Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

21. Progress for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment by Means of Digital Lifecycle Twins — A Taxonomy

Authors : Theresa Riedelsheimer, Sabrina Neugebauer, Kai Lindow

Published in: EcoDesign and Sustainability II

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To understand and optimize the impact of a product along its lifecycle, the consideration of social, economic and environmental factors is of increasing interest for customers and regulating institutions. In this context, Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is used to monitor and understand the trade-offs of the three sustainability dimensions. Today, LCSA still faces major challenges, such as availability, actuality and validity of data or consistent and appropriate measures to support Design for Sustainability. New technological innovations may support the enhancement of the methodology. In the background of a digitized product and service lifecycle, especially Industry 4.0 technologies, Digital Twins and the integration of Artificial Intelligence may solve data and feedback challenges through new ways of data collection, transfer, validation and intelligent analysis. This paper aims at exploring this potential of new technological innovations for an enhanced LCSA of capital goods and durable consumer goods as well as related services and proposes a taxonomy. Therefore, a literature review to identify existing digital solutions and research gaps is established. For the identified gaps, a new concept, the Digital Lifecycle Twin for LCSA is presented. The authors address both, the positive but also the negative implications put on the LCSA framework from a sustainability perspective. Ultimately, these findings will contribute to the enhancement of the LCSA methodology as well as to the design of a support system to enable environmentally and socially sound design of products and services.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abeyratne S, Monfared R (2016) Blockchain ready manufacturing supply Chain using distributed ledger. Int J Res Eng Technol 05 Abeyratne S, Monfared R (2016) Blockchain ready manufacturing supply Chain using distributed ledger. Int J Res Eng Technol 05
go back to reference Barni A et al (Sep. 2018) Exploiting the digital twin in the assessment and optimization of sustainability performances. In Theory, Research and Innovation in Applications, Portugal, pp. 706–713 Barni A et al (Sep. 2018) Exploiting the digital twin in the assessment and optimization of sustainability performances. In Theory, Research and Innovation in Applications, Portugal, pp. 706–713
go back to reference Brundage MP et al (2018) Analyzing environmental sustainability methods for use earlier in the product lifecycle. J Cleaner Prod 187 Brundage MP et al (2018) Analyzing environmental sustainability methods for use earlier in the product lifecycle. J Cleaner Prod 187
go back to reference Buchert T et al (2019) Increasing resource efficiency with an engineering decision support system for comparison of product design variants. J Clean Prod 210:1051–1062CrossRef Buchert T et al (2019) Increasing resource efficiency with an engineering decision support system for comparison of product design variants. J Clean Prod 210:1051–1062CrossRef
go back to reference Cerri D, Terzi S (2016) Improving manufacturing system’s lifecycle: proposal of a closed loop framework. In: IFIP Advances in information and communication technology, vol. 467, Product lifecycle management in the era of internet of things, Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 554–561. Cerri D, Terzi S (2016) Improving manufacturing system’s lifecycle: proposal of a closed loop framework. In: IFIP Advances in information and communication technology, vol. 467, Product lifecycle management in the era of internet of things, Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 554–561.
