Skip to main content
Top

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Politics Versus Law

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Politics is the study or practice of the distribution of power/authority and resources within a given society on top of the interrelationship(s) between societies. It is very often said that politics is about power/authority. To that extent, a political system is a framework which expresses adequate political methods within a given society. Globalization brought forwards the competition state pointing a new reality, but at the same time states and governments still have a role to play. Economic globalization brought integration of national economies into the international economy through trade, foreign direct investment, capital flows, and spread of technology. Legal globalization is a result of the materialization of problems that no national legal order can resolve on its own such as the expansion of trade and the demand for a “corpus” of rules to accompany it. The political systems epitomized by terms such as “law” and “legal system” are complex and organic structures packed with technical, moral, religious and society data, objectives and substance.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
G Zekos, Monetary Policy and Risk Management in Financial Globalization, 2015 Nova Science Publications, New York, USA. www.​novapublishers.​com G Zekos, MNE’s in 21st Century, 2016 Nova Science Publications New York USA. www.​novapublishers.​com
 
2
Ian Clark, Globalization and International Relations Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 89–106. Peter Dicken, Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century, 4th edn. (London: The Guilford Press, 2003), p. 141.
 
3
G Zekos, RISK MANAGEMENT, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN 21ST CENTURY DIGITAL ECONOMY 2014 Nova Science Publications, New York, USA. www.​novapublishers.​com G Zekos, Law and Economics of Corporate Governance and Insider Trading, 2016 Nova Science Publications New York USA. www.​novapublishers.​com
 
4
Neil MacCormick, Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007) 255–61.
 
5
Andy Clark & David Chalmers, The Extended Mind, 59 ANALYSIS 10 (1998).
 
6
A. Alesina and E. Spolaore, The Size of Nations, Cambridge London, The MIT Press, 2003, and A. Caffarena, Le organizzazioni internazionali, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2001.
 
7
D.W. Drezner, The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the State Back In, in “Political Science Quarterly”, vol. 119, n. 3, Fall 2004, pp. 477–498.
 
8
S. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, Cornell Univ. Press, 1983 (3 rd ed. 1995).
 
9
Rebecca Crootof and BJ Ard, “Structuring Techlaw” (2021) 34 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology n 1 https://​papers.​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3664124
 
10
Sabino Cassese, The Globalization of Law www.​ssrn.​com P24.
 
11
A. Riles, “Comparative Law and Socio-Legal Studies”, in M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 799.
 
12
B. Latour, La fabrique du droit. Une ethnographie du Conseil d’État, Paris, La Découverte, 2002.
 
13
A. Riles, “The Anti-Network: Global private law, legal knowledge, and the legitimacy of the state”, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2008; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No 07–025.
 
15
T Büthe and W Mattli, New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press, 2011). R Michaels and N Jansen, “Private Law Beyond the State. Europeanization, Globalization, Privatization” (2006) 54 American Journal of Comparative Law 845.
 
16
JA Maupin, “Public and Private in International Investment Law: An Integrated Systems Approach.”(2013) 53 Virginia Journal of International Law.
 
17
A Mills, The Confluence of Public and Private International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009); H Muir Watt, “Private International Law Beyond the Schism” (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 347.
 
18
Dunoff, J.L. and M.A. Pollack (2013), “International law and international relations,” in J.L. Dunoff and M.A. Pollack (eds).
 
19
Stone Sweet A. A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe // Global Constitutionalism. 2012. No. 1.. Ruddall J. A Cartography of Cosmopolitanism: Particularising the Universal // Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. 2014. No. 3.
 
20
Dibadj R. Postmodernism, Representation, Law // University of Hawai’i Law Review. 2006–2007. Vol. 29.
 
21
Richard Abel, “Law and Society: Project and Practice” (2010) 6 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1.
 
22
Tanja Chopra, “Dispensing Elusive Justice: The Kenyan Judiciary amongst Pastoralist Societies” (2010) 2 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 95.
 
23
Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D.: “Hard law and soft law in international governance,” International Organization, 54, 2000, pp. 421–456.
 
24
H. L. A. Hart’s The Concept of Law.2 Hart 1961.
 
25
Critchley, S. Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity. London: Verso, 1997.
 
26
Mill, J. S. On Liberty. London: Penguin Books, 1974, p. 59–60; Berlin, I. Two Concepts of Liberty. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: University Press, 1969; Ed. Hardy, H. Liberty: Incorporating “Four Essays on Liberty: Isaiah Berlin”. Oxford: University Press, 2002.
 
27
Hegel, G. W. F. (translated by Dyde, S.W.), Philosophy of Right. New York: Dover Publications, 2005; Jessie Allen, A Theory of Adjudication: Law as Magic, 41 Suffolk U.L. Rev. 773, 811 (2008) (noting that in the ritual of trial, “[n]orms and values … become saturated with emotion, while the gross and basic emotions become ennobled through contact with social values”).
 
28
Habremas, J. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Ed. Cronin, C.; De Greiff, P. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005, p. 124–125,, Grotius, H. On the Laws of War and Peace. Kessinger Publishing, 2004; Kant, I. PerpetualPeace. New York: Cosimo Books, 2005.
 
29
Re Wakim; Ex Parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511. R v Hughes (2000) 171 ALR 155.
 
30
Daniel Boorstin, The Decline of Radicalism 76 (1969) “How continue to believe that something about our law is changeless after we have discovered that it may be infinitely plastic? How believe that in some sense the basic laws of society are given us by God, after we have become convinced that we have given them to ourselves.”
 
31
David Barnhizer, “Natural Law as Practical Methodology: A Finnisian Analysis of City of Richmond v. Croson,” 38 Cleveland St. L. Rev. 15 (1990).
 
32
D Held, A McGrew, D Goldblatt, J Perraton, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, and Culture (Stanford, Stanford University Press 1999) 14–28.
 
33
W Twining, General Jurisprudence—Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2009).
 
34
K. Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush (New York, Oceana: 1930).
 
35
Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562. 619.
 
36
Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932] AC 562. 619 per Lord Buckmaster.
 
37
M. Galanter, “Why the ‘haves’ come out ahead: speculation on the limits of legal change” (1974) 9 Law and Society Review 95–151.
 
38
J. Armour, S. Deakin, P. Lele and M. Siems, ‘How do legal rules evolve? Evidence from a cross-country comparison of shareholder, creditor and worker protection” (2009) 57 American Journal of Comparative Law 579–630.
 
39
See Concerning Bills Of Lading Precedent G Zekos, Judicial Analysis Of The Contractual Role Of Bills Of Lading As It Stands In Greek, United States And English Law, Phd Thesis, Hull Law School Https://​Hydra.​Hull.​Ac.​Uk/​Resources/​Hull:​8290.
 
40
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1999. The Quality of Government. Journal of Law and Economic Organization 15, 222–279.
 
41
Merryman, J.H., 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
 
42
Hayek, F., 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
 
43
Dawson, J. P., 1968. The Oracles of the Law. University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI (Reprinted in 1986 by William S. Hein & Co., Inc. Buffalo, New York).
 
44
Schlesinger, R., Baade, H., Damaska, M., Herzog, P., 1988. Comparative Law. Case-Text-Materials. (New York, NY: The Foundation Press, Inc.).
 
45
Merryman, J.H., 1985. The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Western Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
 
46
Schlesinger, R., Baade, H., Damaska, M., Herzog, P., 1988. Comparative Law. Case-Text-Materials. (New York, NY: The Foundation Press, Inc.).
 
47
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1999. The Quality of Government. Journal of Law and Economic Organization 15, 222–279.
 
48
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Pop-Eleches, C., Shleifer, A., 2003. Judicial checks and balances. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9775.
 
49
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1999. The Quality of Government. Journal of Law and Economic Organization 15, 222–279.
 
50
Pistor, K., Keinan, Y., Kleinheisterkamp, J., West, M.D., 2002. The evolution of corporate law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economics and Law 23, 791–871.
 
51
Bailey, M. J., Rubin, P. H., 1994. A positive theory of legal change. International Review of Law and Economics 14, 467–477, December 1994.
 
52
Lee Epstein, Jack Knight & Olga Shvetsova, The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government, 35 L. & Soc’y Rev. 117, 156 (2001).
 
53
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, People v. Nutt, 677 N.W.2d 1, 6 (Mich. 2004).
 
54
William Baude, Is Originalism Our Law?, 115 Colum. L. Rev. 2349, 2355 (2015).
 
55
Christopher Serkin, Public Entrenchment Through Private Law: Binding Local Governments, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 879, 882 (2011).
 
56
Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (2014) Shelby County v. Holder, 133 S.Ct. 2612, 2631 (2013).
 
57
Robert Post, Theories of Constitutional Interpretation, 30 Representations 13, 19 (1990).Jeffrey A. Pojanowski, Statutes in Common Law Courts, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 479, 482–83 (2013).
 
58
Larry Alexander & Emily Sherwin, Demystifying Legal Reasoning 221–22 (2008). Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751, 2772 (2014).
 
59
Lim Y.F., Cyberspace Law: Commentaries and Materials (OUP 2007). Forder J. and Svantesson D., Internet and E-Commerce Law (OUP 2007).
 
60
Goldman D.B., Globalization and the Western Legal Tradition: Recurring Patterns of Law and Authority (Cambridge University Press 2007) 25.
 
61
Przemysław Pałka, “Algorithmic Central Planning: Between Efficiency and Freedom” (2020) 83 Law and Contemporary Problems 125. Joseph Stiglitz, “The Revolution of Information Economics: The Past and the Future” NBER Working Paper Nr 23780 (2017).
 
