Top

Published in:

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Public-Private Partnerships to Improve Urban Environmental Services

Authors : Bharat Dahiya, Bradford Gentry

Published in: Governance for Urban Services

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) are most usefully viewed as a tool, not a religion. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development introduces ‘partnership’ as one of the five critical dimensions of sustainable development, and lays emphasis on encouraging and promoting effective public, public-private and civil society partnerships. Within this larger context, the purpose of this chapter is to offer some thoughts on: (i) The reasons PPPs have generated such interest in the urban environmental arena; (ii) A way to understanding PPPs; (iii) The key features of successful PPPs; (iv) The current trends in and debate over PPPs in the urban water sector; and (v) Ways to make the best use of PPPs to help improve urban water services. The fact that private capital flows have remained above the Official Development Assistance flows since 2005—except 2015 and 2016, has sustained the interest of many parties in searching for profitable and impactful investment opportunities in urban environmental services. PPPs often start with questions vis-à-vis their goals, strengths and weaknesses, structure and processes. Successful PPPs often feature individual champions who address the tensions at the heart of many partnership efforts; partnership space or the context in which PPPs are formed; and optimized structures and processes that would respond to different urban environmental problems. Our analysis of the data (1990–2013) obtained from the World Bank’s Private Participation in Infrastructure Project Database shows that whilst the number of water projects steadily increased from 1990 to 2007, the private capital flows to urban water sector declined from US$37 billion during 1990–2000 to US$25 billion between 2001 and 2010. The reasons for this decline in international private investment are many and varied: (i) functioning of public sector and political systems; (ii) private sector and commercial realities; and (iii) opposition to private sector involvement. Moving forward will require action on at least two important and interrelated fronts: first is addressing the mayors’ dilemma about the choice of PPPs to improve urban environmental services, and second is assessing the performance of all partners.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Accountability Through Participatory Budgeting in India: Only in Kerala?

next chapter Gender Equality and Local Governance: Global Norms and Local Practices

See Asian Development Bank (2018), Geddes (2011), Graham and Marvin (2001), Lanjekar (2010), Medhekar (2014), Nundy and Baru (2008), O’Neill (2010), Siemiatycki (2011), Srinivasan (2006).

For example, compare Hall et al. (2002) with PADCO, Inc. (2002). Also see Fischer (2011) and Rodriguez et al. (2012).

For the evolving developments in the dynamic field of PPPs, see Bayliss and van Waeyenberge (2018), Boardman and Vining (2012), Cui et al. (2018), Hall (2015), Hodge and Greve (2017), Leigland (2018), Marx (2019), Medda et al. (2013), Patrinos et al. (2009), Petersen (2019), Roehrich et al. (2014), Warner (2012), World Economic Forum (2017).

PPPSD was earlier called Public-Private Partnerships for the Urban Environment (see UNDP 2019).

See: https://hixon.yale.edu.

See: https://ppiaf.org.

Particularly including: Mario R. Delos Reyes at the University of the Philippines; Jamal Ansari at the School of Planning and Architecture in Delhi, India; the late Kwabena Darko at the World Bank’s Distance Learning Center in Ghana; Olena Maslyukivska at the University of Kiev-Mohyla Academy in the Ukraine; Shi Han, Center for Environmentally Sustainable Technology Transfer in Beijing, China; M. Sohail at the Water and Engineering Development Center at Loughborough University in the UK; and Hubert Jenny at the Asian Development Bank, China Resident Mission.

The Economist does not include “partnerships” whilst defining “public-private”. See: https://www.economist.com/economics-a-to-z/p#node-21529888 (accessed 3 September 2019).

For a survey of definitions of PPPs, see Jomo et al. (2016).

These could be shared or overlapping goals. Since a PPP is a voluntary arrangement, both sides need to conclude they will benefit from the partnership.

For a broader discussion on this subject, see Campbell (2012).

It should be noted, however, that PPPs are established between organizations even though individuals may initiate them.

Compared to these regions, private sector investments in water sector have remained low in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa (see Water and Sanitation Program 2011; World Bank 2014).

