28112020  Production Process  Issue 1/2021 Open Access
Process design for 5axis ball end milling using a realtime capable dynamic material removal simulation
 Journal:
 Production Engineering > Issue 1/2021
Important notes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1 Introduction
Because of rising demands for economic and sustainable product life cycles, the relevance of efficient repair processes increases [
1]. An example for products for which a repair is highly motivated are Blade integrated disks (Blisks) made from Ti6Al4V. They are commonly used within compressor stages of jet engines, because of a better powertoweight ratio. Due to their integral construction and complex geometries, flexible and efficient repair processes are needed if one blade is damaged during operation. Depending on the type of damage, an additional material deposit by welding or brazing might be required to build up the damaged region. Afterwards, the excessive deposit material has to be removed to restore the original geometry. This material removal is carried out using grinding or milling processes. The socalled recontouring process differs from new part production, because of the uniqueness of each repair case and oftendifferent material properties due to the welding or brazing filler [
2]. The uniqueness of each repair case also prevents runningin processes, which are commonly used in new part production. Thus, the milling process has to be designed individually for each repair case beforehand. Therefore, a virtual process simulation is considered beneficial [
2]. For recontouring, 5axis ball end milling is typically used, due to its geometric flexibility and accessibility [
2]. Because of vibration prone parts and the often required use of slender tool holders, a stability prognosis of the milling process is required for designing sound recontouring processes. Additionally, the resulting geometric accuracy and surface topography is of superior importance to minimize scrap and flow loss [
3]. In literature, methods exist to predict process stability and surface topography, which can be categorized in analytical and numerical approaches. Analytical methods are often limited to calculate stability lobes without predicting geometric shape errors [
4,
5]. They are often restricted to specific use cases, too. Numerical methods are called material removal simulations (MRS). MRS can predict surface topography and process stability, if a dynamic model is used. Their main advantage over analytical models is their flexibility regarding process kinematics and workpiece geometry. Furthermore, the accuracy of stability prognosis is higher, because nonlinear effects can be considered using timedomain discretized simulations. However, they are less efficient and need higher computation time [
6]. For recontouring, the application of numericalsimulations is favourable, because of the flexibility needed regarding the complex workpiece geometries as well as the calculation of the engagement parameters considering true milling kinematics. Existing MRS use voxel, dexel or constructive solid geometry (CSG) to discretize the workpiece. The approach by Surmann is one example for the use of CSG including the consideration of tool dynamics [
7]. Kersting et al. extends the model by considering workpiece vibrations [
8]. However, in both approaches, the cutting edges of the tool are not modelled discretely, preventing the prognosis of surface topography errors due to e.g. cutting edge chipping or helix angle effects. Hense presents a hybrid approach [
9], which is based on the works of Siebrecht and Odendahl [
10]. Thereby, a CSG workpiece model is used to determine the engagement conditions for calculating process forces with Kienzles force model. This allows deriving the displacements of the toolworkpiece dynamic system using sets of damped driven oscillators. An additional multidexel workpiece model is used to consider effects of the discrete modelled cutting edges on the surface topography. However, the long computation time needed is stated as problematically [
9]. Montgomery and Altintas presented a MRS considering the flank face—workpiece contact and the resulting ploughing forces [
11], which were assumed to be proportional to the yield strength of the material [
12]. The workpiece surface could be predicted with a high accuracy. Another MRS considering the contact between flank wear and the workpiece surface was developed by Ko [
13]. Stability charts for worn tools were in good agreement with experimental stability charts. However, the surface resulting from the milling process was not analysed. This paper presents a dynamic material removal simulation, which is able to run in realtime, eliminating the disadvantage of long computation times of existing approaches. Despite analyzing process stability, the simulation is able to predict highresolution surface topography including effects of discretemodelled cutting edges. This allows an optimization of the recontouring process also with respect to geometric accuracy.
2 Experimental setup
To validate the MRS, the 5axis machine tool Deckel Maho DMU 125P is used to carry out ball end milling experiments. Therefore, specimen made of AMS 4911 Ti6Al4V Grade 5 (
\(90 \times 90 \times 10\hbox { mm}^3\)) have been machined featuring a tungsten inert gas (TIG) weld. The filler used during TIG welding equals the titanium alloy of the base material, leading to comparable process forces during milling. A twofluted 10 mm Seco JH970100 solid carbide ball end mill has been used with a hightemperature steel shrinkfit chuck Garant 30823510 tool holder. The static stiffness of the tool system is
