Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance 4/2021

17-06-2021

Patience is a virtue: exploiting behavior bias in gambling markets

Authors: Kevin Krieger, Justin L. Davis, James Strode

Published in: Journal of Economics and Finance | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We examine the influence of bettor behavior in sports gambling markets and the resulting creation of exploitable betting opportunities for patient bettors. Specifically, we build on past research on behavioral bias as a predictor of bettor behavior and explore how this behavior can result in market inefficiencies. Using data from National Football League games taking place between 2007-2019, we find that bettor decision-making is erroneously influenced by recent performance of teams. This bias creates profitable betting opportunities for those less subject to recency bias, and are surprisingly greater for the more prudent, patient bettor. Our findings confirm the need for additional research examining the influence of psychology and behavioral biases on individual decision making and how these factors can influence market efficiency.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Some researchers (e.g., Levitt 2004; Kain and Logan 2014; Paul and Weinbach 2012) note that bookmakers may choose, in some instances, to offer lines that seek to maximize profit (by tempting bettors to take the bookmaker’s perceived, poor side of a wager) rather than seek a riskless, commission-only model. Regardless of bookmaker intention, our results herein seek to describe a contrarian-type wagering opportunity holistically made possible by market participants.
 
2
We also considered omitting Week 17 data as incentives to team performance in the final week of the season vary widely. This omission did not substantively change our findings.
 
3
There are exceptions to this structure. Most commonly, for example, our opening line data in week X for teams participating in a week X-1 Monday Night Football game are not available until Tuesday of week X. There are never intervening games played between the opening and closing lines by either team in our sample observation games. While injuries are common in sport, particularly in a high contact sport such as professional football, the NFL attempts to disseminate information publicly, regarding injuries through the Physically Unable to Perform, or PUP list, and the Injured Reserve, or IR. Deadlines are established for teams to release their PUP and IR lists to reduce the uncertainty associated with key players’ participation. It is rather rare for the bettors or oddsmakers to be unaware of a key injury, and, at least until some clarity emerges on player participation, there is usually a delay in the issuance of the opening line of a game.
 
4
For robustness, we also consider whether the time since a team last played is material to our results. For example, each NFL team has one ‘open’ week on its schedule each year so that its prior performance in, e.g., Week 8 might have actually occurred in Week 6 rather than Week 7. Games also occur on Thursdays and Mondays each NFL week, as well as occasionally on Saturdays toward the end of each season. As we find no material differences in our results when considering the different times elapsed since teams’ prior games we omit the formal results herein.
 
5
For example, if Denver covered its prior game spread by 10, and Seattle failed to cover its prior game spread by 1, we say both Denver and Seattle contribute to the PriorGameATS value of 11. Games where Team B failed to cover its prior spread and Team A covered its prior spread, thus, exclusively make up the “both sides contributing” subsample. Alternatively, as an example, when Atlanta covered its prior game spread by 6, and Buffalo covered its prior game spread by 5, only one team (Atlanta) contributed to the PriorGameATS value of 1.
 
6
The Team B’s on which we wager, in order to implement our reversal strategy, need not be underdogs in their games. In fact, nearly half of Team B’s are actually favorites when we wager on them. We consider, in omitted results, whether the favorite/underdog status of Team B affects our results and find the distinction to be immaterial.
 
7
One estimate is that less than 0.5% of bettors are ‘professional,’ so that they might be considered ‘informed investors’ in a more traditional financial sense (Bluth 1997). Their wiseguy/professional budget for wagering is, on average, considerably larger than a typical bettor; however, the overall public interest in the NFL games appears so large as to limit the correcting influence of wiseguys on inefficiency in many games. Other games have very limited interest from the public so that wiseguys indeed move the price to a more efficient point, sometimes quickly after the opening line is issued.
 
8
In fact, some such hedge fund managers sought to ride the tech stock bubble, i.e., take the opposite approach to trading against inefficiencies. In the equity environment (where there is no analog to the end of an NFL game, which sets the value of a wager as final) the demand of the naïve public for tech stocks was even able to keep the price of some never-profitable stocks inflated for years. In extreme cases, hedge fund managers that traded correctly against the tech bubble even went insolvent due to client withdrawals before their assertions could be proven correct.
 
