Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2019

02-08-2018 | BUILDING COMPONENTS AND BUILDINGS

Performance indicator for potential health impact analysis within LCA framework and for environmental product declaration (EPD)

Authors: Fritz Kalberlah, Eva Schmincke, Peter Saling, Quentin de Hults

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 2/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

This article proposes an approach describing relative potential toxicological performances of products and allows for comparisons with other products with identical functions. The scores derived at the substance level may be aggregated to the product level for each of the life cycle stages of the product. This approach is intended to become a tool for performance assessment of products. It provides complementary information in addition to results from LCA for environmental product declarations (EPD). This article focuses on describing the impact on human health from exposure to construction products and to their ingredients, compatible with “life cycle thinking”. Ingredient substances can be part of the intended composition or can be relevant residues like monomers in plastics or defined contaminants. The proposed approach can also describe the toxicological impact for other than construction products.

Methods

The method describes a dimensionless score suitable for ranking with three characteristics: (1) By a hazard score, it describes chemical products for different applications, e.g. for construction, with regard to the inherent toxicity for humans of their ingredients. (2) It considers exposure potentials to the product’s ingredients by a generic adjustment factor, which may modify potential health impacts. (3) It addresses not only the use stage of a product and its ingredients (e.g. as construction material in a building), but it also includes other life cycle stages of the product’s ingredients.

Results and discussion

The specific method is described which is still under testing. Therefore, no results of any application can be published so far. Since the method provides a scalable, dimensionless score of potential toxicological impacts, independent of time and location, these scores can in principle be aggregated to the building level, comparable to the life cycle assessment (LCA)-based information in an EPD. The different factors make use of the extensive toxicological and exposure data generated under REACH regulation but are not limited to these. Interpretation of such data differs from REACH.

Conclusions

The method can be further developed into a tool for product and building assessment and be provided as (voluntary) additional information in an EPD. It is recommended that the basic concept be adapted to the needs of the users of the information generated with this method (e.g. architects, building assessment) and the providers of information (manufacturers). An intense consultation process with other stakeholders should be organised to establish a final method into a guidance document for unambiguous application.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
DGNB: Deutsche Gesellschaft Nachhaltiges Bauen; BNB: Bewerungssystem Nachhaltiges Bauen; HQE: Haute Qualité Environnementale; BREEAM: Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology; LEED: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.
 
2
EN 15804+A1:2013 “Sustainability of construction works—environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products”
 
3
CEN TC 350: European Committee for Standardisation, Technical Committee 350 Sustainability of Construction Works
 
4
ISO Guide 64:2008 (Guide for addressing environmental issues in product standards definition) states with regard to life cycle thinking: “consideration of all relevant environmental aspects (of a product) during the entire (product) life-cycle”
 
5
ISO DIS 21930 “Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works—core rules for environmental declaration of construction products and services used in any type of construction works”
 
6
EN 15978 “Sustainability of construction works—assessment of environmental performance of buildings—calculation method”
 
9
EN 15978: Sustainability of construction works—assessment of environmental performance of buildings—calculation method
 
Literature
go back to reference Askham C (2012) REACH and LCA—methodological approaches and challenges. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:43–57CrossRef Askham C (2012) REACH and LCA—methodological approaches and challenges. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:43–57CrossRef
go back to reference ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals) (2014) Technical Report No. 124. Addendum to TR114: Technical Basis for the TRA v3.1. Brussels, Belgium ECETOC (European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals) (2014) Technical Report No. 124. Addendum to TR114: Technical Basis for the TRA v3.1. Brussels, Belgium
go back to reference ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) (2010) Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.12: Use Descriptor System. http://echa.europa.eu/. Helsinki, Finland ECHA (European Chemicals Agency) (2010) Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.12: Use Descriptor System. http://​echa.​europa.​eu/. Helsinki, Finland
go back to reference Kalberlah F, Wriedt H (1998) Bewertung und Fortentwicklung der Regelsetzung: Anwendbarkeit der TRGS 440. Fb 784. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin Dortmund Kalberlah F, Wriedt H (1998) Bewertung und Fortentwicklung der Regelsetzung: Anwendbarkeit der TRGS 440. Fb 784. Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin Dortmund
go back to reference Landsiedel R, Saling P (2002) Assessment of toxicological risks for life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:261–268CrossRef Landsiedel R, Saling P (2002) Assessment of toxicological risks for life cycle assessment and eco-efficiency analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:261–268CrossRef
go back to reference Lasvaux S, Schiopu N, Habert G, Chevalier J, Peuportier B (2014) Influence of simplification of life cycle inventories on the accuracy of impact assessment: application to construction products. J Clean Prod 79:142–151CrossRef Lasvaux S, Schiopu N, Habert G, Chevalier J, Peuportier B (2014) Influence of simplification of life cycle inventories on the accuracy of impact assessment: application to construction products. J Clean Prod 79:142–151CrossRef
go back to reference Lee EG, Slaven J, Bowen RB, Harper M (2011) Evaluation of the COSHH essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer. Ann Occup Hyg 55:16–29 Lee EG, Slaven J, Bowen RB, Harper M (2011) Evaluation of the COSHH essentials model with a mixture of organic chemicals at a medium-sized paint producer. Ann Occup Hyg 55:16–29
go back to reference Oppl R, Kalberlah F, Evans PG, van Hemmen JJ (2003) A toolkit for dermal risk assessment and management: an overview. Ann Occup Hyg 47:629–640 Oppl R, Kalberlah F, Evans PG, van Hemmen JJ (2003) A toolkit for dermal risk assessment and management: an overview. Ann Occup Hyg 47:629–640
Metadata
Title
Performance indicator for potential health impact analysis within LCA framework and for environmental product declaration (EPD)
Authors
Fritz Kalberlah
Eva Schmincke
Peter Saling
Quentin de Hults
Publication date
02-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1513-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2/2019 Go to the issue

LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

New ultralight automotive door life cycle assessment