Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2017

17-06-2015

Professors on the Board: Do They Contribute to Society Outside the Classroom?

Authors: Charles H. Cho, Jay Heon Jung, Byungjin Kwak, Jaywon Lee, Choong-Yuel Yoo

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

According to our data, 38.5 % of S&P 1500 firms have at least one professor on their boards. Given the lack of research examining the roles and effects of academic faculty as members of boards of directors (professor–directors) on corporate outcomes, this study investigates whether firms with professor–directors are more likely to exhibit higher corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance ratings. Results indicate that firms with professor–directors do exhibit higher CSR performance ratings than those without. However, the influence of professor–directors on firm CSR performance ratings depends on their academic background—the positive association between the presence of professor–directors and firm CSR performance ratings is significant only when their academic background is specialized (e.g., science, engineering, and medicine). Finally, this positive association weakens when professor–directors hold an administrative position at their universities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
We use the terms “board diversity” and “board heterogeneity” interchangeably in this section.
 
2
The “Image of Professions” Survey, conducted by Roy Morgan Research (2013), asked respondents to rate which professions they consider the most ethical and honest. Results indicated that among all 30 listed professions, university lecturers were ranked in the top one-third, which was higher than the rankings for business executives, lawyers, and accountants.
 
3
As a robustness test, we also check and find that our results are qualitatively the same even when we extend our analysis into the other four CSR dimensions (i.e., we use a dependent variable that sums up all scores in seven CSR dimensions of KLD).
 
4
There may be potential concerns about the use of net difference scores, i.e., sum of strengths – sum of weaknesses (Allison 1990; Edwards and Parry 1993; Johns 1981). However, we choose to use such difference scores as our CSR dependent variables because several recent studies that use the KLD database have commonly done so (Barnea and Rubin 2010; Chen et al. 2008; Rekker et al. 2012). Following Barnea and Rubin (2010), we assume that all types of CSR strengths and weaknesses are equal in terms of their importance and costs. However, as a robustness check, we also replicate our empirical tests by decomposing our dependent variables of difference scores into strengths and weaknesses and find inferentially similar results. We discuss this issue further in the “Robust Test and Additional Issues” section.
 
5
We classify majors into seven categories in a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive way.
 
6
To ensure that multicollinearity is not a significant issue in our study, we check and find that all VIFs (variance inflation factors) in the OLS regressions without year and industry fixed-effects are below 1.8, implying no significant multicollinearity issue. We also find that our results remain qualitatively the same when all control variables are dropped.
 
7
Audretsch and Stephan (1996) argue that university-based scientists provide three functions to biotech firms: 1) knowledge transfer, 2) signaling the quality of the firm’s research to both capital and resource markets, and 3) help chart the scientific direction of the firm. Thus, specialized professors’ role is to provide advice to make a firm succeed in the long run.
 
8
White et al. (2013) introduce some characteristics of administrative professor-directors. For example, administrative professors may provide appointing firms with beneficial social networks and additional access to resources but, at the same time, they may not be able to provide highly technical and industry-specific advice as it is likely that they have not been active in terms of research since they became administrators at their universities.
 
9
According to KLD guidelines, ‘diversity commitment’ ratings take into account whether a firm hires women, disabled, or gays/lesbians. However, these ratings do not consider occupational diversity such as hiring professors on the board. Thus, it is less likely that the presence of professor-directors on the board automatically increases its ratings for ‘diversity commitment.’
 
10
Although statistically insignificant, we also find that the percentage of having attendance problem (i.e., attended less than 75 % of board meetings) is higher for professor-directors with administrative positions than professors-directors without administrative jobs (1.24 % vs. 1.00 %, t statistic = 0.83).
 
11
Adams and Ferreira (2009) use an instrumental variable for the presence of female directors as the fraction of male directors with board connections to female directors.
 
12
We find inferentially similar results when the change in the proportion of professor-directors (△PctPROF) is used.
 
13
In the next section, we provide the rationale or justification for decomposing our CSR dependent variables (in the form of net difference scores) into CSR strengths and weaknesses.
 
14
We were not able to find clear evidence that firm CSR performance ratings increase when a new professor-director is added to the board.
 
