Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published in: Journal of Business and Psychology 2/2015

01-06-2015

Perceptions of Nepotism Beneficiaries: The Hidden Price of Using a Family Connection to Obtain a Job

Authors: Margaret Y. Padgett, Robert J. Padgett, Kathryn A. Morris

Published in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Issue 2/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

This study tested competing predictions about the impact of nepotistic hiring on perceptions of nepotism beneficiaries, focusing specifically on the performance attributions made about nepotism hires. Of particular interest is how the qualifications of the family member compared to other applicants impacts perceptions of the nepotism hire.

Methodology

Two experimental studies, using scenarios that simulated the hiring process, were conducted. Participants reviewed materials describing the hiring process for a manager and then completed a questionnaire assessing their perceptions of the person hired.

Findings

Results showed that successful performance of nepotism beneficiaries was attributed more to political skills and relationships with upper management and less to ability and effort than was the case for non-beneficiaries and that they were perceived as less competent and as having fewer characteristics of successful managers. These negative perceptions occurred regardless of the family member’s qualifications.

Implications

This study contributes to our understanding of nepotistic hiring practices. More negative performance attributions and perceptions of competence for nepotism beneficiaries may hinder their effectiveness on the job. Knowledge gained from this study may help businesses who want to hire family members of current employees to manage this process more effectively.

Originality/Value

This is one of the first studies to examine the consequences of nepotistic hiring for nepotism beneficiaries and the first study to examine how nepotistic hiring effects the performance attributions made about nepotism beneficiaries. It is also the only study to empirically examine how the qualifications of the nepotism beneficiary influence others’ reactions to them.
previous article Does Emphasizing Different Types of Person–Environment Fit in Online Job Ads Influence Application Behavior and Applicant Quality? Evidence from a Field Experiment
next article Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding with an Infrequency Scale: Evaluating Validity and Participant Reactions

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Consistent with other researchers (e.g., Jones 2012; Mhatre et al. 2012; Mulder 2012), we define nepotism to include only preference based on family membership and not preference based on other types of personal connection, such as acquaintances or friends.
 
2
For this interaction, Roy’s greatest characteristic root (g.c.r.) was statistically significant (Roy’s =  .10, F(7,174) = 2.37, p = .025) and indicated that at least the first multivariate function differed across levels and as such warranted further exploration (see Harris 2001).
 
