in a clock auction. Decision Analysis, 7(1): 40–57, 2010.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Shoham Y. Cramton, P. and R. Steinberg. Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press, 2006. Shoham Y. Cramton, P. and R. Steinberg. Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press, 2006.
21.
go back to reference J. Cremer and R.P. McLean. Full extraction of the surplus in bayesian and dominant strategy auctions. Econometrica, 56:1247–1258, 1988.CrossRef J. Cremer and R.P. McLean. Full extraction of the surplus in bayesian and dominant strategy auctions. Econometrica, 56:1247–1258, 1988.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference R. Day and P. Cramton. The quadratic core-selecting payment rule for combinatorial auctions. Working Paper, University of Maryland, 2008. R. Day and P. Cramton. The quadratic core-selecting payment rule for combinatorial auctions. Working Paper, University of Maryland, 2008.
23.
go back to reference R. Day and P. Milgrom. Core-selecting package auctions. International Journal of Game Theory, 36(3–4):393–407, 2008.CrossRef R. Day and P. Milgrom. Core-selecting package auctions. International Journal of Game Theory, 36(3–4):393–407, 2008.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference R.W. Day and S. Raghavan. Fair payments for efficient allocations in public sector combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 53(9):1389–1406, 2007.CrossRef R.W. Day and S. Raghavan. Fair payments for efficient allocations in public sector combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 53(9):1389–1406, 2007.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference M.R. Delgado, A. Schotter, E.Y. Ozbay, and E.A. Phelps. Understanding overbidding: Using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science, 321(5897):1849–1852, 2008.CrossRef M.R. Delgado, A. Schotter, E.Y. Ozbay, and E.A. Phelps. Understanding overbidding: Using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science, 321(5897):1849–1852, 2008.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference A.K. Dixit and S. Skeath. Games of Strategy. W.W. Norton & Company, 2004. A.K. Dixit and S. Skeath. Games of Strategy. W.W. Norton & Company, 2004.
27.
go back to reference R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans. On optimal reservation prices in auctions. Management Science, 33(6):763–770, 1987.CrossRef R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans. On optimal reservation prices in auctions. Management Science, 33(6):763–770, 1987.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans. Revenue equivalence in multi-object auctions. Economics Letters, 26:15–19, 1988.CrossRef R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans. Revenue equivalence in multi-object auctions. Economics Letters, 26:15–19, 1988.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference F. Englmaier, P. Guillen, L. Llorente, S. Onderstal, and R. Sausgruber. The chopstick auction: a study of the exposure problem in multi-unit auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(2):286–291, 2009.CrossRef F. Englmaier, P. Guillen, L. Llorente, S. Onderstal, and R. Sausgruber. The chopstick auction: a study of the exposure problem in multi-unit auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(2):286–291, 2009.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference A. Erdil and P. Klemperer. A new payment rule for core-selecting package auctions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(2–3):537–547, 2010.CrossRef A. Erdil and P. Klemperer. A new payment rule for core-selecting package auctions. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(2–3):537–547, 2010.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference D. Friedman and J. Rust. The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, volume A Proceeding volumen in the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity. Perseus Publishing, 1993. D. Friedman and J. Rust. The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, volume A Proceeding volumen in the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Science of Complexity. Perseus Publishing, 1993.
32.
go back to reference D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. A theory of exit in duopoly. Econometrica, 54(4):943–960, 1986.CrossRef D. Fudenberg and J. Tirole. A theory of exit in duopoly. Econometrica, 54(4):943–960, 1986.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference N. Gandal. Sequential auctions of interdependent objects: Israeli cable television licenses. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3):227–244, 1997.CrossRef N. Gandal. Sequential auctions of interdependent objects: Israeli cable television licenses. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(3):227–244, 1997.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference T.A. Gresik. Rationing rules and european central bank auctions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(6):793–808, 2001.CrossRef T.A. Gresik. Rationing rules and european central bank auctions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(6):793–808, 2001.CrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference J.H. Kagel and D. Levin. Common value auctions and the winner’s curse: Lessons from the economics laboratory. Princeton University Press, 2001. J.H. Kagel and D. Levin. Common value auctions and the winner’s curse: Lessons from the economics laboratory. Princeton University Press, 2001.