For an example of problems associated with political intervention in transport sector in Bangkok, see Pongsiri (2012).

See Asian Development Bank (2000, 2008), Delmon (2014), Mehta (2011), UNDP (2000, 2006), UN-ECE (2008), UN-ESCAP (2011), World Bank (1997, 2006, 2017a, 2017b), World Bank et al. (2014).

Such as the Polaris Institute (http://www.polarisinstitute.org/) and Focus on the Global South (http://focusweb.org/).

Such as the riots in 2000 protesting plans to privatize the water services in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Also see Focus on the Global South and Transnational Institute (2007).

Such as the concerns raised by Public Services International and the research it funds through the Public Services International Research Unit (http://www.psiru.org/).

See: https://ic.fsc.org/index.htm.

Such as the WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (see WHO 2006).

African Development Bank (2001) Handbook on stakeholder consultation and participation in African Development Bank Operations. Environment and Sustainable Development Unit (OESU). Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire: African Development Bank. Available at: https://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Policy-Documents/Handbook%20on%20Stakeholder%20Consultaion.pdf

Angueletou-Marteau A (2008) Informal water suppliers meeting water needs in the peri-urban territories of Mumbai, an Indian perspective. Global changes and water resources: confronting the expanding and diversifying pressures: XIIIth world water congress, Sept, Montpellier, France

Argo T, Laquian A (2007) The privatization of water services: effects on the urban poor in Jakarta and Metro Manila. In: Laquian A, Tewari V, Hanley L (eds) The inclusive city: infrastructure and public services for the urban poor in Asia. Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, DC/Baltimore, MD, pp 224–248

Ashley R, Cashman A (2006) The impacts of change on the long-term future demand for water sector infrastructure. Infrastructure to 2030: telecom, land transport, water and electricity. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp 241–347

Asian Development Bank (2000) Developing best practices for promoting private sector investment in infrastructure: water supply. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong

Asian Development Bank (2008) Public-private partnership handbook. Asian Development Bank, Manila

Asian Development Bank (2009) ADB assistance for public-private partnerships in infrastructure development—potential for more success. Impact Evaluation Department. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong

Asian Development Bank (2014) Public-private partnerships in urbanization in the People’s Republic of China. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong

Asian Development Bank (2018) The office of public–private partnership. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong. Available at: https://www.adb.org/publications/office-of-public-private-partnership-flyer. Accessed 25 Aug 2019

Bayliss K, van Waeyenberge E (2018) Unpacking the public private partnership revival. J Dev Stud 54(4):577–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2017.1303671CrossRef

Bigio AG, Dahiya B (2004) Urban environment and infrastructure: toward livable cities. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRef

Boardman AE, Vining AR (2012) The political economy of public–private partnerships and analysis of their social value. Ann Public Coop Econ 83:117–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00457.xCrossRef

Campbell T (2012) Beyond smart cities: how cities network, learn and innovate. Earthscan Publications, London

Cashore B (2002) Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15(4):503–529CrossRef

Centre for Science and Environment (2011) Water PPPs: are they here to stay? Available at: http://www.cseindia.org/node/2857. Accessed Oct 2014

Chiplunkar A, Dueñas MC, Flor M (2008) Maynilad on the mend: rebidding process infuses new life to a struggling concessionaire. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29272/maynilad-mend.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2019

Cui C, Liu Y, Hope A, Wang J (2018) Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. Int J Proj Manag 36(5):773–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004

Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office (2019) Financing the UN development system: time for hard choices. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation/United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office, Uppsala/New York

Dahiya B (2014) Southeast Asia and sustainable urbanization. Glob Asia 9(3):84–91

Dahiya B, Okitasari M (2018) Partnering for sustainable development: guidelines for multi-stakeholder partnerships to implement the 2030 agenda in Asia and the Pacific. United Nations University, Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability (UNU-IAS)/UN-ESCAP, Tokyo/Bangkok

Delmon VR (2014) Structuring private-sector participation (PSP) contracts for small scale water projects. Water and Sanitation Program, International Finance Corporation and the World Bank, Washington, DC

