Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Quantitative Risk/Benefit Assessment: Where Are We?

Author : Christy Chuang-Stein

Published in: Proceedings of the Fourth Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics: Clinical Trials

Publisher: Springer New York

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Pharmaceutical sponsors use a variety of approaches to make important benefit/risk decisions about their products internally. Benefit/risk assessment is equally important when regulators evaluate a product for marketing approval and payers evaluate it for reimbursement decision. Once a product receives marketing authorization, it is critical to communicate pertinent benefit and risk information to patients and health-care providers. All of the above can be made easier by the use of a common framework. In this paper, we review where we are in benefit/risk assessment. This includes endeavors by academic institutions, regulators, and the pharmaceutical industry. Despite concerns about quantitative benefit/risk assessment expressed by some, we argue that without a way to quantitatively incorporate the relative importance of factors impacting benefit/risk assessment, it will be hard to bring transparent decisions to questions such as “does the benefit of this product outweigh the risk.”

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Honig PK (2011) Comparative effectiveness: the fourth hurdle in drug development and a role for clinical pharmacology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(2):151–156CrossRef Honig PK (2011) Comparative effectiveness: the fourth hurdle in drug development and a role for clinical pharmacology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89(2):151–156CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A (1989) A quality of-life oriented endpoint for comparing treatments. Biometrics 45:781–795MATHCrossRef Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A (1989) A quality of-life oriented endpoint for comparing treatments. Biometrics 45:781–795MATHCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD (1990) Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 9:1259–1276CrossRef Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Gelber RD (1990) Quality adjusted survival analysis. Stat Med 9:1259–1276CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hughes DA, Bayoumi AM, Pirmohamed M (2007) Current assessment of risk-benefit by regulators: is it time to introduce decision analyses? Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:123–127CrossRef Hughes DA, Bayoumi AM, Pirmohamed M (2007) Current assessment of risk-benefit by regulators: is it time to introduce decision analyses? Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:123–127CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Irish W, Sherrill B, Cole B, Gard C, Gledenning GA, Mouridsen H (2005) Quality-adjusted survival in a crossover trial of letrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 10:1458–1462CrossRef Irish W, Sherrill B, Cole B, Gard C, Gledenning GA, Mouridsen H (2005) Quality-adjusted survival in a crossover trial of letrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 10:1458–1462CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chuang-Stein C (1994) A new proposal for benefit-less-risk analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 15:30–43CrossRef Chuang-Stein C (1994) A new proposal for benefit-less-risk analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 15:30–43CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ouellet D, Werth J, Parekh N, Feltner D, McCarthy B, Lalonde RL (2009) The use of a clinical utility index to compare insomnia compounds: a quantitative basis for benefit-risk assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:277–282CrossRef Ouellet D, Werth J, Parekh N, Feltner D, McCarthy B, Lalonde RL (2009) The use of a clinical utility index to compare insomnia compounds: a quantitative basis for benefit-risk assessment. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:277–282CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chuang-Stein C, Mohberg NR, Sinkula M (1991) Three measures for simultaneously evaluating benefits and risks using a categorical data from clinical trials. Stat Med 10:1349–1359CrossRef Chuang-Stein C, Mohberg NR, Sinkula M (1991) Three measures for simultaneously evaluating benefits and risks using a categorical data from clinical trials. Stat Med 10:1349–1359CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Entsuah R, Gorman JM (2002) Global benefit-risk assessment of antidepressants: venlafaxine XR and fluoxetine. J Psychiatr Res 36:111–118CrossRef Entsuah R, Gorman JM (2002) Global benefit-risk assessment of antidepressants: venlafaxine XR and fluoxetine. J Psychiatr Res 36:111–118CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Entsuah R, Gao B (2002) Global benefit-risk evaluation of antidepressant action: comparison of pooled data for venlafaxine, SSRIs and placebo. CNS Spectr 7:882–888 Entsuah R, Gao B (2002) Global benefit-risk evaluation of antidepressant action: comparison of pooled data for venlafaxine, SSRIs and placebo. CNS Spectr 7:882–888
11.