62
Ibrahim Shihata, The World Bank in a Changing World (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991) 87.
 
63
Ibrahim Shihata, “The Role of Law in Business Development” (1996–97) 20 Fordham Journal of International Law 157.
 
64
Beverley Brown and Neil MacCormick “Philosophy of Law” in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1998).
 
65
Brian Z. Tamanaha, A Realistic Theory of Law (New York: Cambridge University Press 2017).
 
66
Gibson K. Kuria, The Rule of Law in Kenya and the Status of Human Rights, 16 Yale J. Int’l L. (1991). http://​digitalcommons.​law.​yale.​edu/​yjil/​vol16/​iss1/​7, Anna Doyle, Colombia, conflict and the rule of law, Amicus Curiae Issue 84 Winter 2010, Keith S. Rosenn, Brazil’s Legal Culture: The Jeito Revisited, 1 Fla. Int’l L.J. 1 (1984). Anthony W. Pereira, Political (In)Justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina Series: 2005 Pitt Latin American Studies.
 
67
J. Waldron, “Stare Decisis and the Rule of Law: A Layered Approach” (2012) 111 Michigan Law Review 1; . S. A. Lindquist and F. C. Cross, “Stability, Predictability and the Rule of Law: Stare Decisis as Reciprocity Norm” University of Texas Law School, Conference Paper, 2010 at https://​law.​utexas.​edu/​conferences/​measuring/​The Papers/​Rule of Law Conference.​crosslindquist.​pdf
 
68
William Baude, Precedent and Discretion, 2019 SUP. CT. REV. 313, 314–29 (2020) (contending that the Roberts Court has introduced elements of arbitrary discretion into modern stare decisis doctrine). Andrei Marmor, Should LikeCases Be Treated Alike?, 11 LEGAL THEORY 27, 27 (2005) (arguing that the principle “like cases should be treated alike” is often confused with two other ideas: “the rationale of analogical reasoning in adjudication” and “the value of coherence”).
 
69
Steven Rathgeb Smith & Kirsten A. Grønbjerg, Scope and Theory of Government-Non-profit Relations, in The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook 221, 222, 229–33 (Walter W. Powell & Richard Steinberg eds., 2006).
 
70
Richard L. Hasen, Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, The Supreme Court, And The Distortion Of American Elections 54 (2016) at 58 (“Money does not buy political outcomes, but, along with candidate quality and campaign organization, it is important to winning elections”). Nicholas Stephanopoulos, Aligning Campaign Finance Law, 101 Va. L. Rev. 1425, 1467–68 (2015) (empirical evidence indicates governmental outputs align more with rich and with political campaign donors than with any other group and non-donors, respectively).
 
71
Martin Gilens & Benjamin I. Page, Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, 12 Persp. On Pol. 564, 576 (2014).
 
72
Antonin Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175 (1989). See the relationship between Justice Scalia’s narrow view of rules and his plurality opinion in Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989).
 
73
Steven L. Winter, A Clearing in the Forest Law, Life, And Mind, 2001, 2003 Chicago Press.
 
74
J.G.A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition 324 (1975) (If laws can attain the status of reason … then laws must rule and not men.).
 
75
A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution 179–92 (1908). Entick v. Carrington 95 Eng. Rep. 807 (K.B. 1765). Luther v. Borden 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1 (1849). Maurice Chittenden, Pinochet Held by London Police on Murder Charges, Sunday Times (London), October 18, 1998, at 1.
 
76
Mila Versteeg & Tom Ginsburg, Measuring the Rule of Law: A Comparison of Indicators, 42 Law & Soc. Inquiry 100 (2017). Rule of Law Index 2016, World Just Project, http://​data.​worldjusticeproj​ect.​org/​#groups/​USA
 
77
Thomas W. Merrill, Presidential Administration and the Traditions of Administrative Law, 115 Colum. L. Rev. 1953, 1958–59 (2015) (noting that rule of law arguments centered on accountability and transparency “are designed to confer legitimacy on [presidential actions] without regard to whether they have been authorized by positive law”).
 
78
Gary Lawson, The Rise and Rise of the Administrative State, 107 Harv. L. Rev. 1231 (1994); Richard B. Stewart, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 1667 (1975); Cass R. Sunstein, Constitutionalism After the New Deal, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 421 (1987). FTC v. Ruberoid Co., 343 U.S. 470, 487 (1952) (Jackson, J., dissenting) (“The rise of administrative bodies … has deranged our three-branch legal theories …”).
 
79
Peter L. Strauss, Overseer, or “The Decider”? The President in Administrative Law, 75 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 696 (2007).
 
80
Barack Obama, The President’s Role in Advancing Criminal Justice Reform, 130 Harv. L. Rev. 811, 814 n.11 (2017).
 
81
Jerry L. Mashaw, Greed, Chaos, And Governance: Using Public Choice To Improve Public Law 139 (1997).
 
82
Jeremy Waldron, Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)?, 21 LAW & PHIL. 137, 151 (2002).
 
83
John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, edited by C.B. Macpherson (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co. 1980).
 
84
Bruce G. Trigger, Understanding Early Civilizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003).
 
85
John B. Morrall, Political Thought in Medieval Times (Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press 1980).
 
86
Coleman, J. L. and Harding, S. K. Citizenship, the demand of justice, and the moral relevance of political borders. Justice in Immigration. ed. Schwartz, W. F. Cambridge: University Press, 2007, p. 40. Maier, C. S. Being there: place, territory and identity. Identities, Affiliations and Allegiances, ed. Benhabib, S.; Shapiro, I.; Petranovic, D. Cambridge: University Press, 2007, p. 78.
 
87
Garrett, G. The Causes of Globalization [interactive]. Yale University, April 2000 <http://​www.​yale.​edu/​leitner/​pdf/​2000-02.​pdf>: “I define globalization somewhat narrowly as the international integration of markets in goods, services and capital.” Giddens, A. Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping our Lives. London: Profile Books, 2002, p. 42–43.
 
88
Evans, M.; Cerny, P. Globalization and Social Policy. Developments in British Social Policy 2. Ed. Ellison N.; Pierson, C. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 22.
 
89
G. Silverstein, Globalization and the rule of law: “A machine that runs of itself?”, in “International Journal of Constitutional Law”, vol. 1, n. 3, 2003.
 
90
G. Fassò, La filosofia del diritto dell’Ottocento e del Novecento, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1988.
 
91
M. Barberis, John Austin, la teoria del diritto e l’universalità dei concetti giuridici, in “Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica”, n. 2, December 2003.
 
92
Chester James Antieau, The Higher Laws: Origins of Modern Constitutional Law (William S. Hein, Buffalo, 1994) where he concentrates on Divine Law and Natural Law concerning the U.S. Constitution.
 
93
Miguel Angel Gonzalez Felix, “Current Development: Fifth Legal Advisers’ Meeting at UN Headquarters in New York” (1995) 89 American Journal of International Law 644. V. Petrovsky, USSR Memorandum: On Enhancing the Role of International Law (Letter from the Deputy Head of the Delegation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics to the 44th Session of the General Assembly, 29 September 1989) UN Doc A/44/585 (2 October 1989), cited in Koskenniemi, “The Politics of International Law” (1990) 1 European Journal of International Law 4.
 
95
Michael Byers, The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International Relations and International Law, Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010 DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​acprof:​oso/​9780199244027.​001.​0001 Martti Koskenniemi, Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations DOI:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​acprof:​oso/​9780199244027.​003.​0003
 
96
Martti Koskenniemi, “What Should International Lawyers Learn from Karl Marx?,” Leiden Journal of International Law 17 (2004), 246 (similarly arguing for the transformative potential of the “myth” of universalism, but observing that “an aspect of the difficulty that any fundamental challenge to the iron laws of power must imply” is that this potential “appears only occasionally, and even then in connection with events of exceptional magnitude, even scandal”).
 
97
Roberto Unger, Knowledge and Politics (New York: The Free Press, 1975).
 
98
Robert Kagan, Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (London: Atlantic Books, 2003).
 
99
Universal Declaration on Human Rights, International Bill of Human Rights, GA Res 217(III), UNGAOR, 3rd sess, 183rd plen mtg, UN Doc A/RES/217(III) (10 December 1948), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 3 (entered into 3 January 1976) (“ICCPR”), and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, opened for signature 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171 (entered into force 23 March 1976).
 
100
France v. Turkey), “Judgment of 7 September 1927,” PCIJ Series A, no. 10, at p. 18.
 
101
Martin, Lisa L. “Against Compliance.” In Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
 
102
Maria Sapignoli, “The Mismeasure of the Human: Big Data and the ‘AI Turn’ in Global Governance” (2021) 37 Anthropology Today 4.
 
103
Ben Scott, Stefan Heumann, and Philippe Lorenz, “Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy,” 2018, https://​www.​stiftung-nv.​de/​sites/​default/​files/​ai_​foreign_​policy.​pdf . Michael C Horowitz et al., “Artificial Intelligence and International Security” (Washington D.C., 2018), https://​www.​cnas.​org/​publications/​reports/​artificial-intelligence-and-international-security
 
104
Eyal Benvenisti, “Upholding Democracy Amid the Challenges of New Technology: What Role for the Law of Global Governance?” (2018) 29 European Journal of International Law 9.
 
105
Hurd, Ian. “International Law and the Practice of Diplomacy.” In edited by Ole Jacob Sending, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
 
106
Beaulac, Stéphane. “The Rule of Law in International Law Today.” In edited by Gianluca Palombella and Neil Walker. Portland, OR: Hart, 2009. Patten, Chris. “The Rule of Lawless.” February 23, 2015. http://​www.​project-syndicate.​org/​commentary/​international-rule-of-law-by-chris-patten-2015-02
 
107
Hurd, Ian. “International Law and the Practice of Diplomacy.” In edited by Ole Jacob Sending, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
 
108
Beetham, David (2015). “Authoritarianism and Democracy: Beyond Regime Types.” Comparative Democratization 13(2): 2, 12, 13.
 
