Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Water Resources Management 4/2020

03-03-2020

Quantifying the Uncertainties in Data-Driven Models for Reservoir Inflow Prediction

Authors: Xiaoli Zhang, Haixia Wang, Anbang Peng, Wenchuan Wang, Baojian Li, Xudong Huang

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 4/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Reservoir inflow prediction is subject to high uncertainties in data-driven modelling. In this study, a decomposition scheme is proposed to evaluate the individual and combined contributions of uncertainties from input sets and data-driven models to the total predictive uncertainty. Six variables (i.e., inflow (Q), precipitation (P), relative humidity (H), minimum temperature (Tmin), maximum temperature (Tmax) and precipitation forecast (F)), and three data-driven models (i.e., artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS)) are used to produce an ensemble of 10-day inflow forecast for Huanren reservoir in China, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) method is employed to decompose the uncertainty. The ensemble forecast results show that when the three variables, i.e., Q, P and F, are used only, the predictive accuracy of the data-driven models is very high and the addition of the other three variables, i. e., H, Tmin and Tmax, can slightly improve the predictive accuracy. The decomposition results indicate that the input set is the dominant source of uncertainty, the contribution of the data-driven model is limited and has a strong seasonal variation: larger in winter and summer, smaller in spring and autumn. Most importantly, the interactive contribution of the input set and the data-driven model to the total predictive uncertainty is very high and is more significant than the individual contribution from the model itself, implying that the combined effects of the input set and the data-driven model should be carefully considered in the modelling process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Abrahart RJ, See L (2000) Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments. Hydrol Process 14(11–12):2157–2172CrossRef Abrahart RJ, See L (2000) Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments. Hydrol Process 14(11–12):2157–2172CrossRef
go back to reference Adamowski J, Sun K (2010) Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. J Hydrol 390(1–2):85–91CrossRef Adamowski J, Sun K (2010) Development of a coupled wavelet transform and neural network method for flow forecasting of non-perennial rivers in semi-arid watersheds. J Hydrol 390(1–2):85–91CrossRef
go back to reference Adamowski J, Fung Chan H, Prasher SO, Ozga-Zielinski B, Sliusarieva A (2012) Comparison of multiple linear and nonlinear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average, artificial neural network, and wavelet artificial neural network methods for urban water demand forecasting in Montreal, Canada. Water Resour Res 48(1):W01528CrossRef Adamowski J, Fung Chan H, Prasher SO, Ozga-Zielinski B, Sliusarieva A (2012) Comparison of multiple linear and nonlinear regression, autoregressive integrated moving average, artificial neural network, and wavelet artificial neural network methods for urban water demand forecasting in Montreal, Canada. Water Resour Res 48(1):W01528CrossRef
go back to reference Asadi S, Shahrabi J, Abbaszadeh P, Tabanmehr S (2013) A new hybrid artificial neural networks for rainfall–runoff process modeling. Neurocomputing 121:470–480CrossRef Asadi S, Shahrabi J, Abbaszadeh P, Tabanmehr S (2013) A new hybrid artificial neural networks for rainfall–runoff process modeling. Neurocomputing 121:470–480CrossRef
go back to reference ASCE TC (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):115–123CrossRef ASCE TC (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5(2):115–123CrossRef
go back to reference Awan JA, Bae D (2014) Improving ANFIS based model for long-term dam inflow prediction by incorporating monthly rainfall forecasts. Water Resour Manag 28(5):1185–1199CrossRef Awan JA, Bae D (2014) Improving ANFIS based model for long-term dam inflow prediction by incorporating monthly rainfall forecasts. Water Resour Manag 28(5):1185–1199CrossRef