15
We acknowledge some possible limitations in this section. To examine how CSR activities are associated with temporal changes in the presence of professor-directors, we adopt and modify a research design that LaFond and Watts (2008) use (i.e., CSR (t) = △Prof (t) + △Prof (t-1) + △Prof (t-2) + controls (t-1)) in which the dependent variable is the CSR rating level while the variables of interest are the longitudinal changes in the presence of professor-directors. As CSR scores provided by the KLD database are relatively sticky and insensitive over time, taking the change (△) of KLD variables does not capture a subtle change in CSR ratings over two consecutive years.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRef Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRef
go back to reference Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.CrossRef Allison, P. D. (1990). Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociological Methodology, 20, 93–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.CrossRef Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 229–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M., Upadhyay, A., & Zhao, W. (2011). The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5–38.CrossRef Anderson, R. C., Reeb, D. M., Upadhyay, A., & Zhao, W. (2011). The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurial access and absorption of knowledge spillovers: strategic board and managerial composition for competitive advantage. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 155–166.CrossRef Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. (2006). Entrepreneurial access and absorption of knowledge spillovers: strategic board and managerial composition for competitive advantage. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 155–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. E. (1996). Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652. Audretsch, D. B., & Stephan, P. E. (1996). Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 641–652.
go back to reference Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.CrossRef Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Baumgarten, E. (1982). Ethics in the academic profession: A Socratic view. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(3), 282–295.CrossRef Baumgarten, E. (1982). Ethics in the academic profession: A Socratic view. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(3), 282–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214.CrossRef Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Bowman, R. F. (2005). Teacher as servant leader. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(6), 257–260.CrossRef Bowman, R. F. (2005). Teacher as servant leader. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(6), 257–260.CrossRef
go back to reference Charnov, B. H. (1987). The academician as good citizen. In S. L. Payne & B. H. Charnov (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas for academic professionals. P.3-20. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield, IL. Charnov, B. H. (1987). The academician as good citizen. In S. L. Payne & B. H. Charnov (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas for academic professionals. P.3-20. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield, IL.
go back to reference Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: a corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 131–144.CrossRef Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: a corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 131–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75–81.CrossRef Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. J. (2012). Hiring cheerleaders: board appointments of “independent” directors. Management Science, 58(6), 1039–1058.CrossRef Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. J. (2012). Hiring cheerleaders: board appointments of “independent” directors. Management Science, 58(6), 1039–1058.CrossRef
go back to reference Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214.CrossRef Duchin, R., Matsusaka, J. G., & Ozbas, O. (2010). When are outside directors effective? Journal of Financial Economics, 96(2), 195–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613.CrossRef Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577–1613.CrossRef
go back to reference Fich, E. M. (2005). Are some outsider directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 firms. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1943–1972.CrossRef Fich, E. M. (2005). Are some outsider directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments by Fortune 1000 firms. The Journal of Business, 78(5), 1943–1972.CrossRef
go back to reference Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2014). Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance. Financial Management (Forthcoming). Francis, B., Hasan, I., & Wu, Q. (2014). Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance. Financial Management (Forthcoming).
go back to reference Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRef Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Gonin, M. (2007). Business research, self-fulfilling prophecy, and the inherent responsibility of scholars. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1), 33–58.CrossRef Gonin, M. (2007). Business research, self-fulfilling prophecy, and the inherent responsibility of scholars. Journal of Academic Ethics, 5(1), 33–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Güner, A. B., Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Financial expertise of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 323–354.CrossRef Güner, A. B., Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2008). Financial expertise of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(2), 323–354.CrossRef
go back to reference Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.CrossRef Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. (1988). External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577–590.CrossRef
go back to reference Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256.CrossRef
go back to reference Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business and Society, 40(3), 295–314.CrossRef Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business and Society, 40(3), 295–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang, B., & Murphy, P. J. (2007). Do business school professors make good executive managers? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 29–50.CrossRef Jiang, B., & Murphy, P. J. (2007). Do business school professors make good executive managers? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 29–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: a critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(3), 443–463.CrossRef Johns, G. (1981). Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: a critique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 27(3), 443–463.CrossRef
go back to reference LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 447–478.CrossRef LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(2), 447–478.CrossRef
go back to reference Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—the effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554.CrossRef Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—the effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554.CrossRef
go back to reference Mesch, D. J., Brown, M. S., Moore, Z. I., & Hayat, A. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 342–355.CrossRef Mesch, D. J., Brown, M. S., Moore, Z. I., & Hayat, A. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 342–355.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitroff, I. (2004). An open letter to the deans and the faculties of American business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 185–189.CrossRef Mitroff, I. (2004). An open letter to the deans and the faculties of American business schools. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 185–189.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Connell, D. M. (1998). From the universities to the marketplace: The business ethics journey. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15), 1617–1622.CrossRef O’Connell, D. M. (1998). From the universities to the marketplace: The business ethics journey. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15), 1617–1622.CrossRef
go back to reference Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 283–297.CrossRef Oh, W. Y., Chang, Y. K., & Martynov, A. (2011). The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 283–297.CrossRef
go back to reference Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession? European Accounting Review, 14(2), 395–404.CrossRef Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession? European Accounting Review, 14(2), 395–404.CrossRef
go back to reference Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.CrossRef Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480.CrossRef
go back to reference Rekker, S. A. C., Benson, K. L., & Faff, R. W. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and CEO compensation revisited: disaggregation, market stress and gender do matter. Working Paper, University of Queensland. Rekker, S. A. C., Benson, K. L., & Faff, R. W. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and CEO compensation revisited: disaggregation, market stress and gender do matter. Working Paper, University of Queensland.
go back to reference Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(1), 1–16.CrossRef Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 68(1), 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Valentine, S., & Fleishman, G. (2008). Professional ethical standards, corporate social responsibility, and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 657–666.CrossRef Valentine, S., & Fleishman, G. (2008). Professional ethical standards, corporate social responsibility, and the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 657–666.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771–778.CrossRef
go back to reference White, J. T., Woidtke, T., Black, H. A., & Schweitzer, R. L. (2013). Appointments of academic directors. Journal of Corporate Finance (Forthcoming). White, J. T., Woidtke, T., Black, H. A., & Schweitzer, R. L. (2013). Appointments of academic directors. Journal of Corporate Finance (Forthcoming).
go back to reference Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRef Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1–10.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Professors on the Board: Do They Contribute to Society Outside the Classroom?
Authors
Charles H. Cho
Jay Heon Jung
Byungjin Kwak
Jaywon Lee
Choong-Yuel Yoo
Publication date
17-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2718-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2017 Go to the issue