Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue
In trying to explain the drivers of global profit shifting by multinational enterprises (MNEs), we investigate firm-specific determinants and their variation across major industries. Using the ORBIS database, we show that intangible asset endowment of subsidiaries and the supply-chain complexity of MNE groups explain aggregate profit-shifting trends. According to our estimates, subsidiaries with no intangibles react to an incremental increase of the tax rate by reducing reported profits by 0.76 %, while subsidiaries with above median intangible endowment decrease their profits by 1.2 %. This difference is significant at the 5 % level. We find an even more pronounced difference in the observed semi-elasticities comparing affiliates belonging to simple (\(-\)0.52) and more complex MNEs (\(-\)1.92), suggesting a significantly larger sensitivity to CIT rate changes of the latter group. Moreover, we incorporate country-specific transfer pricing mitigation measures (documentation requirements) into our analysis. We find significant mitigation effects, which vary depending on the drivers identified in our analysis. On average, estimated profit shifting among MNE subsidiaries in our sample is reduced by 52 % 2 years after the introduction of mandatory documentation requirements. We do, however, not find a significant effect on affiliates with high intangible endowments, whereas documentation reduces profit shifting of subsidiaries within complex MNE groups. Our analysis suggests that complexity poses less of a challenge to effective domestic enforcement than the appropriate pricing of intangible assets. These findings thus provide additional insights on profit-shifting risks and mitigation effects conditional on firm attributes, which may support the design of anti-avoidance approaches and help guide the allocation of scarce analytical and enforcement resources.
Please log in to get access to this content
To get access to this content you need the following product:
Andrews, D. & Serres, A.D. (2012). Intangible assets, resource allocation and growth: A framework for analysis. OECD Economics Department Working Paper 989, OECD Publishing.
Bartelsman, E. J., & Beetsma, R. M. W. J. (2003). Why pay more? corporate tax avoidance through transfer pricing in OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 87(9–10), 2225–2252. CrossRef
Becker, J., & Riedel, N. (2012). Cross-border tax effects on affiliate investment: Evidence from european multinationals. European Economic Review, 56(3), 436–450. CrossRef
Beuselinck, C., Deloof, M., Vanstraelen, A. (2009). Multinational income shifting, tax enforcement and firm value. Working Paper 12/27, University of Tilburg.
Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. J. (2006). The demand for tax haven operations. Journal of Public Economics, 90(3), 513–531. CrossRef
Dischinger, M., & Riedel, N. (2010). The role of headquarters in multinational profit shifting strategies. Working Paper 1003, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
Dischinger, M., & Riedel, N. (2011). Corporate taxes and the location of intangible assets within multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 691–707. CrossRef
Ghosh, A. (1958). Input–output approach in an allocation system. Economica, 25(97), 58–64. CrossRef
Grubert, H. (2003). Intangible income, intercompany transactions, income shifting, and the choice of location. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 221–42. CrossRef
Heckemeyer, J., & Overesch, M. (August 2012). 2012. Profit shifting channels of multinational firms: A meta-study. Paper presented at IIPF Congress.
Hines, J. R., & Rice, E. M. (1994). Fiscal paradise: Foreign tax havens and american business. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(1), 149–182. CrossRef
Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Huizinga, H., & Laeven, L. (2008). International profit shifting within multinationals: A multi-country perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1164–1182. CrossRef
Karkinsky, T., & Riedel, N. (2012). Corporate taxation and the choice of patent location within multinational firms. Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 176–185. CrossRef
Lenzen, M. (2003). Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the australian economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(1), 1–34. CrossRef
Leontief, W. W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105. CrossRef
Lohse, T., & Riedel. N. (2012). The impact of transfer pricing regulations on profit shifting within european multinationals. FZID Discussion Paper 61–2012, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
Lohse, T., Riedel, N., Spengel, C. (2012). The increasing importance of transfer pricing regulations: A worldwide overview. Working Paper 1227, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
Maffini, G., & Mokkas, S. (2009). Profit shifting and measured productivity of multinational firms. Working Paper 0920, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
OECD. (2013). Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Rasmussen, P. (1956). Studies in Intersectoral Relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Ribeiro, S.P., Menghinello, S., Backer, K.D., (2010). The OECD ORBIS database: Responding to the need for firm-level micro-data in the OECD. OECD Statistics Working Paper 2010/1, OECD Publishing.
United Nations. (2013). Practical manual on transfer princing for developing countries. New York: United Nations.
Weichenrieder, A. J. (2009). Profit shifting in the EU: Evidence from germany. International Tax and Public Finance, 16(3), 281–297. CrossRef
World Bank. (2014). forthcoming. World Bank: Transfer Pricing ToolKit.
- Profit shifting: drivers of transfer (mis)pricing and the potential of countermeasures
- Publication date
- Springer US
Neuer Inhalt/© Stellmach, Neuer Inhalt/© Maturus, Pluta Logo/© Pluta, Frankfurt School