37.
go back to reference R. Katkar and D. Lucking-Reiley. Public versus secret reserve prices in ebay auctions: Results from a pokemon field experiment. NBER Working Paper Series, 8183, 2001. R. Katkar and D. Lucking-Reiley. Public versus secret reserve prices in ebay auctions: Results from a pokemon field experiment. NBER Working Paper Series, 8183, 2001.
38.
go back to reference P. Klemperer. Auctions with almost common values: The wallet game and its applications. European Economic Review, 42:757–769, 1998.CrossRef P. Klemperer. Auctions with almost common values: The wallet game and its applications. European Economic Review, 42:757–769, 1998.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference P. Klemperer. The Economic Theory of Auctions. Edward Elgar Pub, 2000. P. Klemperer. The Economic Theory of Auctions. Edward Elgar Pub, 2000.
40.
go back to reference P. Klemperer. Auctions: Theory and Practice. The Toulouse Lectures in Economics. Princeton University Press, England, 2004. P. Klemperer. Auctions: Theory and Practice. The Toulouse Lectures in Economics. Princeton University Press, England, 2004.
41.
go back to reference V. Krishna. Auction Theory. Elsevier, 2009. V. Krishna. Auction Theory. Elsevier, 2009.
42.
go back to reference V. Krishna and J. Morgan. An analysis of the war of attrition and the all-pay auction. Journal of Economic Theory, 72(2):343–362, 1997.CrossRef V. Krishna and J. Morgan. An analysis of the war of attrition and the all-pay auction. Journal of Economic Theory, 72(2):343–362, 1997.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference D. Levin and J.L. Smith. Optimal reservation prices in auctions. The Economic Journal, 106(438):1271–1283, 1996.CrossRef D. Levin and J.L. Smith. Optimal reservation prices in auctions. The Economic Journal, 106(438):1271–1283, 1996.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference E. Maskin and J. Riley. Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica, 52(6):1473–1518, 1984.CrossRef E. Maskin and J. Riley. Optimal auctions with risk averse buyers. Econometrica, 52(6):1473–1518, 1984.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference E.S. Maskin and J.G. Riley. Auction theory with private values. The American Economic Review, 75(2):150–155, 1985. E.S. Maskin and J.G. Riley. Auction theory with private values. The American Economic Review, 75(2):150–155, 1985.
46.
go back to reference J. Maynard Smith. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, 1982. J. Maynard Smith. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
47.
go back to reference R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2):699–738, 1987. R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2):699–738, 1987.
48.
go back to reference R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan. Analyzing the airwaves auction. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10:159–176, 1996.CrossRef R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan. Analyzing the airwaves auction. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10:159–176, 1996.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference K.A. McCabe, S.J. Rassenti, and V. Smith. Designing auctions institutions: is double dutch the best? The Economic Journal, 102(410):9–23, 1992.CrossRef K.A. McCabe, S.J. Rassenti, and V. Smith. Designing auctions institutions: is double dutch the best? The Economic Journal, 102(410):9–23, 1992.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference K.A. McCabe, S.J. Rassenti, and V.L. Smith. Designing a uniform-price double auction: An experimental evaluation. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pages 307–332. Perseus Publishing, 1993. K.A. McCabe, S.J. Rassenti, and V.L. Smith. Designing a uniform-price double auction: An experimental evaluation. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pages 307–332. Perseus Publishing, 1993.
