Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy 3/2020

06-09-2019

Personality Traits and Individual Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage: Evidence from Taiwan

Authors: Ching-Hsing Wang, Tsong-jyi Lin, Dennis Lu-Chung Weng, Yi-Bin Chang

Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy | Issue 3/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

While same-sex marriage has been a particularly salient issue in recent years in Taiwan, few scholarly attentions have been paid to examine the determinants of individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. This study attempts to understand how personality influences individual support for same-sex marriage in Taiwan. Using the original data collected in July 2017 in Taiwan, this study finds that people with higher levels of agreeableness are more likely to oppose same-sex marriage. Besides, conscientiousness and openness to experience have heterogeneous effects on individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage for people of different ages. Specifically, a higher level of conscientiousness is positively associated with support for same-sex marriage among younger people but is negatively correlated with support for same-sex marriage among older people. Similarly, a higher level of openness to experience would lead to increased support for same-sex marriage for younger people but would result in decreased support for same-sex marriage for older people. Overall, our findings indicate that personality can provide some explanatory power for individual attitudes toward homosexual rights.
previous article Understanding Risk and Resilience for Sexual Minority Emerging Adults: a Longitudinal Outlook on Minority Stress, Mental Health, and Academic Perseverance
next article Correction to: Personality Traits and Individual Attitudes Toward Same-Sex-Marriage: Evidence from Taiwan

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The response rate of the survey is 16.7%. The reduction of sample size is mainly due to missing values in terms of individual responses to the questions about support for same-sex marriage. Two hundred and twelve respondents offer non-response options such as “refused to answer,” “difficult to say,” “no opinion,” and “do not know.” On the other hand, there are also many missing values in terms of individual responses to the personality questions. The non-responses to the questions about support for same-sex marriage and personality traits combined with missing values in terms of the other variables lead to a total of 413 missing observations. Please see Table 5 with regard to the numbers of missing values for all variables. Besides, this study tests whether there are significant differences between the respondents who give effective answers and those who offer non-response to the question about support for same-sex marriage in terms of education, gender, and age. The results show no significant differences between them in terms of demographic characteristics. Therefore, missing data can be viewed as missing at random and there is no need to use multiple imputation methods.
 
2
While the TIPI has some advantages to capture individuals’ personality, it is noted that some TIPI questions tap into political orientations and viewpoints and thus the TIPI might be endogenous to political attitudes.
 
3
Some might argue that religiosity which is often operationalized by the frequency of attending religious services and/or the importance of religion in individual life comes into play when it comes to individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. This study acknowledges the role of religiosity in individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. Unfortunately, the survey does not include questions about religiosity and thus this study could not include religiosity in the models.
 
4
Figure 2 shows the average predicted probabilities of support for same-sex marriage for different values of agreeableness by holding all other variables at their observed values.
 
5
This study also performs multiple imputation with 10 iterations for missing data to examine the effects of personality traits on individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. As demonstrated in Table 6, the results are consistent with the findings of Table 3, suggesting that missing data do not influence the substantive conclusions this study arrives at.
 
6
Detailed results about the ANOVA test are available upon request.
 
7
Likewise, we compute the average predicted probabilities by holding all other variables at their observed values.
 
8
Likewise, this study conducts multiple imputation with 10 iterations for missing data to investigate how conscientiousness and openness to experience interact with age to affect individual attitudes toward same-sex marriage. As displayed in Table 7, the results are consistent with the findings of Table 4 and thus missing data do not influence the findings of this study.
 