Development Workshop Angola (2009) The informal peri-urban water sector in Luanda. Report submitted to IDRC. Development Workshop Angola, Luanda

Fischer R (2011) The promise and peril of public-private partnerships: lessons from the chilean experience. International Growth Centre Working Paper 11/0483. London School of Economics, London

Focus on the Global South and Transnational Institute (2007) Water democracy: reclaiming public water in Asia—essay collection presented by the reclaiming public water network. Focus on the Global South/Transnational Institute, Bangkok/Amsterdam

Forest Stewardship Council (2015) FSC international standard: FSC principles and criteria for forest stewardship—FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn

Forest Stewardship Council (2016) Standard setting in FSC—FSC-RP-standard setting V1-1. Forest Stewardship Council, Bonn

Geddes R (2011) The road to renewal: private investment in U.S. transportation infrastructure. American Enterprise Institute Press, Washington, DC

Gentry B, Abuyuan A (2000) Global trends in urban water supply and waste water financing and management: changing roles for the public and private sectors. Working paper CCNM/ENV(2000)36/FINAL. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, London

Haase D, Guneralp B, Dahiya B, Bai X, Elmqvist T (2018) Global urbanization: perspectives and trends. In: Elmqvist T, Bai X, Frantzeskaki N, Griffith C, Maddox D, McPhearson T, Parnell S, Romero-Lankao P, Simon D, Watkins M (eds) Urban planet: knowledge towards sustainable cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316647554.003

Hall D (2002) Water in public hands. Public Services International Research Unit, Greenwich, United Kingdom (Working Paper)

Hall D (2015) Why public-private partnerships don’t work: the many advantages of the public alternative. Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich, United Kingdom. Available at: http://www.world-psi.org/sites/default/files/rapport_eng_56pages_a4_lr.pdf. Accessed Aug 2019

Hall D, Bayliss K, Lobina E (2002) Water privatization in Africa. Paper by the Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich for the Municipal Services Project Conference, in Johannesburg, South Africa

Hasibuan D (2007) Jakarta water privatization: workers campaign to bring back water in public hands. Asian Development Bank Forum on Water Privatization, Kyoto

Hodge GA, Greve C (2017) On public–private partnership performance: a contemporary review. Public Works Manag Policy 22:55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X16657830CrossRef

Jenny H (2008) You said private sector participation? Asian Development Bank, Manila. Available at: http://www.adb.org/Water/Articles/2008/Private-Sector.asp#a1. Accessed Nov 2010

Jomo KS, Chowdhury A, Sharma K, Platz D (2016) Public-private partnerships and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: fit for purpose? DESA Working Paper No. 148, ST/ESA/2016/DWP/148. United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, New York

Kharas H (2019) International financing of the sustainable development goals. In: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation and United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office, Financing the UN Development System: Time for Hard Choices. Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation/United Nations Multi-Partner Trust Fund Office, Uppsala/New York, pp 71–73

Kjellén M, McGranahan G (2006) Informal water vendors and the urban poor. Human settlements working paper series water no. 3. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

Lanjekar P (2010) Public-private partnerships and urban water security: issues and prospects in Mumbai, India. Ritsumeikan J Asia Pacific Stud 27:167–176. Available at: https://en.apu.ac.jp/rcaps/uploads/fckeditor/publications/journal/RJAPS_V27_Prutha.pdf

Leigland J (2018) Public-private partnerships in developing countries: the emerging evidence-based critique. World Bank Res Obs 33(1):103–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkx008

Manila Water (2019) Business profile. Available at: https://www.manilawater.com/customer/about-us/our-company/business-profile. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

Marx A (2019) Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: exploring their design and its impact on effectiveness. Sustainability 11(4):1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041087CrossRef

Maynilad Water Services, Inc. (2017) History and transformation. Available at: http://www.mayniladwater.com.ph/company-history.php. Accessed 21 Nov 2019

Medda FR, Carbonaro G, Davis SL (2013) Public private partnerships in transportation: some insights from the European experience. IATSS Res 36(2):83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.11.002

