Top

Published in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Peace in Peace Studies: Beyond the ‘Negative/Positive’ Divide

Author : Gijsbert M. van Iterson Scholten

Published in: Visions of Peace of Professional Peace Workers

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the academic debate on peace and peacebuilding. It starts with a discussion of classical concepts of peace, such as the well-known dichotomy between positive and negative peace, stable peace, peace as process and the democratic peace thesis. Along the way, seven dimensions are introduced along which these concepts differ from one another.

The second half of the chapter is devoted to the peacebuilding literature, specifically the liberal peace debates. It argues that these debates are not just about the best way to achieve lasting peace in (post-) conflict societies, but more fundamentally about different visions of what constitutes such a peace. Besides the liberal peace itself, four other visions can be distilled from the literature: hybrid peace, agonistic peace, welfare and everyday peace. Using the dimensions identified earlier in the chapter, these visions are compared to one another in order to disentangle what is at stake for the different sides.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Introduction

next chapter Western Dissensus, Non-Western Consensus: A Q Study Into the Meanings of Peace

These were the two names that came up most frequently in response to the background question whether an interviewee was familiar with the academic literature on peace and could name any authors that had influenced his or her thinking. See the interview guide in Appendix E.

For a similar approach, but focused on International Relations (IR) theory, see (Richmond 2008a).

This discussion does not cover even more classical visions of peace, such as those espoused by, e.g., Saint Augustine (Augustine 2010: 212–220), Thomas Hobbes (Hobbes 2003 [1651]: 101–102) or Immanuel Kant (Kant 1976 [1796]). Although present-day peace researchers may cite those visions in support of their own, the primary purpose of this chapter is to establish a conceptual framework for present-day visions of peace, rather than giving a full historical overview of thinking about peace. For that, see, e.g. (Adolf 2009; Dietrich 2012; Hassner 1994).

It should be noted that this reading depends on a constructivist account of International Relations, as Rasmussen himself acknowledges (Rasmussen 2003: 4).

Although, to be fair, there are also quite some political scientists who are interested in the economic underpinnings of peace (e.g. Gartzke 2007; Hegre et al. 2010).

See especially Chap. 3, Sect. 3.2, Chap. 7, Sect. 7.3.3 and Chap. 9, Sect. 9.3.2 in the conclusion.

In a recent appraisal of the ‘hybrid turn’ in peacebuilding literature, Mac Ginty and Richmond even speak of hybridity as an ‘emergent social construct’ (Mac Ginty and Richmond 2016: 221).

Clausewitz’s original maxim being that war is the continuation of policy—or (depending on the translation) of politics—with other means (Von Clausewitz 1984 [1832]: 87).

For a brief overview of the classical arguments, in an interstate context, but equally valid for intrastate conflicts, see, e.g. (Gartzke 2007: 169–170).

In a seemingly largely forgotten essay, German peace scientist Ivan Illich called this ‘vernacular peace’ or Vride, after the medieval German word for this kind of peace. He contrasted the notion with the Roman word Pax that denoted the peace between rulers (Illich 1992).

According to Millar, the same is true for authors who want to prescribe a hybrid peace.

Interestingly, care and empathy also feature heavily in feminist approaches to IR. Feminist authors such as Carol Gilligan and Sara Ruddick contrast a male perspective of domination with a female perspective of care for others, arguing that the latter is inherently more peaceful than the former (Gilligan 2009; Ruddick 1995). Likewise, Christine Sylvester proposes ‘empathetic cooperation’ as a feminist method for IR (Sylvester 1994), raising empathy to a concern at the international level as well.

A point that will be developed in Chap. 8 on the Mindanaoan visions of peace.

Or, using Giddens’s terminology, in structures or in agents (Giddens 1979).

Adolf, A. (2009). Peace. A world history. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Advisory Group of Experts (2015). The challenge of sustaining peace. Report of the Advisory Group of Experts for the 2015 Review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture. New York: United Nations.