9
To further consider the impact of specific levels of PriorGameATS on line movement, as well as our strategy performance, in unpublished results we reconstruct the findings of Table 3, Panel B for the various levels of PriorGameATS (and consider alternative segmenting of the sample, e.g., 5-point windows, 7-point windows, etc.). Results follow the general pattern of profitability, with greater profitability at closing lines, as would be expected given the results of Table 1 and Table 2.
 
10
In unreported results, inspired by Dare and Dennis (2011), we consider whether our baseline reversal strategy results differ when the strategy dictates wagering on a home team or away team in an NFL game. The results do not materially differ.
 
11
In unreported results, inspired by Shank (2019), we consider whether our baseline reversal strategy results differ when the strategy dictates wagering in an intradivision NFL game or interdivision NFL game. The results do not materially differ.
 
Literature
go back to reference Borghesi R (2007) The home team weather advantage and biases in the NFL betting market. J Econ Bus 59(4):340–354CrossRef Borghesi R (2007) The home team weather advantage and biases in the NFL betting market. J Econ Bus 59(4):340–354CrossRef
go back to reference Brunnermeier MK, Nagel S (2004) Hedge funds and the technology bubble. J Financ 59(5):2013–2040CrossRef Brunnermeier MK, Nagel S (2004) Hedge funds and the technology bubble. J Financ 59(5):2013–2040CrossRef
go back to reference Camerer CF (1989) Does the basketball market believe in the ‘Hot Hand’,? Am Econ Rev 79(5):1257–1261 Camerer CF (1989) Does the basketball market believe in the ‘Hot Hand’,? Am Econ Rev 79(5):1257–1261
go back to reference Dare WH, Dennis SA (2011) A test for the bias of inherent characteristics in betting markets. J Sports Econ 12(6):660–665CrossRef Dare WH, Dennis SA (2011) A test for the bias of inherent characteristics in betting markets. J Sports Econ 12(6):660–665CrossRef
go back to reference Davis JL, Mcelfresh L, Krieger K, Fodor A (2015) Exploiting week 2 bias in the NFL betting markets. J Pred Mark 9(1):53–67CrossRef Davis JL, Mcelfresh L, Krieger K, Fodor A (2015) Exploiting week 2 bias in the NFL betting markets. J Pred Mark 9(1):53–67CrossRef
go back to reference Edwards W (1968) Conservatism in human information processing. In Kleinmutz, F., ed.: Formal Representation of Human Judgment (Wiley, New York) Edwards W (1968) Conservatism in human information processing. In Kleinmutz, F., ed.: Formal Representation of Human Judgment (Wiley, New York)
go back to reference Fodor A, DiFilippo M, Krieger K, Davis JL (2013) Inefficient pricing from holdover bias in the NFL point spread markets. Appl Financial Econ 27(17):1407–1418 Fodor A, DiFilippo M, Krieger K, Davis JL (2013) Inefficient pricing from holdover bias in the NFL point spread markets. Appl Financial Econ 27(17):1407–1418
go back to reference Gilovich T, Vallone R, Tversky A (1985) The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cogn Psychol 17:295–314CrossRef Gilovich T, Vallone R, Tversky A (1985) The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cogn Psychol 17:295–314CrossRef
go back to reference Goetzmann W, Massa M (2002) Daily momentum and contrarian behavior of index fund investors. J Financial Quant Anal 37(3):375–389 Goetzmann W, Massa M (2002) Daily momentum and contrarian behavior of index fund investors. J Financial Quant Anal 37(3):375–389
go back to reference Kain KJ, Logan TD (2014) Are sports betting markets prediction markets?: Evidence from a new test. J Sports Econ 15(1):45–63CrossRef Kain KJ, Logan TD (2014) Are sports betting markets prediction markets?: Evidence from a new test. J Sports Econ 15(1):45–63CrossRef
go back to reference Krieger K, Fodor A (2013) Price movements and the prevalence of informed traders: The case of line movement in college basketball. J Econ Bus 68:70–82CrossRef Krieger K, Fodor A (2013) Price movements and the prevalence of informed traders: The case of line movement in college basketball. J Econ Bus 68:70–82CrossRef
