Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
A Fair-Cost Analysis of the Random Neighbor Sampling Method Read chapter Read first chapter

2022 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Quoting is not Citing: Disentangling Affiliation and Interaction on Twitter

Authors : Camille Roth, Jonathan St-Onge, Katrin Herms

Published in: Complex Networks & Their Applications X

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Interaction networks are generally much less homophilic than affiliation networks, accommodating for many more cross-cutting links. By statistically assigning a political valence to users from their follower ties, and by further contrasting interaction and affiliation on Twitter (quotes and retweets) within specific discursive events, namely quote trees, we describe a variety of cross-cutting patterns which significantly nuance the traditional “echo chamber” narrative.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Effects of Population Structure on the Evolution of Linguistic Convention
next chapter The COVID-19 Pandemic and Export Disruptions in the United States
Literature
1.
Adamic, L.A., Glance, N.: The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In: Link KDD 2005, pp. 36–43. ACM (2005)
2.
Barberá, P.: Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using twitter data. Polit. Anal. 23(1), 76–91 (2015)CrossRef
3.
Barberá, P.: Social media, echo chambers, and political polarization. Soc. Media Democracy: State Field, Prospects Reform, 34 (2020)
4.
Barberá, P., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J.A., Bonneau, R.: Tweeting from left to right: is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychol. Sci. 26(10), 1531–1542 (2015)CrossRef
5.
Boyd, D., Golder, S., Lotan, G.: Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. In: 43rd HICCS, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2010)
6.
Briatte, F., Gallic, E.: Recovering the French party space from Twitter data. In: Sciences Po Quanti Workshop. Paris, France (May 2015)
7.
Cinelli, M., Morales, G.D.F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., Starnini, M.: The echo chamber effect on social media. PNAS 118(9), e2023301118 (2021)CrossRef
8.
Conover, M., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Political polarization on twitter. In: AAAI 5th ICWSM, pp. 89–96 (2011)
9.
Entman, R.M.: Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J. Commun. 43(4), 51–58 (1993)CrossRef
10.
Garimella, K., De Francisci Morales, G., Gionis, A., Mathioudakis, M.: Quantifying controversy in social media. In: Proceedings of the 9th WSDM, pp. 33–42. ACM (2016)
11.
Garimella, K., Gionis, A., Morales, G.D.F., Mathioudakis, M.: Political discourse on social media: echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. In: Proceedings of the WWW 2018 Intl Conf World Wide Web, pp. 913–922. ACM (2018)
12.
Garimella, K., Weber, I., De Choudhury, M.: Quote RTs on twitter: usage of the new feature for political discourse. In: 8th ACM Web Science, pp. 200–204 (2016)
13.
Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)
14.
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., Watts, D.J.: The structural virality of online diffusion. Manage. Sci. 62(1), 180–196 (2016)CrossRef
15.
Guerra, P., Nalon, R., Assunçao, R., Meira Jr, W.: Antagonism also flows through retweets: the impact of out-of-context quotes in opinion polarization analysis. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 11th ICWSM (2017)
16.
Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., Smith, M.: Birds of a feather tweet together: integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on twitter. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 18(2), 154–174 (2013)CrossRef
17.
Kaiser, J., Puschmann, C.: Alliance of antagonism: counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication. Comm. Public 2, 371–387 (2017)CrossRef
18.
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: 19th International Conference World Wide Web WWW 2010, pp. 591–600. ACM (2010)
19.
Lev-On, A., Manin, B.: Happy accidents: deliberation and online exposure to opposing views. In: Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.) Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice, Chap. 7, pp. 105–122. University of Chicago Press (2009)
20.
Lietz, H., Wagner, C., Bleier, A., Strohmaier, M.: When politicians talk: assessing online conversational practices of political parties on twitter. In: Proceedings of the ICWSM 8th IInternational Conference Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 285–294. AAAI (2014)
21.
Morales, G.D.F., Monti, C., Starnini, M.: No echo in the chambers of political interactions on reddit. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–12 (2021)
22.
Poole, K.T.: Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge (2005)
23.
Roth, C., Cointet, J.P.: Social and semantic coevolution in knowledge networks. Soc. Netw. 32(1), 16–29 (2010)CrossRef
24.
Schifanella, R., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., Menczer, F.: Folks in folksonomies: social link prediction from shared metadata. In: Proceedings of the WSDM Web Search Data Mining, pp. 271–280. ACM (2010)
25.
Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J., Nagler, J., Tucker, J.: Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs. Soc. Media Soc. 2(3), 1–24 (2016)
26.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., Aral, S.: The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380), 1146–1151 (2018)CrossRef
27.
Wu, S., Resnick, P.: Cross-partisan discussions on YouTube. In: Proceedings of the AAAI ICWSM 15th International Conference Weblogs and Social Media, pp. 808–819 (2021)
Metadata
Title
Quoting is not Citing: Disentangling Affiliation and Interaction on Twitter
Authors
Camille Roth
Jonathan St-Onge
Katrin Herms
Copyright Year
2022
Book
Complex Networks & Their Applications X

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93408-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-93409-5

Copyright Year: 2022

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_58

Premium Partner

    Image Credits