Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book
As ethical issues become increasingly important and problematic in research, this chapter reflects on our own investigations into some of the ethical considerations involved in long-term research ‘in the wild’. In particular, we consider two relevant issues: the effect of a long-term relationship with a community, and the delineation and relevance of ‘practical’ ethics in the process. What becomes clear from our interrogation of the data is that issues of responsibility, including those of how we identify what our responsibilities might be; who holds them; what they entail, and how we discharge them are matters of the negotiated order. In a context where research relationships ‘in the wild’ are predicated on lasting commitments, they are not, and cannot be, determined by the researchers alone. They evolve over time and in delicate relation to the needs and desires of our fellow research partners and participants—this is what ‘practical ethics’ entails.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-centered design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (Vol. 37(4), pp. 445–456). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3297–3306). ACM.
Bardzell, S. (2010). Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1301–1310). ACM.
Becker, L. C., & Becker, C. B. (Eds.). (2003). A history of Western ethics. Psychology Press.
Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Anderson, B., Jacobs, R., Golembewski, M., Jirotka, M., et al. (2015). The ethical implications of HCI’s turn to the cultural. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(5), 24. CrossRef
Berges, S. (2015). A feminist perspective on virtue ethics. Springer.
Bødker, S. (2000). Scenarios in user-centred design—setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 61–75. CrossRef
Brannigan, A. (2017). The rise and fall of social psychology: An iconoclast’s guide to the use and misuse of the experimental method. Routledge.
Bratteteig, T., & Wagner, I. (2014). Disentangling participation: Power and decision-making in participatory design. Springer.
Brey, P. (2010). Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. In The Cambridge handbook of information and computer ethics (pp. 41–58).
Brown, B., Reeves, S., & Sherwood, S. (2011). Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11) (pp. 1657–1666). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Brown, B., Weilenmann, A., McMillan, D., & Lampinen, A. (2016, May). Five provocations for ethical HCI research. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 852–863). ACM.
Crabtree, A., Chamberlain, A., Grinter, R. E., Jones, M., Rodden, T., & Rogers, Y. (2013). Introduction to the special issue of “The Turn to The Wild”. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(3), 13. CrossRef
De Ruyter, B., & Aarts, E. (2004). Ambient intelligence: Visalising the future. In Proceedings of AVI ’04, Gallipoli, Italy. ACM Press.
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2001). Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media.
Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: Design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press.
Edmonds, D. (2013). Would you kill the fat man?: The trolley problem and what your answer tells us about right and wrong. Princeton University Press.
Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., & Kulkki, S. (2005). State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation—A European approach.
Følstad, A. (2008). Living labs for innovation and development of information and communication technology: A literature review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 99–131.
Foot, P. (2002). Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177–1201).
Haddon, L. (2007). Roger Silverstone’s legacies: Domestication. New Media & Society, 9(1), 25–32. CrossRef
Hammersley, M. (2009). Against the ethicists: On the evils of ethical regulation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(3), 211–225. CrossRef
Harding, M., Finney, J., Davies, N., Rouncefield, M., & Hannon, J. (2013, September). Experiences with a social travel information system. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing (pp. 173–182). ACM.
Intille, S., Larson, K., Beaudin, J. S., Nawyn, J., Tapia, E. M., & Kaushik, P. (2005). A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies. In Proceedings of CHI ‘05. ACM press.
Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. JCSCW, 7(3–4), 167–185.
Lehtonen, T. K. (2003). The domestication of new technologies as a set of trials. Journal of Consumer Culture, 3(3), 363–385. CrossRef
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Short history of ethics: A history of moral philosophy from the homeric age to the twentieth century.
McInerny, R. M. (1997). Ethica Thomistica: The moral philosophy of Thomas Aquinas. CUA Press.
Moore, G. E., & Baldwin, T. (1993). Principia ethica. Cambridge University Press.
Mumford, E. (1995). Effective systems design and requirements analysis: The ETHICS approach.
O’Connor, J. (2012). The trolley method of moral philosophy. Essays in Philosophy, 13(1), Article 14.
Randall, D. (2003). Domestic settings and new technology: A case study. In R. Harper (Ed.), Inside the smart home. London: Springer.
Schuurman, D., Evens, T., & De Marez, L. (2009). A Living lab research approach for mobile TV. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Interactive Television Conference. New York: ACM press.
Silverstone, R. (2005). 12 Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of. In Domestication of media and technology (p. 229).
Singer, P. (2011a). The expanding circle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef
Singer, P. (2011b). Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. Psychology Press.
Taylor, N., Cheverst, K., Wright, P., & Olivier, P. (2013, April). Leaving the wild: Lessons from community technology handovers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1549–1558). ACM.
Turner, R. (1970). “Words, utterances, activities”. In Jack D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Towards a reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 169–87). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.
Turner, R. (1974). (Ed.) Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31(3), 361–380. CrossRef
Verbeek, P.-P. (2008). Morality in design: Design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In Philosophy and design (pp. 91–103). Springer Netherlands.
Waycott, J., Munteanu, C., Davis, H., Thieme, A., Moncur, W., McNaney, R., Vines, J., & Branham, S. (2016). Ethical encounters in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3387–3394). ACM.
Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ethics in engineering practice and research. Cambridge University Press.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 121–136.
Wood, A. (2011). Humanity as end in itself. In D. Parfit (Ed.), On what matters (Vol. 2, pp. 58–82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
- Practical Ethics
- Springer International Publishing
- Sequence number