109
Sandholtz, Wayne, Resurgent Authoritarianism and the International Rule of Law, KFG Working Paper Series, No. 38, Berlin Potsdam Research Group “The International Rule of Law – Rise or Decline?”, Berlin, September 2019, p 25–26.
 
110
Hurd, Ian (2015). “Three Models of the International Rule of Law.” Eidos: Revista de Filosofía No. 23: 37–48. Hurd, Ian (2014). “The International Rule of Law: Law and the Limit of Politics.” Ethics & International Affairs 28(1): 39–51.
 
111
Hurd, Ian (2015). “The International Rule of Law and the Domestic Analogy.” Global Constitutionalism 4(3): 365–395 at 391.
 
112
Hurd, Ian (2015). “The International Rule of Law and the Domestic Analogy.” Global Constitutionalism 4(3): 365–395 at 391.
 
113
Palombella, Gianluigi (2009). “The Rule of Law Beyond the State: Failures, Promises, and Theory.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 7(3): 442–467 at 454.
 
114
Nardin, Terry (2008). “Theorising the International Rule of Law.” Review of International Studies 34(3): 385–401 at 394.
 
115
Krieger, Heike and Georg Nolte (2016). The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline? Points of Departure. Working Paper No. 1. Berlin Potsdam Research Group “International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline?”. Berlin. October 2016. https://​papers.​ssrn.​com/​sol3/​papers.​cfm?​abstract_​id=​2866940
 
116
Krieger, Heike (2019). “Populist Governments and International Law.” European Journal of International Law 30(3).
 
117
Waldron, Jeremy (2006). “The Rule of International Law.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 30(1): 15–30.
 
118
Waldron, Jeremy (2006). “The Rule of International Law.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 30(1): 15–30 p 24.
 
119
D. Magendanz. 2019. Church Power, Sovereignty and Freedom of Religion in Thomas Hobbes. SSRN Working Paper. Lloyd, Sharon A.; Sreedhar, Susanne (12 February 2012). “Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
 
120
Weber, Max. Political Writings. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
 
121
Corngold, Stanley (2004). Lambent Traces: Franz Kafka. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
 
122
The Idea of the State Doug Magendanz at: https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3449855 p 27.
 
123
RO Keohane and JS Nye, Power and Interdependence (Upper Saddle River NJ, Pearson, 4th edn 2011).
 
124
Aman, A.C., Jr., “The globalizing state: A future-oriented perspective on the public/private distinction, federalism, and democracy, ”Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 31, 1998, pp. 769–870.
 
125
G Zekos, MNEs and Human Rights in International Law in Globalization, 2006 The ICFAI journal of International Business Law, issue October p7 www.​icfaipress.​org
 
126
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), The White House (2019) Draft Memorandum for the Heads of executive departments and agencies, Guidance for regulation of artificial intelligence applications. www.​whitehouse.​gov/​wp-content/​uploads/​2020/​01/​Draft-OMB-Memo-on-Regulation-of-AI-1-7-19.​pdf
 
127
G Zekos, The Independence of Arbitration, 2016 Nova Science Publications New York USA. www.​novapublishers.​com
 
128
John O. McGinnis, Ilya Somin, Federalism vs. States’ Rights: A Defense of Judicial Review in a Federal System, Research Paper No. 04–08, p48.
 
129
Daniel R. Pinello, Linking Party to Judicial Ideology in American Courts: A Meta-Analysis, 20 Justice Sys. J. 219 (1999). Theodore W. Ruger, et al., The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision-making, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1150, 1162 (2004).
 
130
5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
 
131
David Boies, Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law, 22 Journal of Law and Policy 57.
 
132
Andrei Marmor, Constitutional Interpretation, USC Public Policy Research Paper No. 04–4, p10.
 
133
Sotirios A. Barber, The Constitution Of Judicial Power 50 (1993).
 
134
Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 443–44 (2000); Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
 
135
Retail Prop. Tr. v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 768 F.3d 938, 947 (9th Cir. 2014) Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 393 (1987).
 
136
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Servs., Inc., 545 U.S. 546, 584 (2005) 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2012).
 
137
G.P. Fletcher, Parochial versus Universal Criminal Law, in “Journal of International Criminal Justice”, n. 3, 2005, p. 4.
 
138
PS Berman, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012); S Richards, “Globalization as a Factor in General Jurisprudence” (2012) 41 Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 129.
 
139
P Zumbansen, “Transnational Legal Pluralism” (2010) 1 Transnational Legal Theory 141.
 
140
Barry Friedman and Scott B. Smith, The Sedimentary Constitution, 147 U Pa L Rev. 1, 33 (1998).
 
141
Paul R. Krugman, “Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession,” Foreign Affairs, 73:2 (1994). Erik S. Reinert, “Competitiveness and Its Predecessors – a 500-year Cross-National Perspective,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6:1 (1995).
 
142
William N. Eskridge, Jr. and Gary Peller, The New Public Law Movement: Moderation as a Postmodern Cultural Form, 89 Mich L Rev. 707, 708 (1991).
 
143
William N. Eskridge, Jr. and Gary Peller, The New Public Law Movement: Moderation as a Postmodern Cultural Form, 89 Mich L Rev. 707, 708 (1991).
 
144
Keith E. Whittington, The New Originalism, 2 Georgetown J L & Pub Pol 599, 601 (2004) Antonin Scalia, Originalism: The Lesser Evil, 57 U Cin L Rev. 849, 863 (1989).
 
145
Alec Stone Sweet, “Path Dependence, Precedent, and Judicial Power” in Martin Shapiro and Alec Stone Sweet (eds), On Law, Politics, and Judicialization (Oxford University Press 2002).
 
146
F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960.
 
147
Glaeser, E., Shleifer, A., 2002. Legal origins. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1193–1230.
 
148
Kay Lehman Schlozman, Sidney Verba & Henry E. Brady, The Unheavenly Chorus (2012).
 
149
Benjamin I. Page & Lawrence R. Jacobs, Class War? 14 (2009).
 
150
Martin Gilens & Benjamin I. Page, Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, 12 Persp. On Pol. 564, 573 (2014).
 
151
Andreas Follesdal, The principle of subsidiarity as a constitutional principle in international law, 2 Glob. Const. 37–62 (2013).
 
152
Benjamin I. Page, Larry M. Bartels & Jason Seawright, Democracy and the Policy Preferences of Wealthy Americans, 11 Persp. On Pol. 51 (March 2013). Martin Gilens & Benjamin I. Page, Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, 12 Persp. On Pol. 564, 573 (2014).
 
153
Randy E. Barnett, Restoring, The Lost Constitution (2013); Richard A. Epstein, The Classical Liberal Constitution (2014).
 
154
Andrew Gelman, Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State (2010).
 
155
Larry Bartels, Rich People Rule!, Wash. Post. Monkey Cage Blog, Apr. 8, 2014, http://​www.​washingtonpost.​com/​blogs/​monkeycage/​wp/​2014/​04/​08/​rich-people-rule/​ G. William Domhoff, Who Rules America? (7th ed. 2013).
 
156
Martin Gilens & Benjamin I. Page, Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, 12 Persp. On Pol. 564, 573 (2014).
 
157
Who Governs The Globe?, (Deborah D. Avant, Martha Finnemore, & Susan K. Sell eds., 2010).
 
158
Michael Zürn, Martin Binder & Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, International authority and its politicization, 4 Int. Theory 69–106 (2012). Benedict Kingsbury, Nico Krisch & Richard B. Stewart, The Emergence of Global Administrative Law, 68 Law Contemp. Probl. 15–61 (2005).
 
159
Andrei Marmor, An Institutional Conception of Authority, 39 Phil. & Pub. Aff. 238–40, 240 n.3 (2011).
 
160
Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where The Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We The People Can Correct It) 167–80 (2006).
 
161
Michael Zürn, Global governance and legitimacy problems, 39 Gov. Oppos. 260–287 (2004).
 
162
J. Raz, The Concept of a Legal System (Oxford: Clarendon, 1967); and L.M. Friedman, The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective (New York: Russel Sage, 1975). J. Raz, “The Identity of Legal Systems” (1971) 59(3) California Law Review 795.
 
163
I.D. Balbus, “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the ‘Relative Autonomy’ of Law” (1977) 11(3) Law & Society Review 571.
 
164
Mirjan Damaška, “The Reality of Prosecutorial Discretion: Comments on a German Monograph.” American Journal of Comparative Law 29 (1981): 125.
 
165
Alek Tarkowski. 2019. Report. Automating Society, Poland AlgorithmWatch, (29 January 2019) available at: https://​algorithmwatch.​org/​en/​automatingsociet​y-2019/​poland/​
 
166
Desai, D. and Woolcock, M. (2012) “The Politics of Rule of Law Systems in Developmental States: ‘Political Settlements’ as a Basis for Promoting Effective Justice Institutions for Marginalized Groups” ESID Working Paper No. 08, University of Manchester. Desai, D. and Woolcock, M. (2015); “The politics – and Process – of Rule of Law Systems in Development States,” in Bukenya, B., Hickey, S. and Sen, K. (eds.), The Politics of Inclusive Development: Interrogating the Evidence, pp. 174–196. Oxford: OUP.
 
167
Joel Trachtman, International Trade: Regionalism, in Research Handbook In International Economic Law 151, 151–52 (Andrew T. Guzman & Alan O. Sykes eds., 2007). Masahiro Kawai & Ganeshan Wignaraja, Multilateralizing Regional Trade Arrangements in Asia, in Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges For The Global Trading System 495, 500–504 (Richard Baldwin & Patrick Low eds., 2009).
 