Literature
Abdalla, H. F., Maghrabi, A. S., & Raggad, B. G. (1998). Assessing perceptions of human resource managers toward nepotism: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Manpower, 19, 554–570.CrossRef
Ammons, J. L., & Brooks, C. M. (2011). An empirical study of gender issues in assessments using peer and self evaluations. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15, 49–62.
Arasli, H., Bavik, A., & Ekiz, E. H. (2006). The effects of nepotism on human resource management: The case of three, four and five star hotels in northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 26(7), 295–308.CrossRef
Arasli, H., & Tumer, M. (2008). Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: A study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the banking industry of north Cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(9), 1237–1250.CrossRef
Bellow, A. (2003a). In praise of nepotism: A natural history. New York: Doubleday.
Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 662–669.CrossRef
Ciulla, J. (2005). In praise of nepotism? Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 153–160.CrossRef
Corrigan, P., Markowitz, F. E., Watson, A., Rowan, D., & Kubiak, M. (2003). An attribution model of public discrimination toward persons with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 162–179.CrossRefPubMed
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social Stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dailey, R. C., & Reuschling, T. L. (1980). Human resource management in the family-owned company. Journal of General Management, 5(3), 49–56.
Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the atttribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution theory research (Vol. 1, pp. 335–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deaux, K. (2004). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade’s research on gender. American Psychologist, 39(2), 105–116.CrossRef
Denison, D., Lief, C., & Ward, J. (2004). Culture in family-owned enterprises: Recognizing and leveraging unique strengths. Family Business Review, 17(1), 61–70.CrossRef
Dickson, M. W., Nieminen, L. R., & Biermeier-Hanson, B. (2012). Nepotism and organizational homogeneity: How the attraction-selection-attrition (ASA) is accelerated by nonmerit-based decision-making. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 93–128). New York: Routledge.
Ewing, D. W. (1965). Is nepotism so bad? Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 22–30, 39–40, 156–159.
Ford, R., & McLaughlin, F. (1986). Nepotism: Boon or bane. Personnel Administrator, 31, 79–89.
Furnham, A. (2005). Gender and personality differences in self- and other ratings of business intelligence. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 91–103.CrossRef
Grice, J. W., & Iwasaki, M. (2007). A truly multivariate approach to MANOVA. Applied Multivariate Research, 12, 199–226.
Gutman, A. (2012). Nepotism and employment law. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 93–128). New York: Routledge.
Hamori-Ota, V. E. (2007). Gender differences in leadership style: Predictors of level of agreement between leader self-ratings and supervisory ratings, peer ratings, and ratings by direct reports. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A, 68.
Harris, R. J. (2001). A primer of multivariate statistics. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
Hayajenh, A. F., Maghrabi, A. S., & Al-Dabbagh, T. H. (1994). Assessing the effect of nepotism on human resource managers. International Journal of Manpower, 16, 60–67.CrossRef
Heilman, M. E., Battle, W. S., Keller, C. E., & Lee, A. R. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 190–205.CrossRefPubMed
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Lucas, J. A. (1992). Presumed incompetent? Stigmatization and affirmative action efforts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 536–544.CrossRef
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Stathatos, P. (1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 603–625.CrossRef
Heilman, M. E., McCullough, W. F., & Gilbert, D. (1996). The other side of affirmative action: Reactions of non-beneficiaries to sex-based preferential selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 346–357.CrossRefPubMed
Heilman, M. E., & Welle, B. (2006). Disadvantaged by diversity? The effects of diversity goals on competence perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(5), 1291–1319.CrossRef
Jones, R. G. (2012). Nepotism in organizations. New York: Routledge.
Keles, H. N., Ozkan, T. K., & Bezirci, M. (2011). A study on the effects of nepotism, favoritism and cronyism on organizational trust in the auditing process in family businesses in Turkey. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(9), 9–16.
Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.CrossRefPubMed
Lenz, B. F., & Laband, D. N. (1989). Why so many children of doctors become doctors: Nepotism vs. human capital transfers. The Journal of Human Resources, 24(3), 396–413.CrossRef
Lin, T., Dobbins, G. H., & Farh, J. (1992). A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(3), 363–371.CrossRef
Maestripieri, D. (2012, May–June). Strangers need not apply. Psychology Today, 45, 48–50.
Martin, J. K., Pescosolido, B. A., & Tuch, S. A. (2000). Of fear and loathing: The role of disturbing behavior, labels and causal attributions in shaping public attitudes toward people with mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 4(2), 208–223.CrossRef
Martinko, M. J., Douglas, S. C., & Harvey, P. (2006). Attribution theory in industrial–organizational psychology: A review. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial–organizational psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 127–187). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Massengill, D. (1997). Not with your husband (or wife) you don’t! The legality of no spouse rules in the workplace. Public Personnel Management, 26(1), 61.
Mhatre, K. H., Riggio, R. E., & Riggio, H. R. (2012). Nepotism and leadership. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 171–198). New York: Routledge.
Mulder, B. (2010). Risking the business or reaping the benefits: The antecedents or consequences of nepotism. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 70(12-B), 7889.
Mulder, B. (2012). A model of organizational nepotism. In R. G. Jones (Ed.), Nepotism in organizations (pp. 219–251). New York: Routledge.
Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2000). The impact of sex-based preferential selection on subordinate perceptions of a new supervisor. Paper presented at the 2000 Administrative Sciences Association of Canada conference in Montreal, QC.
Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2005). Keeping it “all in the family”: Does nepotism in the hiring process really benefit the beneficiary? Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies, 11(2), 34–45.CrossRef
Padgett, M. Y., & Morris, K. A. (2012). Reactions to nepotism in the hiring process: The role of family member qualifications. Unpublished manuscript, Indianapolis, IN: Butler University.
Peters, L. H., & Terborg, J. R. (1975). The effects of temporal placement of unfavorable information and of attitude similarity in personnel selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(2), 279–293.CrossRef
Podgers, J. (1996). Marriage traps in the workplace. ABA Journal, 82(1), 46.
Rand, T. M., & Wexley, K. N. (1975). Demonstration of the effect, “similar-to-me”, in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports, 36(2), 535–544.CrossRef
Reisenzein, R. (1986). A structural equation analysis of Weiner’s attribution-affect model of helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1123–1133.CrossRef
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 95–100.CrossRefPubMed
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(3), 340–344.CrossRefPubMed
Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles, 20(1), 103–110.CrossRef
Scoppa, V. (2009). Intergenerational transfers of public service jobs: A shred of evidence on nepotism. Public Choice, 141, 167–188.CrossRef
Sears, D. O., & Funk, C. L. (1995). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–91). New York: Academic Press.
Sears, G. J., & Rowe, P. M. (2003). A personality-based similar-to-me effect in the employment interview: Conscientiousness and affect- versus competence-mediated interpretations and the role of job relevance. Canadian Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 35(1), 13–24.CrossRef
Slack, C. (2001, September). Breeding success. MBA Jungle, September, 82–88.
Vallejo, M. (2008). Is the culture of family firms really different? A value-based model for its survival through generations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 261–279.CrossRef
Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(5), 738–748.CrossRefPubMed
Welle, B. (2004). The price of privilege: The derogation of the work and personal characteristics of favored employees. Unpublished dissertation, New York University.
Werbal, J. D., & Hames, D. S. (1996). Anti-nepotism reconsidered. Group and Organization Management, 21(3), 365–379.CrossRef
Young, B. S. (1995). Family matters. HR Magazine, 40(11), 30.
Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245–287.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perceptions of Nepotism Beneficiaries: The Hidden Price of Using a Family Connection to Obtain a Job
Authors
Margaret Y. Padgett
Robert J. Padgett
Kathryn A. Morris
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Business and Psychology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Electronic ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9354-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Journal of Business and Psychology 2/2015 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Does Emphasizing Different Types of Person–Environment Fit in Online Job Ads Influence Application Behavior and Applicant Quality? Evidence from a Field Experiment

OriginalPaper

Exploring the Use of Credit Scores in Selection Processes: Beware of Adverse Impact

OriginalPaper

Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding with an Infrequency Scale: Evaluating Validity and Participant Reactions

OriginalPaper

The Associations between Ethical Organizational Culture, Burnout, and Engagement: A Multilevel Study

OriginalPaper

Transformational Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Mediating Role of Promotion Focus and Creative Process Engagement

OriginalPaper

Employee Attachment: Implications for Supervisor Trustworthiness and Trust