\(0.7\,\hbox {N}/\upmu \hbox {m}\). The process forces have been measured with a Kistler 9257B dynamometer. Force coefficients were determined in the simulation based on cutting experiments with varying feed per tooth
\(f_\mathrm {z}\) [
14]. An experimental modal analysis has been performed to determine the frequency response functions (FRF) of the tool. Therefore, an impact hammer type PCB Piezotronic 086C03 and a Polytec OFV3001 + OFV 303 vibrometer system were used. From the FRFs, the modal parameters have been derived using a genetic algorithm. The surface topography is measured using an Alicona InfiniteFocus G5, which is based on focusvariation measurement principle.
Advertisement
3 Material removal simulation
The material removal simulation in this paper uses the multi dexelbased approach presented in [
15]. Thereby, the tools rake face is discretized with quadrilaterals and the workpiece is discretized using a 3Ddimensional Cartesian dexel grid. The elements of the rake face of each tooth are transformed with discrete time steps
i depending on the movement of the tool. For each time step
i, the tool rotates about the angular step
\(\mathrm{d} \varphi \). By subtracting the sweep volume of the tool from the workpiece using Boolean operation, the undeformed chip dimensions can be calculated for each element and time step. The differential cutting forces are calculated for each quadrilateral using the process force model by Engin and Altintas
where
dFt is the tangential,
dFr is the radial and
dFa is the axial force, dA is the chip cross section and dS the contact length [
16].
\(K_\mathrm {ic}\) and
\(K_\mathrm {ie}\) are calculated based on experimental milling tests. By integrating over all elements, the resulting cutting forces can be obtained. They are used to calculate the displacement of the toolworkpiece system at each time step using sets of driven damped oszillators. To derive the displacement of the tool center point (TCP), the equations of motions have to be solved for each oszillator, wherefore semiimplicit Euler method is used. Exemplarily, the equation of motion for one oszillator is
where
\(m_\mathrm {x}\) is the modal mass,
\(d_\mathrm {x}\) the modal damping constant,
\(c_\mathrm {x}\) the modal stiffness,
x the displacement and
\(F_\mathrm {x}\) the driving force. By numerical integration using semiimplicit Euler
the displacement
\(x^{i+1}\) is calculated using the velocity
\({\dot{x}}^{i+1}\), which leads to faster convergence and thus faster computation in comparison to classical Euler because of better conservation of energy. The maximum passive force as convergence criterion dependent on
\(\varDelta t\) and the integration method for an exemplary process is shown in Fig.
1. For convergence, a time step size of at least
\(\varDelta \,t\,=\,6.5\times 10^{5}{\hbox {s}}\) is necessary using semiimplicit Euler method. In comparison, explicit Euler requires a time step size of
\(\varDelta \,t\,={1\times 10^{7}}{\hbox {s}}\). A time step size of
\(\varDelta \,t\,=\,{6.5 \times 10^{5}}{\hbox {s}}\) corresponds to an angular step size
\(\varDelta \,\phi \,=\,{0.5}{^\circ }\), which leads to an acceptable absolute error of the rotational sweep volume approximation using a linear connection of
\(f_\mathrm {abs}\,\approx \,{0.1}{\upmu \hbox {m}}\) as shown in Fig.
1. With
\(\varDelta \,t\,=\,{6.5 \times 10^{5}}{\hbox {s}}\), the maximum frequency according to NyquistShannon theorem is
\(f_\mathrm {max}\,=\,1/2\varDelta t\,\approx \,{7690}{\hbox {Hz}}\). Thus, a further increase of the time step size using e.g. Runge Kutta methods is not required, depending on the frequency spectrum to be investigated.
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{bmatrix} dF_\mathrm {t,n}\\ dF_\mathrm {r,n} \\ dF_\mathrm {a,n} \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} K_\mathrm {tc,n} \cdot dA_\mathrm {n} + K_\mathrm {te,n} \cdot dS_\mathrm {n}\\ K_\mathrm {rc,n} \cdot dA_\mathrm {n} + K_\mathrm {re,n} \cdot dS_\mathrm {n}\\ K_\mathrm {ac,n} \cdot dA_\mathrm {n} + K_\mathrm {ae,n} \cdot dS_\mathrm {n} \end{bmatrix} \end{aligned}$$
(1)
$$\begin{aligned} m_\mathrm {x} \cdot \ddot{x}(t) + d_\mathrm {x} \cdot {\dot{x}}(t) + c_\mathrm {x} \cdot x(t) = F_\mathrm {x}(t) \end{aligned}$$
(2)
$$\begin{aligned} \ddot{x}^i= & {} (F_\mathrm {x}^i  d_\mathrm {x} \cdot {\dot{x}}^i  c_\mathrm {x} \cdot x^i) \cdot \frac{1}{m_\mathrm {x}} \end{aligned}$$
(3)
$$\begin{aligned} {\dot{x}}^{i+1}= & {} {\dot{x}}^i + \ddot{x}^i \cdot \varDelta t \end{aligned}$$
(4)
$$\begin{aligned} x^{i+1}= & {} x^i + {\dot{x}}^{i+1} \cdot \varDelta t \end{aligned}$$
(5)
×
4 Results
For validating the simulation, the parameters shown in Fig.
2 have been used. Due to the profile of the welded contour, the depth of cut
\(a_\mathrm {p}\) varies with
\(a_\mathrm {p,max}\,=\,0.5\,\hbox {mm}\). The workpiece is considered stiff as well as the axial direction of the tool. The tools FRFs in x and ydirection have been approximated by 28 modes total (Tables
1,
2). The five modes with the lowest frequency in x and ydirection are the most relevant. The process parameters have been selected according to typical semifinishing operations when recontouring parts from Ti6Al4V.
Table 1
Modal parameters of the tool in
xdirection
No.

