Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Learning Environments Research 1/2021

22-06-2020 | Original Paper

Quantifying the effects of active learning environments: separating physical learning classrooms from pedagogical approaches

Authors: Qiang Hao, Bradley Barnes, Mengguo Jing

Published in: Learning Environments Research | Issue 1/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Prior findings on the effects of active learning environments were limited by both research design and data-analysis techniques, such as lack of controls over confounding factors and misuse of statistical modeling. We (1) investigated the effects of active learning environments on student achievement and motivation and (2) overcame the limitations of prior studies. Using a three-group design, the effects of physical learning environments and pedagogical approaches were successfully separated. Active learning environments were found to have little influence, whereas active learning and teaching were found to have a significantly-positive influence on student achievements. The findings contribute to understandings of active learning environments in higher education, and invite more debate about whether further investments in active learning classrooms are worthwhile.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227–236.CrossRef Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers and Education, 78, 227–236.CrossRef
go back to reference Baldwin, D. (1996). Discovery learning in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 28(1), 222–226.CrossRef Baldwin, D. (1996). Discovery learning in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 28(1), 222–226.CrossRef
go back to reference Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. New York: Wiley. Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P., & Major, C. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Beck, L. L., & Chizhik, A. W. (2008). An experimental study of cooperative learning in CS1. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 205–209.CrossRef Beck, L. L., & Chizhik, A. W. (2008). An experimental study of cooperative learning in CS1. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 205–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.CrossRef Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726.CrossRef
go back to reference Carter, A. S., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2011). A review of studio-based learning in computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 27(1), 105–111. Carter, A. S., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2011). A review of studio-based learning in computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 27(1), 105–111.
go back to reference Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). “It’s not you, it’s the room”—Are the high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82–88.CrossRef Cotner, S., Loper, J., Walker, J. D., & Brooks, D. C. (2013). “It’s not you, it’s the room”—Are the high-tech, active learning classrooms worth it? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(6), 82–88.CrossRef
go back to reference Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.CrossRef Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.CrossRef
go back to reference Dori, Y. J. (2007). Educational reform at MIT: Advancing and evaluating technology-based projects on-and off-campus. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(4), 279–281.CrossRef Dori, Y. J. (2007). Educational reform at MIT: Advancing and evaluating technology-based projects on-and off-campus. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(4), 279–281.CrossRef
go back to reference Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.CrossRef Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.CrossRef
go back to reference Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613.CrossRef Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613.CrossRef
go back to reference Gaffney, J. D., Richards, E., Kustusch, M. B., Ding, L., & Beichner, R. J. (2008). Scaling up education reform. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(5), 48–53. Gaffney, J. D., Richards, E., Kustusch, M. B., Ding, L., & Beichner, R. J. (2008). Scaling up education reform. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(5), 48–53.
go back to reference Greer, T., Hao, Q., Jing, M., & Barnes, B. (2019). On the effects of active learning environments in computing education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 267–272). Greer, T., Hao, Q., Jing, M., & Barnes, B. (2019). On the effects of active learning environments in computing education. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 267–272).
go back to reference Hakimzadeh, H., Adaikkalavan, R., & Batzinger, R. (2011). Successful implementation of an active learning laboratory in computer science. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services (pp. 83–86). Hakimzadeh, H., Adaikkalavan, R., & Batzinger, R. (2011). Successful implementation of an active learning laboratory in computer science. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services (pp. 83–86).
go back to reference Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Branch, R. M. (2017). The influence of achievement goals on online help seeking of computer science students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1273–1283.CrossRef Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Branch, R. M. (2017). The influence of achievement goals on online help seeking of computer science students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1273–1283.CrossRef
go back to reference Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Kim, E. (2018). Effects of active learning environments and instructional methods in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 934–939). Hao, Q., Barnes, B., Wright, E., & Kim, E. (2018). Effects of active learning environments and instructional methods in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 934–939).
go back to reference Horwitz, S., Rodger, S. H., Biggers, M., Binkley, D., Frantz, C. K., Gundermann, D., et al. (2009). Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 163–167.CrossRef Horwitz, S., Rodger, S. H., Biggers, M., Binkley, D., Frantz, C. K., Gundermann, D., et al. (2009). Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 163–167.CrossRef
go back to reference Hu, H. H., & Shepherd, T. D. (2014). Teaching CS 1 with POGIL activities and roles. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 127–132). Hu, H. H., & Shepherd, T. D. (2014). Teaching CS 1 with POGIL activities and roles. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 127–132).
go back to reference McConnell, J. J. (2005). Active and cooperative learning: Tips and tricks (part I). ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(2), 27–30.CrossRef McConnell, J. J. (2005). Active and cooperative learning: Tips and tricks (part I). ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(2), 27–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Oliver-Hoyo, M. T., Allen, D., Hunt, W. F., Hutson, J., & Pitts, A. (2004). Effects of an active learning environment: Teaching innovations at a research I institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(3), 441.CrossRef Oliver-Hoyo, M. T., Allen, D., Hunt, W. F., Hutson, J., & Pitts, A. (2004). Effects of an active learning environment: Teaching innovations at a research I institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(3), 441.CrossRef
go back to reference Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771.CrossRef Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771.CrossRef
go back to reference Porter, L., Bailey Lee, C., & Simon, B. (2013, March). Halving fail rates using peer instruction: A study of four computer science courses. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 177–182). Porter, L., Bailey Lee, C., & Simon, B. (2013, March). Halving fail rates using peer instruction: A study of four computer science courses. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 177–182).
go back to reference Porter, L., Bailey Lee, C., Simon, B., & Zingaro, D. (2011). Peer instruction: Do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 45–52). Porter, L., Bailey Lee, C., Simon, B., & Zingaro, D. (2011). Peer instruction: Do students really learn from peer discussion in computing? In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing Education Research (pp. 45–52).
go back to reference Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2013). Profiles of motivated self-regulation in college computer science courses: Differences in major versus required non-major courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 899–913.CrossRef Shell, D. F., & Soh, L. K. (2013). Profiles of motivated self-regulation in college computer science courses: Differences in major versus required non-major courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 899–913.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, B., Kohanfars, M., Lee, J., Tamayo, K., & Cutts, Q. (2010). Experience report: Peer instruction in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 341–345). Simon, B., Kohanfars, M., Lee, J., Tamayo, K., & Cutts, Q. (2010). Experience report: Peer instruction in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 341–345).
go back to reference Timmerman, B., & Lingard, R. (2003). Assessment of active learning with upper division computer science students. In Proceedings of 2003 Frontiers in Education (FIE 2003). Timmerman, B., & Lingard, R. (2003). Assessment of active learning with upper division computer science students. In Proceedings of 2003 Frontiers in Education (FIE 2003).
go back to reference Whiteside, A., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on learning environments. Educause Quarterly, 33(3), 11–20. Whiteside, A., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on learning environments. Educause Quarterly, 33(3), 11–20.
go back to reference Ziegel, E. R. (1995). Tie series analysis, forecasting, and control. Technometrics, 37(2), 238–242. Ziegel, E. R. (1995). Tie series analysis, forecasting, and control. Technometrics, 37(2), 238–242.
Metadata
Title
Quantifying the effects of active learning environments: separating physical learning classrooms from pedagogical approaches
Authors
Qiang Hao
Bradley Barnes
Mengguo Jing
Publication date
22-06-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Learning Environments Research / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09320-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Learning Environments Research 1/2021 Go to the issue