Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Science Teacher Education 4/2015

01-06-2015

Promoting Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Learning to Use Formative Assessment for Life Science Instruction

Authors: Jaime L. Sabel, Cory T. Forbes, Laura Zangori

Published in: Journal of Science Teacher Education | Issue 4/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

To support elementary students’ learning of core, standards-based life science concepts highlighted in the Next Generation Science Standards, prospective elementary teachers should develop an understanding of life science concepts and learn to apply their content knowledge in instructional practice to craft elementary science learning environments grounded in students’ thinking. To do so, teachers must learn to use high-leverage instructional practices, such as formative assessment, to engage students in scientific practices and connect instruction to students’ ideas. However, teachers may not understand formative assessment or possess sufficient science content knowledge to effectively engage in related instructional practices. To address these needs, we developed and conducted research within an innovative course for preservice elementary teachers built upon two pillars—life science concepts and formative assessment. An embedded mixed methods study was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on preservice teachers’ (n = 49) content knowledge and ability to engage in formative assessment practices for science. Findings showed that increased life content knowledge over the semester helped preservice teachers engage more productively in anticipating and evaluating students’ ideas, but not in identifying effective instructional strategies to respond to those ideas.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 375–386. Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 375–386.
go back to reference Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.CrossRef Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511.CrossRef
go back to reference Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRef Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.CrossRef
go back to reference Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., & Barman, N. S. (2006). Students’ ideas about plants and plant growth. The American Biology Teacher, 68(2), 73–79.CrossRef Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., & Barman, N. S. (2006). Students’ ideas about plants and plant growth. The American Biology Teacher, 68(2), 73–79.CrossRef
go back to reference Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristic of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536–553.CrossRef Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristic of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536–553.CrossRef
go back to reference Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernable to pre-service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 402–421.CrossRef Buck, G. A., Trauth-Nare, A., & Kaftan, J. (2010). Making formative assessment discernable to pre-service teachers of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 402–421.CrossRef
go back to reference Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109–1136.CrossRef Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109–1136.CrossRef
go back to reference Cresswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage. Cresswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.
go back to reference Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Donovan, M. S., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
go back to reference Falk, A. (2011). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 265–290.CrossRef Falk, A. (2011). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 265–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Forbes, C. T., Sabel, J. L., & Zangori, L. (in press). Integrating life science content and instructional methods in elementary teacher education. The American Biology Teacher. Forbes, C. T., Sabel, J. L., & Zangori, L. (in press). Integrating life science content and instructional methods in elementary teacher education. The American Biology Teacher.
go back to reference Friedrichsen, P. M. (2001). Moving from hands-on to inquiry-based: A biology course for prospective elementary teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 63(8), 562–568.CrossRef Friedrichsen, P. M. (2001). Moving from hands-on to inquiry-based: A biology course for prospective elementary teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 63(8), 562–568.CrossRef
go back to reference Graham, P. (2005). Classroom-based assessment: Changing knowledge and practice through preservice teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 21, 607–621.CrossRef Graham, P. (2005). Classroom-based assessment: Changing knowledge and practice through preservice teacher education. Teacher and Teacher Education, 21, 607–621.CrossRef
go back to reference Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students’ understanding? Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 16–29.CrossRef Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students’ understanding? Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 16–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Haefner, L. A., Friedrichsen, P. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2006). Teaching with insects: An applied life science course for supporting prospective elementary teachers’ scientific inquiry. The American Biology Teacher, 68(4), 206–212.CrossRef Haefner, L. A., Friedrichsen, P. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2006). Teaching with insects: An applied life science course for supporting prospective elementary teachers’ scientific inquiry. The American Biology Teacher, 68(4), 206–212.CrossRef
go back to reference Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674.CrossRef Haefner, L. A., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674.CrossRef
go back to reference Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics, and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72. Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics, and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
go back to reference Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues Practice, 28, 24–31.CrossRef Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues Practice, 28, 24–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Keeley, P. (2005). Science curriculum topic study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Keeley, P. (2005). Science curriculum topic study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
go back to reference Kohler, F., Henning, J. E., & Usma-Wilches, J. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions: An examination of data from the teacher work sample. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2108–2117.CrossRef Kohler, F., Henning, J. E., & Usma-Wilches, J. (2008). Preparing preservice teachers to make instructional decisions: An examination of data from the teacher work sample. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2108–2117.CrossRef
go back to reference Krall, R. M., Lott, K. H., & Wymer, C. L. (2009). Inservice elementary and middle school teachers’ conceptions of photosynthesis and respiration. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 41–55.CrossRef Krall, R. M., Lott, K. H., & Wymer, C. L. (2009). Inservice elementary and middle school teachers’ conceptions of photosynthesis and respiration. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 41–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154.CrossRef Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
go back to reference Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
go back to reference Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Morrison, J. A. (2013). Exploring exemplary elementary teachers’ conceptions and implementation of inquiry science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 573–588.CrossRef Morrison, J. A. (2013). Exploring exemplary elementary teachers’ conceptions and implementation of inquiry science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 573–588.CrossRef
go back to reference National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
go back to reference NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards. For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
go back to reference Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1135–1154.CrossRef Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1135–1154.CrossRef
go back to reference Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” concept of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255.CrossRef Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t” concept of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247–255.CrossRef
go back to reference Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 497–523.CrossRef Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 497–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Rice, D. C. (2005). I didn’t know oxygen could boil! What preservice and inservice elementary teachers’ answers to ‘simple’ science questions reveals about their subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1059–1082.CrossRef Rice, D. C. (2005). I didn’t know oxygen could boil! What preservice and inservice elementary teachers’ answers to ‘simple’ science questions reveals about their subject matter knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1059–1082.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 205–235. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 205–235.
go back to reference Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., … Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295–314.CrossRef Shavelson, R. J., Young, D. B., Ayala, C. C., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., … Yin, Y. (2008). On the impact of curriculum-embedded formative assessment on learning: A collaboration between curriculum and assessment developers. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 295–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi:10.1002/tea.21209 Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. doi:10.​1002/​tea.​21209
go back to reference Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students’ understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 189–208.CrossRef Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing students’ understanding of inquiry: What do prospective science teachers notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 189–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Weld, J., & Funk, L. (2005). “I’m not the science type”: Effect of an inquiry biology content course on preservice elementary teachers’ intentions about teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 189–204.CrossRef Weld, J., & Funk, L. (2005). “I’m not the science type”: Effect of an inquiry biology content course on preservice elementary teachers’ intentions about teaching science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 189–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Metadata
Title
Promoting Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Learning to Use Formative Assessment for Life Science Instruction
Authors
Jaime L. Sabel
Cory T. Forbes
Laura Zangori
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Teacher Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1046-560X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1847
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9431-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Science Teacher Education 4/2015 Go to the issue