Aggestam, K., F. Cristiano, et al. (2015). “Towards agonistic peacebuilding? Exploring the antagonism–agonism nexus in the Middle East peace process.” Third World Quarterly 36(9): 1736–1753.CrossRef

Anderson, R. (2004). “A definition of peace.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 10(2): 101.CrossRef

Augustine, S. (2010). The city of god, books XVII–XXII (The Fathers of the church, volume 24). CUA Press.

Austin, A., M. Fischer, et al. (2013). Transforming ethnopolitical conflict: The Berghof handbook. Springer Science & Business Media.

Autesserre, S. (2010). The trouble with the Congo: Local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding. Cambridge University Press.

Autesserre, S. (2014). Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Babo-Soares, D. (2004). “Nahe Biti: The philosophy and process of grassroots reconciliation (and justice) in East Timor.” The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 5(1): 15–33.CrossRef

Banks, M. (1987). “Four conceptions of peace.” In Conflict management and problem solving: Interpersonal to international applications. D. J. D. Sandole and I. Sandole-Staroste (Eds.). London: Pinter: 259–274.

Basabe, N. and J. Valencia (2007). “Culture of peace: Sociostructural dimensions, cultural values, and emotional climate.” Journal of Social Issues 63(2): 405–419.CrossRef

Begby, E. and J. P. Burgess (2009). “Human security and liberal peace.” Public Reason 1(1): 91–104.

Bell, C. (2008). On the law of peace: Peace agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. Oxford University Press.

Belloni, R. (2012). “Hybrid peace governance: Its emergence and significance.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18(1): 21–38.CrossRef

Berents, H. and S. McEvoy-Levy (2015). “Theorising youth and everyday peace (building).” Peacebuilding 3(2): 115–125.CrossRef

Björkdahl, A., K. Höglund, et al. (2016). Peacebuilding and friction: Global and local encounters in post conflict-societies. London and New York: Routledge.

Boege, V. (2011). “Potential and limits of traditional approaches in peacebuilding.” In Berghof handbook II: Advancing conflict transformation. B. Austin, M. Fischer, and H. J. Giessmann (Eds.). Berlin: Barbara Budrich Publishers: 431–457.

Boege, V. (2012). “Hybrid forms of peace and order on a South Sea Island: Experiences from Bougainville (Papua New Guinea).” In Hybrid forms of peace: From everyday agency to post-liberalism. O. Richmond and A. Mitchell (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 88–106.CrossRef

Boulding, K. E. (1977). “Twelve friendly quarrels with Johan Galtung.” Journal of Peace Research 14(1): 75–86.CrossRef

Boulding, K. E. (1978). Stable peace. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Boutros-Ghali, B. (1992). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: UN.

Brigg, M. and P. O. Walker (2016). “Indigeneity and peace.” In The Palgrave handbook of disciplinary and regional approaches to peace. O. P. Richmond and S. Pogodda (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 259–271.CrossRef

Brusset, E., C. De Coning, et al. (2016). Complexity thinking for peacebuilding practice and evaluation. Springer.

Burton, J. W. (1990). Conflict: Resolution and prevention. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Caedel, M. (1987). Thinking about peace and war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Call, C. T. (2008). “Knowing peace when you see it: Setting standards for peacebuilding success.” Civil Wars 10(2): 173–194.CrossRef

Call, C. T. (2012). Why peace fails: The causes and prevention of civil war recurrence. Georgetown University Press.

Call, C. T. and E. M. Cousens (2008). “Ending wars and building peace: International responses to war-torn societies.” International Studies Perspectives 9(1): 1–21.CrossRef

Carothers, T. (2007). “The “sequencing” fallacy.” Journal of Democracy 18(1): 12–27.CrossRef

Chandler, D. (2004). “The responsibility to protect? Imposing the ‘liberal peace’.” International Peacekeeping 11(1): 59–81.CrossRef

Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in denial: The politics of state-building. London: Pluto.