go back to reference Chandrakumar C, Kulatunga AK, Mathavan S (2017) A multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate sustainable product designs based on the principles of design for sustainability and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: Innovation S (ed) Systems and technologies, sustainable design and manufacturing 2017. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 347–354CrossRef Chandrakumar C, Kulatunga AK, Mathavan S (2017) A multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate sustainable product designs based on the principles of design for sustainability and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. In: Innovation S (ed) Systems and technologies, sustainable design and manufacturing 2017. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 347–354CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper J et al (2013) Big data in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17(6):796–799CrossRef Cooper J et al (2013) Big data in life cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 17(6):796–799CrossRef
go back to reference Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322CrossRef Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322CrossRef
go back to reference Garcia-Muiña F, González-Sánchez R, Ferrari A, Settembre-Blundo D (2018) The paradigms of industry 4.0 and circular economy as enabling drivers for the competitiveness of businesses and territories: the case of an italian ceramic tiles manufacturing company. Soc Sci 7(12):255 Garcia-Muiña F, González-Sánchez R, Ferrari A, Settembre-Blundo D (2018) The paradigms of industry 4.0 and circular economy as enabling drivers for the competitiveness of businesses and territories: the case of an italian ceramic tiles manufacturing company. Soc Sci 7(12):255
go back to reference Gayraud S, Singh R (1997) A techno-economic computational tool for power generation project assessments and life cycle risk management. In: ASME 1997 Turbo Asia Conference, Singapore. pp 1–8 Gayraud S, Singh R (1997) A techno-economic computational tool for power generation project assessments and life cycle risk management. In: ASME 1997 Turbo Asia Conference, Singapore. pp 1–8
go back to reference Gu F, et al. (2017) Internet of things and big data as potential solutions to the problems in waste electrical and electronic equipment management: an exploratory study, (eng), Waste management (New York, N.Y.), 68, pp. 434–448 Gu F, et al. (2017) Internet of things and big data as potential solutions to the problems in waste electrical and electronic equipment management: an exploratory study, (eng), Waste management (New York, N.Y.), 68, pp. 434–448
go back to reference Guinée JB et al (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future, (eng). Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96CrossRef Guinée JB et al (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future, (eng). Environ Sci Technol 45(1):90–96CrossRef
go back to reference Gürdür D, Gradin K (2017) Interoperable toolchains in cyber-physical systems with a sustainability perspective. In: 2017 IEEE conference on technologies for sustainability (SusTech): 12–14 Nov. 2017 Gürdür D, Gradin K (2017) Interoperable toolchains in cyber-physical systems with a sustainability perspective. In: 2017 IEEE conference on technologies for sustainability (SusTech): 12–14 Nov. 2017
go back to reference Karakoyun F, Kiritsis D (2014) Closed-loop lifecycle management of automotive components: holistic life cycle approach as decision support system. Matériaux Techniques 102(6–7):606CrossRef Karakoyun F, Kiritsis D (2014) Closed-loop lifecycle management of automotive components: holistic life cycle approach as decision support system. Matériaux Techniques 102(6–7):606CrossRef
go back to reference Kim Y-W, Chang T-W, Park J (2017) Gen2 RFID-based system framework for resource circulation in closed-loop supply Chains. Sustainability 9(11):1995CrossRef Kim Y-W, Chang T-W, Park J (2017) Gen2 RFID-based system framework for resource circulation in closed-loop supply Chains. Sustainability 9(11):1995CrossRef
go back to reference Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRef Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95CrossRef
go back to reference Mieras E, Gaasbeek A, Kan D (2019) How to seize the opportunities of new technologies in life cycle analysis data collection: a case study of the dutch dairy farming sector. Challenges 10(1):1–8CrossRef Mieras E, Gaasbeek A, Kan D (2019) How to seize the opportunities of new technologies in life cycle analysis data collection: a case study of the dutch dairy farming sector. Challenges 10(1):1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Neugebauer S (2016) Enhancing life cycle sustainability assessment: tiered approach and new characterization models for social life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Dissertation, TU Berlin, Berlin Neugebauer S (2016) Enhancing life cycle sustainability assessment: tiered approach and new characterization models for social life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Dissertation, TU Berlin, Berlin
go back to reference Ng CY (2018) Green product design and development using life cycle assessment and ant colony optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5–8):3101–3109CrossRef Ng CY (2018) Green product design and development using life cycle assessment and ant colony optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95(5–8):3101–3109CrossRef
