Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Financial Services Research 1/2019

22-03-2019

Publicly Traded Versus Privately Held Commercial Banks: Sensitivity to Growth Opportunities

Authors: Robert DeYoung, Lei Li

Published in: Journal of Financial Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We test whether and to what extent listed U.S. commercial banks have been able to take advantage of their access to public capital markets to respond more efficiently to new growth opportunities. We examine over 100,000 quarterly observations of publicly traded and privately held U.S. commercial banking companies between 1984 and 2012. Identification is gained via instrumental variables estimation and by exploiting the natural exogeneity of growth opportunities in the commercial banking industry. We find that publicly traded banks are substantially more responsive to new growth opportunities than private banks, and that this superior investment responsiveness exists in both the organic and external (M&A) growth channels.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
In 1984, 2.7% of commercial banks were publicly traded and these banks held 68% of total industry assets; by 2012, these figures increased to 5.9% and 88%, respectively.
 
2
There were 5288 commercial banks or bank holding companies in the U.S. in 2012, of which 312 were publicly traded. In comparison, there were approximately 1.2 million large business enterprises in the U.S. in 2012, of which about 4100 were publicly traded. Data from the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the World Bank.
 
3
From the call reports dataset, we exclude all non-commercial bank financial institutions (RSSD9048 ≠ 200). From the Y9-C dataset, we exclude any holding company that does not have a commercial bank subsidiary. If a holding company contains multiple levels of affiliated banks and bank holding companies, we aggregate quarterly financial data to the top holder level. We exclude all observations with missing total assets, total loans, or equity information, and we exclude banking companies at which foreign ownership equals or exceeds 25%.
 
4
Banks headquartered in rural areas (i.e., cities or towns never included in a metropolitan statistical area, or MSA, during our sample period) face growth opportunities that are both qualitatively and quantitatively different from those faced by banks in urbanized areas. Banks less than 10 years old exhibit periods of unsustainable asset growth as they lever-up their equity capital for the first time (DeYoung and Hasan 1998). Subchapter S corporations face severe, self-imposed limits on equity capital formation that will limit their rates of growth. U.S. banks were prohibited from organizing as S corporations prior to 1997. S corporation status shows up initially in the call reports in the third quarter of 1997 and in the Y-9C reports in the first quarter of 1998. We classify any bank identified as an S corporation as of these dates as an S corporation for the entire 1984–1998 period.
 
5
We use the earliest of the following three dates to determine when a bank became a public corporation: The IPO date reported in the COMPUSTAT database, the first date with non-missing stock price in the CRSP US Stock Database, and the start date of the RSSD ID-PERMCO link in the New York Fed CRSP-FRB link file. A handful of banks delisted during our sample period and we use the latest of the following three dates to identify these events: The delisting date reported in the CRSP US Stock Database, the last date with non-missing stock price in the CRSP US Stock Database, and the end date of the RSSD ID-PERMCO link in the New York Fed CRSP-FRB link file.
 
6
Because the FDIC’s Summary of Deposits information was not available prior to 1994, OPPS is based solely on home-state macroeconomic data between 1984 and 1993. Any measurement error here is likely to be minimal, as during this time period banks in many states were prohibited from operating across state lines.
 
7
The first two steps of our three-step model (the 0 step and the 1st step) are probit models that estimate the probability that banks are publicly traded. Bank fixed effects are problematic in these probit estimations, because the majority of banks in our data are either publicly traded or not publicly traded for the entire sample period. Moreover, the variable lnDISTANCE is highly collinear with bank fixed effects as banks rarely move their headquarters, and as such will not be a strong instrument in a model that includes bank fixed effects. We remind the reader that time series variation is not a necessary condition for our instrumental variable, because we are instrumenting for a condition (being publicly traded) that itself exhibits very little time series variation.
 
8
The first of these three results is calculated as 0.585*2.93 = 1.71, where 2.93 is the standard deviation of OPPS from Table 1. Unless indicated, this approach is used to calculate the economic magnitudes of other coefficient estimates reported in the text.
 
9
The geographic locations of the four cities (New York, San Francisco, Boston, Chicago) used to calculate lnDISTANCE were established based on transportation routes and economic activity at least a century prior to our 1986–2012 data period. While lnDISTANCE contains little time series variation (headquarters cities occasionally change after an acquisition), neither does the variable PUBLIC for which it is instrumenting. The value of PUBLIC changes, always from 0 to 1, just 647 times for the 106,181 bank-quarter observations in our full data sample.
 
10
Compounded annual GDP growth across the 50 states averaged 5.42% with a standard deviation of 0.74% between 1986 and 2012. California (5.5%), Massachusetts (5.0%), New York (4.9%) and Illinois (4.8%) were the 22nd, 32nd, 35th and 39th fasting growing U.S. states during this time period. Data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis website and authors’ calculations.
 