go back to reference Pritchett Y, Tamura R (2008) The application of global benefit-risk assessment in clinical trial design and some statistical considerations. Pharm Stat 7:170–178CrossRef Pritchett Y, Tamura R (2008) The application of global benefit-risk assessment in clinical trial design and some statistical considerations. Pharm Stat 7:170–178CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Norton J (2010) A longitudinal model for medical benefit-risk analysis, with case study. Presented at the 19th Annual International Chinese Statistical Association Applied Statistics Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, June 20–23 Norton J (2010) A longitudinal model for medical benefit-risk analysis, with case study. Presented at the 19th Annual International Chinese Statistical Association Applied Statistics Symposium, Indianapolis, IN, June 20–23
13.
go back to reference Norton J (2011) A longitudinal model and graphic for benefit-risk analysis, with case study. Drug Inf J 45:741–747 Norton J (2011) A longitudinal model and graphic for benefit-risk analysis, with case study. Drug Inf J 45:741–747
14.
go back to reference Coplan PM, Noel RA, Levitan BS, Fergun J, Mussen F (2011) Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:312–315CrossRef Coplan PM, Noel RA, Levitan BS, Fergun J, Mussen F (2011) Development of a framework for enhancing the transparency, reproducibility and communication of the benefit-risk balance of medicines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:312–315CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Levitan BS, Andrews EB, Gilsenan A, Ferguson J, Noel RA, Coplan PM, Mussen F (2011) Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:217–224CrossRef Levitan BS, Andrews EB, Gilsenan A, Ferguson J, Noel RA, Coplan PM, Mussen F (2011) Application of the BRAT framework to case studies: observations and insights. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:217–224CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S (2007) A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines – part 1: the development of a new model using multi-criteria decision analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(Suppl 1):S2–S15CrossRef Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S (2007) A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines – part 1: the development of a new model using multi-criteria decision analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(Suppl 1):S2–S15CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S (2007) A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines – part 2: the practical application of a new model. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(Suppl 1):S16–S41CrossRef Mussen F, Salek S, Walker S (2007) A quantitative approach to benefit-risk assessment of medicines – part 2: the practical application of a new model. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(Suppl 1):S16–S41CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Temple R (2007) Quantitative decision analysis: a work in progress. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:127–130CrossRef Temple R (2007) Quantitative decision analysis: a work in progress. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82:127–130CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chuang-Stein C, Entsuah R, Pritchett Y (2008) Measures for conducting comparative benefit:risk assessment. Drug Inf J 42:223–233CrossRef Chuang-Stein C, Entsuah R, Pritchett Y (2008) Measures for conducting comparative benefit:risk assessment. Drug Inf J 42:223–233CrossRef
20.
go back to reference O’Neill R (2008) A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more? Drug Inf J 42:235–245CrossRef O’Neill R (2008) A perspective on characterizing benefits and risks derived from clinical trials: can we do more? Drug Inf J 42:235–245CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hoerl RW, Snee RD (2010) Statistical engineering: an idea whose time has come? A discussion in honor of Gerry Hahn’s 80th birthday. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver British Columbia, August 1–5 Hoerl RW, Snee RD (2010) Statistical engineering: an idea whose time has come? A discussion in honor of Gerry Hahn’s 80th birthday. Presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Vancouver British Columbia, August 1–5
22.
go back to reference Kramer JM (2009) Balancing the benefits and risks of inhaled long-acting beta-agonists – the influence of values. N Engl J Med 360:1592–1595CrossRef Kramer JM (2009) Balancing the benefits and risks of inhaled long-acting beta-agonists – the influence of values. N Engl J Med 360:1592–1595CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, De Servi S, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, Gibson CM, Antman EM (2007) TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015CrossRef Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, Neumann FJ, Ardissino D, De Servi S, Murphy SA, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, Gibson CM, Antman EM (2007) TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative Risk/Benefit Assessment: Where Are We?
Author
Christy Chuang-Stein
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer New York
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5245-4_8

Premium Partner