Literature
Allemand, M., Zimprich, D., & Hendriks, A. A. J. (2008). Age differences in five personality domains across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 758–770.PubMed
Allemand, M., Zimprich, D., & Hertzog, C. (2007). Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adulthood and old age. Journal of Personality, 75(2), 323–358.PubMed
Armenia, A., & Troia, B. (2017). Evolving opinions: Evidence on marriage equality attitudes from panel data. Social Science Quarterly, 98(1), 185–195.
Barth, J., Overby, L. M., & Huffmon, S. H. (2009). Community context, personal contact, and support for an anti-gay rights referendum. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 355–365.
Baunach, D. M. (2012). Changing same-sex marriage attitudes in America from 1988 through 2010. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(2), 364–378.
Becker, A. B. (2012). Determinants of public support for same-sex marriage: Generational cohorts, social contact, and shifting attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(4), 524–533.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1994). Genes, environment and personality. Science, 264(5166), 1700–1701.PubMed
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (2004). Genetic influence on human psychological traits. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 148–151.
Brewer, P. R. (2003). The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights. Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1208–1220.
Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807–840.
Dinesen, P. T., Klemmensen, R., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2016). Attitudes toward immigration: The role of personal predispositions. Political Psychology, 37(1), 55–72.
Gaines, N. S., & Garand, J. C. (2010). Morality, equality, or locality: Analyzing the determinants of support for same-sex marriage. Political Research Quarterly, 63(3), 553–567.
Gallego, A., & Oberski, D. (2012). Personality and political participation: The mediation hypothesis. Political Behavior, 34(3), 425–451.
Gallego, A., & Pardos-Prado, S. (2014). The Big Five personality traits and attitudes towards immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(1), 79–99.
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012). Personality and the strength and direction of partisan identification. Political Behavior, 34(4), 653–688.
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 111–133.
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., Dowling, C. M., Raso, C., & Ha, S. E. (2011). Personality traits and participation in political processes. Journal of Politics, 73(3), 692–706.
Gibson, J. L., & Tedin, K. L. (1988). The etiology of intolerance of homosexual politics. Social Science Quarterly, 69(3), 587–604.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528.
Ha, S. E., Kim, S., & Jo, S. H. (2013). Personality traits and political participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychology, 34(4), 511–532.
Haider-Markel, D. P., & Joslyn, M. R. (2008). Beliefs about the origins of homosexuality and support for gay rights: An empirical test of attribution theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 291–310.
Harris, M. A., Brett, C. E., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2016). Personality stability from age 14 to age 77 years. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 862–874.PubMedPubMedCentral
Harrison, B. F., & Michelson, M. R. (2015). God and marriage: The impact of religious identity priming on attitudes toward same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1411–1423.
Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 30(3), 239–244.
Hooghe, M., & Meeusen, C. (2013). Is same-sex marriage legislation related to attitudes toward homosexuality? Trends in tolerance of homosexuality in European countries between 2002 and 2010. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10(4), 258–268.
Horne, S. G., Maroney, M. R., Zagryazhskaya, E. A., & Kovena, J. (2017). Attitudes toward gay and lesbian individuals in Russia: An exploration of the interpersonal contact hypothesis and personality factors. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 10(2), 21–34.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Kawamoto, T., Oshio, A., Abe, S., Tsubota, Y., Hirashima, T., Ito, H., & Tani, I. (2015). Age and gender differences of Big Five personality traits in a cross-sectional Japanese sample. The Japanese Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 107–122.
Kerns, J. G., & Fine, M. A. (1994). The relation between gender and negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: Do gender role attitudes mediate this relation? Sex Roles, 31(5–6), 297–307.
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Age differences in personality: Evidence from a nationally representative Australian sample. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1353–1363.PubMed
McGue, M., Bacon, S., & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Personality stability and change in early adulthood: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 96–109.
Mondak, J. J. (2010). Personality and the foundations of political behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mondak, J. J., & Halperin, K. D. (2008). A framework for the study of personality and political behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 335–362.
Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M. A., & Anderson, M. R. (2010). Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 85–110.
Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and public opinion about same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 340–360.
Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Within the limits of civic training: Education moderates the relationship between openness and political attitudes. Political Psychology, 36(3), 295–313.
Poteat, V. P., & Mereish, E. H. (2012). Ideology, prejudice, and attitudes toward sexual minority social policies and organizations. Political Psychology, 33(2), 211–224.
Redlawsk, D., & Tolbert, C. (2012). Context and attitudes towards gay rights. Paper presented at the State Politics and Policy Conference. Rice University.
Rich, T. S. (2017). Electoral paths and support for same-sex marriage legislation: Evidence from Taiwan’s mixed-member system. International Political Science Review, 38(5), 563–576.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 3–25.PubMed
Schoen, H. (2007). Personality traits and foreign policy attitudes in German public opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(3), 408–430.
Shackelford, T. K., & Besser, A. (2007). Predicting attitudes toward homosexuality: Insights from personality psychology. Individual Differences Research, 5(2), 106–114.
Sherkat, D., Power-Williams, M., Maddox, G., & de Vries, K. M. (2011). Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research, 40(1), 167–180.
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 330–348.PubMed
Srivastava, S., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1041–1053.PubMed
Wang, C.-H. (2016). Personality traits, political attitudes and vote choice: Evidence from the United States. Electoral Studies, 44, 26–34.
Wang, C.-H., & Weng, D. L.-C. (2018). Personality traits and individual feeling of national pride in South Korea. Asian Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 257–275.
Weinschenk, A. C. (2014). Personality traits and the sense of civic duty. American Politics Research, 42(1), 90–113.
Whitehead, A. L. (2014). Politics, religion, attribution theory, and attitudes toward same-sex unions. Social Science Quarterly, 95(3), 701–718.
Yang, J., McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1998). Adult age differences in personality traits in the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 53B(6), 375–383.
Metadata
Title
Personality Traits and Individual Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage: Evidence from Taiwan
Authors
Ching-Hsing Wang
Tsong-jyi Lin
Dennis Lu-Chung Weng
Yi-Bin Chang
Publication date
06-09-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Sexuality Research and Social Policy / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1868-9884
Electronic ISSN: 1553-6610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00401-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Sexuality Research and Social Policy 3/2020 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Delaying Gratification: How High School Health Textbooks Portray Marriage and Sex

Correction

Correction to: Personality Traits and Individual Attitudes Toward Same-Sex-Marriage: Evidence from Taiwan

OriginalPaper

Dangerous Sex: Gendered Sexual Bodies and Perceptions of STI Risk

OriginalPaper

Awareness of Sex Offender Registration Policies and Self-Reported Sexual Offending in a Community Sample of Adolescents

OriginalPaper

Exploring Potential Implementation Barriers and Facilitators of the SMART Program: A Stepped-Care Package of eHealth HIV Prevention Interventions for Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men

OriginalPaper

Understanding Risk and Resilience for Sexual Minority Emerging Adults: a Longitudinal Outlook on Minority Stress, Mental Health, and Academic Perseverance