51.
go back to reference P. Milgrom. Putting auction theory to work: The simultaneous ascending auction. Journal of Political Economy, 108:245–272, 2000.CrossRef P. Milgrom. Putting auction theory to work: The simultaneous ascending auction. Journal of Political Economy, 108:245–272, 2000.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference P. Milgrom. Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press, 2004. P. Milgrom. Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
53.
go back to reference P. Milgrom and J. Levin. Online advertising: Heterogeneity and conflation in market design. American Economic Review, 100(2):603–607, 2010.CrossRef P. Milgrom and J. Levin. Online advertising: Heterogeneity and conflation in market design. American Economic Review, 100(2):603–607, 2010.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference P. Milgrom and R.J. Weber. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica, 50(5):1089–1122, 1982.CrossRef P. Milgrom and R.J. Weber. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica, 50(5):1089–1122, 1982.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference A. Mochon, Y. Saez, J.L. Gomez-Barroso, and P. Isasi. The clock proxy auction for allocating radio spectrum licenses. Computational Economics, 37(4):411–431, 2011.CrossRef A. Mochon, Y. Saez, J.L. Gomez-Barroso, and P. Isasi. The clock proxy auction for allocating radio spectrum licenses. Computational Economics, 37(4):411–431, 2011.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference R.B. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1):58–73, 1981.CrossRef R.B. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1):58–73, 1981.CrossRef
57.
go back to reference A. Ockenfels, D. Reiley, and A. Sadrieh. Online auctions. In T. Hendershott, editor, Handbook of Economics and Information Systems, pages 571–628. Elsevier Science, 2006. A. Ockenfels, D. Reiley, and A. Sadrieh. Online auctions. In T. Hendershott, editor, Handbook of Economics and Information Systems, pages 571–628. Elsevier Science, 2006.
58.
go back to reference A. Ockenfels and A.E. Roth. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from ebay and amazon on the internet. American Economic Review, 94(4):1093–1103, 2002. A. Ockenfels and A.E. Roth. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from ebay and amazon on the internet. American Economic Review, 94(4):1093–1103, 2002.
59.
go back to reference A. Ockenfels and A.E. Roth. Late and multiple bidding in second price internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55(2):297–320, 2006.CrossRef A. Ockenfels and A.E. Roth. Late and multiple bidding in second price internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55(2):297–320, 2006.CrossRef
60.
go back to reference A. Ockenfels and A.E. Roth. Late and multiple bidding in second price internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55:297–320, 2006.CrossRef A. Ockenfels and A.E. Roth. Late and multiple bidding in second price internet auctions: Theory and evidence concerning different rules for ending an auction. Games and Economic Behavior, 55:297–320, 2006.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference B. O’neill. International escalation and the dollar auction. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30(1):33–50, 1986. B. O’neill. International escalation and the dollar auction. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30(1):33–50, 1986.
62.
go back to reference J.F. Pages and A. Mochon. Cross-bidding impact throughout the product life cycle. Economics Letters, 113:80–83, 2011.CrossRef J.F. Pages and A. Mochon. Cross-bidding impact throughout the product life cycle. Economics Letters, 113:80–83, 2011.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference D. Parkes. Iterative combinatorial auctions. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 41–78. The MIT Press, 2006. D. Parkes. Iterative combinatorial auctions. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, pages 41–78. The MIT Press, 2006.
64.
go back to reference M. Peters and S. Severinov. Internet auctions with many traders. Journal of Economic Theory, 130:220–245, 2006.CrossRef M. Peters and S. Severinov. Internet auctions with many traders. Journal of Economic Theory, 130:220–245, 2006.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference J.G. Riley and W.F. Samuelson. Optimal auctions. The American Economic Review, 71(3):381–392, 1981. J.G. Riley and W.F. Samuelson. Optimal auctions. The American Economic Review, 71(3):381–392, 1981.
66.
go back to reference A.E. Roth and A. Ockenfels. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from a natural experiment in ebay. American Economic Review, 92:1093–1103, 2002.CrossRef A.E. Roth and A. Ockenfels. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from a natural experiment in ebay. American Economic Review, 92:1093–1103, 2002.CrossRef
67.
go back to reference J. Rust, J. Miller, and R. Palmer. Behavior of trading automata in a computerized double auction market. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pages 155–198. Perseus Publishing, 1992. J. Rust, J. Miller, and R. Palmer. Behavior of trading automata in a computerized double auction market. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pages 155–198. Perseus Publishing, 1992.