Chandler, D. (2010). “The uncritical critique of ‘liberal peace’.” Review of International Studies 36(S1): 137–155.CrossRef

Chandler, D. (2017). Peacebuilding: The twenty years’ crisis, 1997–2017. Springer.

Charbonneau, B. and G. Parent, Eds. (2013). Peacebuilding, memory and reconciliation: Bridging top-down and bottom-up approaches. London and New York: Routledge.

Chigas, D. (2014). “The role and effectiveness of non-governmental third parties in peacebuilding.” In Moving toward a just peace. Springer: 273–315.

Chopra, J. and T. Hohe (2004). “Participatory intervention.” Global Governance 10(3): 289–305.CrossRef

Christie, D. J. (2006). “What is peace psychology the psychology of?” Journal of Social Issues 62(1): 1–17.CrossRef

Cisnero, M. R. L. (2008). “Rediscovering olden pathways and vanishing trails to justice and peace: Indigenous modes of dispute resolution and indigenous justice systems.” In A sourcebook on alternatives to formal dispute resolution mechanisms. A publication of the Justice Reform Initiatives Support Project. C. Ubarra (Ed.). N.P.: National Judicial Institute of Canada.

Coleman, P. T. and M. Deutsch, Eds. (2012). Psychological components of sustainable peace. Peace Psychology Book Series. New York: Springer.

Collier, P. and A. Hoeffler (2004). “Greed and grievance in civil war.” Oxford Economic Papers 56(4): 563–595.CrossRef

Connolly, W. E. (2002). Identity, difference: Democratic negotiations of political paradox. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Cooper, N., M. Turner, et al. (2011). “The end of history and the last liberal peacebuilder: A reply to Roland Paris.” Review of International Studies 1(1): 1–13.

Dafoe, A. (2011). “Statistical critiques of the democratic peace: Caveat emptor.” American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 247–262.CrossRef

Daxecker, U. E. (2007). “Perilous polities? An assessment of the democratization-conflict linkage.” European Journal of International Relations 13(4): 527–553.CrossRef

De Coning, C. (2018a). “Adaptive peacebuilding.” International Affairs 94(2): 301–317.CrossRef

Dietrich, W. (2012). Interpretations of peace in history and culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Dietrich, W. and W. Sützl (1997). A call for many peaces. Peace Center Burg Schlaining.

Donais, T. (2009). “Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding processes.” Peace & Change 34(1): 3–26.CrossRef

Doyle, M. W. (2005). “Three pillars of the liberal peace.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 463–466.CrossRef

Doyle, M. W. and N. Sambanis (2000). “International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis.” American Political Science Review 94(4): 779–801.CrossRef

Doyle, M. W. and N. Sambanis (2006). Making war and building peace: United Nations peace operations. Princeton University Press.

Duffield, M. R. (2001). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. London: Zed Books.

Fabbro, D. (1978). “Peaceful societies: An introduction.” Journal of Peace Research 15(1): 67–83.CrossRef

Firchow, P. (2018). Reclaiming everyday peace: Local voices in measurement and evaluation after war. Cambridge University Press.

Fischer, R. and K. Hanke (2009). “Are societal values linked to global peace and conflict?” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 15(3): 227.CrossRef

Fortna, V. P. (2004). “Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war.” International Studies Quarterly 48(2): 269–292.CrossRef

Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.

Galtung, J. (1964). “An editorial.” Journal of Peace Research 1(1): 1–4.CrossRef

Galtung, J. (1967). “On the future of the international system.” Journal of Peace Research 4(4): 305–333.CrossRef

Galtung, J. (1969). “Violence, peace, and peace research.” Journal of Peace Research 6(3): 167–191.CrossRef

Galtung, J. (2000). Conflict transformation by peaceful means: The transcend method. UN.