f in Hz

m in kg

d in Ns/m

k in
\(\hbox {N}/\upmu \hbox {m}\)

\(\zeta \) in %


1

178

180.9

9823.8

226.5

2.4

2

211

592.4

44276.7

1038.4

2.8

3

419

5.0

1814.0

34.4

6.9

4

681

0.2

36.6

4.3

1.8

5

760

1.2

1020.9

26.6

9.2

6

878

1.6

408.1

49.5

2.3

7

951

19.9

3247.8

711.1

1.4

8

993

252.8

102606.6

9848.2

3.3

9

1177

22.0

6202.4

1203.3

1.9

10

1592

3.9

4002.6

389.4

5.1

11

1884

0.5

538.7

69.0

4.6

12

2442

0.5

398.3

121.0

2.5

13

3171

0.4

1129.2

150.3

7.5

14

3779

0.1

278.4

46.8

7.1

15

4233

0.1

314.5

51.5

8.1

Table 2
Modal parameters of the tool in
ydirection
No.

f in Hz

m in kg

d in Ns/m

k in
\(\hbox {N}/\upmu \hbox {m}\)

\(\zeta \) in %


1

430

6.4

2111.3

46.7

6.1

2

689

0.2

17.9

4.4

0.9

3

827

2.4

1228.5

64.9

4.9

4

883

3.0

788.4

92.3

2.4

5

921

2.3

796.9

76.5

3.0

6

981

261.1

248151.4

9925.4

7.7

7

1010

6.4

1153.3

255.8

1.4

8

1871

0.4

593.6

54.2

6.4

9

2457

0.7

452.2

134.2

2.6

10

3197

0.2

662.5

61.6

10.8

11

3723

0.1

329.4

63.8

6.0

12

3874

0.2

317.5

97.5

4.0

13

4300

0.1

134.9

82.4

2.0

×
4.1 Process forces and process stability
For the given process parameters in Fig.
2, the experimental and simulated process forces and their corresponding frequency spectrum are shown in Fig.
3 for one pass of the TIG weld.
\(F_\mathrm {f}\) is the process force in feed direction,
\(F_\mathrm {fN}\) is the process force in feed normal direction and
\(F_\mathrm {p}\) is the passive force.
×
Advertisement
The maximum forces are reached, when the depth of cut
\(a_\mathrm {p}\) reaches its maximum in the middle of the symmetrical weld shape. The process forces are in good agreement regarding magnitude and frequency. For better comparability, the process forces shown for one tooth pick have been filtered using a low pass filter with a cutoff frequency of
\({1.4}\,{\hbox {kHz}}\) to minimize the impact of the dynamometer. The graphs underline the accuracy of the chosen approach. The dynamometers eigenfrequency is visible in the frequency spectrum at
\(f_\mathrm {dyn}\,=\,2.29\,\hbox {kHz}\). Additional differences arise from the actual geometry of the specimen differing slightly from the ideal CADgeometry. Moreover, machine inaccuracies and fitting of FRFs as well as specific force coefficients lead to further deviations. For ball end milling, it must be noted that specific force coefficients are required for each set of process parameters individually if a high accuracy is needed. This can be attributed to the varying engagement conditions depending on e.g. tool orientation. To underline the accuracy of the approach, the maximum simulated and measured passive forces as well as process stability are shown in Fig.
4 for additional processes, where
dm is down milling,
um is up milling,
\(b_\mathrm {r}\) is the radial depth,
\(\lambda \) is the lead angle and
\({\overline{S}}\) the cutting edge rounding. The cutting coefficients were calculated for every combination of lead angle and cutting edge rounding
\({\overline{S}}\) individually. Therefore, ploughing effects of the cutting edge rounding and the varying engagement conditions for different lead angles were considered. Due to the high requirements of the process on the geometric accuracy, the main stability criteria is the workpiece surface. If the characteristic surface “bowl structure” of the ball end mill process is clearly distorted, the process is classified as unstable. Additionally, processes were classified as unstable if distinct chatter frequencies were detected. The simulation is able to predict process forces and the corresponding process stability correctly for all different sets of process parameters, regardless of tool orientation, strategy and cutting edge rounding.
×
4.2 Surface topography and simulation performance
Due to the dexelbased approach, an analysis of the resulting surface topography is possible. For the process parameters listed in Fig.
2, the resulting surface topography of the recontoured area is shown in Fig.