68.
go back to reference Y. Saez, A. Mochon, J.L. Gomez-Barroso, and P. Isasi. Testing boi and bob algorithms for solving the winner determination problem in radio spectrum auctions. HIS 08 Proceedings of the 2008 8th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, pages 732–737, 2008. Y. Saez, A. Mochon, J.L. Gomez-Barroso, and P. Isasi. Testing boi and bob algorithms for solving the winner determination problem in radio spectrum auctions. HIS 08 Proceedings of the 2008 8th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, pages 732–737, 2008.
69.
go back to reference Y. Saez, D. Quintana, P. Isasi, and A. Mochon. Effects of a rationing rule on the ausubel auction: a genetic algorithm implementation. Computational Intelligence, 23(2):221–235, 2007.CrossRef Y. Saez, D. Quintana, P. Isasi, and A. Mochon. Effects of a rationing rule on the ausubel auction: a genetic algorithm implementation. Computational Intelligence, 23(2):221–235, 2007.CrossRef
70.
go back to reference T. Sandholm. Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence, 135:1–54, 2002.CrossRef T. Sandholm. Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence, 135:1–54, 2002.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference T. Sandholm and S. Suri. Bob: Improved winner determination in combinatorial auctions and generalizations. Artificial Intelligence, 145:33–58, 2003.CrossRef T. Sandholm and S. Suri. Bob: Improved winner determination in combinatorial auctions and generalizations. Artificial Intelligence, 145:33–58, 2003.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference T. Sandholm, S. Suri, A. Gilpin, and D. Levine. Cabob: A fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 51(3):374–390, 2005.CrossRef T. Sandholm, S. Suri, A. Gilpin, and D. Levine. Cabob: A fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Management Science, 51(3):374–390, 2005.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference M.A. Satterthwaite and S.R. Williams. The bayesian theory of the k-double auction. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pages 99–123. Perseus Publishing, 1993. M.A. Satterthwaite and S.R. Williams. The bayesian theory of the k-double auction. In D. Friedman and J. Rust, editors, The Double Auction Market: Institutions, Theories and Evidence, pages 99–123. Perseus Publishing, 1993.
74.
go back to reference M. Shubik. The dollar auction game: A paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(1):109–111, 1971.CrossRef M. Shubik. The dollar auction game: A paradox in noncooperative behavior and escalation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(1):109–111, 1971.CrossRef
75.
go back to reference M. Shubik. Auctions, bidding, and markets: an historical sketch. In M. Shubik, R. Engelbrecht, and R. Stark, editors, Auctions, Bidding and Contracting: Uses and Theory, pages 33–52. University Press, New York, 1983. M. Shubik. Auctions, bidding, and markets: an historical sketch. In M. Shubik, R. Engelbrecht, and R. Stark, editors, Auctions, Bidding and Contracting: Uses and Theory, pages 33–52. University Press, New York, 1983.
76.
go back to reference D.G. Silva. Synergies in recurring procurement auctions: An empirical investigation. Economic Inquiry, 43(1):55–66, 2005.CrossRef D.G. Silva. Synergies in recurring procurement auctions: An empirical investigation. Economic Inquiry, 43(1):55–66, 2005.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference R.H. Thaler. Anomalies: the winner’s curse. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1):191–202, 1988.CrossRef R.H. Thaler. Anomalies: the winner’s curse. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1):191–202, 1988.CrossRef
78.
go back to reference H.R. Varian. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25:1163–1178, 2007.CrossRef H.R. Varian. Position auctions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25:1163–1178, 2007.CrossRef
79.
go back to reference W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16:8–37, 1961.CrossRef W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16:8–37, 1961.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference D.R. Vincent. Bidding off the wall: Why reserve prices may be kept secret. Journal of Economic Theory, 65(2):575–584, 1995.CrossRef D.R. Vincent. Bidding off the wall: Why reserve prices may be kept secret. Journal of Economic Theory, 65(2):575–584, 1995.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Other Single-Unit Auctions
Authors
Asunción Mochón
Yago Sáez
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08813-6_3