Galtung, J. (2007). “Introduction: Peace by peaceful conflict transformation—The transcend approach.” In Handbook of peace and conflict studies. C. Webel and J. Galtung (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge: 14–32.CrossRef

Galtung, J. (2010). “Peace studies and conflict resolution: The need for transdisciplinarity.” Transcultural Psychiatry 47(1): 20–32.CrossRef

Gartzke, E. (2007). “The capitalist peace.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 166–191.CrossRef

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. University of California Press.

Gilligan, C. (2009). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Gleditsch, N. P., J. Nordkvelle, et al. (2014). “Peace research—Just the study of war?” Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 145–158.CrossRef

Hassner, P. (1994). “Beyond the three traditions: The philosophy of war and peace in historical perspective.” International Affairs 70(4): 737–756.CrossRef

Heathershaw, J. (2008). “Unpacking the liberal peace: The dividing and merging of peacebuilding discourses.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 36(3): 597–621.CrossRef

Heathershaw, J. (2009). Post-conflict Tajikistan: The politics of peacebuilding and the emergence of legitimate order. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Heathershaw, J. (2013). “Towards better theories of peacebuilding: Beyond the liberal peace debate.” Peacebuilding 1(2): 275–282.CrossRef

Hegre, H. (2014). “Democracy and armed conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 159–172.CrossRef

Hegre, H., T. Ellingsen, et al. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Association, Cambridge University Press.

Hegre, H., J. R. Oneal, et al. (2010). “Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict.” Journal of Peace Research 47(6): 763–774.CrossRef

Hilhorst, D. and M. Van Leeuwen (2005). “Grounding local peace organisations: A case study of Southern Sudan.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 43(4): 537–563.CrossRef

Hobbes, T. (2003 [1651]). Leviathan: or The matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth ecclesiasticall and civill. Bristol: Thoemmes Continuum.

Illich, I. (1992). “The de-linking of peace and development. Opening address on the occasion of the first meeting of the Asian Peace Research Association, Yokohama, 1 December 1980.” In In the mirror of the past: Lectures and addresses, 1978–1990. I. Illich and V. Borremans (Eds.). London: Marion Boyars Publishers.

Institute for Economics and Peace (2013). Pillars of peace: Understanding the key attitudes and institutions that underpin peaceful societies. IEP Reports. Sydney: Institute for Economics and Peace, 22.

Jarstad, A. K. and R. Belloni (2012). “Introducing hybrid peace governance: Impact and prospects of liberal peacebuilding.” Global Governance 18(1): 1–6.CrossRef

Jenkins, R. (2013). Peacebuilding: From concept to commission. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Johnson, K. and M. L. Hutchison (2012). “Hybridity, political order and legitimacy: Examples from Nigeria.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(2): 37–52.CrossRef

Kaldor, M. (2006). New and old wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kant, I. (1976 [1796]). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Kelsen, H. (1944). Peace through law. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan.

Krijtenburg, F. (2007). Cultural ideologies of peace and conflict: A socio-cognitive study of Giryama discourse (Kenya). Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

Krijtenburg, F. and E. de Volder (2015). “How universal is UN ‘peace’?: A comparative linguistic analysis of the United Nations and Giryama (Kenya) concepts of ‘peace’.” International Journal of Language and Culture 2(2): 194–218.CrossRef

Kühn, F. P. (2012). “The peace prefix: Ambiguities of the word ‘peace’.” International Peacekeeping 19(4): 396–409.CrossRef

Kustermans, J. (2012). Democratic peace as practice. PhD thesis, Faculteit Politieke en Sociale Wetenschappen, Departement Politieke Wetenschappen, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen.

Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse University Press.

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

Lederach, J. P. (2015). Little book of conflict transformation: Clear articulation of the guiding principles by a pioneer in the field. Simon and Schuster.

Lee, Y.-C., Y.-C. Lin, et al. (2013). “The construct and measurement of peace of mind.” Journal of Happiness Studies 14(2): 571–590.CrossRef

Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1947]). Critique of everyday life. Volume 1: Introduction. London and New York: Verso Books.