Literature
go back to reference Altunbas Y, Manganelli S, Marques-Ibanez D (2017) Realized Bank risk during the great recession. J Financ Intermed 32:29–44CrossRef Altunbas Y, Manganelli S, Marques-Ibanez D (2017) Realized Bank risk during the great recession. J Financ Intermed 32:29–44CrossRef
go back to reference Asker J, Farre-Mensa J, Ljungqvist A (2015) Corporate investment and stock market listing: a puzzle? Rev Financ Stud 28(2):342–390CrossRef Asker J, Farre-Mensa J, Ljungqvist A (2015) Corporate investment and stock market listing: a puzzle? Rev Financ Stud 28(2):342–390CrossRef
go back to reference Baron M (2017) Countercyclical Bank equity issuance. Cornell University, unpublished working paper Baron M (2017) Countercyclical Bank equity issuance. Cornell University, unpublished working paper
go back to reference Berger AN, Imbierowicz B, Christian R (2016) The roles of corporate governance in Bank failures during the recent financial crisis. J Money Credit Bank 48(4):729–710CrossRef Berger AN, Imbierowicz B, Christian R (2016) The roles of corporate governance in Bank failures during the recent financial crisis. J Money Credit Bank 48(4):729–710CrossRef
go back to reference Brav O (2009) Access to capital, capital structure, and the funding of the firm. J Financ 64:263–308CrossRef Brav O (2009) Access to capital, capital structure, and the funding of the firm. J Financ 64:263–308CrossRef
go back to reference Chemmanur TJ, He S, Nandy D (2010) The going-public decision and the product market. Rev Financ Stud 23:1855–1908CrossRef Chemmanur TJ, He S, Nandy D (2010) The going-public decision and the product market. Rev Financ Stud 23:1855–1908CrossRef
go back to reference Cole RA, White LJ (2013) Déjà vu all over again: the causes of U.S. commercial Bank failures this time around. J Financ Serv Res 42:5–29CrossRef Cole RA, White LJ (2013) Déjà vu all over again: the causes of U.S. commercial Bank failures this time around. J Financ Serv Res 42:5–29CrossRef
go back to reference DeYoung R, Hasan I (1998) The performance of De novo commercial banks: a profit efficiency approach. J Bank Financ 22:565–587CrossRef DeYoung R, Hasan I (1998) The performance of De novo commercial banks: a profit efficiency approach. J Bank Financ 22:565–587CrossRef
go back to reference Gilje E, Taillard J (2016) Do private firms invest differently than public firms? Taking cues from the natural gas industry. J Financ 71(4):1733–1778CrossRef Gilje E, Taillard J (2016) Do private firms invest differently than public firms? Taking cues from the natural gas industry. J Financ 71(4):1733–1778CrossRef
go back to reference Hickman WB (1953) The value of corporate bond financing. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York Hickman WB (1953) The value of corporate bond financing. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York
go back to reference Holod D, Peek J (2007) Asymmetric information and liquidity constraints: a new test. J Bank Financ 31:2425–2451CrossRef Holod D, Peek J (2007) Asymmetric information and liquidity constraints: a new test. J Bank Financ 31:2425–2451CrossRef
go back to reference Kashyap AK (2010) Lessons from the financial crisis for risk management. Paper prepared for the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Kashyap AK (2010) Lessons from the financial crisis for risk management. Paper prepared for the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
go back to reference Marsh P (1982) The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study. J Financ 27:121–144CrossRef Marsh P (1982) The choice between equity and debt: an empirical study. J Financ 27:121–144CrossRef
go back to reference Moore GH (1980) Business cycles, inflation, and forecasting. National Bureau of economic research studies in business cycles, no. 24, Ballinger Moore GH (1980) Business cycles, inflation, and forecasting. National Bureau of economic research studies in business cycles, no. 24, Ballinger
go back to reference Nichols DC, Wahlen JH, Wieland M (2009) Publicly-traded versus privately-held: implications for conditional conservatism in Bank accounting. Rev Acc Stud 14(1):88–122CrossRef Nichols DC, Wahlen JH, Wieland M (2009) Publicly-traded versus privately-held: implications for conditional conservatism in Bank accounting. Rev Acc Stud 14(1):88–122CrossRef
go back to reference Pagano M, Panetta F, Zingales L (1998) Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. J Financ 53:27–64CrossRef Pagano M, Panetta F, Zingales L (1998) Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis. J Financ 53:27–64CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips G, Sertsios G (2017) Financing and new product decisions of private and publicly traded firms. Rev Financ Stud 30(5):1744–1789CrossRef Phillips G, Sertsios G (2017) Financing and new product decisions of private and publicly traded firms. Rev Financ Stud 30(5):1744–1789CrossRef
go back to reference Saunders A, Steffen S (2011) The costs of being private: evidence from the loan market. Rev Financ Stud 24:4091–4122CrossRef Saunders A, Steffen S (2011) The costs of being private: evidence from the loan market. Rev Financ Stud 24:4091–4122CrossRef
go back to reference Sheen A (2011) Do public and private firms behave differently? An examination of investment in the chemical industry. Working paper, University of Oregon Sheen A (2011) Do public and private firms behave differently? An examination of investment in the chemical industry. Working paper, University of Oregon
go back to reference Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Second edn. MIT Press, Cambridge Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Second edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Metadata
Title
Publicly Traded Versus Privately Held Commercial Banks: Sensitivity to Growth Opportunities
Authors
Robert DeYoung
Lei Li
Publication date
22-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Financial Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0920-8550
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0735
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-019-00310-y