168
Wang Jiangyu, Between Power Politics and International Economic Law: Asian Regionalism, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and U.S.-China Trade Relations NUS Law Working Paper 2018/027Jiangyu Wang, Decoding the Trans-Pacific Partnership: Will the U.S.-led trade agreement pose a threat to China?, BEIJING REV. (May 20, 2017), http://​www.​bjreview.​com/​World/​201510/​t20151026_​800041255.​html
 
169
Marc Bacchetta Et Al., World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence To Coherence 95 (2011).
 
170
World Bank, Trade Blocs 11 (Oxford Univ. Press 2000).
 
171
Barack Obama, President Obama: The TPP would let America, not China, lead the way on global trade, WASH. POST. (May 2, 2016), https://​www.​washingtonpost.​com/​opinions/​ “America should write the rules. America should call the shots. Other countries should play by the rules that America and our partners set, and not the other way around.”
 
172
Michael Froman, The Strategic Logic of Trade: New Rules of the Road for the Global Market, FOREIGN AFF. (2014), https://​www.​foreignaffairs.​com/​articles/​americas/​strategic-logic-trade
 
173
Kejin Zhao, Note, China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy, CHINESE POL. SCI. REV., Sept. 2016, at 539.
 
174
Wang Jiangyu, Between Power Politics and International Economic Law: Asian Regionalism, the Trans-Pacific Partnership and U.S.-China Trade Relations NUS Law Working Paper 2018/027 P50.
 
175
Pelton, J. N., Madry, S., & Camacho-Lara, S. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of Satellite Applications (Second Edition). Cham: Springer. Bjola, C. (2017, October 14). Satellite Remote Sensing and Diplomatic Crisis Management. https://​medium.​com/​digitaldiplomacy​/​satellite-remote-sensing-and-diplomatic-crisis-management-286651c83cb, Bjola, C., & Holmes, M. (Eds.). (2015). Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (1 edition). London; New York: Routledge.
 
176
Peter L Lindseth, Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State (OUP 2010).
 
177
Peter L Lindseth, “The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s–1950s” (2004) 113 Yale LJ 1341.
 
178
Tom Christiano, The Legitimacy of International Institutions, in The Routledge Companion To Philosophy Of Law (Andrei Marmor, Ed.) 380–393 (2012). Nico Krisch, The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods, 108 Am. J. Int. Law 1–40 (2014).
 
179
Allen Buchanan & Robert O. Keohane, The legitimacy of global governance institutions, 20 ETHICS INT. AFF. 405–437 (2006).
 
180
Simon Caney, Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (2005). ch. 5. Michael Blake & Patrick Taylor Smith, International Distributive Justice, in Stanford Encyclopedia Of Philosophy (2013), http://​plato.​stanford.​edu/​archives/​win2013/​entries/​international-justice/​
 
181
Michelle Evans, The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Social and Political Principle in Catholic Social Teaching, 3 Solidar. J. Cathol. Soc. Thought Secul. Ethics 4, 54 (2013). David Golemboski, Federalism and the Catholic Principle of Subsidiarity, EarlyView PUBLIUS (2015).
 
182
Gareth Davies, Subsidiarity: The Wrong Idea, in the Wrong Place, at the Wrong Time, 43 Common Mark. Law Rev. 63–84 (2006).
 
183
Jenna Bednar, Subsidiarity and Robustness. Building the Adaptive Efficiency of Federal Systems, in Federalism And Subsidiarity (Nomos Lv) 231, 231 (James E. Fleming & Jacob T. Levy eds., 2014). Steven G. Calabresi & Lucy D. Bickford, Federalism and Subsidiarity: Perspectives from U.S. Constitutional Law, in Federalism And Subsidiarity (James E. Fleming & Jacob T. Levy, Eds.) 123–189 (2014). Paul Craig, Subsidiarity: A Political and Legal Analysis, 50 J. Common Mark. Stud. 72–87, 80 (2012).
 
184
Katherine Glenn Bass & Sujit Choudhry, Democracy Reporting Int’l, Constitutional Review In New Democracies 7 (Michael Meyer-Resende & Duncan Pickard eds., 2013), http://​www.​democracy-reporting.​org/​files/​dri-bp-40_​en_​constitutional_​review_​in_​new_​democracies_​2013-09.​pdf
 
185
Samuel Issacharoff, Constitutional Courts and Democratic Hedging, 99 Geo. L.J. 961, 965 (2011); Po Jen Yap, The Conundrum of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments, 4 Global Constitutionalism 114, 136 (2015).
 
186
David Landau, Constitution-Making Gone Wrong, 64 Ala. L. Rev. 923 (2013) David Landau, Abusive Constitutionalism, 47 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 189, 191 (2013).
 
187
Ran Hirschl, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences Of The New Constitutionalism 169–70 (2004). William Partlett, The Dangers of Popular Constitution-Making, 38 Brook. J. Int’l L. 193 (2012).
 
188
Andrew Arato, Constitution-Making Under Occupation: The Politics Of Imposed Revolution In Iraq, at viii (2009). Victor Ferreres Comella, The Consequences of Centralizing Constitutional Review in a Special Court: Some Thoughts on Judicial Activism, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1705, 1730 (2004).
 
189
Nathan Brown, Decoder: Morsi, the Judiciary, and Acts of Sovereignty, ARABIST (Nov. 25, 2012), http://​arabist.​net/​blog/​2012/​11/​25/​decoder-morsi-the-judiciary-and-acts-of-sovereignty.​html
 
190
Karl N. Llewellyn, The Common Law Tradition 17 (1960).
 
191
Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 171 (1972) Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 436 (1971).
 
192
Jeremy Waldron, The Rule of Law and the Importance of Procedure, in Getting to the Rule of Law 18 (James E. Fleming ed., 2011) (providing account of procedure as a fundamental rule of law value).
 
193
A.V. Dicey, Introduction To The Study Of The Law Of The Constitution 181–205 (10th ed. 1959).
 
194
Judulang v. Holder, 565 U.S. 42, 45 (2011) (“When an administrative agency sets policy, it must provide a reasoned explanation for its action.”); FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009) (noting “the requirement that an agency provide reasoned explanation for its action”).
 
195
Ming H. Chen, Administrator-in-Chief: The President and Executive Action in Immigration Law, 69 Admin. L. Rev. 347 (2017) (positing that the extent to which the President enhances the procedural legitimacy of agency actions strengthens the legacy of the policies when the substance of the policies is challenged).
 
196
Nina A. Mendelson, Regulatory Beneficiaries and Informal Agency Policymaking, 92 Cornell L.Rev. 397, 408 (2007).
 
197
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Three-Branch Monte, 72 Notre Dame L. Rev. 157, 157 (1996).
 
198
Tom Bingham, “The Case of Liversidge v Anderson : The Rule of Law Amid the Clash of Arms” (2009) 43 The International Lawyer 33, 38. In Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206, “Even in times of war, the courts could not simply accept without question the executive’s view of what was reasonable. So, the executive couldn’t lock up a person without evidence because they thought it was necessary, they had to at least be able to justify this in a court to be in accordance with the law”.
 
199
Ahmet and others v HM Treasury [2010] UKSC 2 at para. 45.
 
200
Daniel Kanstroom, The Better Part of Valor: The REAL ID Act, Discretion, and the “Rule” of Immigration Law, 51 N.Y. L. Sch. L. Rev. 161, 166–67 (2007) (“It is simply impossible to define, ‘unconstitutional, unauthorized or simply arbitrary or capricious’ without judicial review and without a rule-like, systematic backdrop.”).
 
201
Adam Shinar, Enabling Resistance: How Courts Facilitate Departures from the Law, and Why This May Not Be a Bad Thing, 17 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol’y 989, 992 (2014) (“The removal of such oversight opens the door to interpretations and actions that may deviate from those of the courts to the point of violating the law.”).
 
202
European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Report on Constitutional Amendment, Study No. 720/2008, CDL-AD (2010)001 (Jan. 19, 2010), http://​www.​venice.​coe.​int/​webforms/​documents/​default.​aspx?​pdffile=​CDL-AD%282010%29001-e. Tom Ginsburg & Mila Versteeg, Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?, 30 J.L. Econ. & Org. 587, 587 (2014).
 
203
David A. Wirth, Reexamining Decision-Making Processes in International Environmental Law, 79 Iowa L. Rev. 769, 779 (1994) Andrei Marmor, An Institutional Conception of Authority, 39 Phil & Pub Aff. 238–40, 240 n.3 (2011).
 
204
Curtis A. Bradley & Judith G. Kelley, The Concept of Delegation, 71 Law &Contemp Probs no. 1, 2008.
 
205
Walid Ben Hamida, The First Arab Investment Court Decision, 7 J. World Invest. & Trade 699 (2006) (discussing the Arab Investment Court). Joseph Weiler, The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale L.J. 2403, 2447–48 (1991) (discussing how the ECJ built its authority incrementally through its interactions with national judges, government officials, and private litigants).
 
206
Eric A. Posner & Alan O. Sykes, Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, “Legalized Noncompliance,” and Related Issues, 110 Mich. L. Rev. 243, 280 (2011).
 
207
Simon Caney, Justice Beyond Borders. Oxford: OUP, 2006. p. 1.
 
208
Chi Carmody, Frank J. Garcia and John Linarelli, Global Justice And International Economic Law 2011. Jack L. Goldsmith And Eric A. Posner, The Limits Of International Law (2005) (arguing that international law is simply the product of nation states pursuing their self-interest on the international stage and that international law creates no obligations apart from those that arise from the pursuit of self-interest).
 
209
Allen E. Buchanan, “Assessing the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism,” Ethics 99 (1989) pp. 852–82, Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books 1983).
 
210
Anthony D’Amato, Is International Law Really “Law?,” 79 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1293, 1293 (1984). Gregory C. Shaffer & Mark A. Pollack, Hard Versus Soft Law in International Security, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1147, 1163 (2011) (describing the advantages of law that is not binding); Joshua Kleinfeld, Enforcement and the Concept of Law, 121 Yale L.J. Online 293, 306–15 (2011), http://​www.​yalelawjournal.​org/​images/​pdfs/​1029.​pdf (arguing that enforcement power is not a necessary condition for law).
 