Leonardsson, H. and G. Rudd (2015). “The ‘local turn’ in peacebuilding: A literature review of effective and emancipatory local peacebuilding.” Third World Quarterly 36(5): 825–839.CrossRef

Liden, K. (2007). ‘What is the ethics of peacebuilding?’ Lecture prepared for the kick-off meeting of the Liberal Peace and the Ethics of Peacebuilding project. Peace Research Institute Oslo, January 18, 2007.

Lidén, K. (2009). “Building peace between global and local politics: The cosmopolitical ethics of liberal peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 16(5): 616–634.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2006). No war, no peace: The rejuvenation of stalled peace processes and peace accords. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2008). “Indigenous peace-making versus the liberal peace.” Cooperation and Conflict 43(2): 139–163.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2010). “Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace.” Security Dialogue 41(4): 391–412.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2011). International peacebuilding and local resistance: Hybrid forms of peace. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2012). “Routine peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding.” Cooperation and Conflict 47(3): 287–308.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2013). “Indicators+: A proposal for everyday peace indicators.” Evaluation and Program Planning 36: 56–63.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. (2014). “Everyday peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies.” Security Dialogue 45(6): 548–564.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. and G. Sanghera, Eds. (2012b). Special issue: Hybridity in peacebuilding and development. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(2): 3–8.

Mac Ginty, R. and P. Firchow (2016). “Top-down and bottom-up narratives of peace and conflict.” Politics 36(3): 308–323.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. and O. P. Richmond (2013). “The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace.” Third World Quarterly 34(5): 763–783.CrossRef

Mac Ginty, R. and O. Richmond (2016). “The fallacy of constructing hybrid political orders: A reappraisal of the hybrid turn in peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 23(2): 219–239.CrossRef

Macmillan, J. (2003). “Beyond the separate democratic peace.” Journal of Peace Research 40(2): 233–243.CrossRef

Mansfield, E. D. and J. Snyder (1995). “Democratization and the danger of war.” International Security 20(1): 5–38.CrossRef

Mansfield, E. D. and J. Snyder (2007). Electing to fight: Why emerging democracies go to war. MIT Press.

McKeown Jones, S. and D. J. Christie (2016). “Social psychology and peace.” In The Palgrave handbook of disciplinary and regional approaches to peace. O. P. Richmond, S. Pogodda, and J. Ramovic (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Millar, G. (2014). “Disaggregating hybridity: Why hybrid institutions do not produce predictable experiences of peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51(4): 501–514.CrossRef

Millar, G. (2016). “Local experiences of liberal peace.” Journal of Peace Research 53(4): 569–581.CrossRef

Mouffe, C. (1993). The return of the political. London and New York: Verso.

Mouffe, C. (1999). “Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?” Social Research 66(3): 745–758.

Münkler, H. (2005). The new wars. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Nadarajah, S. and D. Rampton (2015). “The limits of hybridity and the crisis of liberal peace.” Review of International Studies 41(1): 49–72.CrossRef

Nagle, J. (2014). “From the politics of antagonistic recognition to agonistic peace building: An exploration of symbols and rituals in divided societies.” Peace & Change 39(4): 468–494.CrossRef

Newman, E. (2009). “‘Liberal’ peacebuilding debates.” In New perspectives on liberal peacebuilding. E. Newman, R. Paris, and O. Richmond (Eds.). Tokyo: United Nations University Press: 26–53.

Nixon, H. and R. Ponzio (2007). “Building democracy in Afghanistan: The statebuilding agenda and international engagement.” International Peacekeeping 14(1): 26–40.CrossRef

Noma, E., D. Aker, et al. (2012). “Heeding women’s voices: Breaking cycles of conflict and deepening the concept of peacebuilding.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(1): 7–32.CrossRef

Oneal, J. R., F. H. Oneal, et al. (1996). “The liberal peace: Interdependence, democracy, and international conflict, 1950–85.” Journal of Peace Research 33(1): 11–28.CrossRef

Owen, J. M. (1994). “How liberalism produces democratic peace.” International Security 19(2): 87–125.CrossRef

Paarlberg-Kvam, K. (2018). “What’s to come is more complicated: Feminist visions of peace in Colombia.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 21(2): 1–30.CrossRef

Paffenholz, T., Ed. (2010). Civil society & peacebuilding: A critical assessment. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.