go back to reference Lee DD, Chan H, Faff RW, Kalev PS (2003) Short-term contrarian investing – is it profitable? Yes and no. J Multl Financ Manag 13(4–5):385–404CrossRef Lee DD, Chan H, Faff RW, Kalev PS (2003) Short-term contrarian investing – is it profitable? Yes and no. J Multl Financ Manag 13(4–5):385–404CrossRef
go back to reference Levitt SD (2004) Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets? Econ J 114:223–246CrossRef Levitt SD (2004) Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets? Econ J 114:223–246CrossRef
go back to reference Murtha BR (2013) Peaking at the right time: Perceptions, expectations, and effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 120(1):62–72CrossRef Murtha BR (2013) Peaking at the right time: Perceptions, expectations, and effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 120(1):62–72CrossRef
go back to reference Nichols MW (2014) The impact of visiting team travel on game outcome and biases in NFL betting markets. J Sports Econ 15(1):78–96CrossRef Nichols MW (2014) The impact of visiting team travel on game outcome and biases in NFL betting markets. J Sports Econ 15(1):78–96CrossRef
go back to reference Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2005) Bettor preferences and market efficiency in football totals markets. J Econ Financ 29(3):409–415CrossRef Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2005) Bettor preferences and market efficiency in football totals markets. J Econ Financ 29(3):409–415CrossRef
go back to reference Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2012) NFL bettor biases and price setting: further tests of the Levitt hypothesis of sportsbook behaviour. Appl Econ Lett 18(2):193–197CrossRef Paul RJ, Weinbach AP (2012) NFL bettor biases and price setting: further tests of the Levitt hypothesis of sportsbook behaviour. Appl Econ Lett 18(2):193–197CrossRef
go back to reference Paul RJ, Weinbach AP, Humphreys B (2011) Revisiting the “Hot Hand” hypothesis in the NBA betting market using actual sportsbook betting percentages on favorites and underdogs. J Gambl Bus Econ 5(2):42–56CrossRef Paul RJ, Weinbach AP, Humphreys B (2011) Revisiting the “Hot Hand” hypothesis in the NBA betting market using actual sportsbook betting percentages on favorites and underdogs. J Gambl Bus Econ 5(2):42–56CrossRef
go back to reference Sauer R (1998) The economics of wagering markets. J Econ Lit 36:2021–2064 Sauer R (1998) The economics of wagering markets. J Econ Lit 36:2021–2064
go back to reference Schiereck D, De Bondt W, Weber M (1999) Contrarian and momentum strategies in Germany. Financ Anal J 55(6):104–116CrossRef Schiereck D, De Bondt W, Weber M (1999) Contrarian and momentum strategies in Germany. Financ Anal J 55(6):104–116CrossRef
go back to reference Shank CA (2019) NFL Betting Biases, Profitable Strategies, and the Wisdom of the Crowd. Int J Sport Financ 14:3–12CrossRef Shank CA (2019) NFL Betting Biases, Profitable Strategies, and the Wisdom of the Crowd. Int J Sport Financ 14:3–12CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131 Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131
go back to reference Vergin RC, Scriabin M (1978) Winning strategies for wagering on National Football League games. Manag Sci 24(8):809–818CrossRef Vergin RC, Scriabin M (1978) Winning strategies for wagering on National Football League games. Manag Sci 24(8):809–818CrossRef
go back to reference Woodland BM, Woodland LM (2015) Testing Probability in the NBA Season Wins Total Betting Market. Int J Sport Financ 10:160–174 Woodland BM, Woodland LM (2015) Testing Probability in the NBA Season Wins Total Betting Market. Int J Sport Financ 10:160–174
Metadata
Title
Patience is a virtue: exploiting behavior bias in gambling markets
Authors
Kevin Krieger
Justin L. Davis
James Strode
Publication date
17-06-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Economics and Finance / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1055-0925
Electronic ISSN: 1938-9744
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-021-09557-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Economics and Finance 4/2021 Go to the issue