Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Policing Native American Lands in the United States

Authors : Robert Morin, Colleen Morin

Published in: Policing and Minority Communities

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The indigenous populations in the United States, Native Americans, have experienced a unique form of governance as their federally assigned lands are designated as sovereign. However, there is direct involvement of federal law enforcement on those lands under many circumstances. In addition, many tribal groups have coordinated their own jurisdictional law enforcement and criminal justice processes, often using traditional laws and tribal practices to remedy disputes between parties, even when issues may reach the criminal level. The history and progress of these developments will be outlined in detail.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Belliveau, J. (1993). Casino gamrbling under the Indian gaming regulatory act: Narragansett tribal sovereignty versus Rhode Island gambling laws. Suffolk University Law Review, 27(2), 389–423. Belliveau, J. (1993). Casino gamrbling under the Indian gaming regulatory act: Narragansett tribal sovereignty versus Rhode Island gambling laws. Suffolk University Law Review, 27(2), 389–423.
go back to reference Carey, G. W., & McClellan, J. (Eds.). (1990). The federalist. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. Carey, G. W., & McClellan, J. (Eds.). (1990). The federalist. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
go back to reference Christensen, G. (2019). The extraterritorial reach of tribal court criminal jurisdiction. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 46, 294–310. Christensen, G. (2019). The extraterritorial reach of tribal court criminal jurisdiction. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 46, 294–310.
go back to reference Dossett, J. H. (2018). Indian country and the territory clause: Washington’s promise at the framing. American University Law Review, 68, 205–280. Dossett, J. H. (2018). Indian country and the territory clause: Washington’s promise at the framing. American University Law Review, 68, 205–280.
go back to reference Douglas, M. (2018). Sufficiently criminal ties: Expanding VAWA criminal jurisdiction for Indian tribes. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166, 745–787. Douglas, M. (2018). Sufficiently criminal ties: Expanding VAWA criminal jurisdiction for Indian tribes. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166, 745–787.
go back to reference Eid, T. A., & Doyle, C. C. (2010). Separate but unequal: The federal criminal justice system in Indian country (Vol. 81, pp. 1067–1117). Boulder: University of Colorado Law Review. Eid, T. A., & Doyle, C. C. (2010). Separate but unequal: The federal criminal justice system in Indian country (Vol. 81, pp. 1067–1117). Boulder: University of Colorado Law Review.
go back to reference French, L. (2005). Law enforcement in Indian country. Criminal Justice Studies, 18(1), 69–80.CrossRef French, L. (2005). Law enforcement in Indian country. Criminal Justice Studies, 18(1), 69–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Goldberg, C., & Champagne, D. (2006). Indian law at a crossroads: Is Public Law 280 fit for the twenty-first century? Some data at last. Connecticut Law Review, 38, 697–729. Goldberg, C., & Champagne, D. (2006). Indian law at a crossroads: Is Public Law 280 fit for the twenty-first century? Some data at last. Connecticut Law Review, 38, 697–729.
go back to reference Kalish, J. (1996). Do the states have an ace in the hole or should the Indians call their bluff? Tribes caught in the power struggle between the federal government and the states. Arizona Law Review, 38(4), 1345–1371. Kalish, J. (1996). Do the states have an ace in the hole or should the Indians call their bluff? Tribes caught in the power struggle between the federal government and the states. Arizona Law Review, 38(4), 1345–1371.
go back to reference Kronowitz, R., Lichtman, J., McSloy, S., & Olsen, M. G. (1987). Toward consent and cooperation: Reconsidering the political status of Indian nations. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 507–622. Kronowitz, R., Lichtman, J., McSloy, S., & Olsen, M. G. (1987). Toward consent and cooperation: Reconsidering the political status of Indian nations. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 22(2), 507–622.
go back to reference Laurence, R. (1981). The Indian commerce clause. Arizona Law Review, 23(1), 203–261. Laurence, R. (1981). The Indian commerce clause. Arizona Law Review, 23(1), 203–261.
go back to reference McCool, C. (2018). Welcome to the Mvskoke reservation: Murphy v. Royal, criminal jurisdiction, and reservation diminishment in Indian country. American Indian Law Review, 42, 355–389. McCool, C. (2018). Welcome to the Mvskoke reservation: Murphy v. Royal, criminal jurisdiction, and reservation diminishment in Indian country. American Indian Law Review, 42, 355–389.
go back to reference Morrow, K. (2019). Bridging the jurisdictional void: Cross-deputization agreements in Indian country. North Dakota Law Review, 94, 66–94. Morrow, K. (2019). Bridging the jurisdictional void: Cross-deputization agreements in Indian country. North Dakota Law Review, 94, 66–94.
go back to reference Newton, N. (1984). Federal power over Indians: Its sources, scope, and limitations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132(1), 195–288.CrossRef Newton, N. (1984). Federal power over Indians: Its sources, scope, and limitations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 132(1), 195–288.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Brien, S. (1989). American Indian tribal governments. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. O’Brien, S. (1989). American Indian tribal governments. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
go back to reference O’Brien, S. (1991). Tribes and Indians: With whom does the United States maintain a relationship? Notre Dame Law Review, 66(5), 1461–1502. O’Brien, S. (1991). Tribes and Indians: With whom does the United States maintain a relationship? Notre Dame Law Review, 66(5), 1461–1502.
go back to reference Riley, A. R. (2016). Crime and governance in Indian country. UCLA Law Review, 63, 1564–1637. Riley, A. R. (2016). Crime and governance in Indian country. UCLA Law Review, 63, 1564–1637.
go back to reference Smith, C. E. (1993). Courts, politics, and the judicial process. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, Inc. Smith, C. E. (1993). Courts, politics, and the judicial process. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, Inc.
go back to reference Turner, A. (1988). Evolution, assimilation, and state control of gambling in Indian country: Is Cabazon v. California an assimilationist wolf in preemption clothing? Idaho Law Review, 24(2), 317–338. Turner, A. (1988). Evolution, assimilation, and state control of gambling in Indian country: Is Cabazon v. California an assimilationist wolf in preemption clothing? Idaho Law Review, 24(2), 317–338.
go back to reference Wakeling, S., Jorgensen, M., Michaelson, S., & Begay, M. (2001). Policing on American Indian reservations (Research report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Wakeling, S., Jorgensen, M., Michaelson, S., & Begay, M. (2001). Policing on American Indian reservations (Research report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
go back to reference Walsh, M. (1983). Terminating the Indian termination policy. Stanford Law Review, 35, 1181–1215.CrossRef Walsh, M. (1983). Terminating the Indian termination policy. Stanford Law Review, 35, 1181–1215.CrossRef
go back to reference Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (2008). Tribal policing on American Indian reservations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(4), 648–673.CrossRef Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (2008). Tribal policing on American Indian reservations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(4), 648–673.CrossRef
go back to reference Wild, R. J. (2019). The last judicial frontier: The fight for recognition and legitimacy of tribal courts. Minnesota Law Review, 103, 1603–1647. Wild, R. J. (2019). The last judicial frontier: The fight for recognition and legitimacy of tribal courts. Minnesota Law Review, 103, 1603–1647.
go back to reference Wilkinson, C., & Biggs, E. R. (1977). The evolution of the termination policy. American Indian Law Review, 5, 139–184.CrossRef Wilkinson, C., & Biggs, E. R. (1977). The evolution of the termination policy. American Indian Law Review, 5, 139–184.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Policing Native American Lands in the United States
Authors
Robert Morin
Colleen Morin
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19182-5_11