211
Hart H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. (Third edition, paperback 2012) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
 
212
Fuller L. 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
 
213
Frederick Schauer, “Formalism”, 97(4) Yale Law Journal (1988) 509–548, Marcin Matczak, “Why Judicial Formalism is Incompatible with the Rule of Law”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, (February 2018), 61–85.
 
214
Frederick Schauer, “Formalism”, 97(4) Yale Law Journal (1988) 509–548, Marcin Matczak, “Why Judicial Formalism is Incompatible with the Rule of Law”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, (February 2018), 61–85.
 
215
Marcin Matczak The Strength of the Attack or the Weakness of the Defence? Poland’s Rule of Law Crisis and Legal Formalism https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3121611
 
216
Bojan Bugaric Alenka Kuhelj, Varieties of Populism in Europe: Is the Rule of Law in Danger? Hague Journal on the Rule of Law April 2018, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp. 21–33 R. Markowski, Creating Authoritarian Clientelism: Poland After 2015, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2019(1); W. Sadurski, How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding, Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 18/01, 2018; W. Sadurski, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown, 2019 (in press); W. Sadurski, Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2019 (1); Commission’s Reasoned Proposal in accordance with Article 7(1) of the Treaty on European Union regarding the rule of law in Poland: Proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law, COM(2017)835 final.
 
217
Marcin Matczak The Strength of the Attack or the Weakness of the Defence? Poland’s Rule of Law Crisis and Legal Formalism https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3121611
 
218
Jane Burbank, “Lenin and the Law in Revolutionary Russia”, 54(1) Slavic Review (Spring 1995), 23–44.
 
219
Marcin Matczak, Matyas Bencze, Zdenek Kuhn, “Constitutions, EU Law and Judicial Strategies in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland”, 30 Journal of Public Policy (April 2010), 81–99.
 
220
Aharon Barak, Purposive Interpretation in Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton, Oxford, 2005.
 
221
Findlay, Mark J. 2008. Governing through Globalised Crime: Futures for international criminal justice, Devon: Willan Publishing. Ashworth, Andrew. 2010, Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
222
Goodall, Kay. 2013. “Conceptualising ‘racism’ in criminal law.” Legal Studies, 33 (2): pp. 215–238. http://​www.​legislationline.​org/​topics/​subtopic/​79/​topic/​4
 
223
Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law. https://​eur-lex.​europa.​eu/​legal-content/​EN/​TXT/​?​uri=​LEGISSUM%3Al33178
 
224
Home Office, Office for National Statistics and Ministry of Justice 2013. An Overview of Hate Crime in England and Wales, London: Home Office, Office for National Statistics and Ministry of Justice.
 
225
Angela J. Davis, Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), 4.
 
226
“Federal Prosecutor Range Criticizes ‘Political Influence’ on Investigation,” Deutsche Welle, August 4, 2015. http://​www.​dw.​com/​en/​federal-prosecutor-range-criticizes-political-influence-on-investigation/​a-18625429. Hon. Alex Kozinski, “Criminal Law 2.0,” Georgetown Law Journal Annual Review Criminal Procedure. 44 (2015): iii, viii. http://​georgetownlawjou​rnal.​org/​files/​2015/​06/​Kozinski_​Preface.​pdf
 
227
Ronald F. Wright, “How Prosecutor Elections Fail Us,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 6 (2009): 509–606. Glenn Harlan Reynolds, “Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything Is a Crime,” Columbia Law Review Sidebar 113 (2013): 102.
 
228
Shawn Marie Boyne, The German Prosecution Service: Guardians of the Law? (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013). David Crawford and Mike Esterl, “Siemans Settlement Sets off Criticism of German Inquiries,” The Wall Street Journal, October 8, 2007, http://​www.​wsj.​com/​articles/​SB11917917608375​1435
 
229
Tim Miller, Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. 267 Artificial Intel. 1, 1–2 (2019).
 
230
Ekaternia Trendafilova and Werner Róth, “Report on the public prosecution service in Germany,” in Promoting Prosecutorial Accountability, Independence and Effectiveness. Comparative Research. Ed. Open Society Institute (Sofia: Open Society Institute, 2008), 237, citing German Code of Criminal Procedure (StGB) Sect. 160, https://​www.​opensocietyfound​ations.​org/​sites/​default/​files/​promoting_​20090217.​pdf
 
231
Gwladys Gilliéron, Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe: A Comparative Analysis with Special Focus on Switzerland, France, and Germany (Switzerland: Springer 2014), 243, citing GVG Sect. 142 (1).
 
232
Martin Krygier, “Rule of Law (and Rechtsstaat),” University of New South Wales Faculty of Law Research Series No. 53 (October 2013): 6, http://​law.​bepress.​com/​cgi/​viewcontent.​cgi?​article=​1052&​context=​unswwps-flrps13
 
233
T.R.S. Allan (1998). Rule of law (Rechtsstaat). In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1998). London: Routledge, DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​4324/​9780415249126-T022-1, https://​www.​rep.​routledge.​com/​articles/​rule-of-law-rechtsstaat/​v-1/​
 
234
Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1872) London: Alex. Murray & Co. p. 570.
 
235
Morton J. Horwitz, The Transformation Of American Law: 1870–1960, at 3–4 (1992) James M. Landis, The Administrative Process 75–76, 154–55 (Yale Univ. Press 1938).
 
236
Emilio S. Binavince, “The Structure and Theory of the German Penal Code,” American Journal of Comparative Law 24 (1976): 601. Horacio Spector, “The Future of Legal Science in Civil Law Systems,” Louisiana Law Review 65 (2004): 261. Markus Dirk Dubber, “The Promise of German Criminal Law: A Science of Crime and Punishment,” German Law Journal 6 (2005): 1051, http://​www.​germanlawjournal​.​com/​pdfsNolO6NoO7fPD​F_​-Vol_​-06_​-No_​-07_​-1049-1073_​ArticlesDubber.​pdf
 
237
Trendafilova and Roth, “Report on the public prosecution service in Germany,” 221 (citing Werner Beulke, Strafprozessrecht (2006) at marginal no. 85.
 
238
David Crawford & Mike Esteral, “Germany: Siemens Settlement Sets off Criticism of German Inquiries,” Wall Street Journal, October 8, 2007, http://​www.​wsj.​com/​articles/​SB11917917608375​1435. Senior Prosecutor Interview, [8HL], May 22, 2006. Stefan Mayr, “Brisante Aktenvermerke im Fall Schottdorf,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, January 26, 2015, http://​www.​sueddeutsche.​de/​bayern/​laboraffaere-brisante-aktenvermerke-im-fall-schottdorf-1.​2319780
 
239
“Germany’s Party Finance Scandal ‘Ends’ With Kohl’s Plea Bargain and Too Many Unanswered Questions,” German Law Journal 2 (2001), http://​www.​germanlawjournal​.​com/​index.​php?​pageID=​11&​artID=​60
 
240
Gwladys Gilliéron, Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe, 2014 Springer 282.
 
241
Stefan Mayr, “Justiz im Zwielicht,"Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 20, 2015, http://​www.​sueddeutsche.​de/​bayern/​affaere-schottdorf-justiz-im-zwielicht-1.​2700023
 
242
Beamtenrechtsrahmengesetz, Sect. 31 I (BRRG). [Act Defining the Scope of Civil Servants’ Rights and Duties].
 
243
“German Prosecutors investigate Internet Journalists for Treason,” Deutsche Welle, July 30, 2015, http://​www.​dw.​com/​en/​german-prosecutors-investigate-internet-journalists-for-treason/​a-18619254. Klaus Brinkbäumer, “Berlin’s NSA Fears: Treason Investigation Reveals Anxiety at the Top,” Der Spiegel, August 10, 2015, http://​www.​spiegel.​de/​international/​germany/​german-treasoninvestiga​tion-reveals-anxiety-among-leaders-a1047256.​html.
 
244
Plugging Leaks: Merkel’s War on Germany’s Press and Parliament,” Der Spiegel, August 7, 2015, http://​www.​spiegel.​de/​international/​germany/​berlin-goes-after-journalists-to-protect-statesecrets- a-1047265.html. Deutscher Richterbund, “Richterbund kritisiert Eingreifen des Bundesjustizministers,“Press Release, August 4, 2015, http://​www.​drb.​de/​cms/​index.​php?​id=​917&​L=​0
 
245
“Critics Hunt Fresh Scalps in Treason Scandal,” The Local.De, August 6, 2015, http://​www.​thelocal.​de/​20150806/​critics-hunt-fresh-scalps-in-treason-scandal. Naomi Conrad, “In Berlin, Probe into Netzpolitik Inquiry Drags on,” Deutsche Welle, August 19, 2015, http://​www.​dw.​com/​en/​in-berlin-probe-into-netzpolitik-inquirydrags-on/​a-18658583
 
246
John Blau, “Prosecutor Fired after Targeting Journalists,” Handlesblatt, August 5, 2015, https://​global.​handelsblatt.​com/​edition/​234/​ressort/​politics/​article/​prosecutor-fired-for-targeting-journalists
 
247
Darryl K. Brown, Free Market Criminal Justice: How Democracy and Laissez Faire Undermine the Rule of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), Andrew Chongseh Kim, “Underestimating the Trial Penalty: An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Trial Penalty and Critique of the Abrams Study” (June 23, 2015). Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 84, No. 5, 2015, http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​2635657
 
248
Darryl K. Brown, Free Market Criminal Justice: How Democracy and Laissez Faire Undermine the Rule of Law, 2. Amita Kelly, “Does it Matter that Ninety Five Percent of Elected Prosecutors are White?” National Public Radio, July 8, 2015, http://​www.​npr.​org/​sections/​itsallpolitics/​2015/​07/​08/​420913118/​does-itmatter-that-95-of-elected-prosecutors-are-white
 
249
“84 Recommendations for More Integrity: Transparency Germany Presents its National Integrity Assessment for Germany,” Transparency International Press Release, January 19, 2012, http://​www.​transparency.​org/​news/​pressrelease/​20120119_​germany_​nis. Ministry Interview [9RR], June 2, 2006. Shawn Marie Boyne, Prosecutorial Accountability in the Rechtsstaat: The Tension between Law, Politics, and the Public Interest, Robert H. McKinney School of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016–29.
 