Medhekar, A. (2014) Public-private partnerships for inclusive development: role of private corporate sector in provision of healthcare services. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 157:33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.007

Mehta A (ed) (2011) Tool-kit for public-private partnerships in urban water supply for the State of Maharashtra, India. Asian Development Bank, Manila

Ng ST, Wong JMW, Wong KKW (2013) A public private people partnerships (P4) process framework for infrastructure development in Hong Kong. Cities 31:370–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.12.002CrossRef

Nicholson N (1998) How hardwired is human behavior? Harvard Bus Rev 76(4):135–147

Nundy M, Baru RV (2008) Blurring of boundaries: public-private partnerships in health services in India. Econ Polit Wkly 43(4):62–71

O’Neill P (2010) Infrastructure financing and operation in the contemporary city. Geograph Res 48(1):3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00606.xCrossRef

OECD (2019a) Discover the OECD: together we create better policies for better lives. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/general/Key-information-about-the-OECD.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2019

OECD (2019b) QWIDS—Query wizard for international development statistics. Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. Available at: https://stats.oecd.org/qwids/about.html

PADCO, Inc. (2002) A review of reports by private-sector-participation skeptics. Discussion Draft prepared for the Municipal Infrastructure Investment Unit, South Africa and USAID

Pangare G, Pangare V (2008) Informal water vendors and service providers in Uganda: the ground reality. The Water Dialogues. Available at: http://www.waterdialogues.org/documents/InformalWaterVendorsandServiceProvidersinUganda.pdf. Accessed Dec 2014

Patrinos HA, Barrera-Osorio F, Guáqueta J (2009) The role and impact of public-private partnerships in education. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRef

Perjo L, Fredricsson C, Oliveira e Costa S (2016) Public-private-people partnerships in urban planning. Working Paper (Deliverable 2.3.1 Potential and challenges of applying public-private-people partnership approach in urban planning), Baltic Urban Lab project, Interregg Central Baltic and European Union. Available at: https://www.nordregio.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Public-Private-People-Partnership-in-urban-planning.pdf. Accessed 4 Sept 2019

Petersen OH (2019) Evaluating the costs, quality, and value for money of infrastructure public-private partnerships: a systematic literature review. Ann Public Coop Econ 90(2):227–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12243CrossRef

Plummer J, Waddell S (2002) Building on the assets of potential partners. In: Plummer J (ed) Focusing partnerships: a sourcebook for municipal capacity building in public-private partnerships. Earthscan Publications, London, pp 67–124

Polaris Institute (2003) Global water grab. GATS ATTACK! Pamphlet Series, Ottawa

Pongsiri N (2012) Public-private partnerships and urban infrastructure development in Southeast Asia. In: Yap KS, Thuzar M (eds) Urbanization in Southeast Asia: issues & impacts. ISEAS Publishing and Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore, pp 139–153CrossRef

PPIAF (2018) Public-private infrastructure advisory facility—annual report 2018. Public-private infrastructure advisory facility. World Bank, Washington, DC

Rodriguez DJ, van den Berg C, McMahon A (2012) Investing in water infrastructure: capital, operations and maintenance. Water Partnership Program and the World Bank, Washington, DC

Roehrich JK, Lewis MA, George G (2014) Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med 113(July):110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037CrossRef

Siemiatycki M (2011) Urban transportation public-private partnerships: drivers of uneven development? Environ Plan A 43(7):1707–1722. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43572CrossRef

Snell S (1998) Water and sanitation for the urban poor—small scale providers: typology & profiles. United Nations Development Program—World Bank Water and Sanitation Program, Washington, DC

Solo TM (2003) Independent water entrepreneurs in Latin America: the other private sector in water services. World Bank, Washington, DC

Srinivasan K (2006) Public, private and voluntary agencies in solid waste management: a study in Chennai City. Econ Polit Wkly 41(22):2259–2268

UNDP (2000) Joint venture public-private partnerships for urban environmental services: report on UNDP/PPPUE’s Project Development Facility (1995–1999). PPP working paper series vol II. United Nations Development Programme, New York

