Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

25. Perplexing Coexistence of Democracy, Transparency and Development in the Contemporary Era

Author : Miskat Jahan

Published in: New Horizons in Management, Leadership and Sustainability

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Though both democracy and development are two conventional words in the modern world, the interrelation between them is crucial. Democracy is one of the state principles that can act as an important catalyst to making development more viable. We can consider democracy as a process where development is the output. Economist Amartya Sen defined development as a process of expanding the real freedoms that people enjoy. And democracy is the process of institutionalization of that freedom. So the correlation between democratization and development is quite inherent. Sen’s view is now widely accepted: development must be judged by its impact on people, not only by changes in their income but more generally in terms of their choices, capabilities and freedoms. We should be concerned about the distribution of these improvements, not just the simple average for a society. Democracy is ‘that institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote’ (Schumpeter J, Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper Perennial, London, 1942). However, recently diverse winds of democracy are blowing that are affecting the trend of development. This paper explores the current state of interrelation between democracy and development based on secondary data and empirical knowledge. It develops a compact understanding about the contemporary interrelation between democracy and development.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2002). The political economy of government responsiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2002). The political economy of government responsiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
go back to reference Boix, C. (2011). Democracy, development and the international system. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 809–828.CrossRef Boix, C. (2011). Democracy, development and the international system. American Political Science Review, 105(4), 809–828.CrossRef
go back to reference Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Bushman, R., & Smith, A. J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65–87. Bushman, R., & Smith, A. J. (2003). Transparency, financial accounting information, and corporate governance. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 65–87.
go back to reference Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13, 1.CrossRef Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13, 1.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambers, R. (1997). Responsible well-being: A Personal agenda for development. World Development, 25(11), 1743–1754. Chambers, R. (1997). Responsible well-being: A Personal agenda for development. World Development, 25(11), 1743–1754.
go back to reference Cheibub, J. A. & Vreeland, J. R. (2012). Economic development, democratization and democracy. International Conference on Democracy as Idea and Practice, University of Oslo. Cheibub, J. A. & Vreeland, J. R. (2012). Economic development, democratization and democracy. International Conference on Democracy as Idea and Practice, University of Oslo.
go back to reference Fukuyama, F. Y. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press. Fukuyama, F. Y. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics and Society, 41, 183–212.CrossRef Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics and Society, 41, 183–212.CrossRef
go back to reference Hasan, M. (2018). Democracies in decline. The Daily Star, p. 6. Hasan, M. (2018). Democracies in decline. The Daily Star, p. 6.
go back to reference Héritier, A. (2003). Composite democracy in Europe: The role of transparency and access to information. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(5), 814–833.CrossRef Héritier, A. (2003). Composite democracy in Europe: The role of transparency and access to information. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(5), 814–833.CrossRef
go back to reference Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2011). Democracy and transparency. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1191–1205.CrossRef Hollyer, J. R., Rosendorff, B. P., & Vreeland, J. R. (2011). Democracy and transparency. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 1191–1205.CrossRef
go back to reference Liaberthal, K. G., Li, C., & Keping, Y. (2014). China’s political development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Liaberthal, K. G., Li, C., & Keping, Y. (2014). China’s political development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
go back to reference Menocal, A. R. (2011). Analysing the relationship between democracy and development: defining basic concepts and assessing key linkages. Commonwealth Good Governance 2011/12. Menocal, A. R. (2011). Analysing the relationship between democracy and development: defining basic concepts and assessing key linkages. Commonwealth Good Governance 2011/12.
go back to reference Michener, G., & Bersch, K. (2013). Identifying transparency. Information Polity, 2013, 233–242.CrossRef Michener, G., & Bersch, K. (2013). Identifying transparency. Information Polity, 2013, 233–242.CrossRef
go back to reference Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics, 49(2), 155–183.CrossRef Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1997). Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics, 49(2), 155–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Rasmussen, R. V. (1991). A communication model based on the conduit metaphor. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 363–374.CrossRef Rasmussen, R. V. (1991). A communication model based on the conduit metaphor. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 363–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Rawlins, B. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99.CrossRef Rawlins, B. (2009). Give the emperor a mirror: Toward developing a stakeholder measurement of organizational transparency. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 71–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age (p. 2006). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Roberts, A. (2006). Blacked out: Government secrecy in the information age (p. 2006). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Roelofs, P. (2019). Transparency and mistrust: Who or what should be made transparent? Governance, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Roelofs, P. (2019). Transparency and mistrust: Who or what should be made transparent? Governance, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Harper Perennial. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Harper Perennial.
go back to reference Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Shapiro, I. (2003). The moral foundations of politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Shapiro, I. (2003). The moral foundations of politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
go back to reference Stiglitz, J. (2003). Towards a new paradigm of development. In J. H. Dunning (Ed.), Making globalization good. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stiglitz, J. (2003). Towards a new paradigm of development. In J. H. Dunning (Ed.), Making globalization good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference UNDP. (2000). Human rights and human development: Human development report. New York: UNDP. UNDP. (2000). Human rights and human development: Human development report. New York: UNDP.
go back to reference Zakaria, S. M. (2018, August 10). Where do we stand in democratic governance? The Daily Star, p. 7. Zakaria, S. M. (2018, August 10). Where do we stand in democratic governance? The Daily Star, p. 7.
Metadata
Title
Perplexing Coexistence of Democracy, Transparency and Development in the Contemporary Era
Author
Miskat Jahan
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62171-1_25