250
Council of Europe Committee of Ministers, Recommendation Rec (2000)19 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the role of public prosecution in the criminal justice system. Adopted October 6, 2000. Rec 13(b), https://​wcd.​coe.​int/​ViewDoc.​jsp?​id=​376859
 
251
Rachel E. Stern “From Dispute to Decision: Suing Polluters in China” The China Quarterly 206, pp. 294---312 (June 2011).
 
252
Han Zhu, Beijing’s “Rule of Law” Strategy for Governing Hong Kong: Legalization without Democratization https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3362068 P 18.
 
253
PILS, Eva. 2017. Human Rights in China: A Social Practice in the Shadows of Authoritarianism. Cambridge, UK and Medford, MA: Polity. TAM, Waikeung. 2013. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of PostColonial Hong Kong. Cambridge University Press. Delisle, Jacques. 2007. “Legalization without Democratization in China under Hu Jintao.” In Cheng Li (ed), China’s Changing Political Landscape: Prospects for Democracy. Brookings Institution Press. 185–90.
 
254
Compilation of Xi Jinping’s Expositions on Rule of Law. 2016. Chinese Law and Government, 48 (6): 468–74. http://​www.​tandfonline.​com/​doi/​full/​10.​1080/​00094609.​2016.​1241114
 
255
William Hurst & Jessica Teets “Compliance, Resistance, Innovation, and Involution–Assessing the Politics of Experimentation and Diffusion” in Jessica C. Teets & William Hurst eds. Local Governance Innovation in China: Experimentation, Diffusion, and Defiance London: Routledge, 2015– pp. 174---179. William Hurst Local Governance Innovation in China: Experimentation, Diffusion, and Defiance (Routledge 2015).
 
256
Tamanaha B. (2011) “The primacy of society and the failures of law and development” in Cornell International Law Journal. 44: 209–47.
 
257
Blake Hallinan, Jed R. Brubaker, and Casey Fiesler, Unexpected expectations: Public reaction to the Facebook emotional contagion study, 22 New Media & Soc. 1076 (2019).
 
258
Gregory Gordon, Complementarity and Alternative Justice, 88 Or. L. Rev. 621 (2009). Judge Philippe Kirsch, Keynote Address at the Belle R. and Joseph H. Braun Memorial Lecture Series symposium, International Justice in the 21st Century: The Law and Politics of the International Criminal Court, at the John Marshall Law School, April 23, 2010.
 
259
United Nations (1999). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court — Overview, It was adopted at a diplomatic conference in Rome on 17 July 1998 and it entered into force on 1 July 2002.
 
260
Stephen Eliot Smith, “Definitely Maybe: The Outlook for U.S. Relations with the International Criminal Court During the Obama Administration”, Florida Journal of International Law, 22:155 at 160, n. 38.
 
261
Jessica Schulberg, 75 Senators Want to Punish Palestine Before it Can Accuse Israel, NEW REPUBLIC (Feb. 3, 2015), https://​newrepublic.​com/​article/​120953/​senators-threaten-cut-palestinianfundi​ng-over-icc-membership, Jack Snyder & Leslie Vinjamuri, Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice, 28 Int’l Security, Winter 2003–04.
 
262
Karen J. The New Terrain Of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (2014).
 
263
David Bosco, Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court In A World Of Power Politics (2014).
 
264
Beth A. Simmons & Allison Danner, Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court, 64 Int’l Org. 225, 232 (2010).
 
265
Hyeran Jo and Beth A. Simmons, Can the International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity? (Dec.18, 2014), http://​papers.​ssrn.​com/​sol3/​papers.​cfm?​abstract_​id=​2552820
 
266
Karen Alter, The New Terrain Of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights (2014).
 
268
UN Security Council: Veto Betrays Syrian Victims. In Face of Mounting Pressure, Russia, China Block ICC Referral, Human. Rights Watch (May 22, 2014), http://​www.​hrw.​org/​news/​2014/​05/​22/​un-security-council-vetoes-betray-syrian-victims
 
269
Press Release, Int’l Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor, Al Mahdi Case: Confirmation of Charges Hearing to Open on 1 March 2016, https://​www.​icccpi.​int/​en_​menus/​icc/​press%20​and%20​media/​press%20​releases/​Pages/​pr1182.​aspx Colum Lynch, Exclusive: U.S. to Support ICC War Crimes Prosecution in Syria, FOREIGN POL’Y (May 17, 2014), http://​foreignpolicy.​com/​2014/​05/​07/​exclusive-u-s-to-supporticc-war-crimes-prosecution-in-syria/​
 
270
David Bosco, Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court In A World Of Power Politics 1–10 (2014).
 
271
Winston P. Nagan, International Criminal Law and the Ad Hoc Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, 6 Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 127, 128 (1995).
 
272
Antonio Cassese Et Al., Cassese’s International Criminal Law (3rd ed. 2013).
 
273
Diane Marie Amann & M.N.S. Sellers, The United States of America and the International Criminal Court, 50 Am. J. Comp. L. (SUPP.) 381, 386–87 (2002).
 
275
David L. Bosco, Five To Rule Them All: The UN Security Council And The Making Of The Modern World 30–31 (2009).
 
276
Elisabeth Zoller, The National Security of the United States as the Host State for the United Nations, 1 Pace U. Sch. L. Y.B. Int’l L. 127, 127–28 (1989).
 
277
Larry D. Johnson, The Lubanga Case and Cooperation Between the UN and the ICC, 10 J. INT’L CRIM. JUST. 887, 887 (2012) http://​councilandcourt.​org/​files/​2014/​06/​Beijing-WorkshopProceedi​ngs.​pdf
 
278
David A. Kaye, Council On Foreign Relations, Justice Beyond The Hague: Supporting The Prosecution Of International Crimes In National Courts 28 (2011). Carsten Stahn et al., Participation of Victims in Pre-Trial Proceedings of the ICC, 4 J. INT’L CRIM. JUST. 219, 238 (2006). U.N. Doc. S/PV.6849 (Oct. 17, 2012).
 
279
Gabriella Blum, On a Differential Law of War, 52 Harv. Int’l L.J. 164, 168–73 (2011). Adam Roberts, The Equal Application of the Laws of War: A Principle Under Pressure, 90 Int’l Rev. Red Cross 931, 961 (2008).
 
280
Michael N. Schmitt, Asymmetrical Warfare and International Humanitarian Law, 62 A.F.L. REV. 1 (2008). Geoffrey Best, Humanity In Warfare: The Modern History Of The International Law Of Armed Conflicts 15 (1980) Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557, 629–36 (2006)”.
 
281
Robin Geiß, Asymmetric Conflict Structures, 88 Int’l Rev. Red Cross 757, 773 (2006).
 
282
Toni Pfanner, Asymmetrical Warfare from the Perspective of Humanitarian Law and Humanitarian Action, 87 Int’l Rev. Red Cross 149, 160–62 (2005).
 
283
Richard J. Goldstone, The Future of International Criminal Justice, 57 ME. L. REV. 553, 563 (2005).
 
284
Brian Lepard, How Should the ICC Prosecutor Exercise His or her Discretion? The Role of Fundamental Ethical Principals, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 553, 553 (2010).
 
285
William A. Schabas, Victor’s Justice: Selecting “Situations” at the International Criminal Court, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 535 (2010).
 
286
Rod Rastan, Comment on Victor’s Justice & the Viability of Ex Ante Standards, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (2010).
 
287
William A. Schabas, Victor’s Justice: Selecting “Situations” at the International Criminal Court, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 535, 537 (2010).
 
288
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court art. 13(a), July 17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90. Rome Statute, art. 14. Antonio Marchesi, Article 14-Reform of a Situation by a State Party, in Commentary On The Rome Statute Of The International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article By Article 575–80 (Otto Triffterer ed., 2d ed. 2008).
 
289
Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119 (1940).
 
290
United States v. IBM Corp., 517 U.S. 843, 856 (1996).
 
291
Kimble v. Marvel Ent., LLC, 576 U.S. 446, 456 (2015).
 
292
Bankamerica Corp. v. United States, 462 U.S. 122, 149 & n.10 (1983).
 
293
Bruno Bodart, The Social Value of the Doctrine of Res Judicata: An Economic Analysis. https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3271743
 
294
Owen Fiss & Judith Resnik, Adjudication and Its Alternatives 535 (2nd ed. 2003). (Indicating that res judicata serves as a protection for parties against the burden of successive relitigation of the same controversy). Digest, Book 44, chap. 2, Ulpian, Edict, Book 15. The Digest Of Justinian, v. 4, 137 (Alan Watson ed. 2011).
 
295
467 U.S. 837, 842–43 (1984).
 
296
King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 2480, 2489 (2015) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 160 (2000)). Christopher J. Walker, Toward a Context-Specific Chevron Deference, 81 MO. L. REV. 1095, (2016) (exploring how Chief Justice Roberts may be embracing a narrower, more context-specific Chevron deference that “would focus not just on the formality of the agency procedure creating the interpretation, but also whether Congress intended to delegate that particular substantive question to the agency”).
 
297
Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 467 U.S. 837, 843–45 (1984).
 