go back to reference Peruzzini M, Germani M (2013) Investigating the sustainability of product and product-service systems in the B2C Industry. In: Product-service integration for sustainable solutions, Bochum, pp 421–434 Peruzzini M, Germani M (2013) Investigating the sustainability of product and product-service systems in the B2C Industry. In: Product-service integration for sustainable solutions, Bochum, pp 421–434
go back to reference Raihanian Mashhadi A, Behdad S (2018) Ubiquitous life cycle assessment (U-LCA): A proposed concept for environmental and social impact assessment of industry 4.0. Manufacturing Letters, 15:93–96 Raihanian Mashhadi A, Behdad S (2018) Ubiquitous life cycle assessment (U-LCA): A proposed concept for environmental and social impact assessment of industry 4.0. Manufacturing Letters, 15:93–96
go back to reference Riedelsheimer T, Lindow K, Stark R (2018) Feedback to design with digital lifecycle-twins: literature review and concept presentation. In: Design for X: Beiträge zum 29. DfX-Symposium, September 2018, München: Tutech Verlag, 2018 (in press), pp 1–12 Riedelsheimer T, Lindow K, Stark R (2018) Feedback to design with digital lifecycle-twins: literature review and concept presentation. In: Design for X: Beiträge zum 29. DfX-Symposium, September 2018, München: Tutech Verlag, 2018 (in press), pp 1–12
go back to reference Rückert M, Merkelbach S, Alt R, Schmitz K, Online life cycle assessment for fluid power manufacturing systems—challenges and opportunities. In IFIP advances in information and communication technology, vol. 536, Smart manufacturing for industry 4.0, Cham: Springer, 2018, pp 128–135 Rückert M, Merkelbach S, Alt R, Schmitz K, Online life cycle assessment for fluid power manufacturing systems—challenges and opportunities. In IFIP advances in information and communication technology, vol. 536, Smart manufacturing for industry 4.0, Cham: Springer, 2018, pp 128–135
go back to reference Smetana S, Seebold C, Heinz V (2018) Neural network, blockchain, and modular complex system: the evolution of cyber-physical systems for material flow analysis and life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 133:229–230CrossRef Smetana S, Seebold C, Heinz V (2018) Neural network, blockchain, and modular complex system: the evolution of cyber-physical systems for material flow analysis and life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl 133:229–230CrossRef
go back to reference Song M-L, Fisher R, Wang J-L, Cui L-B (2018) Environmental performance evaluation with big data: theories and methods. Ann Oper Res 270(1–2):459–472CrossRef Song M-L, Fisher R, Wang J-L, Cui L-B (2018) Environmental performance evaluation with big data: theories and methods. Ann Oper Res 270(1–2):459–472CrossRef
go back to reference Stark R, Damerau T (2019) “Digital Twin”, in CIRP encyclopedia of production engineering, Berlin. Springer, Heidelberg Stark R, Damerau T (2019) “Digital Twin”, in CIRP encyclopedia of production engineering, Berlin. Springer, Heidelberg
go back to reference Stark R, Fresemann C, Lindow K (2019) Development and operation of digital twins for technical systems and services. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology. vol 2019 Stark R, Fresemann C, Lindow K (2019) Development and operation of digital twins for technical systems and services. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology. vol 2019
go back to reference Tao F et al (2014) Internet of Things and BOM-Based Life Cycle Assessment of Energy-Saving and Emission-Reduction of Products. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf 10(2):1252–1261CrossRef Tao F et al (2014) Internet of Things and BOM-Based Life Cycle Assessment of Energy-Saving and Emission-Reduction of Products. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf 10(2):1252–1261CrossRef
go back to reference Tao F et al (2016) Internet of Things in product life-cycle energy management. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 1:26–39CrossRef Tao F et al (2016) Internet of Things in product life-cycle energy management. Journal of Industrial Information Integration 1:26–39CrossRef
go back to reference Tu M et al (2017) A novel IoT-based dynamic carbon footprint approach to reducing uncertainties in carbon footprint assessment of a solar PV supply chain. In: 2017 4th international conference on industrial engineering and applications—ICIEA 2017, Japan, pp 249–254 Tu M et al (2017) A novel IoT-based dynamic carbon footprint approach to reducing uncertainties in carbon footprint assessment of a solar PV supply chain. In: 2017 4th international conference on industrial engineering and applications—ICIEA 2017, Japan, pp 249–254
go back to reference Vanderroost M et al (2017) The digitization of a food package’s life cycle: existing and emerging computer systems in the pre-logistics phase. Comput Ind 87:1–14CrossRef Vanderroost M et al (2017) The digitization of a food package’s life cycle: existing and emerging computer systems in the pre-logistics phase. Comput Ind 87:1–14CrossRef
go back to reference Wellsandt S et al (2017) Model-supported lifecycle analysis: an approach for product-service systems. In: Engineering, technology & innovation management beyond 2020: Conference proceedings, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Wellsandt S et al (2017) Model-supported lifecycle analysis: an approach for product-service systems. In: Engineering, technology & innovation management beyond 2020: Conference proceedings, Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
Metadata
Title
Progress for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment by Means of Digital Lifecycle Twins — A Taxonomy
Authors
Theresa Riedelsheimer
Sabrina Neugebauer
Kai Lindow
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6775-9_21