Paffenholz, T. (2014). “International peacebuilding goes local: Analysing Lederach’s conflict transformation theory and its ambivalent encounter with 20 years of practice.” Peacebuilding 2(1): 11–27.CrossRef

Paffenholz, T. (2015). “Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: A critical assessment towards an agenda for future research.” Third World Quarterly 36(5): 857–874.CrossRef

Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end: Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Paris, R. (2010). “Saving liberal peacebuilding.” Review of International Studies 36: 337–365.CrossRef

Park, J. (2013). “Forward to the future? The democratic peace after the Cold War.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 30(2): 178–194.CrossRef

Polat, N. (2010). “Peace as war.” Alternatives 35(4): 317–345.CrossRef

Pugh, M. (2005). “The political economy of peacebuilding: A critical theory perspective.” International Journal of Peace Studies 10: 23–42.

Pugh, M. (2010). “Welfare in war-torn societies: Nemesis of the liberal peace?” In Palgrave advances in peacebuilding: Critical developments and approaches. O. Richmond (Ed.). London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 262–273.CrossRef

Pugh, M., N. Cooper, et al., Eds. (2008). Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding. New Security Challenges. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Puljek-Shank, R. (2017). “Dead letters on a page? Civic agency and inclusive governance in neopatrimonialism.” Democratization 24(4): 670–688.CrossRef

Ramsbotham, O. (2010). Transforming violent conflict: Radical disagreement, dialogue and survival. London and New York: Routledge.

Randazzo, E. (2016). “The paradoxes of the ‘everyday’: Scrutinising the local turn in peace building.” Third World Quarterly 37(8): 1351–1370.CrossRef

Rapoport, A. (1992). Peace: An idea whose time has come. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Rasmussen, M. V. (2003). The west, civil society and the construction of peace. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Rausch, C. (2015). Speaking their peace. Personal stories from the frontlines of war and peace. Berkeley: Roaring Forties Press.

Regan, P. M. (2014). “Bringing peace back in: Presidential address to the Peace Science Society, 2013.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 31(4): 345–356.CrossRef

Reiter, D., A. C. Stam, et al. (2016). “A revised look at interstate wars, 1816–2007.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 60(5): 956–976.CrossRef

Richmond, O. P. (2005). The transformation of peace. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef

Richmond, O. P. (2008a). Peace in international relations. London and New York: Routledge.

Richmond, O. P. (2008b). “Welfare and the civil peace: Poverty with rights?” In Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding. M. Pugh, N. Cooper, and M. Turner (Eds.). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan: 287–301.CrossRef

Richmond, O. P. (2009a). “A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday.” Review of International Studies 35: 557–580.

Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London and New York: Routledge.

Richmond, O. P. (2013). “Peace formation and local infrastructures for peace.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 38(4): 271–287.CrossRef

Richmond, O. P. and J. Franks (2009). Liberal peace transitions: Between statebuilding and peacebuilding. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Richmond, O. P. and R. Mac Ginty (2015). “Where now for the critique of the liberal peace?” Cooperation and Conflict 50(2): 171–189.CrossRef

Richmond, O. P. and A. Mitchell, Eds. (2012). Hybrid forms of peace. From everyday agency to post-liberalism. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Risse-Kappen, T. (1995). “Democratic peace—Warlike democracies? A social constructivist interpretation of the liberal argument.” European Journal of International Relations 1(4): 491–517.CrossRef

Röling, B. V. A. (1973). Polemologie. Een inleiding in de wetenschap van oorlog en vrede. Assen: van Gorcum.

