Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Pen&Paper, or e-Feedback: Comparative Study

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to research the process of providing individual written feedback to students’ assignments written in the essay format within LMS. The feedback was made by the Pen&Paper method (i.e. handwriting) and by the ICT-enhanced method (i.e. typewriting, called e-feedback) in the English for Specific Purposes online course. The process was structured into three phases: (1) downloading the assignments from the online course, (2) writing the feedback and (3) uploading the assignments back to the online course in LMS. Both methods were identical in phases 1 and 3; however, the phase 2 differed. Totally 62 assignments were used for this research. Both the Pen&Paper method and e-feedback were applied on each assignment; and time periods spent on each assignment were measured and compared. Data were processed by the NCSS2010 statistic software. The results did not show any statistically significant differences in the total time periods.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Chraska, M.: Didaktické testy ve školní praxi [Didactic tests in school practice]. Paido, Brno (2002) Chraska, M.: Didaktické testy ve školní praxi [Didactic tests in school practice]. Paido, Brno (2002)
2.
go back to reference Pieri, M., Diamantini, D.: From e-learning to mobile learning: new opportunities. In: Ally, M. (ed.) Mobile Learning. Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training, pp. 183–194. AU Press, Athabasca (2009) Pieri, M., Diamantini, D.: From e-learning to mobile learning: new opportunities. In: Ally, M. (ed.) Mobile Learning. Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training, pp. 183–194. AU Press, Athabasca (2009)
3.
go back to reference Simonova, I. Poulova, P.: Mobile devices in ESP teaching: pilot study. In: Palalas, A., Ally, M. (eds.) The International Handbook of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (in press) Simonova, I. Poulova, P.: Mobile devices in ESP teaching: pilot study. In: Palalas, A., Ally, M. (eds.) The International Handbook of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (in press)
4.
go back to reference Abdullah, M.R.T.L., et al.: M-learning scaffolding model for undergraduate english language learning: bridging formal and informal learning. TOJET: Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 12(2), 217–233 (2013) Abdullah, M.R.T.L., et al.: M-learning scaffolding model for undergraduate english language learning: bridging formal and informal learning. TOJET: Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 12(2), 217–233 (2013)
6.
go back to reference Farinosi, M., Lim, C., Roll, J.: Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy and the UK. Telematics Inform. 33(2), 410–421 (2016)CrossRef Farinosi, M., Lim, C., Roll, J.: Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy and the UK. Telematics Inform. 33(2), 410–421 (2016)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., Tomte, C., Lover, N.: The effect of pen and paper or tablet computer on early writing – a pilot study. Comput. Educ. 98, 70–80 (2016)CrossRef Wollscheid, S., Sjaastad, J., Tomte, C., Lover, N.: The effect of pen and paper or tablet computer on early writing – a pilot study. Comput. Educ. 98, 70–80 (2016)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cheung, Y.L.: A comparative study of paper-and-pen versus computer-delivered assessment modes on students´writing quality: a Singapore study. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 29(1), 23–33 (2016)CrossRef Cheung, Y.L.: A comparative study of paper-and-pen versus computer-delivered assessment modes on students´writing quality: a Singapore study. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 29(1), 23–33 (2016)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Froldova, V.: Paper-pen peer-correction versus wiki-based peer correction. J. Lang. Cult. Educ. 4(1), 140–153 (2016)CrossRef Froldova, V.: Paper-pen peer-correction versus wiki-based peer correction. J. Lang. Cult. Educ. 4(1), 140–153 (2016)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N.N., Hille, K., Sachse, S.: Handwriting or typewriting? The influence of pen or keyboard-based writing training on reading and writing performance of preschool children. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 11(4), 136–146 (2015)CrossRef Kiefer, M., Schuler, S., Mayer, C., Trumpp, N.N., Hille, K., Sachse, S.: Handwriting or typewriting? The influence of pen or keyboard-based writing training on reading and writing performance of preschool children. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 11(4), 136–146 (2015)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Taipale, S.: Bodily dimensions of reading and writing practices on paper and digitally. Telematics Inform. 32(4), 766–775 (2015)CrossRef Taipale, S.: Bodily dimensions of reading and writing practices on paper and digitally. Telematics Inform. 32(4), 766–775 (2015)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pen&Paper, or e-Feedback: Comparative Study
Author
Ivana Simonova
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_31

Premium Partner