5, top. The characteristic shape of the experimental topography is predicted in good agreement using the simulation. The maximum shape deviation occurs when the tool exits the weld in both, simulation and experiment. The maximum error is
\(\approx \,{20}{\upmu \hbox {m}}\) in both cases during the tool exit. A possible explanation is the increased elastic tool deflection during the tool exit. However, it has to be mentioned that the tool orientation strongly influences the shape error at the tool exit. The influence of the tool orientation on the shape error will be subject of future investigations.
×
Depending on the dexel resolution and tool discretization, a simulation even faster than the actual needed process time is possible as depicted in Fig.
5, bottom. In this example, a dexel resolution of 2,048 in each direction equals 4.9
\(\mu \mathrm {m}\)/dexel in x, 5.9
\(\mu \mathrm {m}\)/dexel in y and 0.7
\(\mu \mathrm {m}\)/dexel in zdirection. Despite of the high resolution used with 2,048 Dexels in each direction, the simulation needs approximately
\({8.2}\,{\hbox {s}}\), whereas the actual process is finished after
\({14.5}\,{\hbox {s}}\). The simulation is run on an Intel Core i7 9900K processor using multiple cores and AVX instructions to increase performance. It has to be mentioned that the process parameters already converge at a dexel resolution of 1,024.
An additional example for predicting surface topography is shown in Fig.
6. Thereby, different process paremeters are used if compared to the ones listed in Fig.
2. Besides a lower cutting speed
\(v_\mathrm {c}\) and step over
\(b_\mathrm {r}\), a cutting edge rounding
\({\overline{S}} = {30}\,{\upmu \hbox {m}}\) for inducing compressive residual stresses is applied. However, the cutting edge rounding leads to higher process forces due to additionally ploughing [
17], thus tool deviations are increased. Furthermore, when using rounded cutting edges as depicted in Fig.
6 for machining titanium, the elastic material springback
\(h_\mathrm {el}\) has to be considered regarding shape deviations. For
\({\overline{S}} = {30}\,{\upmu \hbox {m}}\), the elastic material springback is
\(\approx {9}\,{\upmu \hbox {m}}\) according to experimental investigations by [
18]. This leads to direct deviations from the nominal depth of cut. Because the dexelbased material removal simulation does not consider any elasticplastic material behaviour, the profile of the simulation is overall corrected by
\(\approx {9}\,{\upmu \hbox {m}}\). Then, the surface topographies are in good agreement as shown in Fig.
6. For the tool exit on the right side of the topography, the characteristic peak seen in the experiment can be predicted by the simulation. Comparing profiles of both, experiment and simulation, the high accuracy of the simulative approach is underlined.
×
5 Conclusion and outlook
The simulation presented in this paper allows a precise virtual process planning for arbitrary complex processes targeting process stability as well as geometric accuracy. Due to the fast computation, different process parameters can be virtually tested to optimize the actual milling process. One disadvantage of the presented approach is the need for individual specific force coefficients for each set of process parameters, if a high accuracy is required. Additionally, a precise fitting of the FRFs is necessary, which can be a time consuming task. In future works, process damping effects due to flank face contacts will be included. This will further improve the accuracy of predicting both, process stability as well as surface topography. Besides process design, an additional use of the simulation could be applying the simulation for online process monitoring, where performance is critical e.g. if lookahead functionalities are demanded.
Acknowledgements
The authors kindly thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for the financial support of the Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 871/3  119193472 “Regeneration of Complex Capital Goods” which provides the opportunity of their collaboration in the research projects B2 “Dexterous Regeneration Cell” and C1 “Simulation Based Planning of Recontouring Metal Cutting Processes”.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.