298
Linda Greenhouse, Court Upholds Reagan on Air Standard, N.Y. TIMES, June 26, 1984, at A8. Michael Fix & George C. Eads, The Prospects for Regulatory Reform: The Legacy of Reagan’s First Term, 2 YALE J. ON REG. 293, 298, 318 (1985) (“In the absence of legislative change, the Reagan legacy will be broadened administrative discretion … .”); Erik M. Erlandson, A Technocratic Free Market: How Courts Paved the Way for Administered Deregulation in the American Financial Sector, 1977–1988, 29 J. POL’Y HIST. 350, 351 (2017) (explaining that Reagan-era conservatives embraced Chevron because administrative deference helped them “erode New Deal regulations and move bureaucratic government in a rightward direction”).
 
299
Louis Michael Seidman, J. Skelly Wright and the Limits of Legal Liberalism, 61 LOY. L. REV. 69, 70 (2015).
 
300
Pereira v. Sessions, 138 S. Ct. 2105, 2110 (2018).
 
301
Franchise Tax Bd. v. Hyatt, 139 S. Ct. 1485, 1491–92 (2019), overruling Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.S. 410, 412, 426 (1979) (holding that states cannot invoke sovereign immunity in the courts of other states).
 
302
Peter L. Strauss, “Deference” Is Too Confusing—Let’s Call Them “Chevron Space” and “Skidmore Weight”, 112 COLUM. L. REV. 1143, 1144–45 (2012); accord United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 247 (2001) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (observing that ambiguities in statutes subject to Chevron deference “create a space, so to speak, for the exercise of continuing agency discretion”) Nancy C. Staudt, Modeling Standing, 79 N.Y.U. L. REV. 612, 669 (2004) (“Standing decisions may be motivated by politics, but only when neither clear doctrine exists nor judicial monitoring takes place.”).
 
303
Lee Epstein & Eric Posner, If the Supreme Court Is Nakedly Political, Can It Be Just?, N.Y. TIMES, July 9, 2018, https://​www.​nytimes.​com/​2018/​07/​09/​opinion/​supreme-court-nominee-trump.​html
 
304
Perry, H. W. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Boston: Harvard University Press.
 
305
Tom S. Clarky Pablo Montagnes Jorg L. Spenkuch, Politics from the Bench? Ideology and Strategic Voting in the U.S. Supreme Court September 15, 2018 www.​ssrn.​com
 
306
Bruno Bodart, The Social Value of the Doctrine of Res Judicata: An Economic Analysis. https://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​3271743 Barry Friedman, The Will of the People (2009).
 
307
Cameron, Charles M. and Lewis A. Kornhauser. 2017. “Theorizing the U.S. Supreme Court.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Callander, Steven and Tom S. Clark. 2017. “Precedent and Doctrine in a Complicated World.” American Political Science Review 111(1):184–203.
 
308
Kornhauser, Lewis A. 1995. “Adjudication by a Resource-Constrained Team: Hierarchy and Precedent in a Judicial System.” Southern California Law Review 68:1605–1629.
 
309
Iaryczower, Matias and Gabriel Katz. 2016. “More than Politics: Ability and Ideology in the British Appellate Committee.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 32(1):61–93. Iaryczower, Matias and Matthew Shum. 2012. “The Value of Information in the Court: Get it Right, Keep it Tight.” American Economic Review 102(1):202–37.
 
310
Knight, Jack and Lee Epstein. 1996. “On the struggle for judicial supremacy.” Law and Society Review 30(1):87–120.
 
311
Clark, Tom S. 2011. The Limits of Judicial Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press. Clark, Tom S., Jeffrey R. Lax and Douglas Rice. 2015. Measuring the Political Salience of Supreme Court Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts 3(1):37–65.
 
312
Michael Tomasky, The Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Crisis, N.Y. TIMES, Oct. 5, 2018, https://​www.​nytimes.​com/​2018/​10/​05/​opinion/​supreme-courts-legitimacy-crisis.​html; Alexander M. Bickel, The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics 2nd Edition Yale University Press.
 
313
Ian Millhiser, Kagan Warns That the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy is in Danger, THINKPROGRESS, Sept. 17, 2018, https://​thinkprogress.​org/​justice-kagan-warns-that-the-supreme-courts-legitimacy-is-in-danger2de1192d56​36/​ James L. Gibson, Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance, 23 LAW & SOC. REV. 469, 480–81 (1989) (finding, based on responses to surveys, “some evidence of the Court’s capacity to engender compliance with unpopular political decisions”).
 
314
Tom R. Tyler & Kenneth Rasinski, Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson, 25 LAW & SOC. REV. 621, 627 (1991) (concluding that the “legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court is based on the belief that it makes decisions in fair ways, not on agreement with its decisions.”).
 
315
James L. Gibson & Michael J. Nelson, The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto, 10 ANN. REV. L. & SOC. SCI. 201, 209 (2014).
 
316
Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Reconciling Chevron and Stare Decisis, 85 GEO.L.J. 2225, 2242 (1997) (noting that the Supreme Court is “the most salient symbol of the rule of law in our society”).
 
317
Adrian Vermeule, Political Constraints on Supreme Court Reform, 90 MINN. L.REV. 1154 (2006). Note, Congressional Restrictions on the President’s Appointment Power and the Role of Longstanding Practice in Constitutional Interpretation, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1914, 1919 (2007) (suggesting that “there is strong evidence that the original understanding of the Appointments Clause grants the President plenary appointment power contingent only on Senate confirmation”).
 
318
Anthony Kronman, “Foreword: Legal Scholarship and Moral Education,” 90 Yale L. Rev. 955, 959 (1981).
 
319
, Geoffrey R. Stone, Understanding Supreme Court Confirmations, 2010 SUP. CT. REV. 381, 381–82 (2010) (“Conventional wisdom says that the confirmation process for Supreme Court Justices is now terribly broken … The common refrain is that ‘if only we could get back to the way we did things in the past, the process would be so much better.’”).
 
320
Tara Leigh Grove, The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence, 71 VAND. L. REV. 465, 540 (2018).
 
321
Eric Black, How the Supreme Court Has Come to Play a Policymaking Role, MINNPOST (Nov. 20, 2012), https://​www.​minnpost.​com/​eric-black-ink/​2012/​11/​how-supreme-court-has-come-play-policymakingrole​. Alshrafi v. Am. Airlines, 321 F. Supp. 2d 150, 156 n.7 (D. Mass. 2004) (“The sweeping nature of recent Supreme Court preemption jurisprudence has been the subject of considerable comment, much of it critical.… Still, it is bedrock that Supreme Court decisions bind the analysis of [lower courts].”)
 
322
Kevin Costello, Supreme Court Politics and Life Tenure: A Comparative Inquiry, Vol. 71 May 2020 Hastings Law Journal 1153 at 1180.
 
323
Jane S. Schacter, Metademocracy: The Changing Structure of Legitimacy in Statutory Interpretation, 108 Harv. L. Rev. 593, 594 (1995).
 
324
William N. Eskridge, Jr., Et Al., Legislation and Statutory Interpretation 221 (2d Ed. 2006); Daniel A. Farber & Philip P. Frickey, Law and Public Choice 89 (1991).
 
325
Glen Staszewski, Statutory Interpretation as Contestatory Democracy, 55 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 221 (2013), https://​scholarship.​law.​wm.​edu/​wmlr/​vol55/​iss1/​5
 
326
John Locke, The Second Treatise Of Civil Government, 2.7 (1690).
 
327
I. Bernard Cohen, Revolution in Science 467, 468 (1985).
 
328
Ernest Becker, The Birth and Death of Meaning 139 (2d ed. 1971).
 
329
I. Bernard Cohen, Revolution in Science 468 (1985). Bernard Williams, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy (Princeton, 2000). Kenneth Baker, “Williams examines the merits of truth,” in the on-line Book Review section of the San Francisco Chronicle, Sunday, September 22, 2002, http://​www.​sfgate.​com/​cgibin/​article.​cgi?​f=​/​chronicle/​archive/​2002/​09/​22/​RV93143.​DTL. Plato, Laws, Reinhold Niebuhr, Human Destiny, 1943, William James, The Meaning of Truth, 1907, Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, Ralph Waldo Emerson, “Intellect,” Essays, First Series, 1841, Thomas Henry Huxley, The Coming of Age of “The Origin of Species,” 1893, William James, Pragmatism, 1907, Francis Bacon, Essays, 1597.
 
330
Cass R. Sunstein, Free Markets and Social Justice 70 (1997).
 
331
Hont, Istvan. 2009. “Adam Smith’s History of Law and Government as Political Theory,” in R. Bourke and R. Geuss (eds), Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
 
332
Hont, Istvan. 2005. “Introduction,” Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
333
Antonin Scalia, book review of, Steven D. Smith, Law’s Quandary (Harvard 2005), 2005 First Things 157 (November 2005) pp. 37–46.
 
334
David Barnhizer, “Truth or Consequences in Legal Scholarship,” 50 Hofstra L. Rev. (2005).
 
335
Janice Nadler, Expressive Law, Social Norms, and Social Groups, 42 LAW & SOC. INQUIRY 60, 63, 69, 70–71 (2017).
 
336
Gillian Hadfield, Rules For A Flat World: Why Humans Invented Law And How To Reinvent It For A Complex Global Economy 41 (2016) (stating that “[w]e don’t really know when law first emerged in human societies”). Peter T. Manicas, A Realistic Philosophy Of Social Science: Explanation And Understanding 44 (2006). Lenartowicz Et Al., Social Systems: Complex Adaptive Loci Of Cognition, 18 Emergence: Complexity & Org. 1, 1 (2016).
 
337
Brian Z. Tamanaha, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory 51, 53–54 (2004).
 
338
Christopher Langdell, Address delivered Nov. 5, 1866, reprinted in 3 Law Q. Rev. 123, 124 (1887).
 
339
Raz J. 2009. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality (2nd ed.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press p 223 “I have been treating the rule of law as an ideal, as a standard to which the law ought to conform but which it can and sometimes does violate most radically and systematically.”
 