UNDP (2006) Global lessons learned in PPPUE local level initiatives in support of pro-poor partnerships for basic urban service provision. Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies, Rotterdam

UNDP (2019) Public-private partnerships for service delivery. United Nations Development Programme. Available at: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/capacity-building/pppsd.html

UN-ECE (2008) Guidebook on promoting good governance in public-private partnerships. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/publications/ppp.pdf. Accessed Aug 2019

UN-ESCAP (2011) A guidebook on public-private partnership in infrastructure. Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok. Available at: https://www.unescap.org/resources/guidebook-public-private-partnership-infrastructure. Accessed Aug 2019

UN-HABITAT (2013) State of the world’s cities 2012/2013: prosperity of cities. Routledge, New YorkCrossRef

UN-HABITAT (2016) World cities report 2016—urbanization and development: emerging futures. UN-HABITAT, Nairobi

UN-HABITAT and UN-ESCAP (2010) The state of Asian cities 2010/11. UN-HABITAT, FukuokaCrossRef

United Nations (1992) Earth summit agenda 21, Chapter 33 (Finance). United Nations, New York

United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication

United Nations (2017) The new urban agenda. A/RES/71/256. Habitat III and United Nations, New York

United Nations (2019) Sustainable development goal 11: make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg11

Waddell S (2002) Core competences: a key force in business–government–civil society collaborations. J Corp Citizensh 7(Autumn):43–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jcorpciti.7.43

Warner ME (2012) Privatization and urban governance: the continuing challenges of efficiency, voice and integration. Cities 29(Suppl 2):S38–S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.007

Water and Sanitation Program (2011) Trends in private sector participation in the Indian water sector: a critical review. Water and Sanitation Program, New Delhi

WHO (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: first addendum to third edition, vol 1, recommendations. Available at: https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/gdwq0506.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2019

WHO and UNICEF (2014) Progress on drinking water and sanitation—2014 update. WHO Press, Geneva

WHO and UNICEF (2017) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines. World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Geneva. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

Wong ELY, Yeoh E, Chau PYK, Yam CHK, Cheung AWL, Fung H (2015) How shall we examine and learn about public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the health sector? Realist evaluation of PPPs in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med 147(December):261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.012CrossRef

World Bank (1997) Toolkits for private sector privatization in water and sanitation. World Bank, Washington, DC

World Bank (2003) Private participation in infrastructure: trends in developing countries in 1990–2001. World Bank, Washington, DC

World Bank (2006) Approaches to private participation in water services: a toolkit. Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility and the World Bank, Washington, DC

World Bank (2014) Water PPPs in Africa. World Bank Group, Washington, DC

World Bank (2017a) Public-private partnerships: reference guide version 3. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRef

World Bank (2017b) Guidance on PPP contractual provisions. World Bank, Washington, DC

World Bank (2019a) A guide to community engagement for public-private partnerships: draft for discussion. International Finance Corporation, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.commdev.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/PPP-Community-Engagement-Guide_FIN-for-WEB-1.pdf. Accessed 7 Sept 2019

World Bank (2019b) List of thematic groups and leaders. World Bank Group, Washington, DC. Available at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/WBI/0,,contentMDK:20212529~pagePK:209023~piPK:207535~theSitePK:213799,00.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2019

World Bank (2019c) Key issues in PPPs for the poor. Public-Private-Partnership Legal Resource Center. World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at: https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/key-issues-ppps-poor. Accessed 7 Sept 2019

World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Inter-American Development Bank (2014) Public-private partnerships: reference guide—version 2.0. World Bank, Asian Development Bank/Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC/Mandaluyong

World Economic Forum (2017) Harnessing public-private cooperation to deliver the new urban agenda. World Economic Forum, Davos

Zen F (2018) Public–private partnership development in Southeast Asia. ADB Economics Working Paper Series No. 553. Asian Development Bank, Mandaluyong

Title: Public-Private Partnerships to Improve Urban Environmental Services
Authors: Bharat Dahiya
Bradford Gentry
Publisher: Springer Singapore
Book: Governance for Urban Services
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2972-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-981-15-2973-3

Copyright Year: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2973-3_4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"