Ruddick, S. (1995). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon Press.

Russett, B. (1994). Grasping the democratic peace: Principles for a post-Cold War world. Princeton University Press.

Russett, B. and J. Oneal (2001). Triangulating peace. Democracy, interdependence and international organizations. New York and London: Norton.

Sabaratnam, M. (2011). “The liberal peace? A brief intellectual history of international conflict management, 1990–2010.” In A liberal peace? The problems and practices of peacebuilding. S. Campbell, D. Chandler, and M. Sabaratnam (Eds.). London: Zed Books: 13–30.

Sabaratnam, M. (2013). “Avatars of Eurocentrism in the critique of the liberal peace.” Security Dialogue 44(3): 259–278.CrossRef

Sambanis, N. (2008). “Short- and long-term effects of United Nations peace operations.” The World Bank Economic Review 22(1): 9–32.CrossRef

Schia, N. N. and J. Karlsrud (2013). “‘Where the rubber meets the road’: Friction sites and local-level peacebuilding in Haiti, Liberia and South Sudan.” International Peacekeeping 20(2): 233–248.CrossRef

Schmitt, C. (2008 [1932]). The concept of the political: Expanded edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Selby, J. (2013). “The myth of liberal peace-building.” Conflict, Security & Development 13(1): 57–86.CrossRef

Senghaas, D. (2004). Zum irdischen Frieden: Erkenntnisse und Vermutungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Shinko, R. E. (2008). “Agonistic peace: A postmodern reading.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 36(3): 473–491.CrossRef

Stensrud, E. E. (2009). “New dilemmas in transitional justice: Lessons from the mixed courts in Sierra Leone and Cambodia.” Journal of Peace Research 46(1): 5–15.CrossRef

Suurmond, J. and P. M. Sharma (2012). “Like yeast that leavens the dough? Community mediation as local infrastructure for peace in Nepal.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(3): 81–86.CrossRef

Sylvester, C. (1994). “Empathetic cooperation: A feminist method for IR.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 23(2): 315–334.CrossRef

Tadjbakhsh, S. (2009). “Conflicted outcomes and values:(Neo) liberal peace in central Asia and Afghanistan.” International Peacekeeping 16(5): 635–651.CrossRef

Tadjbakhsh, S., Ed. (2011). Rethinking the liberal peace: External models and local alternatives. London and New York: Routledge.

Tasew, B. (2009). “Metaphors of peace and violence in the folklore discourses of South-Western Ethiopia: A comparative study.” In Department of social and cultural anthropology. Amsterdam: VU University.

Tomz, M. and J. L. Weeks (2013). “Public opinion and the democratic peace.” American Political Science Review 107(4): 849–865CrossRef

Tongeren, P. v., M. Brenk, et al. (2005). People building peace II, Successful stories of civil society. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

van Leeuwen, M., W. Verkoren, et al. (2012). “Thinking beyond the liberal peace: From utopia to heterotopias.” Acta Politica 47(3): 292–316.CrossRef

Van Tongeren, P., M. O. Ojielo, et al. (2012). “The evolving landscape of infrastructures for peace.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 7(3): 1–7.CrossRef

Von Clausewitz, C. (1984 [1832]). On war. Indexed edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wallensteen, P. (2015a). Quality peace: Peacebuilding, victory and world order. Oxford University Press.

Webel, C. (2007). “Introduction: Toward a philosophy and metapsychology of peace.” In Handbook of peace and conflict studies. C. Webel and J. Galtung (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge: 3–13.CrossRef

Zelizer, C. and R. A. Rubinstein (2009). Building peace: Practical reflections from the field. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

Zizek, S. (2009). Violence: Six sideways reflections. London: Profile Books.

Title: Peace in Peace Studies: Beyond the ‘Negative/Positive’ Divide
Author: Gijsbert M. van Iterson Scholten
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Visions of Peace of Professional Peace Workers
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27974-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-27975-2

Copyright Year: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27975-2_2