340
McNollgast. 2007. “Political Economy of Law” in in A. Mitchell Polinsky and Stephen Shavel, eds., Law and Economics Handbook vol 2. North Holland.
 
341
Hadfield, GK, Weingast BR. 2015. “Microfoundations of the Rule of Law,” Annual Review of Political Science 17:21–42.
 
342
David Cole, “Agon at Agora: Creative Misreadings in the First Amendment Tradition”, 95 Yale L. J. 857, 859 (1986), states: “[I]n landmark cases … the Justices alter the puzzle itself and create law. Thus, while judicial legitimacy requires faithful adherence to precedent, legal development turns on creative acts.”
 
343
Roscoe Pound, New Paths of the Law 3 (1950).
 
344
Aristotle, The Politics, B. Jowett trans., The Oxford Translation of Aristotle, W.D. Ross ed. (1921): “For the law has no power to command obedience except that of habit, which can only be given by time, so that a readiness to change from old to new laws enfeebles the power of the law.” Bk. II, c. 8.
 
345
Max Weber, Economy and Society, vol. 2, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich (Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press 1978) p. 883.
 
346
Thomas Carothers, “Rule of Law Revival” (1998) 77(2) Foreign Affairs 95, 95.
 
347
Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents (London: Penguin, 2002).
 
348
Joseph Gold, Conditionality (Pamphlet No 31, IMF Pamphlet Series, Washington DC, 1979).
 
349
Amanda Perry, “International Economic Organisations and the Modern Law and Development Movement” in Ann Seidman, Robert Seidman and Thomas Wälde (eds.), Making Development Work: Legislative Reform for Institutional Transformation and Good Governance (The Hague: Kluwer, 1999) James Thuo Gathii, “Good Governance as a Counter-Insurgency Agenda to Oppositional and Transformative Social Projects in International Law” (1999) 5 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 107.
 
350
James Wolfensohn, “Foreword” in The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The State in a Changing World (World Development Report, 1997) (Washington DC: Oxford University Press, 1997).
 
351
Richard Peet, Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO (London: Zed Books, 2003).
 
352
UN GA Res 44 /23. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v US) (Jurisdiction of the Court and Admissibility of the Application) [1984] ICJ Rep 392; Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v US) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14. Rudolf Bernhardt, “Review of Lori Damrosch (ed.), The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads” (1990) 84(1) American Journal of International Law 293.
 
353
Frank Upham, Mythmaking in the Rule of Law Orthodoxy (2002) (Paper No 30, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Working Papers, Rule of Law Series, Democracy and the Rule of Law Project, September 2002).
 
354
Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon Press, 1967) (first published 1944).
 
355
D. Dyzenhaus, “Hobbes on the International Rule of Law,” Ethics & International Affairs 28 (2014), 54.
 
356
C. Schmitt, “The Turn to the Discriminating Concept of War (1937),” in Carl Schmitt Writings on War 30 (Timothy Nunan, ed. trans. 2011), 31–32. A. Benoist, “Global Terrorism and the State of Permanent Exception: The Significance of Carl Schmitt’s Thought Today,” in L Odysseos and F Petito (eds.)
 
357
D. Bell, Reordering the World: Essays on Liberalism and Empire (2016).
 
358
Kumm, Mattias (2009). “The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State.” In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 258–325.
 
359
Gardbaum, Stephen (2009). “Human Rights and International Constitutionalism.” In Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman, ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 233–257.
 
360
Eric A. Posner & Adrian Vermeule, The Executive Unbound: After The Madisonian Republic 15 (2010).
 
361
Daniel B. Rodriguez et al., The Rule of Law Unplugged, 59 Emory L.J. 1455, 1493 (2010) Jeremy Waldron, Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept (in Florida)? 21 Law & Phil. 137, 151 (2002) (describing rule of law as an essentially contested concept, which inherently defies analytical consensus).
 
362
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 163 (1803); James Harrington, The Commonwealth Of Oceana And A System Of Politics 8 (J.G.A. Pocock ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 1992) (1656) (“[G]overnment… is the empire of laws and not of men.”). Lon L. Fuller, The Morality Of Law 33–94 (rev. ed. 1969). (According to Fuller, laws should be (1) general, (2) publicly promulgated, (3) prospective, (4) intelligible, (5) consistent, (6) practicable, (7) not too frequently changeable, and (8) actually congruent with the behavior of the officials of a regime).
 
363
Antonin Scalia, The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules, 56 U. CHI. L. REV. 1175, 1186–87 (1989).
 
364
Lawrence B. Solum, A Law of Rules: A Critique and Reconstruction of Justice Scalia’s View of the Rule of Law, 1 Apa Newsl. On Phil. & L. 105, 110 (2002) Brian Galle & Mark Seidenfeld, Administrative Law’s Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power, 57 Duke L.J. 1933, 1949 (2008).
 
365
David A. Graham, “Trump’s Assault on the Rule of Law,” The Atlantic, Apr. 9, 2018, https://​www.​theatlantic.​com/​politics/​archive/​2018/​04/​trumps-assault-on-rule-of-law/​557600/​; David Leonhardt,“Trump’s Attacks on the Rule of Law Reach a New Level”, N.Y Times (Opinion), May 21, 2018, https://​www.​nytimes.​com/​2018/​05/​21/​opinion/​trump-department-of-justice.​html
 
366
Ronan Cormacain, Legislative Drafting and the Rule of Law Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London PhD Thesis 2017.
 
367
John Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford University Press 1980).
 
368
Peter van Lochem (2017) Legislation against the rule of law – an introduction, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 5:2, 95–100, DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1080/​20508840.​2017.​1387729 Jonathan Chait, “Trump is mobilizing for war against the rule of law,” New York Magazine, 17 July 2017 Joan Biskupic, “Trump’s disdain for the rule of law,” CNN Politics, 26 July 2017.
 
369
Ran Hirschl, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard University Press 2006).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mills, A. (2009). The confluence of public and private international law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Mills, A. (2009). The confluence of public and private international law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scalia, A. (1989). The rule of law as a law of rules. 56 University of Chicago Law Review, 1175, 1186–1187. Scalia, A. (1989). The rule of law as a law of rules. 56 University of Chicago Law Review, 1175, 1186–1187.
3.
go back to reference Obama, B. (2017). The President’s role in advancing criminal justice reform. Harvard Law Review, 130, 811, 814 n.11. Obama, B. (2017). The President’s role in advancing criminal justice reform. Harvard Law Review, 130, 811, 814 n.11.
4.
go back to reference Brian, Z. (2017). Tamanaha, A realistic theory of law. Cambridge University Press. Brian, Z. (2017). Tamanaha, A realistic theory of law. Cambridge University Press.
5.
6.
go back to reference Bosco, D. (2014). Rough Justice: The international criminal court in a world of power politics (pp. 1–10). Oxford University Press. Bosco, D. (2014). Rough Justice: The international criminal court in a world of power politics (pp. 1–10). Oxford University Press.
7.
go back to reference Benvenisti, E. (2018). Upholding democracy amid the challenges of new technology: what role for the law of global governance? European Journal of International Law, 29, 9.CrossRef Benvenisti, E. (2018). Upholding democracy amid the challenges of new technology: what role for the law of global governance? European Journal of International Law, 29, 9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Forder, J., & Svantesson, D. (2007). Internet and E-commerce law. OUP. Forder, J., & Svantesson, D. (2007). Internet and E-commerce law. OUP.
9.
go back to reference Zekos, G. (2016a). Law and economics of corporate governance and insider trading. Nova Science. Zekos, G. (2016a). Law and economics of corporate governance and insider trading. Nova Science.
10.
go back to reference Zekos, G. (2016b). MNE’s in 21st century. Nova Science. Zekos, G. (2016b). MNE’s in 21st century. Nova Science.
11.
go back to reference Zekos, G. (2015). Monetary policy and risk management in financial globalization. Nova Science. Zekos, G. (2015). Monetary policy and risk management in financial globalization. Nova Science.
12.
go back to reference Zekos, G. (2014). Risk management, corporate governance in 21st century digital economy. Nova Science. Zekos, G. (2014). Risk management, corporate governance in 21st century digital economy. Nova Science.
13.
go back to reference Zekos, G. (2020). Finance Crimes: Insider trading and money laundering. Nova Science.CrossRef Zekos, G. (2020). Finance Crimes: Insider trading and money laundering. Nova Science.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gilliéron, G. (2014). Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe. Springer.CrossRef Gilliéron, G. (2014). Public Prosecutors in the United States and Europe. Springer.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Krieger, H. (2019). Populist governments and international law. European Journal of International Law, 30(3). Krieger, H. (2019). Populist governments and international law. European Journal of International Law, 30(3).
16.
go back to reference Lim, Y. F. (2007). Cyberspace law: commentaries and materials. OUP. Lim, Y. F. (2007). Cyberspace law: commentaries and materials. OUP.
17.
go back to reference Versteeg, M., & Ginsburg, T. (2017). Measuring the rule of law: A comparison of indicators. Law and Social Inquiry, 42, 100.CrossRef Versteeg, M., & Ginsburg, T. (2017). Measuring the rule of law: A comparison of indicators. Law and Social Inquiry, 42, 100.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lindseth, P. L. (2010). Power and legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. OUP.CrossRef Lindseth, P. L. (2010). Power and legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State. OUP.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Caney, S. (2006). Justice beyond borders. OUP. Caney, S. (2006). Justice beyond borders. OUP.
20.
go back to reference Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. 267 Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1–2.CrossRef Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. 267 Artificial Intelligence, 1, 1–2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Politics Versus Law
Author
Georgios I. Zekos
Copyright Year
2022
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94736-1_5

Premium Partner