go back to reference Bosshard T et al (2013) Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections. Water Resour Res 49(3):1523–1536CrossRef Bosshard T et al (2013) Quantifying uncertainty sources in an ensemble of hydrological climate-impact projections. Water Resour Res 49(3):1523–1536CrossRef
go back to reference Bowden GJ, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2005) Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodology. J Hydrol 301(1):75–92CrossRef Bowden GJ, Dandy GC, Maier HR (2005) Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1—background and methodology. J Hydrol 301(1):75–92CrossRef
go back to reference Chitsazan N, Nadiri AA, Tsai FTC (2015) Prediction and structural uncertainty analyses of artificial neural networks using hierarchical Bayesian model averaging. J Hydrol 528:52–62CrossRef Chitsazan N, Nadiri AA, Tsai FTC (2015) Prediction and structural uncertainty analyses of artificial neural networks using hierarchical Bayesian model averaging. J Hydrol 528:52–62CrossRef
go back to reference Da Costa Couto MP (2009) Review of input determination techniques for neural network models based on mutual information and genetic algorithms. Neural Comput & Applic 18(8):891–901CrossRef Da Costa Couto MP (2009) Review of input determination techniques for neural network models based on mutual information and genetic algorithms. Neural Comput & Applic 18(8):891–901CrossRef
go back to reference El-Shafie A, Taha MR, Noureldin A (2007) A neuro-fuzzy model for inflow forecasting of the Nile river at Aswan high dam. Water Resour Manag 21(3):533–556CrossRef El-Shafie A, Taha MR, Noureldin A (2007) A neuro-fuzzy model for inflow forecasting of the Nile river at Aswan high dam. Water Resour Manag 21(3):533–556CrossRef
go back to reference Elshorbagy A, Corzo G, Srinivasulu S, Solomatine DP (2010a) Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - part 1: concepts and methodology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(10):1931–1941CrossRef Elshorbagy A, Corzo G, Srinivasulu S, Solomatine DP (2010a) Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - part 1: concepts and methodology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(10):1931–1941CrossRef
go back to reference Elshorbagy A, Corzo G, Srinivasulu S, Solomatine DP (2010b) Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - part 2: application. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(10):1943–1961CrossRef Elshorbagy A, Corzo G, Srinivasulu S, Solomatine DP (2010b) Experimental investigation of the predictive capabilities of data driven modeling techniques in hydrology - part 2: application. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(10):1943–1961CrossRef
go back to reference He Z, Wen X, Liu H, Du J (2014) A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. J Hydrol 509:379–386CrossRef He Z, Wen X, Liu H, Du J (2014) A comparative study of artificial neural network, adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and support vector machine for forecasting river flow in the semiarid mountain region. J Hydrol 509:379–386CrossRef
go back to reference Hsu C, Chang C, Lin C (2010) A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, 2003 Hsu C, Chang C, Lin C (2010) A practical guide to support vector classification. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, National Taiwan University, 2003
go back to reference Jang J (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685CrossRef Jang J (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang Z, Li R, Ji C, Li A, Zhou J (2018a) Wavelet analysis-based projection pursuit autoregression model and its application in the runoff forecasting of Li Xiangjiang basin. Hydrol Sci J 63(12):1817–1830 Jiang Z, Li R, Ji C, Li A, Zhou J (2018a) Wavelet analysis-based projection pursuit autoregression model and its application in the runoff forecasting of Li Xiangjiang basin. Hydrol Sci J 63(12):1817–1830
go back to reference Jiang Z, Li R, Li A, Ji C (2018b) Runoff forecast uncertainty considered load adjustment model of cascade hydropower stations and its application. Energy 158:693–708CrossRef Jiang Z, Li R, Li A, Ji C (2018b) Runoff forecast uncertainty considered load adjustment model of cascade hydropower stations and its application. Energy 158:693–708CrossRef
