Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Technology 3/2019

27-04-2019 | Original Paper

Patient and practitioner experience with clinical lumbar motion monitor wearable technology

Authors: Sue A. Ferguson, Robin S. Berner, Matthew A. Bridger, Safdar N. Khan, Tristan E. Weaver, Elizabeth M. Yu, William S. Marras

Published in: Health and Technology | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Unfortunately, there is no gold standard for objectively quantifying low back function. The clinical lumbar motion monitor (CLMM), a wearable technology, has been developed to provide an objective measure of low back function. The evaluation for the patient is like playing a video game with their back. For health care practitioners the CLMM provides three metrics including overall impairment, structural/muscular and test reliability (do we have good data). This study had two goals. 1) To evaluate the ease of use for the patients. 2) To evaluate how the health care practitioners were able to use the results. Sixty-six low back pain patients were evaluated in the study and 18 health care practitioners were interviewed after receiving CLMM results on their patients. The patients were given a survey immediately after evaluation completion. The practitioners participated in a phone survey after all patient evaluations were completed. Ninety-two percent of the patients either agreed or strongly agreed that the monitor was comfortable and 98% either agreed or strongly agreed that the instructions were clear. One hundred percent of the health care practitioners agreed the test reliability metric was informative and provided a new perspective to their clinical impression. Overall LBP patients were satisfied with the evaluation and health care practitioners thought the results added to their clinical impression. The CLMM technology provides an objective quantitative measure of low back function that may change the way health care practitioners treat LBP patients.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:968–74.CrossRef Hoy D, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, Woolf A, Bain C, et al. The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:968–74.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates estimates from U.S. National Survey 2002. Spine. 2006;31(23):2724–7.CrossRef Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates estimates from U.S. National Survey 2002. Spine. 2006;31(23):2724–7.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hartvigsen J, Hancock M, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67.CrossRef Hartvigsen J, Hancock M, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay S. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–67.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–53.CrossRef Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000;25(22):2940–53.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Gupta P, Bose J, Parnianpour M, Kim J, et al. The quantification of low back disorder using motion measures: methodology and validation. Spine. 1999;24(20):2091–100.CrossRef Marras WS, Ferguson SA, Gupta P, Bose J, Parnianpour M, Kim J, et al. The quantification of low back disorder using motion measures: methodology and validation. Spine. 1999;24(20):2091–100.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marras WS, Lewis KK, Ferguson SA, Parnianpour M. Impairment magnification during dynamic trunk motion. Spine. 2000;25(5):587–95.CrossRef Marras WS, Lewis KK, Ferguson SA, Parnianpour M. Impairment magnification during dynamic trunk motion. Spine. 2000;25(5):587–95.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ferguson SA, Marras WS, Gupta P. Longitudinal quantitative measure of the natural course of low back pain recovery. Spine. 2000;25(15):1950–6.CrossRef Ferguson SA, Marras WS, Gupta P. Longitudinal quantitative measure of the natural course of low back pain recovery. Spine. 2000;25(15):1950–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ferguson SA, Gallagher S, Marras WS. Validity and reliability of sincerity test for dynamic trunk motion. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:236–41.CrossRef Ferguson SA, Gallagher S, Marras WS. Validity and reliability of sincerity test for dynamic trunk motion. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:236–41.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ferguson SA, Marras WS, Burr D, Woods S, Mendel E, Gupta P. Quantification of a meaningful change in low back functional impairment. Spine. 2009;34(19):2060–5.CrossRef Ferguson SA, Marras WS, Burr D, Woods S, Mendel E, Gupta P. Quantification of a meaningful change in low back functional impairment. Spine. 2009;34(19):2060–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gao Y, Li H, Luo Y. An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2015;115(9):1704–23.CrossRef Gao Y, Li H, Luo Y. An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2015;115(9):1704–23.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Or CKL, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:550–60.CrossRef Or CKL, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:550–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Patient and practitioner experience with clinical lumbar motion monitor wearable technology
Authors
Sue A. Ferguson
Robin S. Berner
Matthew A. Bridger
Safdar N. Khan
Tristan E. Weaver
Elizabeth M. Yu
William S. Marras
Publication date
27-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health and Technology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2190-7188
Electronic ISSN: 2190-7196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00330-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Health and Technology 3/2019 Go to the issue

Expression of Concern

Expression of concern

Premium Partner