Top

Published in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Political Candidates’ Discussions on Twitter During Election Season: A Network Approach

Author : Maurice Vergeer

Published in: Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This chapter investigates how political candidates utilize Twitter to communicate with each other to better understand the role Twitter plays in facilitating public debate. Taking a communication network approach, Vergeer uses the 2012 Dutch national election to provide insight into how political candidates interact on Twitter and describe the structure of the candidates’ online communication network. Results regarding candidate interaction on Twitter are mixed: most candidates only tweet occasionally, and while reciprocity was observed it often only occurred between party members, especially incumbents. While Twitter thus provides political candidates with the opportunity to conduct interparty discussions, it appears that few do and that Twitter is mainly used as a broadcasting platform. As such, candidates do not use the full democratic potential of the platform.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Going “Rogue”: National Parks, Discourses of American Identity and Resistance on Twitter

next chapter #PeoplesVoteMarch or #LosersVoteMarch? Tracing the Collective Identity of a Post-Brexit Referendum Movement on Twitter

Available only for authorised users

Reciprocity = 2 ∗ number of mutual relations / (2 ∗ number of mutual relations + number of asymmetric relations) = 2 ∗ 1264 / (2 ∗ 1264 + 3053)

Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509.CrossRef

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H. et al. (2019). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4 (Version 1.1–21). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

Bordewijk, J. L., & Van Kaam, B. (1986). Towards a new classification of tele-information services. InterMedia, 14, 16–21.

Boutyline, A., & Willer, R. (2017). The social structure of political echo chambers: Variation in ideological homophily in online networks. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337.CrossRef

Bystrom, D. G., Robertson, T., Banwart, M. C., & Kaid, L. L. (Eds.). (2004). Gender and candidate communication: VideoStyle, WebStyle, NewStyle (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.

Carlson, T., Djupsund, G., & Strandberg, K. (2013). Taking risks in social media campaigning: The early adoption of blogging by candidates. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12011.CrossRef

Ceron, A. (2017). Intra-party politics in 140 characters. Party Politics, 23(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816654325.CrossRef

Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2011). Political polarization on twitter. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96.

Constine, J. (2017). Facebook beats in Q2 with $9.32B revenue despite slower user growth. Retrieved October 4, 2017, from TechCrunch website: http://social.techcrunch.com/2017/07/26/facebook-earnings-q2-2017/

Csárdi, G. (2017). igraph: Network analysis and visualization (Version 1.1.2). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/index.html

Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.

Electoral Council. (2012). Official result of the Lower House elections September 12, 2012 [Officiële uitslag Tweede Kamerverkiezing 12 september 2012]. Retrieved September 18, 2012, from http://www.kiesraad.nl/nieuws/offici%C3%ABle-uitslag-tweede-kamerverkiezing-12-september-2012

Evans, H. K., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: An analysis of how house candidates used twitter in their 2012 campaigns. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000389.CrossRef

Gibson, R. K., & McAllister, I. (2014). Normalising or equalising party competition? Assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies, n/a–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12107.

Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Kaltenbrunner, A., & Banchs, R. E. (2010). The structure of political discussion networks: A model for the analysis of online deliberation. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.2.CrossRef

Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & Van ‘t Haar, G. (2013). Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.785581.CrossRef

Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2014). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814546728.

Gruzd, A., & Roy, J. (2014). Investigating political polarization on twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI354.CrossRef

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence, the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, UK: Free Press.

Lee, C., Shin, J., & Hong, A. (2018). Does social media use really make people politically polarized? Direct and indirect effects of social media use on political polarization in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.005.CrossRef

Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2012). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415.CrossRef

Meeks, L. (2016). Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268.CrossRef

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.CrossRef

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x.CrossRef

Newman, M. E. J. 2002. Assortative Mixing in Networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20).

Newman, M. E. J. 2003. Mixing Patterns in Networks. Physical Review E, 67(2).

Nooy, W. D., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2011). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (Expanded ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2019). Inequality – Women in politics. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from http://data.oecd.org/inequality/women-in-politics.htm

Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2011). Politics and the twitter evolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public (1st ed.). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065.CrossRef

Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: Temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008.CrossRef

Van Aelst, P., Maddens, B., Noppe, J., & Fiers, S. (2008). Politicians in the news: Media or party logic?: Media attention and electoral success in the Belgian election campaign of 2003. European Journal of Communication, 23(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108089222.CrossRef

Van Spanje, J. (2018). Controlling the electoral marketplace. How established parties ward off competition.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58202-3.

Vergeer, M., & Hermans, L. (2013). Campaigning on twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12023.

Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2013). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning. The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811407580.CrossRef

Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Van Spanje, J. (2012). Anti-immigrant party support and media visibility: A cross-party, over-time perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 22(3), 315–358. https://doi.org/10/gf8h82.

Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., & Regel, S. (2016). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).

Walter, A. S., Van der Brug, W., & Van Praag, P. (2014). When the stakes are high: Party competition and negative campaigning. Comparative Political Studies, 47(4), 550–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013488543.CrossRef

Wickham, H., Chang, W., Henry, L., Pedersen, T. L., Takahashi, K., Wilke, C., et al. (2019). ggplot2: Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics (Version 3.1.1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggplot2

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848.CrossRef

Title: Political Candidates’ Discussions on Twitter During Election Season: A Network Approach
Author: Maurice Vergeer
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41420-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-41421-4

Copyright Year: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"