go back to reference Jiang Z, Wu W, Qin H, Hu D, Zhang H (2019) Optimization of fuzzy membership function of runoff forecasting error based on the optimal closeness. J Hydrol 570:51–61CrossRef Jiang Z, Wu W, Qin H, Hu D, Zhang H (2019) Optimization of fuzzy membership function of runoff forecasting error based on the optimal closeness. J Hydrol 570:51–61CrossRef
go back to reference Jothiprakash V, Magar RB (2012) Multi-time-step ahead daily and hourly intermittent reservoir inflow prediction by artificial intelligent techniques using lumped and distributed data. J Hydrol 450-451:293–307CrossRef Jothiprakash V, Magar RB (2012) Multi-time-step ahead daily and hourly intermittent reservoir inflow prediction by artificial intelligent techniques using lumped and distributed data. J Hydrol 450-451:293–307CrossRef
go back to reference Krishna B (2014) Comparison of wavelet-based ANN and regression models for reservoir inflow forecasting. J Hydrol Eng 19(7):1385–1400CrossRef Krishna B (2014) Comparison of wavelet-based ANN and regression models for reservoir inflow forecasting. J Hydrol Eng 19(7):1385–1400CrossRef
go back to reference Magar RB, Jothiprakash V (2011) Intermittent reservoir daily-inflow prediction using lumped and distributed data multi-linear regression models. J Earth Syst Sci 120(6):1067–1084CrossRef Magar RB, Jothiprakash V (2011) Intermittent reservoir daily-inflow prediction using lumped and distributed data multi-linear regression models. J Earth Syst Sci 120(6):1067–1084CrossRef
go back to reference May RJ, Maier HR, Dandy GC, Fernando TMKG (2008) Non-linear variable selection for artificial neural networks using partial mutual information. Environ Model Softw 23(10–11):1312–1326CrossRef May RJ, Maier HR, Dandy GC, Fernando TMKG (2008) Non-linear variable selection for artificial neural networks using partial mutual information. Environ Model Softw 23(10–11):1312–1326CrossRef
go back to reference Nash J, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRef Nash J, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRef
go back to reference Noori R et al (2011) Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, gamma test, and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction. J Hydrol 401(3–4):177–189CrossRef Noori R et al (2011) Assessment of input variables determination on the SVM model performance using PCA, gamma test, and forward selection techniques for monthly stream flow prediction. J Hydrol 401(3–4):177–189CrossRef
go back to reference Piechota TC, Chiew FH, Dracup JA, McMahon TA (2001) Development of exceedance probability streamflow forecast. J Hydrol Eng 6(1):20–28CrossRef Piechota TC, Chiew FH, Dracup JA, McMahon TA (2001) Development of exceedance probability streamflow forecast. J Hydrol Eng 6(1):20–28CrossRef
go back to reference Prudhomme C, Davies H (2009) Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: future climate. Clim Chang 93(1–2):197–222CrossRef Prudhomme C, Davies H (2009) Assessing uncertainties in climate change impact analyses on the river flow regimes in the UK. Part 2: future climate. Clim Chang 93(1–2):197–222CrossRef
go back to reference Raman H, Chandramouli V (1996) Deriving a general operating policy for reservoirs using neural network. ASCE J Water Resour Plan Manag 5(12):342–347CrossRef Raman H, Chandramouli V (1996) Deriving a general operating policy for reservoirs using neural network. ASCE J Water Resour Plan Manag 5(12):342–347CrossRef
go back to reference Renard B et al (2011) Toward a reliable decomposition of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: characterizing rainfall errors using conditional simulation. Water Resour Res 47(11) Renard B et al (2011) Toward a reliable decomposition of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: characterizing rainfall errors using conditional simulation. Water Resour Res 47(11)
go back to reference Robertson DE, Wang QJ (2012) A Bayesian approach to predictor selection for seasonal Streamflow forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 13(1):155–171CrossRef Robertson DE, Wang QJ (2012) A Bayesian approach to predictor selection for seasonal Streamflow forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 13(1):155–171CrossRef
go back to reference Sahay RR, Srivastava A (2014) Predicting monsoon floods in rivers embedding wavelet transform, genetic algorithm and neural network. Water Resour Manag 28(2):301–317CrossRef Sahay RR, Srivastava A (2014) Predicting monsoon floods in rivers embedding wavelet transform, genetic algorithm and neural network. Water Resour Manag 28(2):301–317CrossRef
go back to reference Seo Y, Kim S, Kisi O, Singh VP (2015) Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques. J Hydrol 520:224–243CrossRef Seo Y, Kim S, Kisi O, Singh VP (2015) Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques. J Hydrol 520:224–243CrossRef
go back to reference Solomatine D, Ostfeld A (2008) Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches. J Hydroinf 10(1):3–22CrossRef Solomatine D, Ostfeld A (2008) Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches. J Hydroinf 10(1):3–22CrossRef
go back to reference Spank U, Schwärzel K, Renner M, Moderow U, Bernhofer C (2013) Effects of measurement uncertainties of meteorological data on estimates of site water balance components. J Hydrol 492:176–189CrossRef Spank U, Schwärzel K, Renner M, Moderow U, Bernhofer C (2013) Effects of measurement uncertainties of meteorological data on estimates of site water balance components. J Hydrol 492:176–189CrossRef
go back to reference Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Process 16(6):1325–1330CrossRef Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall-runoff models. Hydrol Process 16(6):1325–1330CrossRef
go back to reference Sun AY, Wang D, Xu X (2014) Monthly streamflow forecasting using Gaussian process regression. J Hydrol 511:72–81CrossRef Sun AY, Wang D, Xu X (2014) Monthly streamflow forecasting using Gaussian process regression. J Hydrol 511:72–81CrossRef
go back to reference Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
go back to reference Von Storch H, Zwiers FW (2001) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press Von Storch H, Zwiers FW (2001) Statistical analysis in climate research. Cambridge University Press
go back to reference Wu C (2010) Hydrological predictions using data-driven models coupled with data preprocessing techniques. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Wu C (2010) Hydrological predictions using data-driven models coupled with data preprocessing techniques. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
go back to reference Xu W, Peng Y, Wang B (2013) Evaluation of optimization operation models for cascaded hydropower reservoirs to utilize medium range forecasting inflow. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci 56(10):2540–2552CrossRef Xu W, Peng Y, Wang B (2013) Evaluation of optimization operation models for cascaded hydropower reservoirs to utilize medium range forecasting inflow. SCIENCE CHINA Technol Sci 56(10):2540–2552CrossRef
go back to reference Xu W, Zhang C, Peng Y, Fu G, Zhou H (2014) A two stage Bayesian stochastic optimization model for cascaded hydropower systems considering varying uncertainty of flow forecasts. Water Resour Res 50(12):9267–9286CrossRef Xu W, Zhang C, Peng Y, Fu G, Zhou H (2014) A two stage Bayesian stochastic optimization model for cascaded hydropower systems considering varying uncertainty of flow forecasts. Water Resour Res 50(12):9267–9286CrossRef
go back to reference Yip S, Ferro CAT, Stephenson DB, Hawkins E (2011) A simple, coherent framework for partitioning uncertainty in climate predictions. J Clim 24(17):4634–4643CrossRef Yip S, Ferro CAT, Stephenson DB, Hawkins E (2011) A simple, coherent framework for partitioning uncertainty in climate predictions. J Clim 24(17):4634–4643CrossRef
go back to reference Yoon H, Jun S, Hyun Y, Bae G, Lee K (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 396(1–2):128–138CrossRef Yoon H, Jun S, Hyun Y, Bae G, Lee K (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 396(1–2):128–138CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantifying the Uncertainties in Data-Driven Models for Reservoir Inflow Prediction
Authors
Xiaoli Zhang
Haixia Wang
Anbang Peng
Wenchuan Wang
Baojian Li
Xudong Huang
Publication date
03-03-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Water Resources Management / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02514-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Water Resources Management 4/2020 Go to the issue